A efetiva??o do Acordo de Paris no Brasil : um estudo comparado da prote??o ambiental com a Austr?lia e a Nova Zel?ndia
Ano de defesa: | 2020 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Direito
|
Departamento: |
Escola de Direito
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Palavras-chave em Inglês: | |
Área do conhecimento CNPq: | |
Link de acesso: | http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/9107 |
Resumo: | With the advent of the Paris Agreement in 2015, a new global commitment was drawn up in the framework of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, so that its signatory members could set ambitious voluntary goals to maintain the global temperature. below 1.5? C in order to jointly combat global warming and its effects ? climate change. Currently, influenced by international debates on environmental protection, in particular the Limits to Growth and Our Common Future reports, hundreds of countries have already introduced into their national legal systems environmental principles and standards capable of safeguarding the ecologically balanced environment; others have even created national systems of environmental agencies at different levels and structures of governments. However, a major problem that has been shown is the inability of countries to implement and enforce these rights. The causes are diverse, including political animosity and administrative inefficiency. In this sense, under the question of the capacities of the legal and political measures taken to reach their goals in the framework of the international agreement signed, the present work, using the qualitative descriptive research type, compares Brazil and Oceania countries, in a method comparative procedure when analyzing legal systems ? especially the effectiveness of their environmental courts ? and environmental policies, seeking to understand the reasons why standards are not implemented and enforced, as well as to consider, in an inductive methodological approach, which legal institutes and government policies would best effect the environmental principle in order to ensure the preservation and environmental protection. In the end, it is recognized that the economic instruments described by the Paris Agreement, such as loss and damage financing ? Warsaw International Mechanism (WIM) -, the carbon market and the payment of environmental services instruments, are essential for ensuring sufficient resources to countries, especially those vulnerable to the damaging effects of extreme events, to finance and develop their environmental policies and systems. |
id |
P_RS_2042e47fb7a8a5c0d405ae09f8758164 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/9107 |
network_acronym_str |
P_RS |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Molinaro, Carlos Albertohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1937443594377974Filter, Pedro Ag?o Seabra2020-05-27T14:12:13Z2020-02-18http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/9107With the advent of the Paris Agreement in 2015, a new global commitment was drawn up in the framework of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, so that its signatory members could set ambitious voluntary goals to maintain the global temperature. below 1.5? C in order to jointly combat global warming and its effects ? climate change. Currently, influenced by international debates on environmental protection, in particular the Limits to Growth and Our Common Future reports, hundreds of countries have already introduced into their national legal systems environmental principles and standards capable of safeguarding the ecologically balanced environment; others have even created national systems of environmental agencies at different levels and structures of governments. However, a major problem that has been shown is the inability of countries to implement and enforce these rights. The causes are diverse, including political animosity and administrative inefficiency. In this sense, under the question of the capacities of the legal and political measures taken to reach their goals in the framework of the international agreement signed, the present work, using the qualitative descriptive research type, compares Brazil and Oceania countries, in a method comparative procedure when analyzing legal systems ? especially the effectiveness of their environmental courts ? and environmental policies, seeking to understand the reasons why standards are not implemented and enforced, as well as to consider, in an inductive methodological approach, which legal institutes and government policies would best effect the environmental principle in order to ensure the preservation and environmental protection. In the end, it is recognized that the economic instruments described by the Paris Agreement, such as loss and damage financing ? Warsaw International Mechanism (WIM) -, the carbon market and the payment of environmental services instruments, are essential for ensuring sufficient resources to countries, especially those vulnerable to the damaging effects of extreme events, to finance and develop their environmental policies and systems.Com o advento do Acordo de Paris em 2015, um novo comprometimento global foi tra?ado em sede da Conven??o?Quadro das Na??es Unidas sobre a Mudan?a do Clima, com o objetivo de que seus membros signat?rios pudessem tra?ar metas volunt?rias e ambiciosas para manter a temperatura global m?dia abaixo dos 1,5?C, de forma a combater em conjunto esfor?o o aquecimento global e os seus efeitos ? as mudan?as clim?ticas. Atualmente, influenciados pelos debates em ?mbito internacional sobre a prote??o do meio ambiente, em especial pelos relat?rios Limits to Growth e Our Common Future, centenas de pa?ses j? introduziram em seus ordenamentos jur?dicos p?trios princ?pios e normas ambientais capazes de salvaguardar o meio ambiente ecologicamente equilibrado; outros, criaram inclusive sistemas nacionais de ?rg?os ambientais em diferentes n?veis e estruturas de governos. Entretanto, um grande problema que se tem mostrado ? a incapacidade dos pa?ses em implementarem e darem efetividade a estes direitos. As causas s?o diversas, entre elas est? a animosidade pol?tica e a inefici?ncia administrativa. Neste sentido, sob o questionamento da capacidade das medidas legais e pol?ticas tomadas para alcan?arem suas metas em sede do acordo internacional firmado, o presente trabalho, utilizando-se do tipo de pesquisa descritivo-qualitativo, compara o Brasil e pa?ses da Oceania, em um m?todo de procedimento comparativo, ao analisar os ordenamentos jur?dicos ? especialmente a efetividade de suas cortes ambientais ? e as pol?ticas ambientais, buscando entender os motivos pelos quais as normas n?o s?o implementadas e efetivadas, bem como, ponderar, em uma abordagem metodol?gica indutiva, sobre quais seriam os institutos jur?dicos e pol?ticas governamentais que melhor efetivariam o princ?pio ambiental no sentido de garantir a preserva??o e prote??o do meio ambiente. Ao fim, reconhece-se que os instrumentos econ?micos descritos pelo Acordo de Paris, como o financiamento por perdas e danos ? Warsaw International Mechanism (WIM) ?, o mercado de carbono e os instrumentos referentes ao pagamento de servi?os ambientais, s?o essenciais para a garantia de recursos suficientes aos pa?ses, em especial aqueles vulner?veis aos efeitos danosos causados por eventos extremos, para financiar e desenvolver suas pol?ticas e sistemas ambientais.Submitted by PPG Direito (ppgdir@pucrs.br) on 2020-05-26T14:42:47Z No. of bitstreams: 1 PEDRO_AG?O_ SEABRA_ FILTER_DES.pdf: 1375549 bytes, checksum: b8b1805d1c107c2c76e41c37d5dda61d (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Clarissa Selbach (clarissa.selbach@pucrs.br) on 2020-05-27T14:06:13Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 PEDRO_AG?O_ SEABRA_ FILTER_DES.pdf: 1375549 bytes, checksum: b8b1805d1c107c2c76e41c37d5dda61d (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2020-05-27T14:12:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 PEDRO_AG?O_ SEABRA_ FILTER_DES.pdf: 1375549 bytes, checksum: b8b1805d1c107c2c76e41c37d5dda61d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020-02-18Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPESapplication/pdfhttp://tede2.pucrs.br:80/tede2/retrieve/177923/PEDRO_AG%c3%83O_%20SEABRA_%20FILTER_DES.pdf.jpgporPontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do SulPrograma de P?s-Gradua??o em DireitoPUCRSBrasilEscola de DireitoAcordo de ParisMudan?as clim?ticasProte??o ambientalEfetiva??o de direitosDireito comparadoParis AgreementClimate changesEnvironmental protectionRights effectivenessComparative lawCIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOA efetiva??o do Acordo de Paris no Brasil : um estudo comparado da prote??o ambiental com a Austr?lia e a Nova Zel?ndiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisTrabalho n?o apresenta restri??o para publica??o-81189034825801997565005005006004512033976268881925-72774072330344251443590462550136975366info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RSinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSTHUMBNAILPEDRO_AG?O_ SEABRA_ FILTER_DES.pdf.jpgPEDRO_AG?O_ SEABRA_ FILTER_DES.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg5501http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9107/4/PEDRO_AG%C3%83O_+SEABRA_+FILTER_DES.pdf.jpg51a83389731487f1c4a0cf1e2807ef24MD54TEXTPEDRO_AG?O_ SEABRA_ FILTER_DES.pdf.txtPEDRO_AG?O_ SEABRA_ FILTER_DES.pdf.txttext/plain350449http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9107/3/PEDRO_AG%C3%83O_+SEABRA_+FILTER_DES.pdf.txtef3fa1b88cc46035317b923f48139630MD53ORIGINALPEDRO_AG?O_ SEABRA_ FILTER_DES.pdfPEDRO_AG?O_ SEABRA_ FILTER_DES.pdfapplication/pdf1375549http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9107/2/PEDRO_AG%C3%83O_+SEABRA_+FILTER_DES.pdfb8b1805d1c107c2c76e41c37d5dda61dMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8590http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9107/1/license.txt220e11f2d3ba5354f917c7035aadef24MD51tede/91072020-05-27 12:00:31.633oai:tede2.pucrs.br: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/PRIhttps://tede2.pucrs.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.central@pucrs.br||opendoar:2020-05-27T15:00:31Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
A efetiva??o do Acordo de Paris no Brasil : um estudo comparado da prote??o ambiental com a Austr?lia e a Nova Zel?ndia |
title |
A efetiva??o do Acordo de Paris no Brasil : um estudo comparado da prote??o ambiental com a Austr?lia e a Nova Zel?ndia |
spellingShingle |
A efetiva??o do Acordo de Paris no Brasil : um estudo comparado da prote??o ambiental com a Austr?lia e a Nova Zel?ndia Filter, Pedro Ag?o Seabra Acordo de Paris Mudan?as clim?ticas Prote??o ambiental Efetiva??o de direitos Direito comparado Paris Agreement Climate changes Environmental protection Rights effectiveness Comparative law CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
title_short |
A efetiva??o do Acordo de Paris no Brasil : um estudo comparado da prote??o ambiental com a Austr?lia e a Nova Zel?ndia |
title_full |
A efetiva??o do Acordo de Paris no Brasil : um estudo comparado da prote??o ambiental com a Austr?lia e a Nova Zel?ndia |
title_fullStr |
A efetiva??o do Acordo de Paris no Brasil : um estudo comparado da prote??o ambiental com a Austr?lia e a Nova Zel?ndia |
title_full_unstemmed |
A efetiva??o do Acordo de Paris no Brasil : um estudo comparado da prote??o ambiental com a Austr?lia e a Nova Zel?ndia |
title_sort |
A efetiva??o do Acordo de Paris no Brasil : um estudo comparado da prote??o ambiental com a Austr?lia e a Nova Zel?ndia |
author |
Filter, Pedro Ag?o Seabra |
author_facet |
Filter, Pedro Ag?o Seabra |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Molinaro, Carlos Alberto |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/1937443594377974 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Filter, Pedro Ag?o Seabra |
contributor_str_mv |
Molinaro, Carlos Alberto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Acordo de Paris Mudan?as clim?ticas Prote??o ambiental Efetiva??o de direitos Direito comparado |
topic |
Acordo de Paris Mudan?as clim?ticas Prote??o ambiental Efetiva??o de direitos Direito comparado Paris Agreement Climate changes Environmental protection Rights effectiveness Comparative law CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Paris Agreement Climate changes Environmental protection Rights effectiveness Comparative law |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
description |
With the advent of the Paris Agreement in 2015, a new global commitment was drawn up in the framework of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, so that its signatory members could set ambitious voluntary goals to maintain the global temperature. below 1.5? C in order to jointly combat global warming and its effects ? climate change. Currently, influenced by international debates on environmental protection, in particular the Limits to Growth and Our Common Future reports, hundreds of countries have already introduced into their national legal systems environmental principles and standards capable of safeguarding the ecologically balanced environment; others have even created national systems of environmental agencies at different levels and structures of governments. However, a major problem that has been shown is the inability of countries to implement and enforce these rights. The causes are diverse, including political animosity and administrative inefficiency. In this sense, under the question of the capacities of the legal and political measures taken to reach their goals in the framework of the international agreement signed, the present work, using the qualitative descriptive research type, compares Brazil and Oceania countries, in a method comparative procedure when analyzing legal systems ? especially the effectiveness of their environmental courts ? and environmental policies, seeking to understand the reasons why standards are not implemented and enforced, as well as to consider, in an inductive methodological approach, which legal institutes and government policies would best effect the environmental principle in order to ensure the preservation and environmental protection. In the end, it is recognized that the economic instruments described by the Paris Agreement, such as loss and damage financing ? Warsaw International Mechanism (WIM) -, the carbon market and the payment of environmental services instruments, are essential for ensuring sufficient resources to countries, especially those vulnerable to the damaging effects of extreme events, to finance and develop their environmental policies and systems. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-27T14:12:13Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2020-02-18 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/9107 |
url |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/9107 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
-8118903482580199756 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
500 500 500 600 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
4512033976268881925 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
-7277407233034425144 |
dc.relation.sponsorship.fl_str_mv |
3590462550136975366 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Direito |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
PUCRS |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9107/4/PEDRO_AG%C3%83O_+SEABRA_+FILTER_DES.pdf.jpg http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9107/3/PEDRO_AG%C3%83O_+SEABRA_+FILTER_DES.pdf.txt http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9107/2/PEDRO_AG%C3%83O_+SEABRA_+FILTER_DES.pdf http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/9107/1/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
51a83389731487f1c4a0cf1e2807ef24 ef3fa1b88cc46035317b923f48139630 b8b1805d1c107c2c76e41c37d5dda61d 220e11f2d3ba5354f917c7035aadef24 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.central@pucrs.br|| |
_version_ |
1796793243962179584 |