Da raz?o pr?tica kantiana ? teoria da justi?a rawlsiana : os pressupostos morais do liberalismo pol?tico
Ano de defesa: | 2019 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Filosofia
|
Departamento: |
Escola de Humanidades
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Área do conhecimento CNPq: | |
Link de acesso: | http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8535 |
Resumo: | The scope of philosophical discussions about ethics, morality, politics, and justice is radically impacted by the ideas of John Rawls (1921-2002). In A Theory of Justice (1971), the American philosopher exposes his constructivist conception of justice as fairness, which is admittedly inspired and grounded in Kant's practical reason (1724-1804). Nevertheless, the Rawlsian intellectual itinerary undergoes profound changes, so that in Political Liberalism (1993) a strictly political conception of justice is presented. In effect, the principles of political liberalism are exposed as freestanding, with no link to Kantian moral presuppositions or even to any other philosophical doctrine. This would be a necessary condition for an overlapping consensus between the different conceptions of good existing in democratic societies. In this context, the present research questions the idea of freestanding of the political scope, seeking to highlight some moral assumptions not explicitly stated by Rawls. In the light of a semantic agreement that differentiates the scopes of application of ethics, politics, and moral, this discussion intends to demonstrate that there is a moral foundation in political liberalism, which, however, should not be understood in the ethical sense. This moral assumption would be in Kantian practical reason, for it is from this that Rawls sets out to structure and ground his conception of justice. Hence, the principles of Rawlsian political liberalism, in order to be effective when applied to the basic structure of society, must be analyzed through the moral elements of Kantian practical reason. Finally, this research seeks to show that such moral presupposition puts the idea of freestanding of the political scope in check, however, does not compromise the possibility of an overlapping consensus nor the establishment of the priority of the right over the good. That?s because Kantian morality, unlike ethical conceptions of good, meets the criteria of objectivity and publicity required by the political scope. |
id |
P_RS_2fb750cb1c980212f60cdb08d1eb3c9a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/8535 |
network_acronym_str |
P_RS |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Weber, Thadeuhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0933808527220029Orben, Douglas Jo?o2019-04-25T13:11:52Z2019-03-28http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8535The scope of philosophical discussions about ethics, morality, politics, and justice is radically impacted by the ideas of John Rawls (1921-2002). In A Theory of Justice (1971), the American philosopher exposes his constructivist conception of justice as fairness, which is admittedly inspired and grounded in Kant's practical reason (1724-1804). Nevertheless, the Rawlsian intellectual itinerary undergoes profound changes, so that in Political Liberalism (1993) a strictly political conception of justice is presented. In effect, the principles of political liberalism are exposed as freestanding, with no link to Kantian moral presuppositions or even to any other philosophical doctrine. This would be a necessary condition for an overlapping consensus between the different conceptions of good existing in democratic societies. In this context, the present research questions the idea of freestanding of the political scope, seeking to highlight some moral assumptions not explicitly stated by Rawls. In the light of a semantic agreement that differentiates the scopes of application of ethics, politics, and moral, this discussion intends to demonstrate that there is a moral foundation in political liberalism, which, however, should not be understood in the ethical sense. This moral assumption would be in Kantian practical reason, for it is from this that Rawls sets out to structure and ground his conception of justice. Hence, the principles of Rawlsian political liberalism, in order to be effective when applied to the basic structure of society, must be analyzed through the moral elements of Kantian practical reason. Finally, this research seeks to show that such moral presupposition puts the idea of freestanding of the political scope in check, however, does not compromise the possibility of an overlapping consensus nor the establishment of the priority of the right over the good. That?s because Kantian morality, unlike ethical conceptions of good, meets the criteria of objectivity and publicity required by the political scope.A esfera de discuss?es filos?ficas acerca da ?tica, da moral, da pol?tica e da justi?a ? radicalmente impactada pelas ideias de John Rawls (1921-2002). Em A Theory of Justice (1971), o fil?sofo estadunidense apresenta a sua concep??o construtivista de justi?a como equidade, a qual ? reconhecidamente inspirada e fundamentada na raz?o pr?tica de Kant (1724-1804). N?o obstante, o itiner?rio intelectual rawlsiano passa por mudan?as profundas, de modo que, em Political Liberalism (1993), apresenta-se uma concep??o estritamente pol?tica de justi?a. Com efeito, os princ?pios do liberalismo pol?tico s?o expostos como autossustent?veis, sem nenhuma vincula??o com pressupostos morais kantianos ou mesmo com qualquer outra doutrina filos?fica. Essa seria, ali?s, uma condi??o necess?ria para se levar a cabo um consenso sobreposto entre as diversas concep??es de bem existentes em sociedades democr?ticas. Nesse contexto, a presente pesquisa questiona a ideia de autossustentabilidade do ?mbito pol?tico, buscando evidenciar alguns pressupostos morais n?o explicitados por Rawls. ? luz de um acordo sem?ntico que diferencia os ?mbitos de aplica??o do ?tico, do pol?tico e do moral, pretende-se demostrar que h? uma fundamenta??o moral no liberalismo pol?tico, a qual, todavia, n?o deve ser entendida no sentido ?tico. Esse pressuposto moral estaria na raz?o pr?tica kantiana, pois ? da? que Rawls parte para estruturar e fundamentar a sua concep??o de justi?a. Com isso, os princ?pios do liberalismo pol?tico rawlsiano, para que possam ser efetivos quando aplicados ? estrutura b?sica da sociedade, devem ser analisados mediante os elementos morais da raz?o pr?tica kantiana. Por fim, buscase evidenciar que esse pressuposto moral coloca em xeque a ideia de autossustentabilidade do ?mbito pol?tico, entretanto, n?o compromete a possibilidade de um consenso sobreposto nem o estabelecimento da prioridade do justo sobre o bem. Isso porque a moralidade kantiana, diferente das concep??es ?ticas de bem, atende aos crit?rios de objetividade e publicidade exigidos pelo ?mbito pol?tico.Submitted by PPG Filosofia (filosofia-pg@pucrs.br) on 2019-04-09T18:45:28Z No. of bitstreams: 1 DOUGLAS JO?O ORBEN - TESE - 09-04-2019.pdf: 2179592 bytes, checksum: 48cb16725c7a5fc53222a5f72dd854c0 (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Sheila Dias (sheila.dias@pucrs.br) on 2019-04-25T13:07:29Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 DOUGLAS JO?O ORBEN - TESE - 09-04-2019.pdf: 2179592 bytes, checksum: 48cb16725c7a5fc53222a5f72dd854c0 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2019-04-25T13:11:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 DOUGLAS JO?O ORBEN - TESE - 09-04-2019.pdf: 2179592 bytes, checksum: 48cb16725c7a5fc53222a5f72dd854c0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-03-28Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPESapplication/pdfhttp://tede2.pucrs.br:80/tede2/retrieve/174696/TES_DOUGLAS_JOAO_ORBEN_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpghttps://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/retrieve/187266/TES_DOUGLAS_JOAO_ORBEN_COMPLETO.pdf.jpgporPontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do SulPrograma de P?s-Gradua??o em FilosofiaPUCRSBrasilEscola de HumanidadesKantRawls?ticaPol?ticaJusti?aCIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIADa raz?o pr?tica kantiana ? teoria da justi?a rawlsiana : os pressupostos morais do liberalismo pol?ticoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisTrabalho ser? publicado como artigo ou livro48 meses25/04/2023-1441514414422910841500500500600-6557531471218110192-6723520209401670533590462550136975366info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RSinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSORIGINALTES_DOUGLAS_JOAO_ORBEN_COMPLETO.pdfTES_DOUGLAS_JOAO_ORBEN_COMPLETO.pdfapplication/pdf2179592https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8535/5/TES_DOUGLAS_JOAO_ORBEN_COMPLETO.pdf48cb16725c7a5fc53222a5f72dd854c0MD55THUMBNAILTES_DOUGLAS_JOAO_ORBEN_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpgTES_DOUGLAS_JOAO_ORBEN_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg4087https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8535/4/TES_DOUGLAS_JOAO_ORBEN_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpg3dae660720ecdf4238ff1931d4edc647MD54TES_DOUGLAS_JOAO_ORBEN_COMPLETO.pdf.jpgTES_DOUGLAS_JOAO_ORBEN_COMPLETO.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg5459https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8535/7/TES_DOUGLAS_JOAO_ORBEN_COMPLETO.pdf.jpg03482c7d6afeac6072483181d520711dMD57TEXTTES_DOUGLAS_JOAO_ORBEN_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.txtTES_DOUGLAS_JOAO_ORBEN_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.txttext/plain1822https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8535/3/TES_DOUGLAS_JOAO_ORBEN_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.txtf659e6d57a13e6a7df145bfa50c51aeeMD53TES_DOUGLAS_JOAO_ORBEN_COMPLETO.pdf.txtTES_DOUGLAS_JOAO_ORBEN_COMPLETO.pdf.txttext/plain799672https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8535/6/TES_DOUGLAS_JOAO_ORBEN_COMPLETO.pdf.txtedf53f5c1ebced36f5b739f145727aa4MD56LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8590https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8535/1/license.txt220e11f2d3ba5354f917c7035aadef24MD51tede/85352023-04-28 12:00:19.353oai:tede2.pucrs.br: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/PRIhttps://tede2.pucrs.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.central@pucrs.br||opendoar:2023-04-28T15:00:19Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Da raz?o pr?tica kantiana ? teoria da justi?a rawlsiana : os pressupostos morais do liberalismo pol?tico |
title |
Da raz?o pr?tica kantiana ? teoria da justi?a rawlsiana : os pressupostos morais do liberalismo pol?tico |
spellingShingle |
Da raz?o pr?tica kantiana ? teoria da justi?a rawlsiana : os pressupostos morais do liberalismo pol?tico Orben, Douglas Jo?o Kant Rawls ?tica Pol?tica Justi?a CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
title_short |
Da raz?o pr?tica kantiana ? teoria da justi?a rawlsiana : os pressupostos morais do liberalismo pol?tico |
title_full |
Da raz?o pr?tica kantiana ? teoria da justi?a rawlsiana : os pressupostos morais do liberalismo pol?tico |
title_fullStr |
Da raz?o pr?tica kantiana ? teoria da justi?a rawlsiana : os pressupostos morais do liberalismo pol?tico |
title_full_unstemmed |
Da raz?o pr?tica kantiana ? teoria da justi?a rawlsiana : os pressupostos morais do liberalismo pol?tico |
title_sort |
Da raz?o pr?tica kantiana ? teoria da justi?a rawlsiana : os pressupostos morais do liberalismo pol?tico |
author |
Orben, Douglas Jo?o |
author_facet |
Orben, Douglas Jo?o |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Weber, Thadeu |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0933808527220029 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Orben, Douglas Jo?o |
contributor_str_mv |
Weber, Thadeu |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Kant Rawls ?tica Pol?tica Justi?a |
topic |
Kant Rawls ?tica Pol?tica Justi?a CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
description |
The scope of philosophical discussions about ethics, morality, politics, and justice is radically impacted by the ideas of John Rawls (1921-2002). In A Theory of Justice (1971), the American philosopher exposes his constructivist conception of justice as fairness, which is admittedly inspired and grounded in Kant's practical reason (1724-1804). Nevertheless, the Rawlsian intellectual itinerary undergoes profound changes, so that in Political Liberalism (1993) a strictly political conception of justice is presented. In effect, the principles of political liberalism are exposed as freestanding, with no link to Kantian moral presuppositions or even to any other philosophical doctrine. This would be a necessary condition for an overlapping consensus between the different conceptions of good existing in democratic societies. In this context, the present research questions the idea of freestanding of the political scope, seeking to highlight some moral assumptions not explicitly stated by Rawls. In the light of a semantic agreement that differentiates the scopes of application of ethics, politics, and moral, this discussion intends to demonstrate that there is a moral foundation in political liberalism, which, however, should not be understood in the ethical sense. This moral assumption would be in Kantian practical reason, for it is from this that Rawls sets out to structure and ground his conception of justice. Hence, the principles of Rawlsian political liberalism, in order to be effective when applied to the basic structure of society, must be analyzed through the moral elements of Kantian practical reason. Finally, this research seeks to show that such moral presupposition puts the idea of freestanding of the political scope in check, however, does not compromise the possibility of an overlapping consensus nor the establishment of the priority of the right over the good. That?s because Kantian morality, unlike ethical conceptions of good, meets the criteria of objectivity and publicity required by the political scope. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2019-04-25T13:11:52Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2019-03-28 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8535 |
url |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8535 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
-1441514414422910841 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
500 500 500 600 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
-6557531471218110192 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
-672352020940167053 |
dc.relation.sponsorship.fl_str_mv |
3590462550136975366 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Filosofia |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
PUCRS |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Humanidades |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8535/5/TES_DOUGLAS_JOAO_ORBEN_COMPLETO.pdf https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8535/4/TES_DOUGLAS_JOAO_ORBEN_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpg https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8535/7/TES_DOUGLAS_JOAO_ORBEN_COMPLETO.pdf.jpg https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8535/3/TES_DOUGLAS_JOAO_ORBEN_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.txt https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8535/6/TES_DOUGLAS_JOAO_ORBEN_COMPLETO.pdf.txt https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8535/1/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
48cb16725c7a5fc53222a5f72dd854c0 3dae660720ecdf4238ff1931d4edc647 03482c7d6afeac6072483181d520711d f659e6d57a13e6a7df145bfa50c51aee edf53f5c1ebced36f5b739f145727aa4 220e11f2d3ba5354f917c7035aadef24 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.central@pucrs.br|| |
_version_ |
1796793237906653184 |