Análise dos parâmetros para a tomada de decisão na mobilidade urbana segundo o problema custo – conforto – conveniência
Ano de defesa: | 2020 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Centro de Tecnologia |
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de Produção
|
Departamento: |
Engenharia de Produção
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Palavras-chave em Inglês: | |
Área do conhecimento CNPq: | |
Link de acesso: | http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/21269 |
Resumo: | This work aims to analyze how individuals make the decision on urban mobility taking into account cost, comfort and convenience. The systematic literature review (SLR) methodology was applied, in which 113 articles were selected that had adherence to urban mobility and costs. Subsequently, the main authors were defined, in which the study by the author Fishman, 2017, stood out. In the authors with greater connection, with several studies, the author Cattaneo stood out, the SLR also showed that the theme addressed is relatively new, with 77% of these studies are concentrated between the years 2015 to 2019. The publications are distributed all over the world, highlighting the European continent which concentrates 44.44% of the studies on mobility, after systematization, the most used methodologies by the researchers were identified, which were, mostly, statistical analysis methods and critical literature review. From these definitions, it was identified the need to apply a tool that could give choice’s parameters for the users of transport modals to be able to compare in a quantitative way and choose which type of transport is more viable according to their needs. In this context, the AHP method (Analytic Hierarchy Process) was selected, as it provides the comparison of criteria and sub-criteria for decision making. After the definition of an acceptable sample, the method was applied and the answers analyzed individually and the definition of which transport modal would be most recommended to each person, according assigned amount, taking in consideration cost, comfort and convenience was found as result. The users between 18 and 50 years old preferred the criteria cost, but whem they evaluate the subcriterias the modal own vehicle was suggested as result. In the other hand, the users between 61 and 70 years old it was suggested the modal app service and the preferred criteria was the comfort, showing the method effectiveness to theme adressed. |
id |
UFSM-20_2d5aa6bb4aa62365eadc0fb670cb554d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/21269 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-20 |
network_name_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
2021-06-30T16:40:04Z2021-06-30T16:40:04Z2020-08-12http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/21269This work aims to analyze how individuals make the decision on urban mobility taking into account cost, comfort and convenience. The systematic literature review (SLR) methodology was applied, in which 113 articles were selected that had adherence to urban mobility and costs. Subsequently, the main authors were defined, in which the study by the author Fishman, 2017, stood out. In the authors with greater connection, with several studies, the author Cattaneo stood out, the SLR also showed that the theme addressed is relatively new, with 77% of these studies are concentrated between the years 2015 to 2019. The publications are distributed all over the world, highlighting the European continent which concentrates 44.44% of the studies on mobility, after systematization, the most used methodologies by the researchers were identified, which were, mostly, statistical analysis methods and critical literature review. From these definitions, it was identified the need to apply a tool that could give choice’s parameters for the users of transport modals to be able to compare in a quantitative way and choose which type of transport is more viable according to their needs. In this context, the AHP method (Analytic Hierarchy Process) was selected, as it provides the comparison of criteria and sub-criteria for decision making. After the definition of an acceptable sample, the method was applied and the answers analyzed individually and the definition of which transport modal would be most recommended to each person, according assigned amount, taking in consideration cost, comfort and convenience was found as result. The users between 18 and 50 years old preferred the criteria cost, but whem they evaluate the subcriterias the modal own vehicle was suggested as result. In the other hand, the users between 61 and 70 years old it was suggested the modal app service and the preferred criteria was the comfort, showing the method effectiveness to theme adressed.Este trabalho tem como objetivo analisar como os indivíduos fazem a tomada de decisão na mobilidade urbana levando em consideração custo, conforto e conveniência. Aplicou-se a metodologia de Revisão Sistemática da Literatura (RSL), em que se selecionou 113 artigos que possuíam aderência à temática mobilidade urbana e custos. Posteriormente, definiu-se os principais autores em que se destacou o estudo do autor Fishman, 2017, nos autores com maior ligação com vários estudos destacou-se autor Cattaneo, a RSL também mostrou que a temática abordada é relativamente nova, com 77% desses estudos concentrados entre os anos de 2015 a 2019. As publicações estão distribuídas pelo mundo todo, dando destaque para o continente Europeu que concentra 44,44% dos estudos sobre mobilidade. Após a sistematização, identificou-se as metodologias mais utilizadas pelos pesquisadores que foram, em sua maioria, métodos de análises estatísticas e revisão crítica da literatura. A partir dessas definições, identificou-se a necessidade de aplicação de uma ferramenta que pudesse dar parâmetros de escolha para que os usuários de modais de transporte posam comparar, de forma quantitativa, escolher qual tipo de transporte é mais viável conforme sua necessidade. Nesse contexto, selecionou-se o método AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), pois ele proporciona a comparação de critérios e subcritérios para tomada de decisão. Após a definição de uma amostra aceitável, aplicou-se o método em que as respostas foram analisadas individualmente, e teve-se como resultado a definição de qual modal de transporte seria mais recomendado para cada um conforme pesos atribuídos, levando em consideração custo, conforto e conveniência. Para os usuários entre as idades de 18 a 50 anos, tiveram como resultado de preferência o critério custo, porém ao dar notas aos subcritérios sugeriu-se o modal veículo próprio como resultado. Já ao usuário com a idade de 61 a 70 anos sugeriu-se o uso do modal serviço de aplicativo e como preferência os critérios conforto, mostrando a eficácia do método para a temática abordada.porUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaCentro de TecnologiaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de ProduçãoUFSMBrasilEngenharia de ProduçãoAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMobilidade urbanaTransporte públicoTransporte privadoModais de transporteRevisão sistemática da literaturaUrban mobilityPublic transportPrivate transportTransport modesSystematic literature reviewCNPQ::ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA DE PRODUCAOAnálise dos parâmetros para a tomada de decisão na mobilidade urbana segundo o problema custo – conforto – conveniênciaAnalysis of parameters for decision making on urban mobility according to cost – comfort – convenienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisDalla Nora, Macklinihttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9287411920265033Padillo, Alejandro RuizXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXGuimarães, Gil EduardoXXXXXXXXXXXXXXhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6905852138992881Lobato, Beatriz Cardoso300800000005600fb9b2684-b79b-4169-9244-26eb9c63dc060ce9d1f7-dac4-4fc1-98c6-7bdb00e64b0284320283-2639-4146-b044-e07550805653cb6c7d3a-f38e-4cd9-b097-11255e1c622breponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMORIGINALDIS_PPGEP_2020_LOBATO_BEATRIZ.pdfDIS_PPGEP_2020_LOBATO_BEATRIZ.pdfDissertação de Mestradoapplication/pdf2001735http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/21269/1/DIS_PPGEP_2020_LOBATO_BEATRIZ.pdf7840bd68872fdc61d6094b8ce2088685MD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/21269/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81956http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/21269/3/license.txt2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075dfMD53TEXTDIS_PPGEP_2020_LOBATO_BEATRIZ.pdf.txtDIS_PPGEP_2020_LOBATO_BEATRIZ.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain209634http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/21269/4/DIS_PPGEP_2020_LOBATO_BEATRIZ.pdf.txt4df258a0eec1cc885ddba8d7dc0be6fbMD54THUMBNAILDIS_PPGEP_2020_LOBATO_BEATRIZ.pdf.jpgDIS_PPGEP_2020_LOBATO_BEATRIZ.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4349http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/21269/5/DIS_PPGEP_2020_LOBATO_BEATRIZ.pdf.jpg3c92bea073527ac21502fd022096a88aMD551/212692021-07-01 03:01:28.461oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/21269TElDRU7Dh0EgREUgRElTVFJJQlVJw4fDg08gTsODTy1FWENMVVNJVkEKCkNvbSBhIGFwcmVzZW50YcOnw6NvIGRlc3RhIGxpY2Vuw6dhLCB2b2PDqiAobyBhdXRvciAoZXMpIG91IG8gdGl0dWxhciBkb3MgZGlyZWl0b3MgZGUgYXV0b3IpIGNvbmNlZGUgw6AgVW5pdmVyc2lkYWRlCkZlZGVyYWwgZGUgU2FudGEgTWFyaWEgKFVGU00pIG8gZGlyZWl0byBuw6NvLWV4Y2x1c2l2byBkZSByZXByb2R1emlyLCAgdHJhZHV6aXIgKGNvbmZvcm1lIGRlZmluaWRvIGFiYWl4byksIGUvb3UKZGlzdHJpYnVpciBhIHN1YSB0ZXNlIG91IGRpc3NlcnRhw6fDo28gKGluY2x1aW5kbyBvIHJlc3VtbykgcG9yIHRvZG8gbyBtdW5kbyBubyBmb3JtYXRvIGltcHJlc3NvIGUgZWxldHLDtG5pY28gZQplbSBxdWFscXVlciBtZWlvLCBpbmNsdWluZG8gb3MgZm9ybWF0b3Mgw6F1ZGlvIG91IHbDrWRlby4KClZvY8OqIGNvbmNvcmRhIHF1ZSBhIFVGU00gcG9kZSwgc2VtIGFsdGVyYXIgbyBjb250ZcO6ZG8sIHRyYW5zcG9yIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbwpwYXJhIHF1YWxxdWVyIG1laW8gb3UgZm9ybWF0byBwYXJhIGZpbnMgZGUgcHJlc2VydmHDp8Ojby4KClZvY8OqIHRhbWLDqW0gY29uY29yZGEgcXVlIGEgVUZTTSBwb2RlIG1hbnRlciBtYWlzIGRlIHVtYSBjw7NwaWEgYSBzdWEgdGVzZSBvdQpkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIHBhcmEgZmlucyBkZSBzZWd1cmFuw6dhLCBiYWNrLXVwIGUgcHJlc2VydmHDp8Ojby4KClZvY8OqIGRlY2xhcmEgcXVlIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyDDqSBvcmlnaW5hbCBlIHF1ZSB2b2PDqiB0ZW0gbyBwb2RlciBkZSBjb25jZWRlciBvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBjb250aWRvcwpuZXN0YSBsaWNlbsOnYS4gVm9jw6ogdGFtYsOpbSBkZWNsYXJhIHF1ZSBvIGRlcMOzc2l0byBkYSBzdWEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIG7Do28sIHF1ZSBzZWphIGRlIHNldQpjb25oZWNpbWVudG8sIGluZnJpbmdlIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzIGRlIG5pbmd1w6ltLgoKQ2FzbyBhIHN1YSB0ZXNlIG91IGRpc3NlcnRhw6fDo28gY29udGVuaGEgbWF0ZXJpYWwgcXVlIHZvY8OqIG7Do28gcG9zc3VpIGEgdGl0dWxhcmlkYWRlIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBhdXRvcmFpcywgdm9jw6oKZGVjbGFyYSBxdWUgb2J0ZXZlIGEgcGVybWlzc8OjbyBpcnJlc3RyaXRhIGRvIGRldGVudG9yIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBhdXRvcmFpcyBwYXJhIGNvbmNlZGVyIMOgIFVGU00Kb3MgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXByZXNlbnRhZG9zIG5lc3RhIGxpY2Vuw6dhLCBlIHF1ZSBlc3NlIG1hdGVyaWFsIGRlIHByb3ByaWVkYWRlIGRlIHRlcmNlaXJvcyBlc3TDoSBjbGFyYW1lbnRlCmlkZW50aWZpY2FkbyBlIHJlY29uaGVjaWRvIG5vIHRleHRvIG91IG5vIGNvbnRlw7pkbyBkYSB0ZXNlIG91IGRpc3NlcnRhw6fDo28gb3JhIGRlcG9zaXRhZGEuCgpDQVNPIEEgVEVTRSBPVSBESVNTRVJUQcOHw4NPIE9SQSBERVBPU0lUQURBIFRFTkhBIFNJRE8gUkVTVUxUQURPIERFIFVNIFBBVFJPQ8ONTklPIE9VCkFQT0lPIERFIFVNQSBBR8OKTkNJQSBERSBGT01FTlRPIE9VIE9VVFJPIE9SR0FOSVNNTyBRVUUgTsODTyBTRUpBIEEgVUZTTQosIFZPQ8OKIERFQ0xBUkEgUVVFIFJFU1BFSVRPVSBUT0RPUyBFIFFVQUlTUVVFUiBESVJFSVRPUyBERSBSRVZJU8ODTyBDT01PClRBTULDiU0gQVMgREVNQUlTIE9CUklHQcOHw5VFUyBFWElHSURBUyBQT1IgQ09OVFJBVE8gT1UgQUNPUkRPLgoKQSBVRlNNIHNlIGNvbXByb21ldGUgYSBpZGVudGlmaWNhciBjbGFyYW1lbnRlIG8gc2V1IG5vbWUgKHMpIG91IG8ocykgbm9tZShzKSBkbyhzKQpkZXRlbnRvcihlcykgZG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzIGRhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbywgZSBuw6NvIGZhcsOhIHF1YWxxdWVyIGFsdGVyYcOnw6NvLCBhbMOpbSBkYXF1ZWxhcwpjb25jZWRpZGFzIHBvciBlc3RhIGxpY2Vuw6dhLgoKRepositório Institucionalhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/PUBhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestopendoar:39132021-07-01T06:01:28Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Análise dos parâmetros para a tomada de decisão na mobilidade urbana segundo o problema custo – conforto – conveniência |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Analysis of parameters for decision making on urban mobility according to cost – comfort – convenience |
title |
Análise dos parâmetros para a tomada de decisão na mobilidade urbana segundo o problema custo – conforto – conveniência |
spellingShingle |
Análise dos parâmetros para a tomada de decisão na mobilidade urbana segundo o problema custo – conforto – conveniência Lobato, Beatriz Cardoso Mobilidade urbana Transporte público Transporte privado Modais de transporte Revisão sistemática da literatura Urban mobility Public transport Private transport Transport modes Systematic literature review CNPQ::ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA DE PRODUCAO |
title_short |
Análise dos parâmetros para a tomada de decisão na mobilidade urbana segundo o problema custo – conforto – conveniência |
title_full |
Análise dos parâmetros para a tomada de decisão na mobilidade urbana segundo o problema custo – conforto – conveniência |
title_fullStr |
Análise dos parâmetros para a tomada de decisão na mobilidade urbana segundo o problema custo – conforto – conveniência |
title_full_unstemmed |
Análise dos parâmetros para a tomada de decisão na mobilidade urbana segundo o problema custo – conforto – conveniência |
title_sort |
Análise dos parâmetros para a tomada de decisão na mobilidade urbana segundo o problema custo – conforto – conveniência |
author |
Lobato, Beatriz Cardoso |
author_facet |
Lobato, Beatriz Cardoso |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Dalla Nora, Macklini |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/9287411920265033 |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Padillo, Alejandro Ruiz |
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Guimarães, Gil Eduardo |
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv |
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/6905852138992881 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lobato, Beatriz Cardoso |
contributor_str_mv |
Dalla Nora, Macklini Padillo, Alejandro Ruiz Guimarães, Gil Eduardo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Mobilidade urbana Transporte público Transporte privado Modais de transporte Revisão sistemática da literatura |
topic |
Mobilidade urbana Transporte público Transporte privado Modais de transporte Revisão sistemática da literatura Urban mobility Public transport Private transport Transport modes Systematic literature review CNPQ::ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA DE PRODUCAO |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Urban mobility Public transport Private transport Transport modes Systematic literature review |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA DE PRODUCAO |
description |
This work aims to analyze how individuals make the decision on urban mobility taking into account cost, comfort and convenience. The systematic literature review (SLR) methodology was applied, in which 113 articles were selected that had adherence to urban mobility and costs. Subsequently, the main authors were defined, in which the study by the author Fishman, 2017, stood out. In the authors with greater connection, with several studies, the author Cattaneo stood out, the SLR also showed that the theme addressed is relatively new, with 77% of these studies are concentrated between the years 2015 to 2019. The publications are distributed all over the world, highlighting the European continent which concentrates 44.44% of the studies on mobility, after systematization, the most used methodologies by the researchers were identified, which were, mostly, statistical analysis methods and critical literature review. From these definitions, it was identified the need to apply a tool that could give choice’s parameters for the users of transport modals to be able to compare in a quantitative way and choose which type of transport is more viable according to their needs. In this context, the AHP method (Analytic Hierarchy Process) was selected, as it provides the comparison of criteria and sub-criteria for decision making. After the definition of an acceptable sample, the method was applied and the answers analyzed individually and the definition of which transport modal would be most recommended to each person, according assigned amount, taking in consideration cost, comfort and convenience was found as result. The users between 18 and 50 years old preferred the criteria cost, but whem they evaluate the subcriterias the modal own vehicle was suggested as result. In the other hand, the users between 61 and 70 years old it was suggested the modal app service and the preferred criteria was the comfort, showing the method effectiveness to theme adressed. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-12 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-30T16:40:04Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-30T16:40:04Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/21269 |
url |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/21269 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
300800000005 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 |
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv |
fb9b2684-b79b-4169-9244-26eb9c63dc06 0ce9d1f7-dac4-4fc1-98c6-7bdb00e64b02 84320283-2639-4146-b044-e07550805653 cb6c7d3a-f38e-4cd9-b097-11255e1c622b |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Centro de Tecnologia |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de Produção |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFSM |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Engenharia de Produção |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Centro de Tecnologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
collection |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/21269/1/DIS_PPGEP_2020_LOBATO_BEATRIZ.pdf http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/21269/2/license_rdf http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/21269/3/license.txt http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/21269/4/DIS_PPGEP_2020_LOBATO_BEATRIZ.pdf.txt http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/21269/5/DIS_PPGEP_2020_LOBATO_BEATRIZ.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
7840bd68872fdc61d6094b8ce2088685 4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347 2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075df 4df258a0eec1cc885ddba8d7dc0be6fb 3c92bea073527ac21502fd022096a88a |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1794524335531098112 |