Clarice Lispector e ditadura militar:representação e subjetividade num contexto de censura

• Ano de defesa: 2015
• Autor(a) principal: Sander, Isabella Smith
• Orientador(a): Ramos, Roberto José
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação Social
• Departamento: Faculdade de Comunicação Social
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: COMUNICAÇÃO; LISPECTOR, CLARICE - CRÍTICA E INTERPRETAÇÃO; JORNALISMO; SEMIOLOGIA; CRÔNICAS BRASILEIRAS
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::COMUNICACAO
• Link de acesso: http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/6149

longo do caminho transdisciplinar.Those who think about what was written in periodicals, during the military regime in Brazil, soon will remember the alternative newspapers that exposed the problems of that period, in opposition to the mainstream media, that kept quiet. However, obviously, the journalistic scenario was not composed exclusively by these two opposites: the impact of the historical situation was perceived in different levels at all journalism sectors, even in mainstream media. This work came with the purpose to analyze in which ways this historical period is represented in Clarice Lispector’s publications in Jornal do Brasil, a high circulation newspaper at the period. The chronicles analyzed were: Daqui a vinte e cinco anos, published in September 16, 1967; Dos palavrões no teatro, published in October 7, 1967; Carta ao Ministro da Educação, published in February 17, 1968; Medo da libertação and Esboço do sonho do líder, both published in May 31, 1969. The concepts analyzed in the chosen texts are the Chronicle, under the optics of the journalist José Marques de Melo, and the Stereotype, the Culture, the Power and the Sociolect, based in the conceptions of the semiotician Roland Barthes. The Chronicle will be analyzed as an Opinative Gender of newspapers, with a structure composed by hypotesis/conclusion, which has the intention to transmit thoughts regarding facts, ideas and sensations. The Stereotype will be considered a language necrosis, once that it is composed by words that, the more are repeated, the more they lose their deepest sense. The Power, in this research, will be connected to any speech, even when it comes from outside the official power. It is concepted as the Libido dominante, or pleasurable energy, that is in the human being and appears present in all people’s actions. The Culture, here, will be influenced by society in all senses: will be all ways of spoke, seen or written communication. It’s about the set of influences of the author, the so-called intertext. About the Sociolect, it will be considered as the idiomatic social language. It won’t be divided by geographical specifications, but by the construction of professional and social ghettos, for example. The Sociolect is divided in two segments: the speeches within the power, or encratics, and the ones outside the power, or acratics. One can become the other and, when that occurs, automatically takes features of that type of language. Considering that the analyzed writer exposes criticism about the military actions, the subtype verified here will be the acratic. The research executed will be qualitative, through a semiotic analysis, using Roland Barthes’ concepts. The french’s semiologist seeks to reconstitute the operation of language’s signification systems, building a simulacrum to the observed objects. Based in the principle of pertinence, a point of view will be chosen and the other possible ones will be excluded, in order to delimitate the corpus. The method used will be Edgar Morin’s Paradigm of Complexity, that seeks to articulate different areas of knowledge, promoting Transdisciplinarity. To achieve that, seven principles were created by the author, willing to guide the researcher in the transdisciplinary path.