Design líquido: comunicação interespacial e arquitetônica

• Ano de defesa: 2008
• Autor(a) principal: Bicudo, Marcelo Marino
• Orientador(a): Beiguelman, Giselle
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Comunicação e Semiótica
• Departamento: Comunicação
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Urbanismo; Hibridismo; Rizoma; Design; Arquitetura; Percepcao espacial
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Architecture; Urbanization; Hybridism; Rhizome
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::COMUNICACAO
• Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/5081

In both academic circles and designing practice, it is noted that the scope of communication has changed substantially, in the sense that the component disciplines have been expanded and mixed as part of a process of hybridization of languages, opening into other disciplines, such as architecture and urbanization, and strongly influencing the construction of communicational systems seeking to determine subject-object relations. This scenario is augmented by the major technological and cultural transformations that intensified in the 1990s and potentiated the construction of images, requiring the development of a new approach to design. This thesis poses strategies and provides concrete examples of this new approach, which is seen in what Bauman calls "liquid design", emphasizing transdisciplinarity and intersemiosis between identitory systems. In this context, there is now a crucial role for concepts such as rhizome (Deleuze, 1997), with design as a system formed of variables and contexts, or complex emerging systems (Johnson, 2003). In addition, "sensitive strategies" (Sodré, 2006 and Greimas, 1997) dialogue with the intelligible with the aim of pervading enunciators, and create dense images. These concepts prompt an approach to design as "work in progress" while reinforcing identitory relations between subjects and objects and between subjects and subjects, thus posing a discussion of the concept of identity itself, and the definitions of singularity, standard, context and feedback. Since this entire process takes place in the ambit of communication, semiotics is necessarily involved, with design seen as a process of constantly encoding, decoding and re-encoding (Flusser, 2007), and is culturally determined (Lotman, 1998 and 1999). This means there can be no a priori methods; designers must work with strategies for approaching problems and develop specific methodologies in the course of their design activity. Thus what has been called liquid design assumes the orchestration of other disciplines, such as architecture and urbanization, which are also hybridized. This new approach to designing activity aims to tackle new complexities posed by emerging cultural contexts, ultimately aiming to transform spaces to places, creating ties of identity with enunciators