As Diferenças de expectativas em auditoria no ambiente brasileiro

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2017
Autor(a) principal: Wanderley, Luis Eduardo Teixeira Leal
Orientador(a): Vasconcelos, Flávio Carvalho de
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
AEG
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
AEG
Link de acesso: http://hdl.handle.net/10438/19605
Resumo: Audit Expectation Gaps (AEG) are a major challenge for auditors to debate. Besideshaving the potential to undermine auditors´ credibility, AEGs increase the risks of financiallosses to firms and auditors as they may influence the outcome of lawsuits. This study examinesthe existence of AEG in Brazil and evaluates the relevance of actions aimed at improving thequality of audits.The research included the analysis of the previous studies onthe subject and their findings and the empirical investigation of the AEG in Brazil, through theapplication of a questionnaire survey. 97 questionnaire replies were obtained, of which 31 wereauditors and 66 were non-auditors.The evidence obtained suggests that AEGs are perceived in Brazil and that the gapis mainly a result of unreasonable expectations from society and of information needs in relationto the audit work and the audited companies. In addition, the study reveals that the respondentsconsidered relevant the adoption of proposed measures aiming the increase of quality andregulation of the audit activity.An understanding of the AEGs in Brazil can facilitate the discussionof the topic in academia, in the professional environment - independent auditors, accountants,regulatory boards, judiciary, capital market entities and press vehicles - and in the society.
id FGV_0735daa4bad973a8aa1ebdd38b4ef472
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.fgv.br:10438/19605
network_acronym_str FGV
network_name_str Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)
repository_id_str
spelling Wanderley, Luis Eduardo Teixeira LealEscolas::EBAPECardoso, Ricardo LopesBraunbeck, Guillermo OscarVasconcelos, Flávio Carvalho de2018-01-09T16:33:06Z2018-01-09T16:33:06Z2017-12-05http://hdl.handle.net/10438/19605Audit Expectation Gaps (AEG) are a major challenge for auditors to debate. Besideshaving the potential to undermine auditors´ credibility, AEGs increase the risks of financiallosses to firms and auditors as they may influence the outcome of lawsuits. This study examinesthe existence of AEG in Brazil and evaluates the relevance of actions aimed at improving thequality of audits.The research included the analysis of the previous studies onthe subject and their findings and the empirical investigation of the AEG in Brazil, through theapplication of a questionnaire survey. 97 questionnaire replies were obtained, of which 31 wereauditors and 66 were non-auditors.The evidence obtained suggests that AEGs are perceived in Brazil and that the gapis mainly a result of unreasonable expectations from society and of information needs in relationto the audit work and the audited companies. In addition, the study reveals that the respondentsconsidered relevant the adoption of proposed measures aiming the increase of quality andregulation of the audit activity.An understanding of the AEGs in Brazil can facilitate the discussionof the topic in academia, in the professional environment - independent auditors, accountants,regulatory boards, judiciary, capital market entities and press vehicles - and in the society.Objetivo: As diferenças de expectativas em relação ao trabalho dos auditores independentes (Audit Expectation Gaps - AEG) constituem um importante desafio a ser debatido pelos auditores. Além de terem potencial de minar a credibilidade dos auditores perante os usuários do relatório de auditoria, os AEG trazem às firmas e aos auditores riscos de impactos financeiros, à medida que podem influenciar o resultado de processos judiciais que questionem a responsabilidade dos auditores em casos de fraudes e outras distorções relevantes não detectadas. O presente estudo objetiva apurar a existência de AEG no ambiente brasileiro e avaliar a relevância de ações visando a melhoria da qualidade das auditorias. Metodologia: A pesquisa envolveu a revisão da bibliografia sobre o tema, com o levantamento dos principais achados reportados, e a investigação empírica dos AEG, no Brasil, através da aplicação de questionários eletrônicos. Foram obtidas 97 respostas ao questionário, sendo 31 de auditores e 66 de não auditores. Resultados: As evidências obtidas sugerem que os AEG também são percebidos no Brasil e decorrem, principalmente, de expectativas não razoáveis dos usuários das demonstrações contábeis e de uma maior demanda por informações em relação ao trabalho de auditoria. Adicionalmente, o estudo aponta que os respondentes consideraram relevantes as medidas sugeridas na pesquisa visando aumentar a qualidade e a regulação da atividade de auditoria. Aplicabilidade: A compreensão das diferenças de expectativas sobre o trabalho dos auditores no Brasil pode facilitar o debate do tema no meio acadêmico, no meio profissional – auditores independentes, contadores, órgãos reguladores, poder judiciário, entes do mercado de capitais e veículos de imprensa – e na sociedade em geral.porAudit expectations gapAEGAuditor´s responsibilityFraudAuditDiferenças de expectativas em auditoriaAEGResponsabilidade do auditor independenteFraudeAuditoriaAdministração públicaAdministração pública - BrasilAuditoria administrativa - BrasilAuditores - BrasilFraudeAs Diferenças de expectativas em auditoria no ambiente brasileiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisreponame:Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTEXTDissertação Wanderley, Luis Eduardo T L - MEX 2016.pdf.txtDissertação Wanderley, Luis Eduardo T L - MEX 2016.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain102885https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/4f020962-4eb3-4053-afe1-065450020fb4/download2d1b880bdc236314dc50e92385da68b9MD55ORIGINALDissertação Wanderley, Luis Eduardo T L - MEX 2016.pdfDissertação Wanderley, Luis Eduardo T L - MEX 2016.pdfPDFapplication/pdf605486https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/c5a1d84d-6111-4852-8c8c-d25014835308/download743045e4541c798bd60dc4f255407bccMD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-84707https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/d58a6e88-ca4c-4cb0-9814-092f383b749f/downloaddfb340242cced38a6cca06c627998fa1MD52THUMBNAILDissertação Wanderley, Luis Eduardo T L - MEX 2016.pdf.jpgDissertação Wanderley, Luis Eduardo T L - MEX 2016.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg3156https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/e6b0ade7-f651-48b4-8f06-63eeb6e95c7d/download075d70cb5458f67ba5ea3dc1fe7a0a64MD5610438/196052023-11-28 03:07:13.992open.accessoai:repositorio.fgv.br:10438/19605https://repositorio.fgv.brRepositório InstitucionalPRIhttp://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace-oai/requestopendoar:39742023-11-28T03:07:13Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)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
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv As Diferenças de expectativas em auditoria no ambiente brasileiro
title As Diferenças de expectativas em auditoria no ambiente brasileiro
spellingShingle As Diferenças de expectativas em auditoria no ambiente brasileiro
Wanderley, Luis Eduardo Teixeira Leal
Audit expectations gap
AEG
Auditor´s responsibility
Fraud
Audit
Diferenças de expectativas em auditoria
AEG
Responsabilidade do auditor independente
Fraude
Auditoria
Administração pública
Administração pública - Brasil
Auditoria administrativa - Brasil
Auditores - Brasil
Fraude
title_short As Diferenças de expectativas em auditoria no ambiente brasileiro
title_full As Diferenças de expectativas em auditoria no ambiente brasileiro
title_fullStr As Diferenças de expectativas em auditoria no ambiente brasileiro
title_full_unstemmed As Diferenças de expectativas em auditoria no ambiente brasileiro
title_sort As Diferenças de expectativas em auditoria no ambiente brasileiro
author Wanderley, Luis Eduardo Teixeira Leal
author_facet Wanderley, Luis Eduardo Teixeira Leal
author_role author
dc.contributor.unidadefgv.por.fl_str_mv Escolas::EBAPE
dc.contributor.member.none.fl_str_mv Cardoso, Ricardo Lopes
Braunbeck, Guillermo Oscar
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Wanderley, Luis Eduardo Teixeira Leal
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Vasconcelos, Flávio Carvalho de
contributor_str_mv Vasconcelos, Flávio Carvalho de
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Audit expectations gap
AEG
Auditor´s responsibility
Fraud
Audit
topic Audit expectations gap
AEG
Auditor´s responsibility
Fraud
Audit
Diferenças de expectativas em auditoria
AEG
Responsabilidade do auditor independente
Fraude
Auditoria
Administração pública
Administração pública - Brasil
Auditoria administrativa - Brasil
Auditores - Brasil
Fraude
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Diferenças de expectativas em auditoria
AEG
Responsabilidade do auditor independente
Fraude
Auditoria
dc.subject.area.por.fl_str_mv Administração pública
dc.subject.bibliodata.por.fl_str_mv Administração pública - Brasil
Auditoria administrativa - Brasil
Auditores - Brasil
Fraude
description Audit Expectation Gaps (AEG) are a major challenge for auditors to debate. Besideshaving the potential to undermine auditors´ credibility, AEGs increase the risks of financiallosses to firms and auditors as they may influence the outcome of lawsuits. This study examinesthe existence of AEG in Brazil and evaluates the relevance of actions aimed at improving thequality of audits.The research included the analysis of the previous studies onthe subject and their findings and the empirical investigation of the AEG in Brazil, through theapplication of a questionnaire survey. 97 questionnaire replies were obtained, of which 31 wereauditors and 66 were non-auditors.The evidence obtained suggests that AEGs are perceived in Brazil and that the gapis mainly a result of unreasonable expectations from society and of information needs in relationto the audit work and the audited companies. In addition, the study reveals that the respondentsconsidered relevant the adoption of proposed measures aiming the increase of quality andregulation of the audit activity.An understanding of the AEGs in Brazil can facilitate the discussionof the topic in academia, in the professional environment - independent auditors, accountants,regulatory boards, judiciary, capital market entities and press vehicles - and in the society.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017-12-05
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-01-09T16:33:06Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2018-01-09T16:33:06Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10438/19605
url http://hdl.handle.net/10438/19605
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)
collection Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/4f020962-4eb3-4053-afe1-065450020fb4/download
https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/c5a1d84d-6111-4852-8c8c-d25014835308/download
https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/d58a6e88-ca4c-4cb0-9814-092f383b749f/download
https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/e6b0ade7-f651-48b4-8f06-63eeb6e95c7d/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 2d1b880bdc236314dc50e92385da68b9
743045e4541c798bd60dc4f255407bcc
dfb340242cced38a6cca06c627998fa1
075d70cb5458f67ba5ea3dc1fe7a0a64
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1827842450727632896