Uma contribui??o de Nietzsche ? filosofia moral : a moralidade como imoralidade
Ano de defesa: | 2019 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Filosofia
|
Departamento: |
Escola de Humanidades
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Área do conhecimento CNPq: | |
Link de acesso: | http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8636 |
Resumo: | This dissertation aims to reflect on the philosophy of Friedrich W. Nietzsche, with particular regard to its contribution and place in the contemporary reflection on morality. Nietzsche?s self-proclaimed negation and critique of morality enable a new ethical perspective. As an immoralist, not only does he deny the validity and effectiveness of Christian morality, but also sees himself as a peculiar kind of moralist, one who seeks to reverse the authority and the power of morality against itself. The philosopher calls himself the first immoralist in his 1888 book Ecce Homo, where he defines his ?most intimate nature? as amor fati. This refutation occurs through his corrosive and ruthless criticism of the epistemic foundations of metaphysics and morality, especially morality of a rational nature. Thus, he puts the belief in all morality under suspicion, unveils its foundations, and destroys its axiological constructs. Here we have the destructive side of the philosophy of Nietzsche, the philosopher from the depths who takes up the task of demolishing moral tradition with a hammer. However, there is also the creative side, which aspires to devise a new morality that is free of metaphysical principles. Nietzsche takes morality as a philosophical problem. Placing the dominant morality under suspicion, Nietzsche brings down the foundation on which it was built, allowing for the glimpse of other possible moralities, such as the tragic one, which affirms life. In other words, the morality of an immoralist. In this regard, some argue that Nietzsche's peculiar position in the history of moral philosophy consists in the critical analysis of the multiplicity of different moral values, always referred to its human (all too human) sources. Focusing on the circumstances and conditions of emergence, development, and decline of the various ideals, moral values, and religious doctrines, we seek to show how Nietzsche sets up a philosophy that breaks with the notion of divine and immutable values. Thus the transvaluation of all values is the ?formula? for overcoming all values consecrated up to modernity as supreme and the nihilism they engendered. The condition for the transvaluation is also present in the ideas of the eternal recurrence ? a new relation to time, in which life is fully affirmed ? and of amor fati, that states every instant ever liver must be desired infinitely. Through the critique carried out by the immoralist, we understand that to love one?s existence as a fatum is a devoid of metaphysical elements, tragic affirmation of life. Based on a bibliographic research of the work of Nietzsche and his commentators (such as Wotling, Conway, Clark, Schacht, Bailey, Leiter, Marton, Giacoia, Araldi, Paschoal, Medrado, among others), we argue that the defense of an (im)moralistic stance on the part of Nietzsche ensures him highlight in the history of ethics and allows for a contemporary reflection on morality. |
id |
P_RS_38f0b36c70e9cae077bfe6fac54bc449 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/8636 |
network_acronym_str |
P_RS |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Oliveira Junior, Nythamar Hilario Fernandes dehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3541527557611037http://lattes.cnpq.br/5286130992699852Acosta, Lucas Giovan Gomes2019-06-04T13:30:14Z2019-03-19http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8636This dissertation aims to reflect on the philosophy of Friedrich W. Nietzsche, with particular regard to its contribution and place in the contemporary reflection on morality. Nietzsche?s self-proclaimed negation and critique of morality enable a new ethical perspective. As an immoralist, not only does he deny the validity and effectiveness of Christian morality, but also sees himself as a peculiar kind of moralist, one who seeks to reverse the authority and the power of morality against itself. The philosopher calls himself the first immoralist in his 1888 book Ecce Homo, where he defines his ?most intimate nature? as amor fati. This refutation occurs through his corrosive and ruthless criticism of the epistemic foundations of metaphysics and morality, especially morality of a rational nature. Thus, he puts the belief in all morality under suspicion, unveils its foundations, and destroys its axiological constructs. Here we have the destructive side of the philosophy of Nietzsche, the philosopher from the depths who takes up the task of demolishing moral tradition with a hammer. However, there is also the creative side, which aspires to devise a new morality that is free of metaphysical principles. Nietzsche takes morality as a philosophical problem. Placing the dominant morality under suspicion, Nietzsche brings down the foundation on which it was built, allowing for the glimpse of other possible moralities, such as the tragic one, which affirms life. In other words, the morality of an immoralist. In this regard, some argue that Nietzsche's peculiar position in the history of moral philosophy consists in the critical analysis of the multiplicity of different moral values, always referred to its human (all too human) sources. Focusing on the circumstances and conditions of emergence, development, and decline of the various ideals, moral values, and religious doctrines, we seek to show how Nietzsche sets up a philosophy that breaks with the notion of divine and immutable values. Thus the transvaluation of all values is the ?formula? for overcoming all values consecrated up to modernity as supreme and the nihilism they engendered. The condition for the transvaluation is also present in the ideas of the eternal recurrence ? a new relation to time, in which life is fully affirmed ? and of amor fati, that states every instant ever liver must be desired infinitely. Through the critique carried out by the immoralist, we understand that to love one?s existence as a fatum is a devoid of metaphysical elements, tragic affirmation of life. Based on a bibliographic research of the work of Nietzsche and his commentators (such as Wotling, Conway, Clark, Schacht, Bailey, Leiter, Marton, Giacoia, Araldi, Paschoal, Medrado, among others), we argue that the defense of an (im)moralistic stance on the part of Nietzsche ensures him highlight in the history of ethics and allows for a contemporary reflection on morality.A presente disserta??o tem por objetivo refletir sobre a filosofia de Friedrich W. Nietzsche, especialmente no que se refere ? sua contribui??o e ao seu lugar na reflex?o contempor?nea da moral. Em sua autoproclamada nega??o e cr?tica da moral, Nietzsche possibilita uma nova perspectiva ?tica. Como imoralista, n?o apenas nega a validade e a efic?cia da moralidade crist?, mas tamb?m vislumbra-se como um tipo peculiar de moralista que visa a inverter a autoridade e o poder da moral contra ela mesma. O fil?sofo se denomina como o primeiro imoralista em Ecce Homo de 1888, definindo sua ?natureza mais ?ntima? como amor fati. Essa refuta??o ocorre por meio de sua corrosiva e implac?vel cr?tica aos fundamentos epist?micos da metaf?sica e da Moral, especialmente a moralidade de cunho racional. Assim, coloca sob suspeita a cren?a em toda a moral, desvela suas funda??es e destr?i seus constructos axiol?gicos. Eis a parte destrutiva da filosofia de Nietzsche, o fil?sofo do martelo e das profundezas, que se arroga o trabalho de demolir a tradi??o moral. H? tamb?m a parte construtiva que visa elaborar uma nova moralidade que n?o se baseie em princ?pios metaf?sicos. Nietzsche toma a moralidade como problema filos?fico. Colocando em suspeita a moral vigente, faz ruir o edif?cio em que fora constru?da, permitindo vislumbrar outras moralidades poss?veis, como por exemplo, a moralidade tr?gica, que afirma a vida. Dito de outra maneira, uma moralidade de um imoralista. Nesse sentido, defende-se que a posi??o peculiar de Nietzsche na hist?ria da filosofia moral consiste na an?lise cr?tica da multiplicidade de diferentes valora??es morais, sempre remetidas a suas fontes humanas (demasiado humanas). Atrav?s da aten??o ?s circunst?ncias e ?s condi??es de surgimento, desenvolvimento e ocaso dos diversos ideais, valores morais e doutrinas religiosas, procuramos mostrar como Nietzsche constitui uma filosofia que rompe com a no??o de valores divinos e imut?veis. Desse modo A transvalora??o de todos os valores ? a ?f?rmula? para a supera??o de todos os valores consagrados at? a modernidade como supremos e do niilismo por eles provocados. A condi??o para a transvalora??o est?, inclusive, nas ideias de eterno retorno ? uma nova rela??o com o tempo, em que a vida ? plenamente afirmada ? e de amor fati, que afirma que cada instante vivido deve ser desejado infinitas vezes. Entendemos que por meio da cr?tica realizada pelo imoralista amar sua exist?ncia como um fatum constitui uma afirma??o tr?gica da vida, desprovida de elementos metaf?sicos. Com base em uma pesquisa bibliogr?fica da obra de Nietzsche e seus comentadores (como Wotling, Conway, Clark, Schacht, Bailey, Leiter, Marton, Giacoia, Araldi, Paschoal, Medrado, e outros), argumenta-se que a defesa de uma postura (i)moralista da parte de Nietzsche lhe garante destaque na hist?ria da ?tica e possibilita uma reflex?o contempor?nea sobre a moral.Submitted by PPG Filosofia (filosofia-pg@pucrs.br) on 2019-05-07T12:30:57Z No. of bitstreams: 1 LUCAS GIOVAN GOMES ACOSTA - Disserta??o - 07-05-2019.pdf: 912555 bytes, checksum: c0d77f7176616d8251c9598a43904104 (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2019-06-04T13:22:34Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 LUCAS GIOVAN GOMES ACOSTA - Disserta??o - 07-05-2019.pdf: 912555 bytes, checksum: c0d77f7176616d8251c9598a43904104 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2019-06-04T13:30:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 LUCAS GIOVAN GOMES ACOSTA - Disserta??o - 07-05-2019.pdf: 912555 bytes, checksum: c0d77f7176616d8251c9598a43904104 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-03-19Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPESapplication/pdfhttp://tede2.pucrs.br:80/tede2/retrieve/175287/DIS_LUCAS_GIOVAN_GOMES_ACOSTA_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpghttp://tede2.pucrs.br:80/tede2/retrieve/178946/DIS_LUCAS_GIOVAN_GOMES_ACOSTA_COMPLETO.pdf.jpgporPontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do SulPrograma de P?s-Gradua??o em FilosofiaPUCRSBrasilEscola de HumanidadesMoralImoralismoValoresAmor FatiTransvalora??o de Todos os ValoresCIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIAUma contribui??o de Nietzsche ? filosofia moral : a moralidade como imoralidadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisTrabalho ser? publicado como artigo ou livro12 meses04/06/2020-1441514414422910841500500500600-6557531471218110192-6723520209401670533590462550136975366info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RSinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSORIGINALDIS_LUCAS_GIOVAN_GOMES_ACOSTA_COMPLETO.pdfDIS_LUCAS_GIOVAN_GOMES_ACOSTA_COMPLETO.pdfapplication/pdf912555http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8636/5/DIS_LUCAS_GIOVAN_GOMES_ACOSTA_COMPLETO.pdfc0d77f7176616d8251c9598a43904104MD55THUMBNAILDIS_LUCAS_GIOVAN_GOMES_ACOSTA_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpgDIS_LUCAS_GIOVAN_GOMES_ACOSTA_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg4089http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8636/4/DIS_LUCAS_GIOVAN_GOMES_ACOSTA_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpgb8fc3394daf0c6c6d6f861a3a988c539MD54DIS_LUCAS_GIOVAN_GOMES_ACOSTA_COMPLETO.pdf.jpgDIS_LUCAS_GIOVAN_GOMES_ACOSTA_COMPLETO.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg5637http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8636/7/DIS_LUCAS_GIOVAN_GOMES_ACOSTA_COMPLETO.pdf.jpgbb53779c840817f873da18ad50eea8f1MD57TEXTDIS_LUCAS_GIOVAN_GOMES_ACOSTA_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.txtDIS_LUCAS_GIOVAN_GOMES_ACOSTA_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.txttext/plain1760http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8636/3/DIS_LUCAS_GIOVAN_GOMES_ACOSTA_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.txt5c37daa92a76994fe9fa55e6cfd680c6MD53DIS_LUCAS_GIOVAN_GOMES_ACOSTA_COMPLETO.pdf.txtDIS_LUCAS_GIOVAN_GOMES_ACOSTA_COMPLETO.pdf.txttext/plain293070http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8636/6/DIS_LUCAS_GIOVAN_GOMES_ACOSTA_COMPLETO.pdf.txtd0bb55f3716b44bafcad4a1a50b1a6d0MD56LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8590http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8636/1/license.txt220e11f2d3ba5354f917c7035aadef24MD51tede/86362020-10-05 12:00:26.43oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/8636QXV0b3JpemE/P28gcGFyYSBQdWJsaWNhPz9vIEVsZXRyP25pY2E6IENvbSBiYXNlIG5vIGRpc3Bvc3RvIG5hIExlaSBGZWRlcmFsIG4/OS42MTAsIGRlIDE5IGRlIGZldmVyZWlybyBkZSAxOTk4LCBvIGF1dG9yIEFVVE9SSVpBIGEgcHVibGljYT8/byBlbGV0cj9uaWNhIGRhIHByZXNlbnRlIG9icmEgbm8gYWNlcnZvIGRhIEJpYmxpb3RlY2EgRGlnaXRhbCBkYSBQb250aWY/Y2lhIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkZSBDYXQ/bGljYSBkbyBSaW8gR3JhbmRlIGRvIFN1bCwgc2VkaWFkYSBhIEF2LiBJcGlyYW5nYSA2NjgxLCBQb3J0byBBbGVncmUsIFJpbyBHcmFuZGUgZG8gU3VsLCBjb20gcmVnaXN0cm8gZGUgQ05QSiA4ODYzMDQxMzAwMDItODEgYmVtIGNvbW8gZW0gb3V0cmFzIGJpYmxpb3RlY2FzIGRpZ2l0YWlzLCBuYWNpb25haXMgZSBpbnRlcm5hY2lvbmFpcywgY29ucz9yY2lvcyBlIHJlZGVzID9zIHF1YWlzIGEgYmlibGlvdGVjYSBkYSBQVUNSUyBwb3NzYSBhIHZpciBwYXJ0aWNpcGFyLCBzZW0gP251cyBhbHVzaXZvIGFvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBhdXRvcmFpcywgYSB0P3R1bG8gZGUgZGl2dWxnYT8/byBkYSBwcm9kdT8/byBjaWVudD9maWNhLgo=Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/PRIhttps://tede2.pucrs.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.central@pucrs.br||opendoar:2020-10-05T15:00:26Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Uma contribui??o de Nietzsche ? filosofia moral : a moralidade como imoralidade |
title |
Uma contribui??o de Nietzsche ? filosofia moral : a moralidade como imoralidade |
spellingShingle |
Uma contribui??o de Nietzsche ? filosofia moral : a moralidade como imoralidade Acosta, Lucas Giovan Gomes Moral Imoralismo Valores Amor Fati Transvalora??o de Todos os Valores CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
title_short |
Uma contribui??o de Nietzsche ? filosofia moral : a moralidade como imoralidade |
title_full |
Uma contribui??o de Nietzsche ? filosofia moral : a moralidade como imoralidade |
title_fullStr |
Uma contribui??o de Nietzsche ? filosofia moral : a moralidade como imoralidade |
title_full_unstemmed |
Uma contribui??o de Nietzsche ? filosofia moral : a moralidade como imoralidade |
title_sort |
Uma contribui??o de Nietzsche ? filosofia moral : a moralidade como imoralidade |
author |
Acosta, Lucas Giovan Gomes |
author_facet |
Acosta, Lucas Giovan Gomes |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira Junior, Nythamar Hilario Fernandes de |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/3541527557611037 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/5286130992699852 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Acosta, Lucas Giovan Gomes |
contributor_str_mv |
Oliveira Junior, Nythamar Hilario Fernandes de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Moral Imoralismo Valores Amor Fati Transvalora??o de Todos os Valores |
topic |
Moral Imoralismo Valores Amor Fati Transvalora??o de Todos os Valores CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
description |
This dissertation aims to reflect on the philosophy of Friedrich W. Nietzsche, with particular regard to its contribution and place in the contemporary reflection on morality. Nietzsche?s self-proclaimed negation and critique of morality enable a new ethical perspective. As an immoralist, not only does he deny the validity and effectiveness of Christian morality, but also sees himself as a peculiar kind of moralist, one who seeks to reverse the authority and the power of morality against itself. The philosopher calls himself the first immoralist in his 1888 book Ecce Homo, where he defines his ?most intimate nature? as amor fati. This refutation occurs through his corrosive and ruthless criticism of the epistemic foundations of metaphysics and morality, especially morality of a rational nature. Thus, he puts the belief in all morality under suspicion, unveils its foundations, and destroys its axiological constructs. Here we have the destructive side of the philosophy of Nietzsche, the philosopher from the depths who takes up the task of demolishing moral tradition with a hammer. However, there is also the creative side, which aspires to devise a new morality that is free of metaphysical principles. Nietzsche takes morality as a philosophical problem. Placing the dominant morality under suspicion, Nietzsche brings down the foundation on which it was built, allowing for the glimpse of other possible moralities, such as the tragic one, which affirms life. In other words, the morality of an immoralist. In this regard, some argue that Nietzsche's peculiar position in the history of moral philosophy consists in the critical analysis of the multiplicity of different moral values, always referred to its human (all too human) sources. Focusing on the circumstances and conditions of emergence, development, and decline of the various ideals, moral values, and religious doctrines, we seek to show how Nietzsche sets up a philosophy that breaks with the notion of divine and immutable values. Thus the transvaluation of all values is the ?formula? for overcoming all values consecrated up to modernity as supreme and the nihilism they engendered. The condition for the transvaluation is also present in the ideas of the eternal recurrence ? a new relation to time, in which life is fully affirmed ? and of amor fati, that states every instant ever liver must be desired infinitely. Through the critique carried out by the immoralist, we understand that to love one?s existence as a fatum is a devoid of metaphysical elements, tragic affirmation of life. Based on a bibliographic research of the work of Nietzsche and his commentators (such as Wotling, Conway, Clark, Schacht, Bailey, Leiter, Marton, Giacoia, Araldi, Paschoal, Medrado, among others), we argue that the defense of an (im)moralistic stance on the part of Nietzsche ensures him highlight in the history of ethics and allows for a contemporary reflection on morality. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2019-06-04T13:30:14Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2019-03-19 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8636 |
url |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8636 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
-1441514414422910841 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
500 500 500 600 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
-6557531471218110192 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
-672352020940167053 |
dc.relation.sponsorship.fl_str_mv |
3590462550136975366 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Filosofia |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
PUCRS |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Humanidades |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8636/5/DIS_LUCAS_GIOVAN_GOMES_ACOSTA_COMPLETO.pdf http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8636/4/DIS_LUCAS_GIOVAN_GOMES_ACOSTA_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpg http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8636/7/DIS_LUCAS_GIOVAN_GOMES_ACOSTA_COMPLETO.pdf.jpg http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8636/3/DIS_LUCAS_GIOVAN_GOMES_ACOSTA_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.txt http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8636/6/DIS_LUCAS_GIOVAN_GOMES_ACOSTA_COMPLETO.pdf.txt http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8636/1/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
c0d77f7176616d8251c9598a43904104 b8fc3394daf0c6c6d6f861a3a988c539 bb53779c840817f873da18ad50eea8f1 5c37daa92a76994fe9fa55e6cfd680c6 d0bb55f3716b44bafcad4a1a50b1a6d0 220e11f2d3ba5354f917c7035aadef24 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.central@pucrs.br|| |
_version_ |
1796793238879731712 |