Dissenso e normatividade na esfera p?blica
Ano de defesa: | 2018 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Filosofia
|
Departamento: |
Escola de Humanidades
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Área do conhecimento CNPq: | |
Link de acesso: | http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/7972 |
Resumo: | In this work, I ask what is the normative capacity of dissensus in a theory of social normativity. I investigate the fundamental elements of a deliberative theory of social normativity set forth by J?rgen Habermas and argue that, in a project of deliberative normative justification, not only consensus but also dissensus has normative capacity. I present a minimal formulation of Habermas? normative project, which encompasses the concepts of discourse, consensus and public sphere, and then proceed to distinguish three different realms in a deliberative theory of social normativity ? politics, the political, and the dispute for politicity ? approaching the nature and the role of dissensus in each one. I argue that (a) politics is a realm of the institutions of liberal democracy, where dissensus takes the form of conflict among groups and models of public spheres, having the role of keeping the public sphere multiple and inclusive; (b) the political is the realm of interaction of discourses about the imperative of human coexistence in the world, where dissensus takes the form of adversariness and has the role of maintaining the disagreement necessary for pluralism; and (c) the dispute for politicity is the pre-discursive realm where struggles for the capacity to issue political claims take place, where dissensus has the role of pointing out the unjustified partiality of the discursive genre as the only one capable of conveying social interactions with normative potential. |
id |
P_RS_0b3b787d0e90011bdc10033c84b7d85e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/7972 |
network_acronym_str |
P_RS |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Weber, Thadeuhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0652643529727347http://lattes.cnpq.br/0310102426281941Alves, ?talo da Silva2018-05-02T14:18:35Z2018-03-05http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/7972In this work, I ask what is the normative capacity of dissensus in a theory of social normativity. I investigate the fundamental elements of a deliberative theory of social normativity set forth by J?rgen Habermas and argue that, in a project of deliberative normative justification, not only consensus but also dissensus has normative capacity. I present a minimal formulation of Habermas? normative project, which encompasses the concepts of discourse, consensus and public sphere, and then proceed to distinguish three different realms in a deliberative theory of social normativity ? politics, the political, and the dispute for politicity ? approaching the nature and the role of dissensus in each one. I argue that (a) politics is a realm of the institutions of liberal democracy, where dissensus takes the form of conflict among groups and models of public spheres, having the role of keeping the public sphere multiple and inclusive; (b) the political is the realm of interaction of discourses about the imperative of human coexistence in the world, where dissensus takes the form of adversariness and has the role of maintaining the disagreement necessary for pluralism; and (c) the dispute for politicity is the pre-discursive realm where struggles for the capacity to issue political claims take place, where dissensus has the role of pointing out the unjustified partiality of the discursive genre as the only one capable of conveying social interactions with normative potential.Neste trabalho, questiono qual ? a capacidade normativa do dissenso em uma teoria da normatividade social. Para tanto, investigo os elementos fundamentais de uma teoria deliberativa da normatividade social estabelecidos por J?rgen Habermas e sustento que, em um projeto deliberativo de justifica??o normativa, n?o apenas o consenso, mas tamb?m o dissenso possui capacidade normativa. Apresento uma formula??o m?nima do projeto normativo de Habermas, que envolve os conceitos de discurso, consenso e esfera p?blica, e fa?o uma distin??o entre tr?s ?mbitos diferentes presentes em uma teoria deliberativa da normatividade social ? a pol?tica, o pol?tico e a disputa pela politicidade ?, abordando a natureza e o papel do dissenso em cada um deles. Defendo que (a) a pol?tica ? um ?mbito das institui??es da democracia liberal, onde o dissenso toma a forma de conflito entre grupos e modelos de esferas p?blicas e tem o papel de manter a esfera p?blica m?ltipla e inclusiva; (b) o pol?tico ? o ?mbito da intera??o de discursos sobre o imperativo da coexist?ncia humana no mundo, onde o dissenso toma a forma de adversariedade e tem o papel de manter o desacordo necess?rio ao pluralismo; e (c) a disputa pela politicidade ? o ?mbito pr?-discursivo onde t?m lugar as reivindica??es pela capacidade de emitir demandas normativas, onde o dissenso tem o papel de apontar a parcialidade injustificada do g?nero discursivo como ?nico capaz de comportar intera??es sociais com potencial normativo.Submitted by PPG Filosofia (filosofia-pg@pucrs.br) on 2018-05-02T13:54:54Z No. of bitstreams: 1 DISSERTA??O - ?TALO DA SILVA ALVES.pdf: 922926 bytes, checksum: 37b72dc5a9648c006567e23bf7c504be (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2018-05-02T14:16:19Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 DISSERTA??O - ?TALO DA SILVA ALVES.pdf: 922926 bytes, checksum: 37b72dc5a9648c006567e23bf7c504be (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2018-05-02T14:18:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 DISSERTA??O - ?TALO DA SILVA ALVES.pdf: 922926 bytes, checksum: 37b72dc5a9648c006567e23bf7c504be (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-03-05Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico - CNPqapplication/pdfhttp://tede2.pucrs.br:80/tede2/retrieve/171695/DIS_ITALO_DA_SILVA_ALVES_COMPLETO.pdf.jpgporPontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do SulPrograma de P?s-Gradua??o em FilosofiaPUCRSBrasilEscola de HumanidadesNormatividadeDissensoFilosofia Pol?ticaSociedadeHabermasCIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIADissenso e normatividade na esfera p?blicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisTrabalho n?o apresenta restri??o para publica??o-8305327606432166393500500500600-6557531471218110192-672352020940167053-2555911436985713659info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RSinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSTHUMBNAILDIS_ITALO_DA_SILVA_ALVES_COMPLETO.pdf.jpgDIS_ITALO_DA_SILVA_ALVES_COMPLETO.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg4485http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7972/4/DIS_ITALO_DA_SILVA_ALVES_COMPLETO.pdf.jpg3b627495c8fa9d70028da4313d7475faMD54TEXTDIS_ITALO_DA_SILVA_ALVES_COMPLETO.pdf.txtDIS_ITALO_DA_SILVA_ALVES_COMPLETO.pdf.txttext/plain239041http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7972/3/DIS_ITALO_DA_SILVA_ALVES_COMPLETO.pdf.txt11b5e861b094961eb9ab3e9536567cf0MD53ORIGINALDIS_ITALO_DA_SILVA_ALVES_COMPLETO.pdfDIS_ITALO_DA_SILVA_ALVES_COMPLETO.pdfapplication/pdf922926http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7972/2/DIS_ITALO_DA_SILVA_ALVES_COMPLETO.pdf37b72dc5a9648c006567e23bf7c504beMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8610http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7972/1/license.txt5a9d6006225b368ef605ba16b4f6d1beMD51tede/79722018-05-02 12:00:55.983oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/7972QXV0b3JpemHDp8OjbyBwYXJhIFB1YmxpY2HDp8OjbyBFbGV0csO0bmljYTogQ29tIGJhc2Ugbm8gZGlzcG9zdG8gbmEgTGVpIEZlZGVyYWwgbsK6OS42MTAsIGRlIDE5IGRlIGZldmVyZWlybyBkZSAxOTk4LCBvIGF1dG9yIEFVVE9SSVpBIGEgcHVibGljYcOnw6NvIGVsZXRyw7RuaWNhIGRhIHByZXNlbnRlIG9icmEgbm8gYWNlcnZvIGRhIEJpYmxpb3RlY2EgRGlnaXRhbCBkYSBQb250aWbDrWNpYSBVbml2ZXJzaWRhZGUgQ2F0w7NsaWNhIGRvIFJpbyBHcmFuZGUgZG8gU3VsLCBzZWRpYWRhIGEgQXYuIElwaXJhbmdhIDY2ODEsIFBvcnRvIEFsZWdyZSwgUmlvIEdyYW5kZSBkbyBTdWwsIGNvbSByZWdpc3RybyBkZSBDTlBKIDg4NjMwNDEzMDAwMi04MSBiZW0gY29tbyBlbSBvdXRyYXMgYmlibGlvdGVjYXMgZGlnaXRhaXMsIG5hY2lvbmFpcyBlIGludGVybmFjaW9uYWlzLCBjb25zw7NyY2lvcyBlIHJlZGVzIMOgcyBxdWFpcyBhIGJpYmxpb3RlY2EgZGEgUFVDUlMgcG9zc2EgYSB2aXIgcGFydGljaXBhciwgc2VtIMO0bnVzIGFsdXNpdm8gYW9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzLCBhIHTDrXR1bG8gZGUgZGl2dWxnYcOnw6NvIGRhIHByb2R1w6fDo28gY2llbnTDrWZpY2EuCg==Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/PRIhttps://tede2.pucrs.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.central@pucrs.br||opendoar:2018-05-02T15:00:55Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Dissenso e normatividade na esfera p?blica |
title |
Dissenso e normatividade na esfera p?blica |
spellingShingle |
Dissenso e normatividade na esfera p?blica Alves, ?talo da Silva Normatividade Dissenso Filosofia Pol?tica Sociedade Habermas CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
title_short |
Dissenso e normatividade na esfera p?blica |
title_full |
Dissenso e normatividade na esfera p?blica |
title_fullStr |
Dissenso e normatividade na esfera p?blica |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dissenso e normatividade na esfera p?blica |
title_sort |
Dissenso e normatividade na esfera p?blica |
author |
Alves, ?talo da Silva |
author_facet |
Alves, ?talo da Silva |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Weber, Thadeu |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0652643529727347 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0310102426281941 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Alves, ?talo da Silva |
contributor_str_mv |
Weber, Thadeu |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Normatividade Dissenso Filosofia Pol?tica Sociedade Habermas |
topic |
Normatividade Dissenso Filosofia Pol?tica Sociedade Habermas CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
description |
In this work, I ask what is the normative capacity of dissensus in a theory of social normativity. I investigate the fundamental elements of a deliberative theory of social normativity set forth by J?rgen Habermas and argue that, in a project of deliberative normative justification, not only consensus but also dissensus has normative capacity. I present a minimal formulation of Habermas? normative project, which encompasses the concepts of discourse, consensus and public sphere, and then proceed to distinguish three different realms in a deliberative theory of social normativity ? politics, the political, and the dispute for politicity ? approaching the nature and the role of dissensus in each one. I argue that (a) politics is a realm of the institutions of liberal democracy, where dissensus takes the form of conflict among groups and models of public spheres, having the role of keeping the public sphere multiple and inclusive; (b) the political is the realm of interaction of discourses about the imperative of human coexistence in the world, where dissensus takes the form of adversariness and has the role of maintaining the disagreement necessary for pluralism; and (c) the dispute for politicity is the pre-discursive realm where struggles for the capacity to issue political claims take place, where dissensus has the role of pointing out the unjustified partiality of the discursive genre as the only one capable of conveying social interactions with normative potential. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2018-05-02T14:18:35Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2018-03-05 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/7972 |
url |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/7972 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
-8305327606432166393 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
500 500 500 600 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
-6557531471218110192 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
-672352020940167053 |
dc.relation.sponsorship.fl_str_mv |
-2555911436985713659 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Filosofia |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
PUCRS |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Humanidades |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7972/4/DIS_ITALO_DA_SILVA_ALVES_COMPLETO.pdf.jpg http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7972/3/DIS_ITALO_DA_SILVA_ALVES_COMPLETO.pdf.txt http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7972/2/DIS_ITALO_DA_SILVA_ALVES_COMPLETO.pdf http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7972/1/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
3b627495c8fa9d70028da4313d7475fa 11b5e861b094961eb9ab3e9536567cf0 37b72dc5a9648c006567e23bf7c504be 5a9d6006225b368ef605ba16b4f6d1be |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.central@pucrs.br|| |
_version_ |
1796793232763387904 |