A prescrição intercorrente no direito processual civil brasileiro

• Ano de defesa: 2023
• Autor(a) principal: Gasparetti, Marco Vanin
• Orientador(a): Bueno, Cassio Scarpinella
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
• Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Prescrição; Decadência; Interrupção e suspensão da prescrição; Prescrição intercorrente no processo de execução e cumprimento de sentença; Prescrição intercorrente no processo de conhecimento; Extinção do processo por inércia; Modelo constitucional de processo civil; Duração razoável do processo; Efetividade do processo para o réu; Responsabilidade civil do Estado Juiz; Legge Pinto
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Statute of limitation; Interruption and suspension of the limitation period; Intercurrent statute of limitation on summary collections and enforcement of judgments; Termination of lawsuits due to inertia; Constitutional model of civil procedure; Reasonable duration of lawsuits; Effectiveness of the procedure for the defendant; Public entities liability; Legge Pinto
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
• Link de acesso: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/40764

Statutes of limitation are a concept linked to material law, as a result of the understanding, inherent to the concept of justice, that the exercise of rights is not immune to the effects of time. Even after the creditor exercise its right to demand the performance of the defaulted obligation, the eternalization of lawsuit result in unlawful effects, so that, upon the application, in the procedural plan, of the binomial need for stabilization of legal relationships and punishment to the inertia of the creditor, arises the need for a solution to lawsuits in which the enforcement of the rights was frustrated or that are paralyzed due to the inertia of the creditor or of the Judiciary, always in light of the limitation period of the material right. The termination of a lawsuit with prejudice to the right to exercise the material right is conventionally named intercurrent statute of limitation. In this study, we make some preliminary comments about the concept and legal grounds of the statutes of limitation, their differences with the decadência (limitation applicable in Brazil to potestative rights) and the events that interfere in the lapse of the limitation period. Upon these premises of material law, we proceed with the framework of the modalities of intercurrent statutes of limitation set forth in the civil procedural law as causes for the termination of summary collections and enforcement of judgment proceedings, following in the investigation of the possibility of applying the intercurrent statute of limitation also to lawsuits in the decision-making stage, upon a constitutional model of civil procedure formed by the fundamental right to a reasonable duration of the lawsuits and the effectiveness of the procedure under the perspective of the defendant. After the conclusion of this analysis, we deal with the consequences of admitting the hypothesis in case of plaintiffinertia and Judiciary-inertia, and, to the latter, the effects of admitting the intercurrent statute of limitation over the liability of public entities and the consequences that it might have to the judiciary administration