Reconhecimento: movimentos e sentidos de uma trajetória de investigação e formação interdisciplinar

• Ano de defesa: 2008
• Autor(a) principal: Taino, Ana Maria dos Reis
• Orientador(a): Fazenda, Ivani Catarina Arantes
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Educação: Currículo
• Departamento: Educação
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Reconhecimento; Interdisciplinaridade; História de vida; Totalidade; Formação; Interdisciplinaridade em educacao
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Recognition; Interdisciplinarity; Life history; Totality; Formation
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO
• Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/10049

The investigative process in this thesis indicates the recognition path, which, by intertwining with interdisciplinarity, proposes reflections on the formation of educators. It employs qualitative research and, through narrativity, reveals the theoretical and practical nature of the phenomenon and the movements and ways of formation, of being able to talk about oneself and others. The author elects the circular movement as a metaphor to recognition and moves through different realities: from singularity to totality, by identifying in her life history the historical conscience of narrated time, which allows the play between objectivity and subjectivity, the time of the soul and the time of the movement. She organizes the space of her experience in management and educational formation as imprints of an ontological movement through which she tries to understand the meaning of recognition. The author also configures her doings to make the movement of her actions as an educator and investigator visible, both in the Interdisciplinarity Study and Research Group (GEPI) at PUC/SP and at the GEPI in Jacareí, by understanding the value of interdisciplinarity and recognition in an axiological movement. The author executes, by interpreting the promise, the decision of showing the challenges of writing and authoring in an epistemological circular movement. She concludes that, by appropriating Fazenda s and Ricoeur s theoretical contributions, she builds, by the hermeneutics of totality, another epistemologic movement on formation