As a??es repetitivas no direito brasileiro e a proposta de um incidente de resolu??o de demandas repetitivas no projeto de lei n? 8.046/2010

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2012
Autor(a) principal: Viafore, Daniele lattes
Orientador(a): Tesheiner, Jos? Maria Rosa lattes
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Direito
Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
País: BR
Palavras-chave em Português:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/4196
Resumo: This work analyses the repetitive actions in brazilian law and a proposal of an incident of repetitive demands resolution, provided for the articles 930 to 941 of the new Civil Procedure Code Law project 8.046/2010, currently under discussion at the Chamber of Deputies. The economy of scale and speed of the commercial transactions through modern communications means made at the judiciary numbers high level of identical individual process. The lawsuit has suffered changes both quantitative, and qualitative. Forensic practice has detected real violations to the principle of due process in the treatment of repetitive actions, once the judiciary has proved inefficient for provide the judicial protection of effective form. Considering the majority of actions brought to the judiciary are repetitive, in which are discussion of questions of identical rights, so several procedural reforms and mechanisms of filters in order to reduce the volume of processes and resources, give speed in its processing and avoid the development of processes that have already been thoroughly valued by the Judiciary. However, it appears that the procedural reforms have not been sufficient to counteract the gloom. So, the Federal Senate opted for preparation of a new Code of Civil Procedure. With this intention and aiming to confer greater rationality judicial and reconcile vertically judicial decisions, it is proposed an incident resolution demand of repetitive. The proposal is to establish decision-paradigm with content of standard general and abstract spanning identical question of rights, whose implementation by judicial bodies competent is compulsory. The society is anxious for a procedural system that guarantees justice with efficiency and speed. In the current situation experienced by the Judiciary, the proposal of an incident of resolution of repetitive demands seems to be an instrument to print more uniformity and better rationality in judicial activity. The jurisdiction will not make it possible for the maintenance of different solutions to similar cases, which foster increased delay procedural and legal uncertainty. However, observing the extraprocedural factors that also contribute to the delay in the solution of legal disputes, such initiative can be taken as a contribution to the improvement in the performance of the judicial sector
id P_RS_6cf426f2645d61aaf4dee69743787972
oai_identifier_str oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/4196
network_acronym_str P_RS
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
repository_id_str
spelling Tesheiner, Jos? Maria RosaCPF:00148431020http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4703605P4CPF:00111133084http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4220456U5Viafore, Daniele2015-04-14T14:33:54Z2012-11-292012-08-27VIAFORE, Daniele. As a??es repetitivas no direito brasileiro e a proposta de um incidente de resolu??o de demandas repetitivas no projeto de lei n? 8.046/2010. 2012. 39 f. Disserta??o (Mestrado em Direito) - Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2012.http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/4196This work analyses the repetitive actions in brazilian law and a proposal of an incident of repetitive demands resolution, provided for the articles 930 to 941 of the new Civil Procedure Code Law project 8.046/2010, currently under discussion at the Chamber of Deputies. The economy of scale and speed of the commercial transactions through modern communications means made at the judiciary numbers high level of identical individual process. The lawsuit has suffered changes both quantitative, and qualitative. Forensic practice has detected real violations to the principle of due process in the treatment of repetitive actions, once the judiciary has proved inefficient for provide the judicial protection of effective form. Considering the majority of actions brought to the judiciary are repetitive, in which are discussion of questions of identical rights, so several procedural reforms and mechanisms of filters in order to reduce the volume of processes and resources, give speed in its processing and avoid the development of processes that have already been thoroughly valued by the Judiciary. However, it appears that the procedural reforms have not been sufficient to counteract the gloom. So, the Federal Senate opted for preparation of a new Code of Civil Procedure. With this intention and aiming to confer greater rationality judicial and reconcile vertically judicial decisions, it is proposed an incident resolution demand of repetitive. The proposal is to establish decision-paradigm with content of standard general and abstract spanning identical question of rights, whose implementation by judicial bodies competent is compulsory. The society is anxious for a procedural system that guarantees justice with efficiency and speed. In the current situation experienced by the Judiciary, the proposal of an incident of resolution of repetitive demands seems to be an instrument to print more uniformity and better rationality in judicial activity. The jurisdiction will not make it possible for the maintenance of different solutions to similar cases, which foster increased delay procedural and legal uncertainty. However, observing the extraprocedural factors that also contribute to the delay in the solution of legal disputes, such initiative can be taken as a contribution to the improvement in the performance of the judicial sectorEste trabalho tem por finalidade analisar as a??es repetitivas no Direito brasileiro e a proposta de um incidente de resolu??o de demandas repetitivas, prevista nos artigos 930 a 941 do Projeto de novo C?digo de Processo Civil - Projeto de Lei n? 8.046/2010, atualmente em tr?mite na C?mara dos Deputados. A economia de escala e a velocidade das transa??es comerciais, atrav?s dos meios de comunica??o modernos, produziram no Judici?rio n?meros elevados de lides individuais id?nticas. Os lit?gios sofreram mudan?as tanto quantitativas, quanto qualitativas. A pr?tica forense tem detectado verdadeiras viola??es ao princ?pio do devido processo legal no tratamento das a??es repetitivas, uma vez que o aparato judicial tem se revelado ineficiente para prestar a tutela jurisdicional de forma efetiva. Considerando-se que a maioria das a??es trazidas ao Judici?rio s?o repetitivas, em que se discutem quest?es de direito id?nticas, surgem, assim, diversas reformas processuais e mecanismos de filtros a fim de reduzir o volume de processos e recursos, conferir celeridade no seu processamento e evitar o desenvolvimento de processos que j? tenham sido, de forma exaustiva, apreciados pelo Judici?rio. Contudo, verifica-se que as reformas processuais n?o t?m sido suficientes para combater a morosidade. A par disso, o Senado Federal optou pela elabora??o de um novo C?digo de Processo Civil. Neste intento, visando conferir maior racionalidade judici?ria e compatibilizar verticalmente as decis?es judiciais, prop?e-se um incidente de resolu??o de demandas repetitivas. A proposta consiste em estabelecer decis?o-paradigma com conte?do de norma geral e abstrata abarcando id?ntica quest?o de direito, cuja aplica??o pelos ?rg?os judici?rios competentes revela-se compuls?ria. A sociedade anseia por um sistema processual que garanta a justi?a com efici?ncia e celeridade. Na atual conjuntura experimentada pelo Poder Judici?rio, a proposta de um incidente de resolu??o de demandas repetitivas parece constituir s?rio instrumento para imprimir maior uniformidade e melhor racionalidade na atividade jurisdicional. A jurisdi??o n?o se viabiliza pela manuten??o de solu??es diferentes para casos id?nticos, as quais ensejam maior delonga processual e inseguran?a jur?dica. Entretanto, atentando-se aos fatores extraprocessuais, que tamb?m contribuem para a demora na solu??o dos lit?gios judiciais, tal iniciativa pode ser tida como uma contribui??o para a melhoria do desempenho do setor judici?rioMade available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T14:33:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 444153.pdf: 563731 bytes, checksum: 98a413bcacd87e64f02f970742bf64de (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-08-27application/pdfhttp://tede2.pucrs.br:80/tede2/retrieve/14481/444153.pdf.jpgporPontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do SulPrograma de P?s-Gradua??o em DireitoPUCRSBRFaculdade de DireitoDIREITOC?DIGO DE PROCESSO CIVILPODER JUDICI?RIOCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOAs a??es repetitivas no direito brasileiro e a proposta de um incidente de resolu??o de demandas repetitivas no projeto de lei n? 8.046/2010info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis-10466298559371193025006002194221341323903125info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RSinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSTHUMBNAIL444153.pdf.jpg444153.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg3431http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/4196/3/444153.pdf.jpg97ca07fad250c612bcbcab842e5ff1a8MD53TEXT444153.pdf.txt444153.pdf.txttext/plain89304http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/4196/2/444153.pdf.txte9b42ddf1e5d21126fe6a2196318fc7eMD52ORIGINAL444153.pdfapplication/pdf563731http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/4196/1/444153.pdf98a413bcacd87e64f02f970742bf64deMD51tede/41962015-04-29 17:10:46.647oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/4196Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/PRIhttps://tede2.pucrs.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.central@pucrs.br||opendoar:2015-04-29T20:10:46Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv As a??es repetitivas no direito brasileiro e a proposta de um incidente de resolu??o de demandas repetitivas no projeto de lei n? 8.046/2010
title As a??es repetitivas no direito brasileiro e a proposta de um incidente de resolu??o de demandas repetitivas no projeto de lei n? 8.046/2010
spellingShingle As a??es repetitivas no direito brasileiro e a proposta de um incidente de resolu??o de demandas repetitivas no projeto de lei n? 8.046/2010
Viafore, Daniele
DIREITO
C?DIGO DE PROCESSO CIVIL
PODER JUDICI?RIO
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
title_short As a??es repetitivas no direito brasileiro e a proposta de um incidente de resolu??o de demandas repetitivas no projeto de lei n? 8.046/2010
title_full As a??es repetitivas no direito brasileiro e a proposta de um incidente de resolu??o de demandas repetitivas no projeto de lei n? 8.046/2010
title_fullStr As a??es repetitivas no direito brasileiro e a proposta de um incidente de resolu??o de demandas repetitivas no projeto de lei n? 8.046/2010
title_full_unstemmed As a??es repetitivas no direito brasileiro e a proposta de um incidente de resolu??o de demandas repetitivas no projeto de lei n? 8.046/2010
title_sort As a??es repetitivas no direito brasileiro e a proposta de um incidente de resolu??o de demandas repetitivas no projeto de lei n? 8.046/2010
author Viafore, Daniele
author_facet Viafore, Daniele
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Tesheiner, Jos? Maria Rosa
dc.contributor.advisor1ID.fl_str_mv CPF:00148431020
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4703605P4
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv CPF:00111133084
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4220456U5
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Viafore, Daniele
contributor_str_mv Tesheiner, Jos? Maria Rosa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv DIREITO
C?DIGO DE PROCESSO CIVIL
PODER JUDICI?RIO
topic DIREITO
C?DIGO DE PROCESSO CIVIL
PODER JUDICI?RIO
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
description This work analyses the repetitive actions in brazilian law and a proposal of an incident of repetitive demands resolution, provided for the articles 930 to 941 of the new Civil Procedure Code Law project 8.046/2010, currently under discussion at the Chamber of Deputies. The economy of scale and speed of the commercial transactions through modern communications means made at the judiciary numbers high level of identical individual process. The lawsuit has suffered changes both quantitative, and qualitative. Forensic practice has detected real violations to the principle of due process in the treatment of repetitive actions, once the judiciary has proved inefficient for provide the judicial protection of effective form. Considering the majority of actions brought to the judiciary are repetitive, in which are discussion of questions of identical rights, so several procedural reforms and mechanisms of filters in order to reduce the volume of processes and resources, give speed in its processing and avoid the development of processes that have already been thoroughly valued by the Judiciary. However, it appears that the procedural reforms have not been sufficient to counteract the gloom. So, the Federal Senate opted for preparation of a new Code of Civil Procedure. With this intention and aiming to confer greater rationality judicial and reconcile vertically judicial decisions, it is proposed an incident resolution demand of repetitive. The proposal is to establish decision-paradigm with content of standard general and abstract spanning identical question of rights, whose implementation by judicial bodies competent is compulsory. The society is anxious for a procedural system that guarantees justice with efficiency and speed. In the current situation experienced by the Judiciary, the proposal of an incident of resolution of repetitive demands seems to be an instrument to print more uniformity and better rationality in judicial activity. The jurisdiction will not make it possible for the maintenance of different solutions to similar cases, which foster increased delay procedural and legal uncertainty. However, observing the extraprocedural factors that also contribute to the delay in the solution of legal disputes, such initiative can be taken as a contribution to the improvement in the performance of the judicial sector
publishDate 2012
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2012-11-29
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2012-08-27
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2015-04-14T14:33:54Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv VIAFORE, Daniele. As a??es repetitivas no direito brasileiro e a proposta de um incidente de resolu??o de demandas repetitivas no projeto de lei n? 8.046/2010. 2012. 39 f. Disserta??o (Mestrado em Direito) - Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2012.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/4196
identifier_str_mv VIAFORE, Daniele. As a??es repetitivas no direito brasileiro e a proposta de um incidente de resolu??o de demandas repetitivas no projeto de lei n? 8.046/2010. 2012. 39 f. Disserta??o (Mestrado em Direito) - Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2012.
url http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/4196
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv -1046629855937119302
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 500
600
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv 2194221341323903125
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Direito
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv PUCRS
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Direito
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/4196/3/444153.pdf.jpg
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/4196/2/444153.pdf.txt
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/4196/1/444153.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 97ca07fad250c612bcbcab842e5ff1a8
e9b42ddf1e5d21126fe6a2196318fc7e
98a413bcacd87e64f02f970742bf64de
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.central@pucrs.br||
_version_ 1796793201284087808