O imaginário e o poético na obra A paixão segundo G.H.

• Ano de defesa: 2016
• Autor(a) principal: Dias, Ana Maria
• Orientador(a): Lima, Maria de Fátima Gonçalves
• Banca de defesa: Cruz, Antonio Donizeti da , Pinto, Divino José
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação STRICTO SENSU em Letras
• Departamento: Ciências Humanas
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: A Paixão segundo G.H.; Imagem; Imaginário; Metáfora viva
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Passion according to G.H.; Image; Imaginary; Living metaphor
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LETRAS
• Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucgoias.edu.br/handle/tede/3245

Modern literature in the twentieth century, especially the novel, underwent a radical modernization process, abdicating itself of the shackles of the nineteenth century, that did not let it flow as gender. One of the innovations of contemporary authors was to narrate his writing in first person, facilitating, thereby, the approach of the reader with what was being narrated. The objective of this research is to analyze the imaginary and the poetic in the novel Passion according to G.H., by Clarice Lispector, written in 1964. The first chapter of this research shows the relationship between the poet and the historian, then the image, imaginary and symbol concepts, according to Sartre, Bachelard and Durand. The second chapter analyzes the imagery language of the narrative. By means of the images, a comparison is made between the room, where G.H character is in, and Jonas complex, with the same view of the authors cited above. This chapter also presents the insight of the narrator character and her zenith moment. In the third chapter, the poeticity of the work is discussed. Therefore, a study was made about the dimension of poetic language and, then, an analysis of metaphorical language by Paul Ricouer and Octavio Paz, with the subtitle Nor truth, nor lie: metaphor . In this chapter, besides discussing imagery language, graphic signs and polissemic and metaphorical traces of the work were explored in order to prove it is a prose poem.