Análise in vitro da desinfecção promovida por diferentes protocolos de limpeza do canal radicular com o uso do ultrassom em dentes humanos infectados por Enterococcus faecalis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2011
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Kathrein Tapia da
Orientador(a): Figueiredo, José Antonio Poli de
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
Porto Alegre
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://hdl.handle.net/10923/359
Resumo: Introduction: This study aims at analyzing, in vitro, the ultrasonic action on microbial agents (sodium hypochlorite 2. 5% and chlorhexidine 2%) in human teeth infected by enterococcus faecalis.Methodology: Sixty human premolars were used, which were contaminated with an E. faecalis pure culture with 3. 9 to 6. 3 x 107(CFU/ml) during a period of 60 days to form bacterial biofilm. Teeth were randomly divided in 8 groups, whereby those in which ultrasonic was used had a n= 10, the control groups (without ultrasound) had a n=5. Group 1- ultrasonic irrigation with sodium hypochlorite 2. 5%; group 2- ultrasonic irrigation with chlorhexidine liquid 2%; group 3- ultrasonic irrigation with chlorhexidine gel 2%; group 4- ultrasonic irrigation with distilled water; group 5- conventional irrigation with sodium hypochlorite 2. 5%; group 6- conventional irrigation with chlorhexidine liquid 2%; group 7- conventional irrigation with chlorhexidine gel 2% and group 8- conventional irrigation with distilled water. An analysis with a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed.Results: In the SEM analysis with a 2000x magnification in backscattering, it was analyzed the removal of the smear layer and there was a significant difference among the groups in all the root portions. Groups 1 and 2 showed better cleaning capacity and were similar in their results. The group which showed the worst performance was group 7. In the 10000X magnfication in backscattering it was analyzed the presence of bacteria in the root canal and there was again statistic difference among the groups in all the root portions. The groups which showed the smallest bacterial biofilm were groups 1 and 2, and they were similar in their results. The group which showed the worst performance in the apical third was group 8, and in the medium and cervical third group 7.Conclusion: Regardless of the solution, ultrasonic irrigation proved to be superior to the conventional irrigation; we believe that ultrasonic can be used as an excellent auxiliary to the root canal cleaningness and disinfection.
id PUCR_986049941521f5749ba4867a8db2204c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.pucrs.br:10923/359
network_acronym_str PUCR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional PUCRS
repository_id_str
spelling Silva, Kathrein Tapia daFigueiredo, José Antonio Poli de2011-12-27T14:13:58Z2011-12-27T14:13:58Z2011http://hdl.handle.net/10923/359Introduction: This study aims at analyzing, in vitro, the ultrasonic action on microbial agents (sodium hypochlorite 2. 5% and chlorhexidine 2%) in human teeth infected by enterococcus faecalis.Methodology: Sixty human premolars were used, which were contaminated with an E. faecalis pure culture with 3. 9 to 6. 3 x 107(CFU/ml) during a period of 60 days to form bacterial biofilm. Teeth were randomly divided in 8 groups, whereby those in which ultrasonic was used had a n= 10, the control groups (without ultrasound) had a n=5. Group 1- ultrasonic irrigation with sodium hypochlorite 2. 5%; group 2- ultrasonic irrigation with chlorhexidine liquid 2%; group 3- ultrasonic irrigation with chlorhexidine gel 2%; group 4- ultrasonic irrigation with distilled water; group 5- conventional irrigation with sodium hypochlorite 2. 5%; group 6- conventional irrigation with chlorhexidine liquid 2%; group 7- conventional irrigation with chlorhexidine gel 2% and group 8- conventional irrigation with distilled water. An analysis with a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed.Results: In the SEM analysis with a 2000x magnification in backscattering, it was analyzed the removal of the smear layer and there was a significant difference among the groups in all the root portions. Groups 1 and 2 showed better cleaning capacity and were similar in their results. The group which showed the worst performance was group 7. In the 10000X magnfication in backscattering it was analyzed the presence of bacteria in the root canal and there was again statistic difference among the groups in all the root portions. The groups which showed the smallest bacterial biofilm were groups 1 and 2, and they were similar in their results. The group which showed the worst performance in the apical third was group 8, and in the medium and cervical third group 7.Conclusion: Regardless of the solution, ultrasonic irrigation proved to be superior to the conventional irrigation; we believe that ultrasonic can be used as an excellent auxiliary to the root canal cleaningness and disinfection.Introdução: O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar, in vitro, a ação do ultrassom sobre os agentes antimicrobianos (hipoclorito de sódio 2,5% e clorexidina 2%) em dentes humanos infectados com Enterococcus faecalis.Metodologia: Foram utilizados 60 pré-molares humanos, os quais foram contaminados com uma cultura pura de E. faecalis com uma variável de 3. 9 a 6. 3 x 107(CFU/ml) por um período de 60 dias para formação do biofilme bacteriano. Os dentes foram divididos aleatoriamente em 8 grupos sendo que os grupos que fizeram uso de ultrassom tiveram um n= 10 e os grupos grupos controle (sem ultrassom) um n=5. Grupo 1- irrigação ultrassônica com hipoclorito de sódio 2,5%; grupo 2- irrigação ultrassônica com clorexidina líquida 2%; grupo 3- irrigação ultrassônica com clorexidina gel 2%; grupo 4- irrigação ultrassônica com água destilada; grupo 5- irrigação convencional com hipoclorito de sódio 2,5%; grupo 6- irrigação convencional com clorexidina líquida 2%; grupo 7- irrigação convencional com clorexidina gel 2% e grupo 8- irrigação convencional com água destilada. Foi realizada análise em Microscópio Eletrônico de Varredura (MEV).Resultados: Na análise em MEV em um aumento de 2000x em backscattering, analisou-se a remoção da smear layer e houve diferença significativa entre os grupos em todos os terços. Os grupos 1 e 2 apresentaram uma melhor capacidade de limpeza e foram similares em seus resultados. O grupo que apresentou um pior desempenho foi o grupo 7. No aumento de 10000X em backscattering, analisou- se a presença de bactéria no canal radicular e novamente houve diferença estatística entre os grupos em todos os terços. Os grupos que apresentaram menor biofilme bacteriano foram os grupos 1 e 2 e foram similares em seus resultados. O grupo que apresentou um pior desempenho no terço apical foi o grupo 8 e nos terços médio e cervical o grupo 7.Conclusões: Independente da solução, irrigação ultrassônica mostrou-se superior à irrigação convencional, indicando que o ultrassom deve ser utilizado como um excelente auxiliar na limpeza e desinfecção do canal radicular.Made available in DSpace on 2011-12-27T14:13:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 000434030-0.pdf: 652041 bytes, checksum: 6e27ed7f0dd246585a4df46e0c25eb69 (MD5) license.txt: 581 bytes, checksum: 44ea52f0b7567232681c6e3d72285adc (MD5)Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreODONTOLOGIAENDODONTIAMICROSCOPIA ELETRÔNICACLOREXIDINAAnálise in vitro da desinfecção promovida por diferentes protocolos de limpeza do canal radicular com o uso do ultrassom em dentes humanos infectados por Enterococcus faecalisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do SulFaculdade de OdontologiaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em OdontologiaMestrado2011porreponame:Repositório Institucional PUCRSinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessORIGINAL000434030-0.pdfTexto Completoapplication/pdf652041repositorio.pucrs.br/jspui/bitstream/10923/359/1/000434030-0.pdf6e27ed7f0dd246585a4df46e0c25eb69MD51LICENSElicense.txttext/plain581repositorio.pucrs.br/jspui/bitstream/10923/359/2/license.txt44ea52f0b7567232681c6e3d72285adcMD52TEXT000434030-0.pdf.txt000434030-0.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain53091repositorio.pucrs.br/jspui/bitstream/10923/359/3/000434030-0.pdf.txt7d6317d7814da7304fd896ca4e77085eMD5310923/3592017-09-28 11:05:34.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ório InstitucionalPRI
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Análise in vitro da desinfecção promovida por diferentes protocolos de limpeza do canal radicular com o uso do ultrassom em dentes humanos infectados por Enterococcus faecalis
title Análise in vitro da desinfecção promovida por diferentes protocolos de limpeza do canal radicular com o uso do ultrassom em dentes humanos infectados por Enterococcus faecalis
spellingShingle Análise in vitro da desinfecção promovida por diferentes protocolos de limpeza do canal radicular com o uso do ultrassom em dentes humanos infectados por Enterococcus faecalis
Silva, Kathrein Tapia da
ODONTOLOGIA
ENDODONTIA
MICROSCOPIA ELETRÔNICA
CLOREXIDINA
title_short Análise in vitro da desinfecção promovida por diferentes protocolos de limpeza do canal radicular com o uso do ultrassom em dentes humanos infectados por Enterococcus faecalis
title_full Análise in vitro da desinfecção promovida por diferentes protocolos de limpeza do canal radicular com o uso do ultrassom em dentes humanos infectados por Enterococcus faecalis
title_fullStr Análise in vitro da desinfecção promovida por diferentes protocolos de limpeza do canal radicular com o uso do ultrassom em dentes humanos infectados por Enterococcus faecalis
title_full_unstemmed Análise in vitro da desinfecção promovida por diferentes protocolos de limpeza do canal radicular com o uso do ultrassom em dentes humanos infectados por Enterococcus faecalis
title_sort Análise in vitro da desinfecção promovida por diferentes protocolos de limpeza do canal radicular com o uso do ultrassom em dentes humanos infectados por Enterococcus faecalis
author Silva, Kathrein Tapia da
author_facet Silva, Kathrein Tapia da
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Kathrein Tapia da
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Figueiredo, José Antonio Poli de
contributor_str_mv Figueiredo, José Antonio Poli de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv ODONTOLOGIA
ENDODONTIA
MICROSCOPIA ELETRÔNICA
CLOREXIDINA
topic ODONTOLOGIA
ENDODONTIA
MICROSCOPIA ELETRÔNICA
CLOREXIDINA
description Introduction: This study aims at analyzing, in vitro, the ultrasonic action on microbial agents (sodium hypochlorite 2. 5% and chlorhexidine 2%) in human teeth infected by enterococcus faecalis.Methodology: Sixty human premolars were used, which were contaminated with an E. faecalis pure culture with 3. 9 to 6. 3 x 107(CFU/ml) during a period of 60 days to form bacterial biofilm. Teeth were randomly divided in 8 groups, whereby those in which ultrasonic was used had a n= 10, the control groups (without ultrasound) had a n=5. Group 1- ultrasonic irrigation with sodium hypochlorite 2. 5%; group 2- ultrasonic irrigation with chlorhexidine liquid 2%; group 3- ultrasonic irrigation with chlorhexidine gel 2%; group 4- ultrasonic irrigation with distilled water; group 5- conventional irrigation with sodium hypochlorite 2. 5%; group 6- conventional irrigation with chlorhexidine liquid 2%; group 7- conventional irrigation with chlorhexidine gel 2% and group 8- conventional irrigation with distilled water. An analysis with a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed.Results: In the SEM analysis with a 2000x magnification in backscattering, it was analyzed the removal of the smear layer and there was a significant difference among the groups in all the root portions. Groups 1 and 2 showed better cleaning capacity and were similar in their results. The group which showed the worst performance was group 7. In the 10000X magnfication in backscattering it was analyzed the presence of bacteria in the root canal and there was again statistic difference among the groups in all the root portions. The groups which showed the smallest bacterial biofilm were groups 1 and 2, and they were similar in their results. The group which showed the worst performance in the apical third was group 8, and in the medium and cervical third group 7.Conclusion: Regardless of the solution, ultrasonic irrigation proved to be superior to the conventional irrigation; we believe that ultrasonic can be used as an excellent auxiliary to the root canal cleaningness and disinfection.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2011-12-27T14:13:58Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2011-12-27T14:13:58Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2011
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10923/359
url http://hdl.handle.net/10923/359
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
Porto Alegre
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
Porto Alegre
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional PUCRS
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional PUCRS
collection Repositório Institucional PUCRS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv repositorio.pucrs.br/jspui/bitstream/10923/359/1/000434030-0.pdf
repositorio.pucrs.br/jspui/bitstream/10923/359/2/license.txt
repositorio.pucrs.br/jspui/bitstream/10923/359/3/000434030-0.pdf.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 6e27ed7f0dd246585a4df46e0c25eb69
44ea52f0b7567232681c6e3d72285adc
7d6317d7814da7304fd896ca4e77085e
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1747679332526981120