Conflito de interesses em pesquisa cl?nica e integridade : aportes ? luz da teoria do reconhecimento de Axel Honneth
Ano de defesa: | 2018 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Filosofia
|
Departamento: |
Escola de Humanidades
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Área do conhecimento CNPq: | |
Link de acesso: | http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8295 |
Resumo: | This thesis investigates, based on Axel Honneth's Theory of Recognition, Conflicts of Interest (COIs) and integrity in the process of emancipation and management of a diversity of borderline issues such as: disrespect (Mi?achtung) and violation (Verletzung) to the citizen, capable of provoking profound transformations and changes to society in the face of the peculiar characteristics of a concrete social reality of participatory democratic domain. Issues of integrity, disrespect for patients, research participants, society, and institutions are discussed; as well as issues related to injustice and dishonesty. COIs and misconduct provoke political, technical, ethical, and moral offenses when individuals are violated in nonrecognition dynamics. The three patterns (affective, juridical, solidarity) can result in: (i) psychic death in the first pattern of recognition (affective); (ii) social death in the second (legal) pattern; and (iii) social humiliation in the third pattern (solidarity). The struggle for recognition is the condition for conflicts to be normative. There are models of justice such as: redistributive; economicist, and of recognition. But the research is delimited around the contribution of recognition to the theoretical confrontation of COIs and integrity. It is presumed that the struggle for recognition is a fundamental element to instantiate research on COIs and integrity, thus articulating an interdisciplinary approach (Philosophy and Health). The title ? contains elements that articulated in a certain way, indicate what I intend to discuss in a multidisciplinary way in this research: the investigation into the contributions of the Theory of Recognition applied to the dilemmas of COIs and integrity. Chapter 1. Conflict of interests (COIs) in health and integrity ? aims to: (a) explain about COIs and integrity at the level of citizens' basic needs and the opposition of interests between private and public actors to explain the citizen's struggle for sustainability of your demands; and (b) expound on COIs and integrity in an interdisciplinary way, that is, transversely articulating the philosophical point of view and the health sciences so that citizens can be recognized. The following subchapters make up the first part: 1.1. Methodological strategy; 1.2. COIs and integrity: how they are managed; 1.3. COI typology and policy diversity, and 1.4. Bioethics: synoptic overview and reflections. Chapter 2. Axel Honneth's Theory of Recognition (RT) ? addresses Honneth's RT, focusing on the following subchapters: 2.1. Social conflicts and normativity; 2.2. From self-preservation to recognition: normative resizing of conflicts; 2.3. Normative recognition standards, and 2.4. Denial of normative standards of recognition. Chapter 3. Contributions of Honneth's TR to the thesis ? articulates Honneth's RT with elements present in the health sciences, thus aiming to raise debate and justify the importance of defending the application of Honneth's RT to the movement fighting for right to quality policies for all. To do so, I make a conceptual inflection on COIs, integrity and scientific policies, and as a result of these interrelationships, I present some solutions for the researched dilemmas, focusing on the following subchapters: 3.1. Brazilian research relating Honneth's RT with health; 3.2. Integrity and COIs: fundamental dilemmas and preventive strategies, and 3.3. Honneth's concepts validated in this research. Other topics refer to conclusions and bibliography. |
id |
P_RS_59c5f2b580dcabe84b57c65f7843453c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/8295 |
network_acronym_str |
P_RS |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Bavaresco, Agemirhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6597683266934574Lima, Francisco Jozivan Guedes dehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8231159547990641http://lattes.cnpq.br/3483646615781615Cassimiro, M?rcia de C?ssia2018-09-27T12:11:57Z2018-08-29http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8295This thesis investigates, based on Axel Honneth's Theory of Recognition, Conflicts of Interest (COIs) and integrity in the process of emancipation and management of a diversity of borderline issues such as: disrespect (Mi?achtung) and violation (Verletzung) to the citizen, capable of provoking profound transformations and changes to society in the face of the peculiar characteristics of a concrete social reality of participatory democratic domain. Issues of integrity, disrespect for patients, research participants, society, and institutions are discussed; as well as issues related to injustice and dishonesty. COIs and misconduct provoke political, technical, ethical, and moral offenses when individuals are violated in nonrecognition dynamics. The three patterns (affective, juridical, solidarity) can result in: (i) psychic death in the first pattern of recognition (affective); (ii) social death in the second (legal) pattern; and (iii) social humiliation in the third pattern (solidarity). The struggle for recognition is the condition for conflicts to be normative. There are models of justice such as: redistributive; economicist, and of recognition. But the research is delimited around the contribution of recognition to the theoretical confrontation of COIs and integrity. It is presumed that the struggle for recognition is a fundamental element to instantiate research on COIs and integrity, thus articulating an interdisciplinary approach (Philosophy and Health). The title ? contains elements that articulated in a certain way, indicate what I intend to discuss in a multidisciplinary way in this research: the investigation into the contributions of the Theory of Recognition applied to the dilemmas of COIs and integrity. Chapter 1. Conflict of interests (COIs) in health and integrity ? aims to: (a) explain about COIs and integrity at the level of citizens' basic needs and the opposition of interests between private and public actors to explain the citizen's struggle for sustainability of your demands; and (b) expound on COIs and integrity in an interdisciplinary way, that is, transversely articulating the philosophical point of view and the health sciences so that citizens can be recognized. The following subchapters make up the first part: 1.1. Methodological strategy; 1.2. COIs and integrity: how they are managed; 1.3. COI typology and policy diversity, and 1.4. Bioethics: synoptic overview and reflections. Chapter 2. Axel Honneth's Theory of Recognition (RT) ? addresses Honneth's RT, focusing on the following subchapters: 2.1. Social conflicts and normativity; 2.2. From self-preservation to recognition: normative resizing of conflicts; 2.3. Normative recognition standards, and 2.4. Denial of normative standards of recognition. Chapter 3. Contributions of Honneth's TR to the thesis ? articulates Honneth's RT with elements present in the health sciences, thus aiming to raise debate and justify the importance of defending the application of Honneth's RT to the movement fighting for right to quality policies for all. To do so, I make a conceptual inflection on COIs, integrity and scientific policies, and as a result of these interrelationships, I present some solutions for the researched dilemmas, focusing on the following subchapters: 3.1. Brazilian research relating Honneth's RT with health; 3.2. Integrity and COIs: fundamental dilemmas and preventive strategies, and 3.3. Honneth's concepts validated in this research. Other topics refer to conclusions and bibliography.Esta tese investiga com base na Teoria do Reconhecimento de Axel Honneth, os Conflitos de interesses (COIs) e a integridade no processo de emancipa??o e manejo de uma diversidade de quest?es lim?trofes tais como: desrespeito (Mi?achtung) e viola??o (Verletzung) ao cidad?o, capazes de provocar profundas transforma??es e mudan?as ? sociedade em face das caracter?sticas peculiares de uma realidade social concreta de dom?nio democr?tico participativo. S?o discutidas quest?es de integridade, desrespeito aos pacientes, aos participantes de pesquisa, a sociedade, e as institui??es; al?m de quest?es relacionadas a injusti?a e desonestidade. COIs e m? conduta provocam impasses pol?ticos, t?cnicos, ?ticos, e ofensa moral, quando os indiv?duos s?o violados em din?micas de n?o reconhecimento (nonrecognition). Os tr?s padr?es (afetivo, jur?dico, solidariedade) podem ter como consequ?ncia: (i) morte ps?quica no primeiro padr?o de reconhecimento (afetivo); (ii) morte social no segundo padr?o (jur?dico); e (iii) humilha??o social no terceiro padr?o (solidariedade). A luta por reconhecimento ? a condi??o para que os conflitos sejam normativos. H? modelos de justi?a tais como: redistributivo; economicista, e de reconhecimento. Mas a pesquisa ? delimitada em torno da contribui??o do reconhecimento para o enfrentamento te?rico dos COIs e da integridade. Presume-se que a luta por reconhecimento constitui elemento fundamental para instanciar a investiga??o sobre COIs e integridade, articulando desta forma uma abordagem interdisciplinar (Filosofia e Sa?de). O t?tulo ? cont?m elementos que articulados de determinada maneira, indicam aquilo que tenciono discutir de maneira multidisciplinar nesta pesquisa: a investiga??o sobre as contribui??es da Teoria do Reconhecimento aplicada aos dilemas dos COIs e integridade. O cap?tulo 1. Conflito de interesses (COIs) em sa?de e integridade ? visa: (a) explicitar sobre COIs e integridade em n?vel das necessidades b?sicas dos cidad?os e a oposi??o de interesses entre atores privados e p?blicos para explicar a luta do cidad?o ? sustentabilidade de suas demandas; e (b) expor sobre COIs e integridade de forma interdisciplinar, ou seja, articulando transversalmente o ponto de vista filos?fico e das ci?ncias da sa?de para que os cidad?os possam ser reconhecidos. Os seguintes subcap?tulos integram a primeira parte: 1.1. Estrat?gia metodol?gica; 1.2. COIs e integridade: como s?o geridos; 1.3. Tipologia dos COIs e diversidade de pol?ticas, e 1.4. Bio?tica: sin?ptico panorama e reflex?es. O cap?tulo 2. A Teoria do Reconhecimento (TR) de Axel Honneth ? aborda a TR de Honneth, com foco nos seguintes subcap?tulos: 2.1. Conflitos sociais e normatividade; 2.2. Da autoconserva??o ao reconhecimento: redimensionamento normativo dos conflitos; 2.3. Padr?es normativos de reconhecimento, e 2.4. Nega??o dos padr?es normativos de reconhecimento. O cap?tulo 3. Aportes da TR de Honneth ? tese ? articula a TR de Honneth com elementos presentes nas ci?ncias da sa?de, visando desta forma, suscitar o debate e justificar a import?ncia de defender a aplica??o da TR de Honneth ao movimento de luta por direito a pol?ticas de qualidade para todos. Para tanto, fa?o inflex?o conceitual nos COIs, integridade e pol?ticas cient?ficas, e como saldo dessas inter-rela??es apresento algumas solu??es para os dilemas pesquisados, com foco nos seguintes subcap?tulos: 3.1. Pesquisas brasileiras que relacionam a TR de Honneth com a sa?de; 3.2. Integridade e COIs: dilemas fundamentais e estrat?gias preventivas, e 3.3. Conceitos de Honneth validados nesta pesquisa. Demais t?picos se referem ?s conclus?es e bibliografia.Submitted by PPG Filosofia (filosofia-pg@pucrs.br) on 2018-09-25T20:17:37Z No. of bitstreams: 1 TES_M?RCIA DE C?SSIA CASSIMIRO.pdf: 2463749 bytes, checksum: 385f8cdc256f0fbd00f0f9b9f4ee466b (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Sheila Dias (sheila.dias@pucrs.br) on 2018-09-27T12:04:42Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 TES_M?RCIA DE C?SSIA CASSIMIRO.pdf: 2463749 bytes, checksum: 385f8cdc256f0fbd00f0f9b9f4ee466b (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2018-09-27T12:11:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 TES_M?RCIA DE C?SSIA CASSIMIRO.pdf: 2463749 bytes, checksum: 385f8cdc256f0fbd00f0f9b9f4ee466b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-08-29application/pdfhttp://tede2.pucrs.br:80/tede2/retrieve/173268/TES_MARCIA_DE_CASSIA_CASSIMIRO_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpghttps://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/retrieve/188892/TES_MARCIA_DE_CASSIA_CASSIMIRO_COMPLETO.pdf.jpgporPontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do SulPrograma de P?s-Gradua??o em FilosofiaPUCRSBrasilEscola de HumanidadesAxel HonnethConflito de InteressesIntegridadePesquisa Cl?nica em Sa?deBio?ticaCIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIAConflito de interesses em pesquisa cl?nica e integridade : aportes ? luz da teoria do reconhecimento de Axel Honnethinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisTrabalho ser? publicado como artigo ou livro60 meses27/09/2023-8305327606432166393500500500-6557531471218110192-672352020940167053info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RSinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSORIGINALTES_MARCIA_DE_CASSIA_CASSIMIRO_COMPLETO.pdfTES_MARCIA_DE_CASSIA_CASSIMIRO_COMPLETO.pdfapplication/pdf1941191https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8295/5/TES_MARCIA_DE_CASSIA_CASSIMIRO_COMPLETO.pdf7a1ecef97fad9973a30962a2813b805cMD55THUMBNAILTES_MARCIA_DE_CASSIA_CASSIMIRO_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpgTES_MARCIA_DE_CASSIA_CASSIMIRO_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg4088https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8295/3/TES_MARCIA_DE_CASSIA_CASSIMIRO_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpg14bbc3d774f56d81bb43f14f3f3d7391MD53TES_MARCIA_DE_CASSIA_CASSIMIRO_COMPLETO.pdf.jpgTES_MARCIA_DE_CASSIA_CASSIMIRO_COMPLETO.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg5797https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8295/7/TES_MARCIA_DE_CASSIA_CASSIMIRO_COMPLETO.pdf.jpg60b45f7235687a1382ca6647e6b25664MD57TEXTTES_MARCIA_DE_CASSIA_CASSIMIRO_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.txtTES_MARCIA_DE_CASSIA_CASSIMIRO_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.txttext/plain2196https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8295/4/TES_MARCIA_DE_CASSIA_CASSIMIRO_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.txt93ad9e6b1964b3fbeefb7f5f193f904dMD54TES_MARCIA_DE_CASSIA_CASSIMIRO_COMPLETO.pdf.txtTES_MARCIA_DE_CASSIA_CASSIMIRO_COMPLETO.pdf.txttext/plain426679https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8295/6/TES_MARCIA_DE_CASSIA_CASSIMIRO_COMPLETO.pdf.txt2982a7c1c70d400e3b1b2e6e5d6f1953MD56LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8610https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8295/1/license.txt5a9d6006225b368ef605ba16b4f6d1beMD51tede/82952023-09-06 12:00:17.715oai:tede2.pucrs.br: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/PRIhttps://tede2.pucrs.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.central@pucrs.br||opendoar:2023-09-06T15:00:17Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Conflito de interesses em pesquisa cl?nica e integridade : aportes ? luz da teoria do reconhecimento de Axel Honneth |
title |
Conflito de interesses em pesquisa cl?nica e integridade : aportes ? luz da teoria do reconhecimento de Axel Honneth |
spellingShingle |
Conflito de interesses em pesquisa cl?nica e integridade : aportes ? luz da teoria do reconhecimento de Axel Honneth Cassimiro, M?rcia de C?ssia Axel Honneth Conflito de Interesses Integridade Pesquisa Cl?nica em Sa?de Bio?tica CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
title_short |
Conflito de interesses em pesquisa cl?nica e integridade : aportes ? luz da teoria do reconhecimento de Axel Honneth |
title_full |
Conflito de interesses em pesquisa cl?nica e integridade : aportes ? luz da teoria do reconhecimento de Axel Honneth |
title_fullStr |
Conflito de interesses em pesquisa cl?nica e integridade : aportes ? luz da teoria do reconhecimento de Axel Honneth |
title_full_unstemmed |
Conflito de interesses em pesquisa cl?nica e integridade : aportes ? luz da teoria do reconhecimento de Axel Honneth |
title_sort |
Conflito de interesses em pesquisa cl?nica e integridade : aportes ? luz da teoria do reconhecimento de Axel Honneth |
author |
Cassimiro, M?rcia de C?ssia |
author_facet |
Cassimiro, M?rcia de C?ssia |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Bavaresco, Agemir |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/6597683266934574 |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv |
Lima, Francisco Jozivan Guedes de |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/8231159547990641 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/3483646615781615 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cassimiro, M?rcia de C?ssia |
contributor_str_mv |
Bavaresco, Agemir Lima, Francisco Jozivan Guedes de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Axel Honneth Conflito de Interesses Integridade Pesquisa Cl?nica em Sa?de Bio?tica |
topic |
Axel Honneth Conflito de Interesses Integridade Pesquisa Cl?nica em Sa?de Bio?tica CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
description |
This thesis investigates, based on Axel Honneth's Theory of Recognition, Conflicts of Interest (COIs) and integrity in the process of emancipation and management of a diversity of borderline issues such as: disrespect (Mi?achtung) and violation (Verletzung) to the citizen, capable of provoking profound transformations and changes to society in the face of the peculiar characteristics of a concrete social reality of participatory democratic domain. Issues of integrity, disrespect for patients, research participants, society, and institutions are discussed; as well as issues related to injustice and dishonesty. COIs and misconduct provoke political, technical, ethical, and moral offenses when individuals are violated in nonrecognition dynamics. The three patterns (affective, juridical, solidarity) can result in: (i) psychic death in the first pattern of recognition (affective); (ii) social death in the second (legal) pattern; and (iii) social humiliation in the third pattern (solidarity). The struggle for recognition is the condition for conflicts to be normative. There are models of justice such as: redistributive; economicist, and of recognition. But the research is delimited around the contribution of recognition to the theoretical confrontation of COIs and integrity. It is presumed that the struggle for recognition is a fundamental element to instantiate research on COIs and integrity, thus articulating an interdisciplinary approach (Philosophy and Health). The title ? contains elements that articulated in a certain way, indicate what I intend to discuss in a multidisciplinary way in this research: the investigation into the contributions of the Theory of Recognition applied to the dilemmas of COIs and integrity. Chapter 1. Conflict of interests (COIs) in health and integrity ? aims to: (a) explain about COIs and integrity at the level of citizens' basic needs and the opposition of interests between private and public actors to explain the citizen's struggle for sustainability of your demands; and (b) expound on COIs and integrity in an interdisciplinary way, that is, transversely articulating the philosophical point of view and the health sciences so that citizens can be recognized. The following subchapters make up the first part: 1.1. Methodological strategy; 1.2. COIs and integrity: how they are managed; 1.3. COI typology and policy diversity, and 1.4. Bioethics: synoptic overview and reflections. Chapter 2. Axel Honneth's Theory of Recognition (RT) ? addresses Honneth's RT, focusing on the following subchapters: 2.1. Social conflicts and normativity; 2.2. From self-preservation to recognition: normative resizing of conflicts; 2.3. Normative recognition standards, and 2.4. Denial of normative standards of recognition. Chapter 3. Contributions of Honneth's TR to the thesis ? articulates Honneth's RT with elements present in the health sciences, thus aiming to raise debate and justify the importance of defending the application of Honneth's RT to the movement fighting for right to quality policies for all. To do so, I make a conceptual inflection on COIs, integrity and scientific policies, and as a result of these interrelationships, I present some solutions for the researched dilemmas, focusing on the following subchapters: 3.1. Brazilian research relating Honneth's RT with health; 3.2. Integrity and COIs: fundamental dilemmas and preventive strategies, and 3.3. Honneth's concepts validated in this research. Other topics refer to conclusions and bibliography. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2018-09-27T12:11:57Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2018-08-29 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8295 |
url |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8295 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
-8305327606432166393 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
500 500 500 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
-6557531471218110192 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
-672352020940167053 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Filosofia |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
PUCRS |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Humanidades |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8295/5/TES_MARCIA_DE_CASSIA_CASSIMIRO_COMPLETO.pdf https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8295/3/TES_MARCIA_DE_CASSIA_CASSIMIRO_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.jpg https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8295/7/TES_MARCIA_DE_CASSIA_CASSIMIRO_COMPLETO.pdf.jpg https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8295/4/TES_MARCIA_DE_CASSIA_CASSIMIRO_CONFIDENCIAL.pdf.txt https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8295/6/TES_MARCIA_DE_CASSIA_CASSIMIRO_COMPLETO.pdf.txt https://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8295/1/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
7a1ecef97fad9973a30962a2813b805c 14bbc3d774f56d81bb43f14f3f3d7391 60b45f7235687a1382ca6647e6b25664 93ad9e6b1964b3fbeefb7f5f193f904d 2982a7c1c70d400e3b1b2e6e5d6f1953 5a9d6006225b368ef605ba16b4f6d1be |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.central@pucrs.br|| |
_version_ |
1796793235583008768 |