Acesso (e bloqueios) à justiça no Brasil: observações críticas a partir da potência crítica da Teoria dos sistemas
Ano de defesa: | 2020 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Palavras-chave em Inglês: | |
Área do conhecimento CNPq: | |
Link de acesso: | https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/23721 |
Resumo: | At least at the legislative and institutional level, after the 1980s and the 1988 Federal Constitution in particular, mechanisms were created and access to justice was expanded in Brazil. Whether in the law, guaranteeing rights never recognized before or reinforcing rights previously recognized, the Federal Constitution of 1988 is the paradigm of legal text that guarantees and reinforces rights. Thus, it was expected that, in addition to the arrival of citizens in the Judiciary, rights would be realized from such a movement. Not only that, it was expected that social transformation and overcoming inequalities would come from there. Nevertheless, expectations were dashed. The frustration of such expectations can be explained by the difficulties in implementing functional differentiation and the peculiarities of Brazilian peripheral modernity. The new systems theory, initially developed by Luhmann and developed by his critical disciples, in the form we chose to call the critical power of systems theory, is the best theoretical tool for diagnosing the impasses of the legal system in Brazilian peripheral modernity. Bringing Luhmann and Deleuze together, as well as other critical authors, such as Foucault and Luhmann's Brazilian critical disciples in Brazil, we can develop the critical power of systems theory. The critical power of systems theory carries a certain courage for the truth that makes it possible to treat law with the radicalism that the study of law in Brazilian peripheral modernity requires. In the face of Brazilian reality, systems theory has gained developments that go beyond more dogmatic readings of the theory that can restrict its critical potential. It is necessary from the limits immanent to the legal phenomenon, as well as observing what we call unfulfilled promises of the post-redemocratization right in the face of the social inequalities characteristic of Brazil in a way that is detached from dogmatic or idealistic theses. The inclusion / exclusion pair is a central concept so that we can explain the reasons why the law and access to Justice found limits for the realization of social transformation, pointing to the complexity of the law system. The hope remains that, once the limits of the law and the difficulties of peripheral modernity are recognized, we can suggest initiatives that are capable of tackling the complex framework aimed at achieving some improvements in the realization of access to justice and the realization of rights in Brazil |
id |
PUC_SP-1_d17f96a551472518c143a1edc3836863 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/23721 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-1 |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Guerra Filho, Willis SantiagoD´Amico, Rafael Gandara2021-09-17T12:00:39Z2020-11-27D´Amico, Rafael Gandara. Acesso (e bloqueios) à justiça no Brasil: observações críticas a partir da potência crítica da Teoria dos sistemas. 2020. 124 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2020.https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/23721At least at the legislative and institutional level, after the 1980s and the 1988 Federal Constitution in particular, mechanisms were created and access to justice was expanded in Brazil. Whether in the law, guaranteeing rights never recognized before or reinforcing rights previously recognized, the Federal Constitution of 1988 is the paradigm of legal text that guarantees and reinforces rights. Thus, it was expected that, in addition to the arrival of citizens in the Judiciary, rights would be realized from such a movement. Not only that, it was expected that social transformation and overcoming inequalities would come from there. Nevertheless, expectations were dashed. The frustration of such expectations can be explained by the difficulties in implementing functional differentiation and the peculiarities of Brazilian peripheral modernity. The new systems theory, initially developed by Luhmann and developed by his critical disciples, in the form we chose to call the critical power of systems theory, is the best theoretical tool for diagnosing the impasses of the legal system in Brazilian peripheral modernity. Bringing Luhmann and Deleuze together, as well as other critical authors, such as Foucault and Luhmann's Brazilian critical disciples in Brazil, we can develop the critical power of systems theory. The critical power of systems theory carries a certain courage for the truth that makes it possible to treat law with the radicalism that the study of law in Brazilian peripheral modernity requires. In the face of Brazilian reality, systems theory has gained developments that go beyond more dogmatic readings of the theory that can restrict its critical potential. It is necessary from the limits immanent to the legal phenomenon, as well as observing what we call unfulfilled promises of the post-redemocratization right in the face of the social inequalities characteristic of Brazil in a way that is detached from dogmatic or idealistic theses. The inclusion / exclusion pair is a central concept so that we can explain the reasons why the law and access to Justice found limits for the realization of social transformation, pointing to the complexity of the law system. The hope remains that, once the limits of the law and the difficulties of peripheral modernity are recognized, we can suggest initiatives that are capable of tackling the complex framework aimed at achieving some improvements in the realization of access to justice and the realization of rights in BrazilAo menos no plano legislativo e institucional, após os anos 1980 e a Constituição Federal de 1988 especialmente, foram criados mecanismos e foi ampliado o acesso à Justiça no Brasil. Seja na lei, garantindo direitos nunca antes reconhecidos ou reforçando direitos anteriormente reconhecidos, a Constituição Federal de 1988 é o paradigma de texto legal garantidor e reforçador de direitos. Esperava-se, assim, que, além da chegada dos cidadãos ao Judiciário, fossem concretizados direitos a partir de tal movimento. Não só isso, esperava-se que viesse a transformação social e a superação de desigualdades a partir daí. Não obstante, as expectativas foram frustradas. A frustração de tais expectativas pode ser explicada a partir das dificuldades de concretização da diferenciação funcional e das peculiaridades da modernidade periférica brasileira. A nova teoria dos sistemas, desenvolvida inicialmente por Luhmann e desenvolvida por seus discípulos críticos, na forma que optamos por chamar de potência crítica da teoria dos sistemas, é o melhor instrumento teórico para diagnosticar os impasses do sistema jurídico na modernidade periférica brasileira. Aproximando Luhmann e Deleuze, assim como outros autores críticos, tais como Foucault e os discípulos críticos brasileiros de Luhmann no Brasil, podemos desenvolver a potência crítica da teoria dos sistemas. A potência crítica da teoria dos sistemas carrega uma certa coragem da verdade que permite tratar do direito com a radicalidade que o estudo do direito na modernidade periférica brasileira requer. Frente à realidade brasileira, a teoria dos sistemas ganhou desenvolvimentos que vão além de leituras mais dogmáticas da teoria que podem restringir seu potencial crítico. É necessário dos limites imanentes ao fenômeno jurídico, assim como observar o que chamamos de promessas não cumpridas do direito pós-redemocratização frente às desigualdades sociais características do Brasil de forma desprendida de teses dogmáticas ou idealistas. O par inclusão / exclusão é um conceito central para que possamos expor os motivos pelos quais o direito e o acesso à Justiça encontraram limites para a realização da transformação social, apontando para a complexidade do sistema do direito. Resta a esperança de, uma vez reconhecidos os limites do direito e as dificuldades da modernidade periférica, sugerir iniciativas hábeis a enfrentar o complexo quadro apontado para que sejam alcançadas algumas melhorias na concretização do acesso à Justiça e concretização de direitos no Brasilapplication/pdfhttp://tede2.pucsp.br/tede/retrieve/53978/Rafael%20Gandara%20D%c2%b4Amico.pdf.jpgporPontifícia Universidade Católica de São PauloPrograma de Estudos Pós-Graduados em DireitoPUC-SPBrasilFaculdade de DireitoTeoria dos sistemasAcesso à justiçaDireitos fundamentaisSystems theoryAccess to justiceCivil rightsCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOAcesso (e bloqueios) à justiça no Brasil: observações críticas a partir da potência crítica da Teoria dos sistemasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SPinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPTEXTRafael Gandara D´Amico.pdf.txtRafael Gandara D´Amico.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain326623https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/23721/4/Rafael%20Gandara%20D%c2%b4Amico.pdf.txtc88a417992f4ee3b48e94a14668f92f7MD54LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/23721/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51ORIGINALRafael Gandara D´Amico.pdfRafael Gandara D´Amico.pdfapplication/pdf1254462https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/23721/2/Rafael%20Gandara%20D%c2%b4Amico.pdfa7daf55f9ab9228e9f4f0bbca8f17126MD52THUMBNAILRafael Gandara D´Amico.pdf.jpgRafael Gandara D´Amico.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1943https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/23721/3/Rafael%20Gandara%20D%c2%b4Amico.pdf.jpgcc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2MD53handle/237212022-08-22 18:11:36.641oai:repositorio.pucsp.br: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://sapientia.pucsp.br/https://sapientia.pucsp.br/oai/requestbngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.bropendoar:2022-08-22T21:11:36Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Acesso (e bloqueios) à justiça no Brasil: observações críticas a partir da potência crítica da Teoria dos sistemas |
title |
Acesso (e bloqueios) à justiça no Brasil: observações críticas a partir da potência crítica da Teoria dos sistemas |
spellingShingle |
Acesso (e bloqueios) à justiça no Brasil: observações críticas a partir da potência crítica da Teoria dos sistemas D´Amico, Rafael Gandara Teoria dos sistemas Acesso à justiça Direitos fundamentais Systems theory Access to justice Civil rights CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
title_short |
Acesso (e bloqueios) à justiça no Brasil: observações críticas a partir da potência crítica da Teoria dos sistemas |
title_full |
Acesso (e bloqueios) à justiça no Brasil: observações críticas a partir da potência crítica da Teoria dos sistemas |
title_fullStr |
Acesso (e bloqueios) à justiça no Brasil: observações críticas a partir da potência crítica da Teoria dos sistemas |
title_full_unstemmed |
Acesso (e bloqueios) à justiça no Brasil: observações críticas a partir da potência crítica da Teoria dos sistemas |
title_sort |
Acesso (e bloqueios) à justiça no Brasil: observações críticas a partir da potência crítica da Teoria dos sistemas |
author |
D´Amico, Rafael Gandara |
author_facet |
D´Amico, Rafael Gandara |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Guerra Filho, Willis Santiago |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
D´Amico, Rafael Gandara |
contributor_str_mv |
Guerra Filho, Willis Santiago |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Teoria dos sistemas Acesso à justiça Direitos fundamentais |
topic |
Teoria dos sistemas Acesso à justiça Direitos fundamentais Systems theory Access to justice Civil rights CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Systems theory Access to justice Civil rights |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
description |
At least at the legislative and institutional level, after the 1980s and the 1988 Federal Constitution in particular, mechanisms were created and access to justice was expanded in Brazil. Whether in the law, guaranteeing rights never recognized before or reinforcing rights previously recognized, the Federal Constitution of 1988 is the paradigm of legal text that guarantees and reinforces rights. Thus, it was expected that, in addition to the arrival of citizens in the Judiciary, rights would be realized from such a movement. Not only that, it was expected that social transformation and overcoming inequalities would come from there. Nevertheless, expectations were dashed. The frustration of such expectations can be explained by the difficulties in implementing functional differentiation and the peculiarities of Brazilian peripheral modernity. The new systems theory, initially developed by Luhmann and developed by his critical disciples, in the form we chose to call the critical power of systems theory, is the best theoretical tool for diagnosing the impasses of the legal system in Brazilian peripheral modernity. Bringing Luhmann and Deleuze together, as well as other critical authors, such as Foucault and Luhmann's Brazilian critical disciples in Brazil, we can develop the critical power of systems theory. The critical power of systems theory carries a certain courage for the truth that makes it possible to treat law with the radicalism that the study of law in Brazilian peripheral modernity requires. In the face of Brazilian reality, systems theory has gained developments that go beyond more dogmatic readings of the theory that can restrict its critical potential. It is necessary from the limits immanent to the legal phenomenon, as well as observing what we call unfulfilled promises of the post-redemocratization right in the face of the social inequalities characteristic of Brazil in a way that is detached from dogmatic or idealistic theses. The inclusion / exclusion pair is a central concept so that we can explain the reasons why the law and access to Justice found limits for the realization of social transformation, pointing to the complexity of the law system. The hope remains that, once the limits of the law and the difficulties of peripheral modernity are recognized, we can suggest initiatives that are capable of tackling the complex framework aimed at achieving some improvements in the realization of access to justice and the realization of rights in Brazil |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2020-11-27 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-17T12:00:39Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
D´Amico, Rafael Gandara. Acesso (e bloqueios) à justiça no Brasil: observações críticas a partir da potência crítica da Teoria dos sistemas. 2020. 124 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2020. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/23721 |
identifier_str_mv |
D´Amico, Rafael Gandara. Acesso (e bloqueios) à justiça no Brasil: observações críticas a partir da potência crítica da Teoria dos sistemas. 2020. 124 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2020. |
url |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/23721 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
PUC-SP |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/23721/4/Rafael%20Gandara%20D%c2%b4Amico.pdf.txt https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/23721/1/license.txt https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/23721/2/Rafael%20Gandara%20D%c2%b4Amico.pdf https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/23721/3/Rafael%20Gandara%20D%c2%b4Amico.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
c88a417992f4ee3b48e94a14668f92f7 bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468 a7daf55f9ab9228e9f4f0bbca8f17126 cc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.br |
_version_ |
1793423983103705088 |