Processo civil coletivo : em busca de uma teoria geral
Ano de defesa: | 2012 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Direito
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Área do conhecimento CNPq: | |
Link de acesso: | http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/4195 |
Resumo: | This study is focused on the research guidance of jurisdiction, instrumentality, and effectiveness of civil procedure and concentrated on the civil procedure and general theory of jurisdiction and procedure area. This work intends to demonstrate the necessity of creating a general theory for the Brazilian collective civil procedure, since the Brazilian procedure science developed in view of purely individual conflicts is outdated. The process, which should be the hub of any methodological procedural theory, should be inserted in the panorama of the Brazilian social massification of legal relations, only then it can aspire to a sustainable justice of the decisions (ethical, economic, social, environmental, legalpolitical), which can be understood as the dinamic realization - progressive (not static) - of the fundamental rights contained in the legal system. From the perspective that the state should concern itself with the new interests claimed by the jurisdictioned, the dogmatic scenario of the liberal state, eminently concerned with the way in the strict sense, should be rethought. Changes to pre-misunderstandings and procedural formulas out of step with contemporary must happen for massified interests receive proper legal protection. In this perspective, the reformulation of principles such as the access to justice is of great importance. The idea of access to purely formal justice must transcend to the idea of access to the material justice. The brazilian legislature, throughout history, well tried to adjust the process to the material interests eminently collective and accidentally collective, taking advantage of different encodings, but the law s applier distorted the procedural institutes to the misconcepted idea of subjectivity of any law. The objective law (law in itself), which can be understood as the set of legal rules governing the power to act (subjective law) or set of rules that do not give anyone the subjective law, can also be protected legally. When it intends to defend diffuse interests through a lawsuit, it is seeking the application (eventual creation) of the objective law, since any pretense of protection of subjective law is absent. It is essential, therefore, the reinterpretation of traditional legal assumptions disposed in the Brazilian legal system, from the evolution of the methodological phases of the process and juridical concepts, including: jurisdiction, principles, legitimacy, res judicata, third party intervention, procedure, litigation costs, resources, lis pendens, continence, connection, competence, evidence etc. We should not forget that this improvement pass, mainly, by the study of the development of procedural mechanisms that served as inspiration for the creation of the Brazilian collective procedural law (U.S. class action). And, when one realizes that, as a rule, the procedural institutes that constitute the general theory of individual civil procedure cannot simply be transported to the collective procedure, the requirement of a general theory for the collective procedure, with proper elements of composition, is imposed. |
id |
P_RS_c022602195433487f859d5c96468a1da |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/4195 |
network_acronym_str |
P_RS |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Facchini Neto, Eug?nioCPF:30693195053CPF:00721714056http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4406450Y8Mandelli, Alexandre Grandi2015-04-14T14:33:54Z2012-09-172012-08-30MANDELLI, Alexandre Grandi. Processo civil coletivo : em busca de uma teoria geral. 2012. 37 f. Disserta??o (Mestrado em Direito) - Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2012.http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/4195This study is focused on the research guidance of jurisdiction, instrumentality, and effectiveness of civil procedure and concentrated on the civil procedure and general theory of jurisdiction and procedure area. This work intends to demonstrate the necessity of creating a general theory for the Brazilian collective civil procedure, since the Brazilian procedure science developed in view of purely individual conflicts is outdated. The process, which should be the hub of any methodological procedural theory, should be inserted in the panorama of the Brazilian social massification of legal relations, only then it can aspire to a sustainable justice of the decisions (ethical, economic, social, environmental, legalpolitical), which can be understood as the dinamic realization - progressive (not static) - of the fundamental rights contained in the legal system. From the perspective that the state should concern itself with the new interests claimed by the jurisdictioned, the dogmatic scenario of the liberal state, eminently concerned with the way in the strict sense, should be rethought. Changes to pre-misunderstandings and procedural formulas out of step with contemporary must happen for massified interests receive proper legal protection. In this perspective, the reformulation of principles such as the access to justice is of great importance. The idea of access to purely formal justice must transcend to the idea of access to the material justice. The brazilian legislature, throughout history, well tried to adjust the process to the material interests eminently collective and accidentally collective, taking advantage of different encodings, but the law s applier distorted the procedural institutes to the misconcepted idea of subjectivity of any law. The objective law (law in itself), which can be understood as the set of legal rules governing the power to act (subjective law) or set of rules that do not give anyone the subjective law, can also be protected legally. When it intends to defend diffuse interests through a lawsuit, it is seeking the application (eventual creation) of the objective law, since any pretense of protection of subjective law is absent. It is essential, therefore, the reinterpretation of traditional legal assumptions disposed in the Brazilian legal system, from the evolution of the methodological phases of the process and juridical concepts, including: jurisdiction, principles, legitimacy, res judicata, third party intervention, procedure, litigation costs, resources, lis pendens, continence, connection, competence, evidence etc. We should not forget that this improvement pass, mainly, by the study of the development of procedural mechanisms that served as inspiration for the creation of the Brazilian collective procedural law (U.S. class action). And, when one realizes that, as a rule, the procedural institutes that constitute the general theory of individual civil procedure cannot simply be transported to the collective procedure, the requirement of a general theory for the collective procedure, with proper elements of composition, is imposed.O presente estudo ? focado na linha de pesquisa da jurisdi??o, instrumentalidade e efetividade do processo civil e na ?rea de concentra??o do direito processual civil e teoria geral da jurisdi??o e processo. O trabalho pretende demonstrar a necessidade de cria??o de uma teoria geral para o processo civil coletivo brasileiro, visto que a ci?ncia processual brasileira desenvolvida em vista de conflitos puramente individuais est? defasada. O processo, que deve ser o polo metodol?gico de qualquer teoria processual, deve inserir-se no panorama brasileiro social da massifica??o das rela??es jur?dicas. S? assim se poder? aspirar a uma justi?a sustent?vel das decis?es (?tica, econ?mica, social, ambiental, jur?dicopol?tica), que pode ser entendida como realiza??o din?mica - progressista (n?o est?tica) - dos direitos fundamentais presentes no ordenamento jur?dico. A partir da perspectiva de que o Estado deve preocupar-se com os novos interesses reclamados pelos jurisdicionados, aquele cen?rio dogm?tico do Estado liberal, preocupado eminentemente com a forma em sentido estrito, deve ser repensado. Mudan?as de pr?-compreens?es equivocadas e de f?rmulas processuais descompassadas com a hodiernidade devem acontecer para que interesses massificados recebam a devida tutela jurisdicional. Nesta perspectiva, a reformula??o de princ?pios como o do acesso ? justi?a ? de suma import?ncia. A ideia de acesso ? justi?a puramente formal deve transcender para a ideia de acesso ? justi?a material. O legislador brasileiro, ao longo da hist?ria, bem tentou adequar o processo aos interesses materiais eminentemente coletivos e acidentalmente coletivos, valendo-se de diversas codifica??es, por?m o aplicador do direito desvirtuou os institutos processuais ? ideia equivocada de subjetivar todo e qualquer direito. O direito objetivo (direito em si), que pode ser entendido como o conjunto de normas jur?dicas que regulam o poder de agir (direito subjetivo) ou o conjunto de normas que n?o atribuem a ningu?m direito subjetivo, tamb?m pode ser tutelado juridicamente. Quando se pretende tutelar interesses difusos por meio de uma demanda judicial, se est? a buscar a aplica??o (eventual cria??o) do direito objetivo, visto que ausente qualquer pretens?o de tutela de direitos subjetivos. Imprescind?vel, portanto, a releitura, a partir da evolu??o das fases metodol?gicas do processo e dos conceitos jur?dicos, de pressupostos jur?dicos tradicionais dispostos no ordenamento jur?dico brasileiro, dentre eles: jurisdi??o, princ?pios, legitimidade, coisa julgada, interven??o de terceiros, procedimento, despesas processuais, recursos, litispend?ncia, contin?ncia, conex?o, compet?ncia, provas etc. N?o se pode olvidar que esse aprimoramento passa, sobretudo, pelo estudo do desenvolvimento dos mecanismos processuais que serviram de inspira??o para a cria??o da legisla??o processual coletiva brasileira (class action estadunidenses). E, com a constata??o de que, via de regra, os institutos processuais que constituem a teoria geral do processo civil individual n?o podem ser simplesmente transportados para o processo coletivo, a exig?ncia de uma teoria geral para o processo coletivo, com elementos pr?prios de composi??o, se imp?e.Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T14:33:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 441539.pdf: 161940 bytes, checksum: 496ab72d3edc9409a5b448ce61648f2d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-08-30application/pdfhttp://tede2.pucrs.br:80/tede2/retrieve/14461/441539.pdf.jpgporPontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do SulPrograma de P?s-Gradua??o em DireitoPUCRSBRFaculdade de DireitoDIREITOACESSO ? JUSTI?ADIREITO PROCESSUAL CIVILPROCESSO COLETIVOINTERESSES DIFUSOS (DIREITO)CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOProcesso civil coletivo : em busca de uma teoria geralinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis-10466298559371193025006002194221341323903125info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RSinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSTHUMBNAIL441539.pdf.jpg441539.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg3270http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/4195/3/441539.pdf.jpg917ca3082440b37b3d88c0c1305db41dMD53TEXT441539.pdf.txt441539.pdf.txttext/plain67107http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/4195/2/441539.pdf.txt8df814238df8acc3f553dd10fa502432MD52ORIGINAL441539.pdfapplication/pdf161940http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/4195/1/441539.pdf496ab72d3edc9409a5b448ce61648f2dMD51tede/41952015-04-17 15:47:49.577oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/4195Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/PRIhttps://tede2.pucrs.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.central@pucrs.br||opendoar:2015-04-17T18:47:49Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Processo civil coletivo : em busca de uma teoria geral |
title |
Processo civil coletivo : em busca de uma teoria geral |
spellingShingle |
Processo civil coletivo : em busca de uma teoria geral Mandelli, Alexandre Grandi DIREITO ACESSO ? JUSTI?A DIREITO PROCESSUAL CIVIL PROCESSO COLETIVO INTERESSES DIFUSOS (DIREITO) CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
title_short |
Processo civil coletivo : em busca de uma teoria geral |
title_full |
Processo civil coletivo : em busca de uma teoria geral |
title_fullStr |
Processo civil coletivo : em busca de uma teoria geral |
title_full_unstemmed |
Processo civil coletivo : em busca de uma teoria geral |
title_sort |
Processo civil coletivo : em busca de uma teoria geral |
author |
Mandelli, Alexandre Grandi |
author_facet |
Mandelli, Alexandre Grandi |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Facchini Neto, Eug?nio |
dc.contributor.advisor1ID.fl_str_mv |
CPF:30693195053 |
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv |
CPF:00721714056 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4406450Y8 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mandelli, Alexandre Grandi |
contributor_str_mv |
Facchini Neto, Eug?nio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
DIREITO ACESSO ? JUSTI?A DIREITO PROCESSUAL CIVIL PROCESSO COLETIVO INTERESSES DIFUSOS (DIREITO) |
topic |
DIREITO ACESSO ? JUSTI?A DIREITO PROCESSUAL CIVIL PROCESSO COLETIVO INTERESSES DIFUSOS (DIREITO) CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
description |
This study is focused on the research guidance of jurisdiction, instrumentality, and effectiveness of civil procedure and concentrated on the civil procedure and general theory of jurisdiction and procedure area. This work intends to demonstrate the necessity of creating a general theory for the Brazilian collective civil procedure, since the Brazilian procedure science developed in view of purely individual conflicts is outdated. The process, which should be the hub of any methodological procedural theory, should be inserted in the panorama of the Brazilian social massification of legal relations, only then it can aspire to a sustainable justice of the decisions (ethical, economic, social, environmental, legalpolitical), which can be understood as the dinamic realization - progressive (not static) - of the fundamental rights contained in the legal system. From the perspective that the state should concern itself with the new interests claimed by the jurisdictioned, the dogmatic scenario of the liberal state, eminently concerned with the way in the strict sense, should be rethought. Changes to pre-misunderstandings and procedural formulas out of step with contemporary must happen for massified interests receive proper legal protection. In this perspective, the reformulation of principles such as the access to justice is of great importance. The idea of access to purely formal justice must transcend to the idea of access to the material justice. The brazilian legislature, throughout history, well tried to adjust the process to the material interests eminently collective and accidentally collective, taking advantage of different encodings, but the law s applier distorted the procedural institutes to the misconcepted idea of subjectivity of any law. The objective law (law in itself), which can be understood as the set of legal rules governing the power to act (subjective law) or set of rules that do not give anyone the subjective law, can also be protected legally. When it intends to defend diffuse interests through a lawsuit, it is seeking the application (eventual creation) of the objective law, since any pretense of protection of subjective law is absent. It is essential, therefore, the reinterpretation of traditional legal assumptions disposed in the Brazilian legal system, from the evolution of the methodological phases of the process and juridical concepts, including: jurisdiction, principles, legitimacy, res judicata, third party intervention, procedure, litigation costs, resources, lis pendens, continence, connection, competence, evidence etc. We should not forget that this improvement pass, mainly, by the study of the development of procedural mechanisms that served as inspiration for the creation of the Brazilian collective procedural law (U.S. class action). And, when one realizes that, as a rule, the procedural institutes that constitute the general theory of individual civil procedure cannot simply be transported to the collective procedure, the requirement of a general theory for the collective procedure, with proper elements of composition, is imposed. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2012-09-17 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2012-08-30 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2015-04-14T14:33:54Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
MANDELLI, Alexandre Grandi. Processo civil coletivo : em busca de uma teoria geral. 2012. 37 f. Disserta??o (Mestrado em Direito) - Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2012. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/4195 |
identifier_str_mv |
MANDELLI, Alexandre Grandi. Processo civil coletivo : em busca de uma teoria geral. 2012. 37 f. Disserta??o (Mestrado em Direito) - Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2012. |
url |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/4195 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
-1046629855937119302 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
500 600 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
2194221341323903125 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Direito |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
PUCRS |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
BR |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/4195/3/441539.pdf.jpg http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/4195/2/441539.pdf.txt http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/4195/1/441539.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
917ca3082440b37b3d88c0c1305db41d 8df814238df8acc3f553dd10fa502432 496ab72d3edc9409a5b448ce61648f2d |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.central@pucrs.br|| |
_version_ |
1796793201279893504 |