Agricultura familiar e participação política no desenvolvimento local

• Ano de defesa: 2013
• Autor(a) principal: SANTANA, Gildo Ribeiro de
• Orientador(a): ALMEIDA, Maria das Graças Andrade Ataíde de
• Banca de defesa: LIMA, Irenilda de Souza, Silva, Maria Salett Tauk, ARRAZOLA, Laura Suzana Duque
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Extensão Rural e Desenvolvimento Local
• Departamento: Departamento de Educação
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Agricultura familiar; Participação política; Desenvolvimento local; Agriculture familiar; Political participation; Local development
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: AGRONOMIA::EXTENSAO RURAL
• Link de acesso: http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/6077

This research study focuses on participatory democracy and local development in the direct environment of social movements, particularly the family farmers that make up the City Council for Sustainable Rural Development (CMDRS). Our interest in researching the participation of farmer and farmer family turns to understand the direct participatory democracy in CMDRS lived together for local development. The municipality of Araçoiaba belonging to mesoregion Metropolitan Recife, will host locus of our research. The theoretical permeates the following categories: family farming, political participation and local development. As for the theorists who have supported the work, the study of family farming, were relevant readings Abramovay (1997, 2000, 2009), and Campanhola Silva (2000), Navarro (2010), Schneider (2003, 2009), Silva (1998, 2002) and Veiga (2003). Regarding the studies on political participation, we use Bourdieu (1989, 2010), Buarque (2003), Demo (1999), Gadotti (2000), Gohn (1997, 2010, 2011), Rattner (2000), Sousa Santos ( 2002, 2005, 2007), Sawaia (2009) and Xiberras (1996). About the local development, we have relied on Cavalcanti (1994), Franco (2000), Jesus (2003, 2007), Lima (2005), Milanez (2003), and Silveira Reis (2000), Veiga (2008), Santos Tauk and Callou (2006) and Zapata (2000). The methodological orientation part of qualitative research seeks to analyze and interpret the phenomenon that this research intends. We used the inductive method, which considers the process as the main focus. To conduct the research, use research and documentary analysis. With regard to empirical evidence, guided us direct observation and semi-structured interviews with farmers and family farmers represented by CDMAR. Finally, to analyze the findings of the research, we use the Discourse Analysis (DA), in light of the French line, which privileges the senses and resignified constructed by the interlocutors (ORLANDI, 1999). The narratives analyzed emphasize understanding the meanings that were produced through the interviews. Accordingly, the reported link to relevant conclusions about political participation in daily CDMAR exerted by family farmers, is also evident that the official ATER contributes significantly, those processes that link to local development. Despite the finding of low mobilization, coupled with the significant drop in the forums promoted by the council realize that participation practiced here enables changes and provides empowerment, creating conditions for the expansion of citizen participation. Thus, participatory processes common in daily CDMAR contribute to the local development of Araçoiaba.