Quem tem medo do processo coletivo? As disputas e as escolhas políticas no CPC/2015 para o tratamento da litigiosidade repetitiva no Brasil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2019
Autor(a) principal: Miranda, Andrea Pimentel de
Orientador(a): Cunha, Luciana Gross
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Acesso à justiça
IRDR
Processo coletivo
Litigiosidade repetitiva
Código de processo civil de 2015
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Access to justice
Repetitive litigation
Code of Civil Procedure of 2015
Link de acesso: http://hdl.handle.net/10438/27367
Resumo: It is a consensus among Brazilian jurists that the Judiciary is going through a crisis that affects its ability to act with efficiency and quality, distancing itself from a minimally satisfactory model of justice. In this scenario, repetitive litigation acquires special relevance insofar as it is identified as one of the main problems faced by the Judiciary. Observing the way to deal with the effects of repetitive litigation by the Code of Civil Procedure of 2015, the question that guides the present work arises: why repetitive case judgment techniques - specifically the Brazilian case management technique “Incidente de Resolução de Demandas Repetitivas”- were preferred by the legislator? The main idea is to analyze documents related to the elaboration of the Code of Civil Procedure of 2015 (minutes of meetings and public hearings, news, text of the draft, substitutes and amendments), seeking to observe how the legislative process took place, especially the choice for enlargement of the technique of trial of repetitive cases to deal with repetitive litigiousness, while the collective process occupied the role of supporting actor as a technique capable of dealing with the same question. In addition, it seeks to understand who the actors were responsible for this choice and what were its justifications.
id FGV_80f0a027c491a644bb577c8a1db39894
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.fgv.br:10438/27367
network_acronym_str FGV
network_name_str Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)
repository_id_str
spelling Miranda, Andrea Pimentel deEscolas::DIREITO SPGabbay, Daniela MonteiroAsperti, Maria Cecília de AraújoCunha, Luciana Gross2019-04-22T16:45:37Z2019-04-22T16:45:37Z2019-04-08http://hdl.handle.net/10438/27367It is a consensus among Brazilian jurists that the Judiciary is going through a crisis that affects its ability to act with efficiency and quality, distancing itself from a minimally satisfactory model of justice. In this scenario, repetitive litigation acquires special relevance insofar as it is identified as one of the main problems faced by the Judiciary. Observing the way to deal with the effects of repetitive litigation by the Code of Civil Procedure of 2015, the question that guides the present work arises: why repetitive case judgment techniques - specifically the Brazilian case management technique “Incidente de Resolução de Demandas Repetitivas”- were preferred by the legislator? The main idea is to analyze documents related to the elaboration of the Code of Civil Procedure of 2015 (minutes of meetings and public hearings, news, text of the draft, substitutes and amendments), seeking to observe how the legislative process took place, especially the choice for enlargement of the technique of trial of repetitive cases to deal with repetitive litigiousness, while the collective process occupied the role of supporting actor as a technique capable of dealing with the same question. In addition, it seeks to understand who the actors were responsible for this choice and what were its justifications.É consenso entre juristas brasileiros que o Poder Judiciário passa por uma crise que afeta sua capacidade de atuar com eficiência e qualidade, distanciando-se de um modelo de justiça minimamente satisfatório. Nesse cenário, a litigiosidade repetitiva adquire especial relevância na medida em que é identificada como um dos problemas centrais enfrentados pelo Judiciário. Observando a forma de lidar com os efeitos da litigiosidade repetitiva pelo Código de Processo Civil de 2015 surge a pergunta que orienta o presente trabalho: por que as técnicas de julgamento de casos repetitivos – especificamente o Incidente de Resolução de Demandas Repetitivas – foram preferidas pelo legislador? A ideia primordial consiste em analisar documentos relativos à elaboração do CPC/2015 (atas de reuniões e audiências públicas, notícias, texto do anteprojeto, substitutivos e emendas), buscando observar como se deu o processo legislativo, especialmente a escolha pela ampliação da técnica de julgamento de casos repetitivos para lidar com a litigiosidade repetitiva, enquanto o processo coletivo ocupou o papel de ator coadjuvante como técnica capaz de lidar com a mesma questão. Além disso, busca-se compreender quem foram os atores responsáveis por essa escolha e quais foram suas justificativas.porAccess to justiceRepetitive litigationCode of Civil Procedure of 2015Acesso à justiçaIRDRProcesso coletivoLitigiosidade repetitivaCódigo de processo civil de 2015DireitoAção coletivaAcesso à justiçaProcesso civil - BrasilBrasil. [Código de processo civil (2015)]Poder judiciário - BrasilQuem tem medo do processo coletivo? As disputas e as escolhas políticas no CPC/2015 para o tratamento da litigiosidade repetitiva no Brasilinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVTEXTAndrea Pimentel de Miranda - Quem tem medo do processo coletivo.pdf.txtAndrea Pimentel de Miranda - Quem tem medo do processo coletivo.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain103136https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/9e213ddb-8c1c-4be3-b622-9b0e582f5018/download2977e1e8ee2ffd3b896eb9d8f8e05fbaMD55ORIGINALAndrea Pimentel de Miranda - Quem tem medo do processo coletivo.pdfAndrea Pimentel de Miranda - Quem tem medo do processo coletivo.pdfPDFapplication/pdf2066629https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/38edefab-045a-437a-87b0-944a531a379d/download3271b17b0c1a9be5b0d76fe1888b50d3MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-84707https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/0ec9c962-06fb-494f-9b6b-9a9d799c7321/downloaddfb340242cced38a6cca06c627998fa1MD52THUMBNAILAndrea Pimentel de Miranda - Quem tem medo do processo coletivo.pdf.jpgAndrea Pimentel de Miranda - Quem tem medo do processo coletivo.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2715https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/8b0e9ed8-9c94-41b8-bf0a-bbe59d3214f0/downloadf282f64ee1b15dca6405a8fd68db9a04MD5610438/273672023-11-27 22:21:10.345open.accessoai:repositorio.fgv.br:10438/27367https://repositorio.fgv.brRepositório InstitucionalPRIhttp://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace-oai/requestopendoar:39742023-11-27T22:21:10Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)falseVEVSTU9TIExJQ0VOQ0lBTUVOVE8gUEFSQSBBUlFVSVZBTUVOVE8sIFJFUFJPRFXDh8ODTyBFIERJVlVMR0HDh8ODTwpQw5pCTElDQSBERSBDT05URcOaRE8gw4AgQklCTElPVEVDQSBWSVJUVUFMIEZHViAodmVyc8OjbyAxLjIpCgoxLiBWb2PDqiwgdXN1w6FyaW8tZGVwb3NpdGFudGUgZGEgQmlibGlvdGVjYSBWaXJ0dWFsIEZHViwgYXNzZWd1cmEsIG5vCnByZXNlbnRlIGF0bywgcXVlIMOpIHRpdHVsYXIgZG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzIHBhdHJpbW9uaWFpcyBlL291CmRpcmVpdG9zIGNvbmV4b3MgcmVmZXJlbnRlcyDDoCB0b3RhbGlkYWRlIGRhIE9icmEgb3JhIGRlcG9zaXRhZGEgZW0KZm9ybWF0byBkaWdpdGFsLCBiZW0gY29tbyBkZSBzZXVzIGNvbXBvbmVudGVzIG1lbm9yZXMsIGVtIHNlIHRyYXRhbmRvCmRlIG9icmEgY29sZXRpdmEsIGNvbmZvcm1lIG8gcHJlY2VpdHVhZG8gcGVsYSBMZWkgOS42MTAvOTggZS9vdSBMZWkKOS42MDkvOTguIE7Do28gc2VuZG8gZXN0ZSBvIGNhc28sIHZvY8OqIGFzc2VndXJhIHRlciBvYnRpZG8sIGRpcmV0YW1lbnRlCmRvcyBkZXZpZG9zIHRpdHVsYXJlcywgYXV0b3JpemHDp8OjbyBwcsOpdmlhIGUgZXhwcmVzc2EgcGFyYSBvIGRlcMOzc2l0byBlCmRpdnVsZ2HDp8OjbyBkYSBPYnJhLCBhYnJhbmdlbmRvIHRvZG9zIG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzIGUgY29uZXhvcwphZmV0YWRvcyBwZWxhIGFzc2luYXR1cmEgZG9zIHByZXNlbnRlcyB0ZXJtb3MgZGUgbGljZW5jaWFtZW50bywgZGUKbW9kbyBhIGVmZXRpdmFtZW50ZSBpc2VudGFyIGEgRnVuZGHDp8OjbyBHZXR1bGlvIFZhcmdhcyBlIHNldXMKZnVuY2lvbsOhcmlvcyBkZSBxdWFscXVlciByZXNwb25zYWJpbGlkYWRlIHBlbG8gdXNvIG7Do28tYXV0b3JpemFkbyBkbwptYXRlcmlhbCBkZXBvc2l0YWRvLCBzZWphIGVtIHZpbmN1bGHDp8OjbyDDoCBCaWJsaW90ZWNhIFZpcnR1YWwgRkdWLCBzZWphCmVtIHZpbmN1bGHDp8OjbyBhIHF1YWlzcXVlciBzZXJ2acOnb3MgZGUgYnVzY2EgZSBkaXN0cmlidWnDp8OjbyBkZSBjb250ZcO6ZG8KcXVlIGZhw6dhbSB1c28gZGFzIGludGVyZmFjZXMgZSBlc3Bhw6dvIGRlIGFybWF6ZW5hbWVudG8gcHJvdmlkZW5jaWFkb3MKcGVsYSBGdW5kYcOnw6NvIEdldHVsaW8gVmFyZ2FzIHBvciBtZWlvIGRlIHNldXMgc2lzdGVtYXMgaW5mb3JtYXRpemFkb3MuCgoyLiBBIGFzc2luYXR1cmEgZGVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EgdGVtIGNvbW8gY29uc2Vxw7zDqm5jaWEgYSB0cmFuc2ZlcsOqbmNpYSwgYQp0w610dWxvIG7Do28tZXhjbHVzaXZvIGUgbsOjby1vbmVyb3NvLCBpc2VudGEgZG8gcGFnYW1lbnRvIGRlIHJveWFsdGllcwpvdSBxdWFscXVlciBvdXRyYSBjb250cmFwcmVzdGHDp8OjbywgcGVjdW5pw6FyaWEgb3UgbsOjbywgw6AgRnVuZGHDp8OjbwpHZXR1bGlvIFZhcmdhcywgZG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGRlIGFybWF6ZW5hciBkaWdpdGFsbWVudGUsIHJlcHJvZHV6aXIgZQpkaXN0cmlidWlyIG5hY2lvbmFsIGUgaW50ZXJuYWNpb25hbG1lbnRlIGEgT2JyYSwgaW5jbHVpbmRvLXNlIG8gc2V1CnJlc3Vtby9hYnN0cmFjdCwgcG9yIG1laW9zIGVsZXRyw7RuaWNvcywgbm8gc2l0ZSBkYSBCaWJsaW90ZWNhIFZpcnR1YWwKRkdWLCBhbyBww7pibGljbyBlbSBnZXJhbCwgZW0gcmVnaW1lIGRlIGFjZXNzbyBhYmVydG8uCgozLiBBIHByZXNlbnRlIGxpY2Vuw6dhIHRhbWLDqW0gYWJyYW5nZSwgbm9zIG1lc21vcyB0ZXJtb3MgZXN0YWJlbGVjaWRvcwpubyBpdGVtIDIsIHN1cHJhLCBxdWFscXVlciBkaXJlaXRvIGRlIGNvbXVuaWNhw6fDo28gYW8gcMO6YmxpY28gY2Fiw612ZWwKZW0gcmVsYcOnw6NvIMOgIE9icmEgb3JhIGRlcG9zaXRhZGEsIGluY2x1aW5kby1zZSBvcyB1c29zIHJlZmVyZW50ZXMgw6AKcmVwcmVzZW50YcOnw6NvIHDDumJsaWNhIGUvb3UgZXhlY3XDp8OjbyBww7pibGljYSwgYmVtIGNvbW8gcXVhbHF1ZXIgb3V0cmEKbW9kYWxpZGFkZSBkZSBjb211bmljYcOnw6NvIGFvIHDDumJsaWNvIHF1ZSBleGlzdGEgb3UgdmVuaGEgYSBleGlzdGlyLApub3MgdGVybW9zIGRvIGFydGlnbyA2OCBlIHNlZ3VpbnRlcyBkYSBMZWkgOS42MTAvOTgsIG5hIGV4dGVuc8OjbyBxdWUKZm9yIGFwbGljw6F2ZWwgYW9zIHNlcnZpw6dvcyBwcmVzdGFkb3MgYW8gcMO6YmxpY28gcGVsYSBCaWJsaW90ZWNhClZpcnR1YWwgRkdWLgoKNC4gRXN0YSBsaWNlbsOnYSBhYnJhbmdlLCBhaW5kYSwgbm9zIG1lc21vcyB0ZXJtb3MgZXN0YWJlbGVjaWRvcyBubwppdGVtIDIsIHN1cHJhLCB0b2RvcyBvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBjb25leG9zIGRlIGFydGlzdGFzIGludMOpcnByZXRlcyBvdQpleGVjdXRhbnRlcywgcHJvZHV0b3JlcyBmb25vZ3LDoWZpY29zIG91IGVtcHJlc2FzIGRlIHJhZGlvZGlmdXPDo28gcXVlCmV2ZW50dWFsbWVudGUgc2VqYW0gYXBsaWPDoXZlaXMgZW0gcmVsYcOnw6NvIMOgIG9icmEgZGVwb3NpdGFkYSwgZW0KY29uZm9ybWlkYWRlIGNvbSBvIHJlZ2ltZSBmaXhhZG8gbm8gVMOtdHVsbyBWIGRhIExlaSA5LjYxMC85OC4KCjUuIFNlIGEgT2JyYSBkZXBvc2l0YWRhIGZvaSBvdSDDqSBvYmpldG8gZGUgZmluYW5jaWFtZW50byBwb3IKaW5zdGl0dWnDp8O1ZXMgZGUgZm9tZW50byDDoCBwZXNxdWlzYSBvdSBxdWFscXVlciBvdXRyYSBzZW1lbGhhbnRlLCB2b2PDqgpvdSBvIHRpdHVsYXIgYXNzZWd1cmEgcXVlIGN1bXByaXUgdG9kYXMgYXMgb2JyaWdhw6fDtWVzIHF1ZSBsaGUgZm9yYW0KaW1wb3N0YXMgcGVsYSBpbnN0aXR1acOnw6NvIGZpbmFuY2lhZG9yYSBlbSByYXrDo28gZG8gZmluYW5jaWFtZW50bywgZQpxdWUgbsOjbyBlc3TDoSBjb250cmFyaWFuZG8gcXVhbHF1ZXIgZGlzcG9zacOnw6NvIGNvbnRyYXR1YWwgcmVmZXJlbnRlIMOgCnB1YmxpY2HDp8OjbyBkbyBjb250ZcO6ZG8gb3JhIHN1Ym1ldGlkbyDDoCBCaWJsaW90ZWNhIFZpcnR1YWwgRkdWLgoKNi4gQ2FzbyBhIE9icmEgb3JhIGRlcG9zaXRhZGEgZW5jb250cmUtc2UgbGljZW5jaWFkYSBzb2IgdW1hIGxpY2Vuw6dhCkNyZWF0aXZlIENvbW1vbnMgKHF1YWxxdWVyIHZlcnPDo28pLCBzb2IgYSBsaWNlbsOnYSBHTlUgRnJlZQpEb2N1bWVudGF0aW9uIExpY2Vuc2UgKHF1YWxxdWVyIHZlcnPDo28pLCBvdSBvdXRyYSBsaWNlbsOnYSBxdWFsaWZpY2FkYQpjb21vIGxpdnJlIHNlZ3VuZG8gb3MgY3JpdMOpcmlvcyBkYSBEZWZpbml0aW9uIG9mIEZyZWUgQ3VsdHVyYWwgV29ya3MKKGRpc3BvbsOtdmVsIGVtOiBodHRwOi8vZnJlZWRvbWRlZmluZWQub3JnL0RlZmluaXRpb24pIG91IEZyZWUgU29mdHdhcmUKRGVmaW5pdGlvbiAoZGlzcG9uw612ZWwgZW06IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuZ251Lm9yZy9waGlsb3NvcGh5L2ZyZWUtc3cuaHRtbCksIApvIGFycXVpdm8gcmVmZXJlbnRlIMOgIE9icmEgZGV2ZSBpbmRpY2FyIGEgbGljZW7Dp2EgYXBsaWPDoXZlbCBlbQpjb250ZcO6ZG8gbGVnw612ZWwgcG9yIHNlcmVzIGh1bWFub3MgZSwgc2UgcG9zc8OtdmVsLCB0YW1iw6ltIGVtIG1ldGFkYWRvcwpsZWfDrXZlaXMgcG9yIG3DoXF1aW5hLiBBIGluZGljYcOnw6NvIGRhIGxpY2Vuw6dhIGFwbGljw6F2ZWwgZGV2ZSBzZXIKYWNvbXBhbmhhZGEgZGUgdW0gbGluayBwYXJhIG9zIHRlcm1vcyBkZSBsaWNlbmNpYW1lbnRvIG91IHN1YSBjw7NwaWEKaW50ZWdyYWwuCgoKQW8gY29uY2x1aXIgYSBwcmVzZW50ZSBldGFwYSBlIGFzIGV0YXBhcyBzdWJzZXHDvGVudGVzIGRvIHByb2Nlc3NvIGRlCnN1Ym1pc3PDo28gZGUgYXJxdWl2b3Mgw6AgQmlibGlvdGVjYSBWaXJ0dWFsIEZHViwgdm9jw6ogYXRlc3RhIHF1ZSBsZXUgZQpjb25jb3JkYSBpbnRlZ3JhbG1lbnRlIGNvbSBvcyB0ZXJtb3MgYWNpbWEgZGVsaW1pdGFkb3MsIGFzc2luYW5kby1vcwpzZW0gZmF6ZXIgcXVhbHF1ZXIgcmVzZXJ2YSBlIG5vdmFtZW50ZSBjb25maXJtYW5kbyBxdWUgY3VtcHJlIG9zCnJlcXVpc2l0b3MgaW5kaWNhZG9zIG5vIGl0ZW0gMSwgc3VwcmEuCgpIYXZlbmRvIHF1YWxxdWVyIGRpc2NvcmTDom5jaWEgZW0gcmVsYcOnw6NvIGFvcyBwcmVzZW50ZXMgdGVybW9zIG91IG7Do28Kc2UgdmVyaWZpY2FuZG8gbyBleGlnaWRvIG5vIGl0ZW0gMSwgc3VwcmEsIHZvY8OqIGRldmUgaW50ZXJyb21wZXIKaW1lZGlhdGFtZW50ZSBvIHByb2Nlc3NvIGRlIHN1Ym1pc3PDo28uIEEgY29udGludWlkYWRlIGRvIHByb2Nlc3NvCmVxdWl2YWxlIMOgIGFzc2luYXR1cmEgZGVzdGUgZG9jdW1lbnRvLCBjb20gdG9kYXMgYXMgY29uc2Vxw7zDqm5jaWFzIG5lbGUKcHJldmlzdGFzLCBzdWplaXRhbmRvLXNlIG8gc2lnbmF0w6FyaW8gYSBzYW7Dp8O1ZXMgY2l2aXMgZSBjcmltaW5haXMgY2Fzbwpuw6NvIHNlamEgdGl0dWxhciBkb3MgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXV0b3JhaXMgcGF0cmltb25pYWlzIGUvb3UgY29uZXhvcwphcGxpY8OhdmVpcyDDoCBPYnJhIGRlcG9zaXRhZGEgZHVyYW50ZSBlc3RlIHByb2Nlc3NvLCBvdSBjYXNvIG7Do28gdGVuaGEKb2J0aWRvIHByw6l2aWEgZSBleHByZXNzYSBhdXRvcml6YcOnw6NvIGRvIHRpdHVsYXIgcGFyYSBvIGRlcMOzc2l0byBlCnRvZG9zIG9zIHVzb3MgZGEgT2JyYSBlbnZvbHZpZG9zLgoKClBhcmEgYSBzb2x1w6fDo28gZGUgcXVhbHF1ZXIgZMO6dmlkYSBxdWFudG8gYW9zIHRlcm1vcyBkZSBsaWNlbmNpYW1lbnRvIGUKbyBwcm9jZXNzbyBkZSBzdWJtaXNzw6NvLCBjbGlxdWUgbm8gbGluayAiRmFsZSBjb25vc2NvIi4K
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Quem tem medo do processo coletivo? As disputas e as escolhas políticas no CPC/2015 para o tratamento da litigiosidade repetitiva no Brasil
title Quem tem medo do processo coletivo? As disputas e as escolhas políticas no CPC/2015 para o tratamento da litigiosidade repetitiva no Brasil
spellingShingle Quem tem medo do processo coletivo? As disputas e as escolhas políticas no CPC/2015 para o tratamento da litigiosidade repetitiva no Brasil
Miranda, Andrea Pimentel de
Access to justice
Repetitive litigation
Code of Civil Procedure of 2015
Acesso à justiça
IRDR
Processo coletivo
Litigiosidade repetitiva
Código de processo civil de 2015
Direito
Ação coletiva
Acesso à justiça
Processo civil - Brasil
Brasil. [Código de processo civil (2015)]
Poder judiciário - Brasil
title_short Quem tem medo do processo coletivo? As disputas e as escolhas políticas no CPC/2015 para o tratamento da litigiosidade repetitiva no Brasil
title_full Quem tem medo do processo coletivo? As disputas e as escolhas políticas no CPC/2015 para o tratamento da litigiosidade repetitiva no Brasil
title_fullStr Quem tem medo do processo coletivo? As disputas e as escolhas políticas no CPC/2015 para o tratamento da litigiosidade repetitiva no Brasil
title_full_unstemmed Quem tem medo do processo coletivo? As disputas e as escolhas políticas no CPC/2015 para o tratamento da litigiosidade repetitiva no Brasil
title_sort Quem tem medo do processo coletivo? As disputas e as escolhas políticas no CPC/2015 para o tratamento da litigiosidade repetitiva no Brasil
author Miranda, Andrea Pimentel de
author_facet Miranda, Andrea Pimentel de
author_role author
dc.contributor.unidadefgv.por.fl_str_mv Escolas::DIREITO SP
dc.contributor.member.none.fl_str_mv Gabbay, Daniela Monteiro
Asperti, Maria Cecília de Araújo
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Miranda, Andrea Pimentel de
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Cunha, Luciana Gross
contributor_str_mv Cunha, Luciana Gross
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Access to justice
Repetitive litigation
Code of Civil Procedure of 2015
topic Access to justice
Repetitive litigation
Code of Civil Procedure of 2015
Acesso à justiça
IRDR
Processo coletivo
Litigiosidade repetitiva
Código de processo civil de 2015
Direito
Ação coletiva
Acesso à justiça
Processo civil - Brasil
Brasil. [Código de processo civil (2015)]
Poder judiciário - Brasil
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Acesso à justiça
IRDR
Processo coletivo
Litigiosidade repetitiva
Código de processo civil de 2015
dc.subject.area.por.fl_str_mv Direito
dc.subject.bibliodata.por.fl_str_mv Ação coletiva
Acesso à justiça
Processo civil - Brasil
Brasil. [Código de processo civil (2015)]
Poder judiciário - Brasil
description It is a consensus among Brazilian jurists that the Judiciary is going through a crisis that affects its ability to act with efficiency and quality, distancing itself from a minimally satisfactory model of justice. In this scenario, repetitive litigation acquires special relevance insofar as it is identified as one of the main problems faced by the Judiciary. Observing the way to deal with the effects of repetitive litigation by the Code of Civil Procedure of 2015, the question that guides the present work arises: why repetitive case judgment techniques - specifically the Brazilian case management technique “Incidente de Resolução de Demandas Repetitivas”- were preferred by the legislator? The main idea is to analyze documents related to the elaboration of the Code of Civil Procedure of 2015 (minutes of meetings and public hearings, news, text of the draft, substitutes and amendments), seeking to observe how the legislative process took place, especially the choice for enlargement of the technique of trial of repetitive cases to deal with repetitive litigiousness, while the collective process occupied the role of supporting actor as a technique capable of dealing with the same question. In addition, it seeks to understand who the actors were responsible for this choice and what were its justifications.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2019-04-22T16:45:37Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2019-04-22T16:45:37Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2019-04-08
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10438/27367
url http://hdl.handle.net/10438/27367
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)
collection Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/9e213ddb-8c1c-4be3-b622-9b0e582f5018/download
https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/38edefab-045a-437a-87b0-944a531a379d/download
https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/0ec9c962-06fb-494f-9b6b-9a9d799c7321/download
https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/8b0e9ed8-9c94-41b8-bf0a-bbe59d3214f0/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 2977e1e8ee2ffd3b896eb9d8f8e05fba
3271b17b0c1a9be5b0d76fe1888b50d3
dfb340242cced38a6cca06c627998fa1
f282f64ee1b15dca6405a8fd68db9a04
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1827842587345551360

Registros relacionados