Reprodutibilidade na avalia????o da cinem??tica de um modelo multissegmentar do p?? durante os testes de step down anterior e lateral

• Ano de defesa: 2014
• Autor(a) principal: Contani, Luciane Beatriz Grohs
• Orientador(a): Lucareli, Paulo Roberto Garcia
• Banca de defesa: Lucareli, Paulo Roberto Garcia , Yi, Liu Chiao , Lanza, Fernanda de Cordoba
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Nove de Julho
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de P??s-Gradua????o em Ci??ncias da Reabilita????o
• Departamento: Sa??de
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: cinem??tica; reprodutibilidade; oxford foot model; testes funcionais
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: kinematics; repeatability; oxford foot model; functional tests
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CIENCIAS DA SAUDE
• Link de acesso: http://bibliotecatede.uninove.br/handle/tede/1340

The aim of the present study was to analyze the Oxford Foot Model (OFM) repeatability of healthy adults during two clinical tests: the Anterior Step down Test (ASDT) and the Lateral Step down Test (LSDT). Five healthy participants (one male, four females, 10 limbs in total), with a mean age of 22.2 (??4.7) years, were assessed in four sessions of tests using an interval of one week. Two independent examiners performed two sessions of each of the tests. For each session (intra-day), nine repetitions were carried out for each clinical test (ASDT and LSDT). After an interval of three hours, the data were collected once more. The tests were conducted after an interval of a week, using the same experimental conditions. The intra and inter-session repeatability of the range of motion of the foot was determined by the standard error of measurement (SEM) of each examiner and between the examiners. Differences between the test and the retest, as well as between the examiners, were assessed using the students t-test (p<0.05). The repeatability of the data was high for the two tests conducted. The SEM results were as follows: 0.26?? to 1.59?? for the intra-examiner assessment (ASDT); 0.28?? to 1.31?? for the inter-examiner comparison (ASDT); 0.02?? to 1.03?? for the intra-examiner assessment (LSDT); 0.28?? to 1.00?? for the inter-examiner comparison (LSDT). The OFM model was shown to be reproducible in terms of assessing the range of motion during functional tests (ASDT and DAS) in healthy adults.