As Diferenças de expectativas em auditoria no ambiente brasileiro
| Ano de defesa: | 2017 |
|---|---|
| Autor(a) principal: | |
| Orientador(a): | |
| Banca de defesa: | |
| Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
| Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: | por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: | |
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: | |
| Link de acesso: | http://hdl.handle.net/10438/19605 |
Resumo: | Audit Expectation Gaps (AEG) are a major challenge for auditors to debate. Besideshaving the potential to undermine auditors´ credibility, AEGs increase the risks of financiallosses to firms and auditors as they may influence the outcome of lawsuits. This study examinesthe existence of AEG in Brazil and evaluates the relevance of actions aimed at improving thequality of audits.The research included the analysis of the previous studies onthe subject and their findings and the empirical investigation of the AEG in Brazil, through theapplication of a questionnaire survey. 97 questionnaire replies were obtained, of which 31 wereauditors and 66 were non-auditors.The evidence obtained suggests that AEGs are perceived in Brazil and that the gapis mainly a result of unreasonable expectations from society and of information needs in relationto the audit work and the audited companies. In addition, the study reveals that the respondentsconsidered relevant the adoption of proposed measures aiming the increase of quality andregulation of the audit activity.An understanding of the AEGs in Brazil can facilitate the discussionof the topic in academia, in the professional environment - independent auditors, accountants,regulatory boards, judiciary, capital market entities and press vehicles - and in the society. |
| id |
FGV_0735daa4bad973a8aa1ebdd38b4ef472 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.fgv.br:10438/19605 |
| network_acronym_str |
FGV |
| network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Wanderley, Luis Eduardo Teixeira LealEscolas::EBAPECardoso, Ricardo LopesBraunbeck, Guillermo OscarVasconcelos, Flávio Carvalho de2018-01-09T16:33:06Z2018-01-09T16:33:06Z2017-12-05http://hdl.handle.net/10438/19605Audit Expectation Gaps (AEG) are a major challenge for auditors to debate. Besideshaving the potential to undermine auditors´ credibility, AEGs increase the risks of financiallosses to firms and auditors as they may influence the outcome of lawsuits. This study examinesthe existence of AEG in Brazil and evaluates the relevance of actions aimed at improving thequality of audits.The research included the analysis of the previous studies onthe subject and their findings and the empirical investigation of the AEG in Brazil, through theapplication of a questionnaire survey. 97 questionnaire replies were obtained, of which 31 wereauditors and 66 were non-auditors.The evidence obtained suggests that AEGs are perceived in Brazil and that the gapis mainly a result of unreasonable expectations from society and of information needs in relationto the audit work and the audited companies. In addition, the study reveals that the respondentsconsidered relevant the adoption of proposed measures aiming the increase of quality andregulation of the audit activity.An understanding of the AEGs in Brazil can facilitate the discussionof the topic in academia, in the professional environment - independent auditors, accountants,regulatory boards, judiciary, capital market entities and press vehicles - and in the society.Objetivo: As diferenças de expectativas em relação ao trabalho dos auditores independentes (Audit Expectation Gaps - AEG) constituem um importante desafio a ser debatido pelos auditores. Além de terem potencial de minar a credibilidade dos auditores perante os usuários do relatório de auditoria, os AEG trazem às firmas e aos auditores riscos de impactos financeiros, à medida que podem influenciar o resultado de processos judiciais que questionem a responsabilidade dos auditores em casos de fraudes e outras distorções relevantes não detectadas. O presente estudo objetiva apurar a existência de AEG no ambiente brasileiro e avaliar a relevância de ações visando a melhoria da qualidade das auditorias. Metodologia: A pesquisa envolveu a revisão da bibliografia sobre o tema, com o levantamento dos principais achados reportados, e a investigação empírica dos AEG, no Brasil, através da aplicação de questionários eletrônicos. Foram obtidas 97 respostas ao questionário, sendo 31 de auditores e 66 de não auditores. Resultados: As evidências obtidas sugerem que os AEG também são percebidos no Brasil e decorrem, principalmente, de expectativas não razoáveis dos usuários das demonstrações contábeis e de uma maior demanda por informações em relação ao trabalho de auditoria. Adicionalmente, o estudo aponta que os respondentes consideraram relevantes as medidas sugeridas na pesquisa visando aumentar a qualidade e a regulação da atividade de auditoria. Aplicabilidade: A compreensão das diferenças de expectativas sobre o trabalho dos auditores no Brasil pode facilitar o debate do tema no meio acadêmico, no meio profissional – auditores independentes, contadores, órgãos reguladores, poder judiciário, entes do mercado de capitais e veículos de imprensa – e na sociedade em geral.porAudit expectations gapAEGAuditor´s responsibilityFraudAuditDiferenças de expectativas em auditoriaAEGResponsabilidade do auditor independenteFraudeAuditoriaAdministração públicaAdministração pública - BrasilAuditoria administrativa - BrasilAuditores - BrasilFraudeAs Diferenças de expectativas em auditoria no ambiente brasileiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisreponame:Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTEXTDissertação Wanderley, Luis Eduardo T L - MEX 2016.pdf.txtDissertação Wanderley, Luis Eduardo T L - MEX 2016.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain102885https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/4f020962-4eb3-4053-afe1-065450020fb4/download2d1b880bdc236314dc50e92385da68b9MD55ORIGINALDissertação Wanderley, Luis Eduardo T L - MEX 2016.pdfDissertação Wanderley, Luis Eduardo T L - MEX 2016.pdfPDFapplication/pdf605486https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/c5a1d84d-6111-4852-8c8c-d25014835308/download743045e4541c798bd60dc4f255407bccMD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-84707https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/d58a6e88-ca4c-4cb0-9814-092f383b749f/downloaddfb340242cced38a6cca06c627998fa1MD52THUMBNAILDissertação Wanderley, Luis Eduardo T L - MEX 2016.pdf.jpgDissertação Wanderley, Luis Eduardo T L - MEX 2016.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg3156https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/e6b0ade7-f651-48b4-8f06-63eeb6e95c7d/download075d70cb5458f67ba5ea3dc1fe7a0a64MD5610438/196052023-11-28 03:07:13.992open.accessoai:repositorio.fgv.br:10438/19605https://repositorio.fgv.brRepositório InstitucionalPRIhttp://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace-oai/requestopendoar:39742023-11-28T03:07:13Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)falseVEVSTU9TIExJQ0VOQ0lBTUVOVE8gUEFSQSBBUlFVSVZBTUVOVE8sIFJFUFJPRFXDh8ODTyBFIERJVlVMR0HDh8ODTwpQw5pCTElDQSBERSBDT05URcOaRE8gw4AgQklCTElPVEVDQSBWSVJUVUFMIEZHViAodmVyc8OjbyAxLjIpCgoxLiBWb2PDqiwgdXN1w6FyaW8tZGVwb3NpdGFudGUgZGEgQmlibGlvdGVjYSBWaXJ0dWFsIEZHViwgYXNzZWd1cmEsIG5vCnByZXNlbnRlIGF0bywgcXVlIMOpIHRpdHVsYXIgZG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzIHBhdHJpbW9uaWFpcyBlL291CmRpcmVpdG9zIGNvbmV4b3MgcmVmZXJlbnRlcyDDoCB0b3RhbGlkYWRlIGRhIE9icmEgb3JhIGRlcG9zaXRhZGEgZW0KZm9ybWF0byBkaWdpdGFsLCBiZW0gY29tbyBkZSBzZXVzIGNvbXBvbmVudGVzIG1lbm9yZXMsIGVtIHNlIHRyYXRhbmRvCmRlIG9icmEgY29sZXRpdmEsIGNvbmZvcm1lIG8gcHJlY2VpdHVhZG8gcGVsYSBMZWkgOS42MTAvOTggZS9vdSBMZWkKOS42MDkvOTguIE7Do28gc2VuZG8gZXN0ZSBvIGNhc28sIHZvY8OqIGFzc2VndXJhIHRlciBvYnRpZG8sIGRpcmV0YW1lbnRlCmRvcyBkZXZpZG9zIHRpdHVsYXJlcywgYXV0b3JpemHDp8OjbyBwcsOpdmlhIGUgZXhwcmVzc2EgcGFyYSBvIGRlcMOzc2l0byBlCmRpdnVsZ2HDp8OjbyBkYSBPYnJhLCBhYnJhbmdlbmRvIHRvZG9zIG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzIGUgY29uZXhvcwphZmV0YWRvcyBwZWxhIGFzc2luYXR1cmEgZG9zIHByZXNlbnRlcyB0ZXJtb3MgZGUgbGljZW5jaWFtZW50bywgZGUKbW9kbyBhIGVmZXRpdmFtZW50ZSBpc2VudGFyIGEgRnVuZGHDp8OjbyBHZXR1bGlvIFZhcmdhcyBlIHNldXMKZnVuY2lvbsOhcmlvcyBkZSBxdWFscXVlciByZXNwb25zYWJpbGlkYWRlIHBlbG8gdXNvIG7Do28tYXV0b3JpemFkbyBkbwptYXRlcmlhbCBkZXBvc2l0YWRvLCBzZWphIGVtIHZpbmN1bGHDp8OjbyDDoCBCaWJsaW90ZWNhIFZpcnR1YWwgRkdWLCBzZWphCmVtIHZpbmN1bGHDp8OjbyBhIHF1YWlzcXVlciBzZXJ2acOnb3MgZGUgYnVzY2EgZSBkaXN0cmlidWnDp8OjbyBkZSBjb250ZcO6ZG8KcXVlIGZhw6dhbSB1c28gZGFzIGludGVyZmFjZXMgZSBlc3Bhw6dvIGRlIGFybWF6ZW5hbWVudG8gcHJvdmlkZW5jaWFkb3MKcGVsYSBGdW5kYcOnw6NvIEdldHVsaW8gVmFyZ2FzIHBvciBtZWlvIGRlIHNldXMgc2lzdGVtYXMgaW5mb3JtYXRpemFkb3MuCgoyLiBBIGFzc2luYXR1cmEgZGVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EgdGVtIGNvbW8gY29uc2Vxw7zDqm5jaWEgYSB0cmFuc2ZlcsOqbmNpYSwgYQp0w610dWxvIG7Do28tZXhjbHVzaXZvIGUgbsOjby1vbmVyb3NvLCBpc2VudGEgZG8gcGFnYW1lbnRvIGRlIHJveWFsdGllcwpvdSBxdWFscXVlciBvdXRyYSBjb250cmFwcmVzdGHDp8OjbywgcGVjdW5pw6FyaWEgb3UgbsOjbywgw6AgRnVuZGHDp8OjbwpHZXR1bGlvIFZhcmdhcywgZG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGRlIGFybWF6ZW5hciBkaWdpdGFsbWVudGUsIHJlcHJvZHV6aXIgZQpkaXN0cmlidWlyIG5hY2lvbmFsIGUgaW50ZXJuYWNpb25hbG1lbnRlIGEgT2JyYSwgaW5jbHVpbmRvLXNlIG8gc2V1CnJlc3Vtby9hYnN0cmFjdCwgcG9yIG1laW9zIGVsZXRyw7RuaWNvcywgbm8gc2l0ZSBkYSBCaWJsaW90ZWNhIFZpcnR1YWwKRkdWLCBhbyBww7pibGljbyBlbSBnZXJhbCwgZW0gcmVnaW1lIGRlIGFjZXNzbyBhYmVydG8uCgozLiBBIHByZXNlbnRlIGxpY2Vuw6dhIHRhbWLDqW0gYWJyYW5nZSwgbm9zIG1lc21vcyB0ZXJtb3MgZXN0YWJlbGVjaWRvcwpubyBpdGVtIDIsIHN1cHJhLCBxdWFscXVlciBkaXJlaXRvIGRlIGNvbXVuaWNhw6fDo28gYW8gcMO6YmxpY28gY2Fiw612ZWwKZW0gcmVsYcOnw6NvIMOgIE9icmEgb3JhIGRlcG9zaXRhZGEsIGluY2x1aW5kby1zZSBvcyB1c29zIHJlZmVyZW50ZXMgw6AKcmVwcmVzZW50YcOnw6NvIHDDumJsaWNhIGUvb3UgZXhlY3XDp8OjbyBww7pibGljYSwgYmVtIGNvbW8gcXVhbHF1ZXIgb3V0cmEKbW9kYWxpZGFkZSBkZSBjb211bmljYcOnw6NvIGFvIHDDumJsaWNvIHF1ZSBleGlzdGEgb3UgdmVuaGEgYSBleGlzdGlyLApub3MgdGVybW9zIGRvIGFydGlnbyA2OCBlIHNlZ3VpbnRlcyBkYSBMZWkgOS42MTAvOTgsIG5hIGV4dGVuc8OjbyBxdWUKZm9yIGFwbGljw6F2ZWwgYW9zIHNlcnZpw6dvcyBwcmVzdGFkb3MgYW8gcMO6YmxpY28gcGVsYSBCaWJsaW90ZWNhClZpcnR1YWwgRkdWLgoKNC4gRXN0YSBsaWNlbsOnYSBhYnJhbmdlLCBhaW5kYSwgbm9zIG1lc21vcyB0ZXJtb3MgZXN0YWJlbGVjaWRvcyBubwppdGVtIDIsIHN1cHJhLCB0b2RvcyBvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBjb25leG9zIGRlIGFydGlzdGFzIGludMOpcnByZXRlcyBvdQpleGVjdXRhbnRlcywgcHJvZHV0b3JlcyBmb25vZ3LDoWZpY29zIG91IGVtcHJlc2FzIGRlIHJhZGlvZGlmdXPDo28gcXVlCmV2ZW50dWFsbWVudGUgc2VqYW0gYXBsaWPDoXZlaXMgZW0gcmVsYcOnw6NvIMOgIG9icmEgZGVwb3NpdGFkYSwgZW0KY29uZm9ybWlkYWRlIGNvbSBvIHJlZ2ltZSBmaXhhZG8gbm8gVMOtdHVsbyBWIGRhIExlaSA5LjYxMC85OC4KCjUuIFNlIGEgT2JyYSBkZXBvc2l0YWRhIGZvaSBvdSDDqSBvYmpldG8gZGUgZmluYW5jaWFtZW50byBwb3IKaW5zdGl0dWnDp8O1ZXMgZGUgZm9tZW50byDDoCBwZXNxdWlzYSBvdSBxdWFscXVlciBvdXRyYSBzZW1lbGhhbnRlLCB2b2PDqgpvdSBvIHRpdHVsYXIgYXNzZWd1cmEgcXVlIGN1bXByaXUgdG9kYXMgYXMgb2JyaWdhw6fDtWVzIHF1ZSBsaGUgZm9yYW0KaW1wb3N0YXMgcGVsYSBpbnN0aXR1acOnw6NvIGZpbmFuY2lhZG9yYSBlbSByYXrDo28gZG8gZmluYW5jaWFtZW50bywgZQpxdWUgbsOjbyBlc3TDoSBjb250cmFyaWFuZG8gcXVhbHF1ZXIgZGlzcG9zacOnw6NvIGNvbnRyYXR1YWwgcmVmZXJlbnRlIMOgCnB1YmxpY2HDp8OjbyBkbyBjb250ZcO6ZG8gb3JhIHN1Ym1ldGlkbyDDoCBCaWJsaW90ZWNhIFZpcnR1YWwgRkdWLgoKNi4gQ2FzbyBhIE9icmEgb3JhIGRlcG9zaXRhZGEgZW5jb250cmUtc2UgbGljZW5jaWFkYSBzb2IgdW1hIGxpY2Vuw6dhCkNyZWF0aXZlIENvbW1vbnMgKHF1YWxxdWVyIHZlcnPDo28pLCBzb2IgYSBsaWNlbsOnYSBHTlUgRnJlZQpEb2N1bWVudGF0aW9uIExpY2Vuc2UgKHF1YWxxdWVyIHZlcnPDo28pLCBvdSBvdXRyYSBsaWNlbsOnYSBxdWFsaWZpY2FkYQpjb21vIGxpdnJlIHNlZ3VuZG8gb3MgY3JpdMOpcmlvcyBkYSBEZWZpbml0aW9uIG9mIEZyZWUgQ3VsdHVyYWwgV29ya3MKKGRpc3BvbsOtdmVsIGVtOiBodHRwOi8vZnJlZWRvbWRlZmluZWQub3JnL0RlZmluaXRpb24pIG91IEZyZWUgU29mdHdhcmUKRGVmaW5pdGlvbiAoZGlzcG9uw612ZWwgZW06IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuZ251Lm9yZy9waGlsb3NvcGh5L2ZyZWUtc3cuaHRtbCksIApvIGFycXVpdm8gcmVmZXJlbnRlIMOgIE9icmEgZGV2ZSBpbmRpY2FyIGEgbGljZW7Dp2EgYXBsaWPDoXZlbCBlbQpjb250ZcO6ZG8gbGVnw612ZWwgcG9yIHNlcmVzIGh1bWFub3MgZSwgc2UgcG9zc8OtdmVsLCB0YW1iw6ltIGVtIG1ldGFkYWRvcwpsZWfDrXZlaXMgcG9yIG3DoXF1aW5hLiBBIGluZGljYcOnw6NvIGRhIGxpY2Vuw6dhIGFwbGljw6F2ZWwgZGV2ZSBzZXIKYWNvbXBhbmhhZGEgZGUgdW0gbGluayBwYXJhIG9zIHRlcm1vcyBkZSBsaWNlbmNpYW1lbnRvIG91IHN1YSBjw7NwaWEKaW50ZWdyYWwuCgoKQW8gY29uY2x1aXIgYSBwcmVzZW50ZSBldGFwYSBlIGFzIGV0YXBhcyBzdWJzZXHDvGVudGVzIGRvIHByb2Nlc3NvIGRlCnN1Ym1pc3PDo28gZGUgYXJxdWl2b3Mgw6AgQmlibGlvdGVjYSBWaXJ0dWFsIEZHViwgdm9jw6ogYXRlc3RhIHF1ZSBsZXUgZQpjb25jb3JkYSBpbnRlZ3JhbG1lbnRlIGNvbSBvcyB0ZXJtb3MgYWNpbWEgZGVsaW1pdGFkb3MsIGFzc2luYW5kby1vcwpzZW0gZmF6ZXIgcXVhbHF1ZXIgcmVzZXJ2YSBlIG5vdmFtZW50ZSBjb25maXJtYW5kbyBxdWUgY3VtcHJlIG9zCnJlcXVpc2l0b3MgaW5kaWNhZG9zIG5vIGl0ZW0gMSwgc3VwcmEuCgpIYXZlbmRvIHF1YWxxdWVyIGRpc2NvcmTDom5jaWEgZW0gcmVsYcOnw6NvIGFvcyBwcmVzZW50ZXMgdGVybW9zIG91IG7Do28Kc2UgdmVyaWZpY2FuZG8gbyBleGlnaWRvIG5vIGl0ZW0gMSwgc3VwcmEsIHZvY8OqIGRldmUgaW50ZXJyb21wZXIKaW1lZGlhdGFtZW50ZSBvIHByb2Nlc3NvIGRlIHN1Ym1pc3PDo28uIEEgY29udGludWlkYWRlIGRvIHByb2Nlc3NvCmVxdWl2YWxlIMOgIGFzc2luYXR1cmEgZGVzdGUgZG9jdW1lbnRvLCBjb20gdG9kYXMgYXMgY29uc2Vxw7zDqm5jaWFzIG5lbGUKcHJldmlzdGFzLCBzdWplaXRhbmRvLXNlIG8gc2lnbmF0w6FyaW8gYSBzYW7Dp8O1ZXMgY2l2aXMgZSBjcmltaW5haXMgY2Fzbwpuw6NvIHNlamEgdGl0dWxhciBkb3MgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXV0b3JhaXMgcGF0cmltb25pYWlzIGUvb3UgY29uZXhvcwphcGxpY8OhdmVpcyDDoCBPYnJhIGRlcG9zaXRhZGEgZHVyYW50ZSBlc3RlIHByb2Nlc3NvLCBvdSBjYXNvIG7Do28gdGVuaGEKb2J0aWRvIHByw6l2aWEgZSBleHByZXNzYSBhdXRvcml6YcOnw6NvIGRvIHRpdHVsYXIgcGFyYSBvIGRlcMOzc2l0byBlCnRvZG9zIG9zIHVzb3MgZGEgT2JyYSBlbnZvbHZpZG9zLgoKClBhcmEgYSBzb2x1w6fDo28gZGUgcXVhbHF1ZXIgZMO6dmlkYSBxdWFudG8gYW9zIHRlcm1vcyBkZSBsaWNlbmNpYW1lbnRvIGUKbyBwcm9jZXNzbyBkZSBzdWJtaXNzw6NvLCBjbGlxdWUgbm8gbGluayAiRmFsZSBjb25vc2NvIi4K |
| dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
As Diferenças de expectativas em auditoria no ambiente brasileiro |
| title |
As Diferenças de expectativas em auditoria no ambiente brasileiro |
| spellingShingle |
As Diferenças de expectativas em auditoria no ambiente brasileiro Wanderley, Luis Eduardo Teixeira Leal Audit expectations gap AEG Auditor´s responsibility Fraud Audit Diferenças de expectativas em auditoria AEG Responsabilidade do auditor independente Fraude Auditoria Administração pública Administração pública - Brasil Auditoria administrativa - Brasil Auditores - Brasil Fraude |
| title_short |
As Diferenças de expectativas em auditoria no ambiente brasileiro |
| title_full |
As Diferenças de expectativas em auditoria no ambiente brasileiro |
| title_fullStr |
As Diferenças de expectativas em auditoria no ambiente brasileiro |
| title_full_unstemmed |
As Diferenças de expectativas em auditoria no ambiente brasileiro |
| title_sort |
As Diferenças de expectativas em auditoria no ambiente brasileiro |
| author |
Wanderley, Luis Eduardo Teixeira Leal |
| author_facet |
Wanderley, Luis Eduardo Teixeira Leal |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.unidadefgv.por.fl_str_mv |
Escolas::EBAPE |
| dc.contributor.member.none.fl_str_mv |
Cardoso, Ricardo Lopes Braunbeck, Guillermo Oscar |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Wanderley, Luis Eduardo Teixeira Leal |
| dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Vasconcelos, Flávio Carvalho de |
| contributor_str_mv |
Vasconcelos, Flávio Carvalho de |
| dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Audit expectations gap AEG Auditor´s responsibility Fraud Audit |
| topic |
Audit expectations gap AEG Auditor´s responsibility Fraud Audit Diferenças de expectativas em auditoria AEG Responsabilidade do auditor independente Fraude Auditoria Administração pública Administração pública - Brasil Auditoria administrativa - Brasil Auditores - Brasil Fraude |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Diferenças de expectativas em auditoria AEG Responsabilidade do auditor independente Fraude Auditoria |
| dc.subject.area.por.fl_str_mv |
Administração pública |
| dc.subject.bibliodata.por.fl_str_mv |
Administração pública - Brasil Auditoria administrativa - Brasil Auditores - Brasil Fraude |
| description |
Audit Expectation Gaps (AEG) are a major challenge for auditors to debate. Besideshaving the potential to undermine auditors´ credibility, AEGs increase the risks of financiallosses to firms and auditors as they may influence the outcome of lawsuits. This study examinesthe existence of AEG in Brazil and evaluates the relevance of actions aimed at improving thequality of audits.The research included the analysis of the previous studies onthe subject and their findings and the empirical investigation of the AEG in Brazil, through theapplication of a questionnaire survey. 97 questionnaire replies were obtained, of which 31 wereauditors and 66 were non-auditors.The evidence obtained suggests that AEGs are perceived in Brazil and that the gapis mainly a result of unreasonable expectations from society and of information needs in relationto the audit work and the audited companies. In addition, the study reveals that the respondentsconsidered relevant the adoption of proposed measures aiming the increase of quality andregulation of the audit activity.An understanding of the AEGs in Brazil can facilitate the discussionof the topic in academia, in the professional environment - independent auditors, accountants,regulatory boards, judiciary, capital market entities and press vehicles - and in the society. |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2017-12-05 |
| dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2018-01-09T16:33:06Z |
| dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2018-01-09T16:33:06Z |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| format |
masterThesis |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10438/19605 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10438/19605 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
| language |
por |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
| instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
| instacron_str |
FGV |
| institution |
FGV |
| reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) |
| collection |
Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/4f020962-4eb3-4053-afe1-065450020fb4/download https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/c5a1d84d-6111-4852-8c8c-d25014835308/download https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/d58a6e88-ca4c-4cb0-9814-092f383b749f/download https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/e6b0ade7-f651-48b4-8f06-63eeb6e95c7d/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
2d1b880bdc236314dc50e92385da68b9 743045e4541c798bd60dc4f255407bcc dfb340242cced38a6cca06c627998fa1 075d70cb5458f67ba5ea3dc1fe7a0a64 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1827842450727632896 |