A vinculação da supremacia do interesse público na Constituição Federal de 1988

• Ano de defesa: 2011
• Autor(a) principal: Furlani, Carlos Eduardo Pereira
• Orientador(a): Pugliesi, Marcio
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
• Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Princípios; Interesse público; Regime jurídico; Constitucionalização
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Principles; Public interest; Legal regime; Constitutionalization
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO CONSTITUCIONAL
• Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/5532

There is no doubt as to the composition of the legal system consists of rules and principles for this, we begin this present study classifies about the concepts, exteriorization of the concept and principles, identifying them as their respective functions and settings in the legal scenario and in the context of the regime legal public law. It relies on the following principles in the interpretation of the legal landscape on the principle of supremacy of public over private interest, even taking into account the activity of this exegesis in the process of constitutional and as the activity of the public administration and administrator and the mechanisms of state action in the face of the constitution. We understand which supports authorizing the obedience, the conflicts between those who point out its impracticality and those that seek to reconstruct it, and a critical analysis from the perspective of the state may consider whether there is supremacy of public interest over the particular. How questioning, pointed to the current constitutional order is adjusted to the process of constitutional norms under the Constitution, even if these conditioning fit for Public Policy and the broader aspects of social change in order to promote the public interest. We tried to thus address some controversy as and when an act is directed to benefit a specific public interest, collective interest or private interest, but did not earn the same benefits given to other public interest. As a theoretical underpinning of this study we relied on the following authors: Humberto Avila, Celso Antonio Bandeira De Mello, Robert Alexy, Luiz Roberto Barroso, Maria Sylvia Zanella Di Pietro, Marçal Justen Son, Daniel Sarmento, which led to numerous scores and discussions on this work. It is redefining the idea of showing the supremacy of public interest over the particular, with the recognition that private interests may fall under the protection of the Constitution and require weights as earned to each individual case