Avaliação de pais de adolescentes em conflito com a lei

• Ano de defesa: 2016
• Autor(a) principal: Grabicoski , Bianca
• Orientador(a): Gomide, Paula Inez Cunha
• Banca de defesa: Toni, Caroline Guisantes Salvo, Kruszielski, Leandro
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Tuiuti do Parana
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Mestrado em Psicologia
• Departamento: Psicologia
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Protocolo de avaliação forense; Práticas parentais; Comportamentos antissociais
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Forensic assessment protocol; Parenting; Antisocial behavior
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CIENCIAS HUMANAS::PSICOLOGIA
• Resumo em Inglês: Evaluation is an essential tool to the psychologist’s practice, once it grants access to information that will assist in the decision-making process, on routing and treatment to be carried out for each individual. The protocols used in forensics evaluation should contain multiple instruments, which are complementary, given that it is a forensic evaluation, in which hardly the assessed will produce evidence against himself. The aim of this study was to evaluate the young offenders’ parents, by clustering behavioral traits, such as aggression, neglect, attention problems, anxiety and depression, among others. There were 21 participants (15 female caregivers and 6 male caregivers), who were evaluated in four locations: in Cejusc (Judicial Center of Conflict and Citizenship Solution) in Cense (socioeducation centers) in of Semi-open system houses, and other interviews were carried in their participants’ homes, all performed in a medium-sized city at Paraná. The instruments used for the evaluation were: a) semi-structured interview developed by the authors, including a brief survey about their life history (marital status, paternal / maternal relationship with their children); b) the inventory of parenting styles -IEP, and c) Inventory self-assessment for adults from 18 to 59 years -ASR. Since the data collection procedures were different, that is, some participants, at Cejusc, answered the instruments in three 60-minutes interview, making cense and Semi-open, answered in one 120-minute interview, the participants were divided into two groups: Group I, with data collected in three sessions, and Group II, with data collected in one meeting. The interviews were analyzed by the IRAMUTEQ program, that found 5 classes, or categories: Class 1 titled "historical life" (26.9%), class 2 "historical childhood" (13.6%), class 3 "current situation" (18%), class 4 "reason for measure "(12.8%), class 5" adolescent behavior "(28.7%). Most participants (81%) self assessed with risk educational practices, and 50% had clinical / borderline range in the ASR group I (family, partner relationship, work, education, anxiety and depression, internalized and externalized problems, behavior aggressive, anxiety problems, withdrawal, schizoid personality), and 18.1% in group II (relationship with a partner, work, education and withdrawal). These results are consistent with the literature, featuring offenders’ parents with a high risk behavior index, such as negative educational practices (physical abuse, neglect, relaxed discipline) and no positive educational practices (moral behavior, and positive monitoring behavior), and observed family issues such as and marital problems, deficits in education and work, externalizing and internalizing problems. This study allows us to indicate the need for assessment of adolescents' caregivers, who are complying to socio-educational measures for further interventions and the development of appropriate social policies.
• Link de acesso: http://tede.utp.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/1295

Evaluation is an essential tool to the psychologist’s practice, once it grants access to information that will assist in the decision-making process, on routing and treatment to be carried out for each individual. The protocols used in forensics evaluation should contain multiple instruments, which are complementary, given that it is a forensic evaluation, in which hardly the assessed will produce evidence against himself. The aim of this study was to evaluate the young offenders’ parents, by clustering behavioral traits, such as aggression, neglect, attention problems, anxiety and depression, among others. There were 21 participants (15 female caregivers and 6 male caregivers), who were evaluated in four locations: in Cejusc (Judicial Center of Conflict and Citizenship Solution) in Cense (socioeducation centers) in of Semi-open system houses, and other interviews were carried in their participants’ homes, all performed in a medium-sized city at Paraná. The instruments used for the evaluation were: a) semi-structured interview developed by the authors, including a brief survey about their life history (marital status, paternal / maternal relationship with their children); b) the inventory of parenting styles -IEP, and c) Inventory self-assessment for adults from 18 to 59 years -ASR. Since the data collection procedures were different, that is, some participants, at Cejusc, answered the instruments in three 60-minutes interview, making cense and Semi-open, answered in one 120-minute interview, the participants were divided into two groups: Group I, with data collected in three sessions, and Group II, with data collected in one meeting. The interviews were analyzed by the IRAMUTEQ program, that found 5 classes, or categories: Class 1 titled "historical life" (26.9%), class 2 "historical childhood" (13.6%), class 3 "current situation" (18%), class 4 "reason for measure "(12.8%), class 5" adolescent behavior "(28.7%). Most participants (81%) self assessed with risk educational practices, and 50% had clinical / borderline range in the ASR group I (family, partner relationship, work, education, anxiety and depression, internalized and externalized problems, behavior aggressive, anxiety problems, withdrawal, schizoid personality), and 18.1% in group II (relationship with a partner, work, education and withdrawal). These results are consistent with the literature, featuring offenders’ parents with a high risk behavior index, such as negative educational practices (physical abuse, neglect, relaxed discipline) and no positive educational practices (moral behavior, and positive monitoring behavior), and observed family issues such as and marital problems, deficits in education and work, externalizing and internalizing problems. This study allows us to indicate the need for assessment of adolescents' caregivers, who are complying to socio-educational measures for further interventions and the development of appropriate social policies.