Participação social na elaboração dos instrumentos de planejamento e orçamento em Minas Gerais: uma análise das emendas de participação cidadã no período de 2012 - 2019

• Ano de defesa: 2020
• Autor(a) principal: Mourão, Sarah Cristina de Sales
• Orientador(a): Brasil, Flávia de Paula Duque
• Banca de defesa: Brasil, Flávia de Paula Duque, Carneiro, Ricardo, Dufloth, Simone Cristina, Teodósio, Armindo dos Santos de Sousa
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Fundação João Pinheiro
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Mestrado em Administração Pública
• Departamento: Escola de Governo Professor Paulo Neves de Carvalho
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Política e Sociedade; Minas Gerais; Orçamento Público; Participação Popular; Participação Política; Plano Plurianual
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: ADMINISTRACAO PUBLICA::POLITICA E PLANEJAMENTO GOVERNAMENTAIS
• Link de acesso: http://repositorio.fjp.mg.gov.br/handle/tede/515

This paper analyzes the effectiveness of public hearings for participatory discussion of the Plano Plurianual de Ação Governamental (PPAG) e da Lei Orçamentária Anual (LOA) of the state of Minas Gerais, in the period 2012-2019. Through them, civil society deliberates and constructs Propostas de Alteração Legislativa (PLEs) that can be converted into amendments of citizen participation that will directly influence the planning of public policies and the allocation of public resources. The evaluated effects concern the constituent elements of public hearings, which are reflected in its institutional design, rules and operating procedures. In addition, the level of institutionalization, participation and representation of these spaces was verified, as well as the administrative capacity of the Executive Power to implement the amendments of citizen participation arising from this process. For that, an applied research was developed, with a quali-quanti approach and with descriptive and exploratory objectives. The technical procedures used to carry out the research were the case study, the bibliographic research and the documentary research. The results found point out that the public hearings of participatory discussion are hybrid Instituições Participativas (IPs), fitting into the list of planning, resource allocation and monitoring IPs. They are considered peripheral or contestation spaces, in which the criteria and mechanisms of access and participation are contingent symmetric selectivity. The institutional design adopted is from the bottom up. They have a high level of institutionalization. Regarding participation and representation, it was found that the number of subscribers is always higher than the number of participants, but that both vary over the years, with periods of decline and rise. This trend was also observed in relation to the participating institutions, with the predominance of institutions representing civil society. Regarding the target audience of actions contemplated as amendments to citizen participation, there is a predominance of segments that position themselves in subordinate positions. Finally, regarding the administrative capacity to implement amendments to citizen participation, the absence of an objective rule for the definition of the values assigned to these amendments, the predominant allocation in the functions education, social assistance, agriculture and public security, the low effectiveness in budget execution and the low representativeness of the programmed and executed amounts compared to the state fiscal budget.