Processos de constru??o autom?tica de tesauro

• Ano de defesa: 2011
• Autor(a) principal: Granada, Roger Leitzke
• Orientador(a): Lima, Vera L?cia Strube de
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncia da Computa??o
• Departamento: Faculdade de Inform?ca
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: INFORM?TICA; TESAUROS - ELABORA??O; INDEXA??O DE ASSUNTOS
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS EXATAS E DA TERRA::CIENCIA DA COMPUTACAO
• Link de acesso: http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/5158

The advances in technology have made the amount of information available in digital format increase rapidly. This increase reflects on the importance of efficient systems to Information Retrieval (IR), getting the right information when it's requested by users. Thesauri can be associated with IR systems, allowing the system to query not only by the key term, but also by related terms, obtaining related documents that were not retrieved. The manual construction, long and costly process that gave rise to the first thesaurus, shall be performed automatically, using different methods and processes available today. With this motivation, this dissertation proposes to study three cases of automatic thesauri construction. One method uses statistical techniques to identify the best related terms. Another method uses syntactic knowledge, being necessary to extract, besides the grammatical categories of each term, the relations that a verb have with its subject or object. The latter method makes use of syntactic knowledge and semantic knowledge of the terms, identifying non apparent relations. For this, this latter method uses an adaptation of the Latent Semantic Analysis technique. We developed three methods for automatic thesaurus construction using documents from the field of data privacy. The results were applied to an IR system, allowing the evaluation by domain experts. In conclusion, we observed that, in certain cases, it's better to apply techniques that do not use semantic knowledge of the terms, obtaining better results with methods that use only the syntactic knowledge of them.