Nepotismo e estado patrimonial no Brasil em face do princípio constitucional da moralidade

• Ano de defesa: 2011
• Autor(a) principal: Araújo, José Carlos Evangelista de
• Orientador(a): Beznos, Clovis
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
• Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Nepotismo; Patrimonialismo; Princípio da moralidade; Jurisdição constitucional; Garantias públicas fundamentais
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Nepotism; Patrimonialism; Principle of the morality; Constitutional jurisdiction; Basic public guarantees
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO ADMINISTRATIVO
• Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/5536

The present work considers to study the phenomena of the nepotism and the patrimonialism in the scope of the Brazilian Public Administration and the way it runs its prohibition and repression in the context of our effective jurisprudence, especially, in face of the constitutional principle of the sensible new morality and the reach acquired for the constitutional jurisdiction in the plan of the legal-constitutional system introduced by the Federal Constitution of 1988. The concepts of nepotism and patrimonial State or simply patrimonialism will be analyzed in such a way under the description-sociological prism how much under a purely legalnormative approach. One in this manner searches to articulate in an only plan of analysis the perspective call of the participant (legal-normative approach) and the perspective of the observer (description-sociological approach). In what it refers to the legal-normative appreciation of the nepotism, our analysis aimed at since the meaning contemporary of the proper constitutional jurisdiction in our legal system, passing for the eventual collision of the rule that prohibition the available nepotism with other principles constitutional and procedural ways for its repression and has controlled, until the study and the minute reflection on its normative concept and its modalities, the available parameters legal-argumentative for the application of the prohibition rule and its limits and, finally, resistences, contradictions and ambiguities you observed in the last effort undertaken for the institutions for controlling the nepotism and other modalities of patrimonialism in the state scope - by means of the edition of the Resolution nº 07/05 of the CNJ and Binding the Abridgement nº 13 of the STF. The reflection on the constitutional normativeness of principles such as of the morality (main axle of our legal-normative analysis) and of the impersonality will be given in the scope of a theoretical field however in constitution, but usually identify in the academic debate for pos-positivism - and is recognized in the workmanship of authors as RONALD DWORKIN, ROBERT ALEXY, EDUARDO GARCI'A DE ENTERRÍA and J. J. GOMES CANOTILHO. To this referencial theoretician-metodological we add as structurant line of our reflection, with intention to provide to an analysis of first the legal system of and second order (observing/participant) the concept of legal system in the form that printed it NIKLAS LUHMANN - with some exceptions in what it says respect to its conception on the legitimation of the Right. It was still opted to a methodological framing that in allowed them to base on a historical perspective and politics the dynamics of the patrimonial State, and to collate it with a theory of the social evolution and the moral development in the individual and institutional scope. An interpretation based in a renewed conception of the historical materialism, in landmarks presented for JÜRGEN HABERMAS was adopted here then. How much to the waited results, we intend to excite, in first place, a reflection on the historical beddings and politicians of the patrimonialism and its manifestation in the nepotism form. In second, a change of attitude of the legal operators in relation to this subject. Finally, in we strengthen to supply them elements of legal-normative nature with potential to clarify and to contribute the dogmatic perfectioning of this substance, assisting in some way in the search for a society that is, in fact, free, joust and of solidarity