A busca por um marco processual da internet : requisitos para colheita dos dados armazenados em compartimentos eletr?nicos

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2018
Autor(a) principal: Costa Jr., Ivan Jezler lattes
Orientador(a): Lopes Junior, Aury Celso Lima lattes
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncias Criminais
Departamento: Escola de Direito
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8209
Resumo: This paper analyzes the Civil Internet Framework in the context of the right to evidence in criminal proceedings. From the new technological resources of investigation energized by electronic compartments and by the Internet, the main legislative vacuums were pointed out in the orientation of these means of proof. There are no strong guiding rules, which contributed to a jurisprudential oscillation, with arbitrariness and decisionism in judicial decisions analyzed. In the pursuit of an absolute and anticipated truth, the trivialization of the hidden means of investigation had been demonstrated, even directly, when a public audience had been witnessed and concluded, which pursued the insertion of back door in applications with rigid encryption to propitiate the collection of communications stored in these telematic vehicles. The criminal prosecution organs questioned on this solemnity still supported the suppression of the rules of international cooperation for the collection of electronic data abroad. The distinction between interception and capture of conversations had still been drawn in a watertight manner. The general objective of the research is to analyze if the Civil Framework of the Internet presents itself as sufficient to regulate the capture of telematic data stored in electronic compartments. For that, a critical and multidisciplinary analysis of the themes was done, based on the consultation of scientific works and journalistic publications, and the documentary research was used to demonstrate the need to face the theme and the practical relevance of the theme, as attested by the analysis of the decisions of the Superior Courts and manifestations of other procedural subjects. As a result, the necessity of a proper legal regime for the search of digital data stored in electronic compartments was evidenced. The devices that regulate orthodox search and seizure do not have the ability to maintain the integrity and sameness of content volatile, tangible, and easily deteriorated. At the same time, in the wake of what had been commented on the ontological distinction between interception and informational search, the rule of Law no. 9,296, dated July 24, 1996, can not preserve the specificities of the collection of stored content. In this step, the application of the extensive and privileged interpretation, a taxation with protection in a constitutional hermeneutic, had been removed. It is concluded that the Civilian Internet Framework did not provide, with requirements and assumptions, the blind spot mentioned. There are no clear rules as to legitimacy, competence, reasoning and timing. This void provided the analysis of decisions of the first degree to the Federal Supreme Court, which evidenced the legal insecurity built by a non-existent or deficient legislation.
id P_RS_f7319e1167a4ceb03d068205caa37919
oai_identifier_str oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/8209
network_acronym_str P_RS
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
repository_id_str
spelling Lopes Junior, Aury Celso Limahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4629371641091359http://lattes.cnpq.br/0136206458490576Costa Jr., Ivan Jezler2018-07-16T13:27:26Z2018-03-22http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8209This paper analyzes the Civil Internet Framework in the context of the right to evidence in criminal proceedings. From the new technological resources of investigation energized by electronic compartments and by the Internet, the main legislative vacuums were pointed out in the orientation of these means of proof. There are no strong guiding rules, which contributed to a jurisprudential oscillation, with arbitrariness and decisionism in judicial decisions analyzed. In the pursuit of an absolute and anticipated truth, the trivialization of the hidden means of investigation had been demonstrated, even directly, when a public audience had been witnessed and concluded, which pursued the insertion of back door in applications with rigid encryption to propitiate the collection of communications stored in these telematic vehicles. The criminal prosecution organs questioned on this solemnity still supported the suppression of the rules of international cooperation for the collection of electronic data abroad. The distinction between interception and capture of conversations had still been drawn in a watertight manner. The general objective of the research is to analyze if the Civil Framework of the Internet presents itself as sufficient to regulate the capture of telematic data stored in electronic compartments. For that, a critical and multidisciplinary analysis of the themes was done, based on the consultation of scientific works and journalistic publications, and the documentary research was used to demonstrate the need to face the theme and the practical relevance of the theme, as attested by the analysis of the decisions of the Superior Courts and manifestations of other procedural subjects. As a result, the necessity of a proper legal regime for the search of digital data stored in electronic compartments was evidenced. The devices that regulate orthodox search and seizure do not have the ability to maintain the integrity and sameness of content volatile, tangible, and easily deteriorated. At the same time, in the wake of what had been commented on the ontological distinction between interception and informational search, the rule of Law no. 9,296, dated July 24, 1996, can not preserve the specificities of the collection of stored content. In this step, the application of the extensive and privileged interpretation, a taxation with protection in a constitutional hermeneutic, had been removed. It is concluded that the Civilian Internet Framework did not provide, with requirements and assumptions, the blind spot mentioned. There are no clear rules as to legitimacy, competence, reasoning and timing. This void provided the analysis of decisions of the first degree to the Federal Supreme Court, which evidenced the legal insecurity built by a non-existent or deficient legislation.Este trabalho analisa o Marco Civil da Internet no contexto do direito ? prova no processo penal. A partir dos novos recursos tecnol?gicos de investiga??o energizados por compartimentos eletr?nicos e pela Internet, elencaram-se os principais v?cuos legislativos na orienta??o desses meios de prova. N?o h? regras orientadoras fortes, o que contribuiu para uma oscila??o jurisprudencial, com arbitrariedade e decisionismo em decis?es jurisdicionais analisadas. Na busca de uma verdade absoluta e antecipada, a banaliza??o dos meios ocultos de investiga??o fora demonstrada, inclusive diretamente, quando se presenciou e se colocou, a termo, uma audi?ncia p?blica que perseguiu a inser??o de porta dos fundos em aplicativos com criptografia r?gida para propiciar a coleta de comunica??es armazenadas nesses ve?culos telem?ticos. Os ?rg?os de persecu??o penal inquiridos nessa solenidade ainda sustentaram a supress?o das regras de coopera??o internacional para a coleta de dados eletr?nicos no exterior. Ainda fora tra?ada a distin??o entre intercepta??o e capta??o das conversas de maneira estanque. O objetivo geral da pesquisa busca analisar se o Marco Civil da Internet se apresenta como suficiente para regrar a capta??o de dados telem?ticos armazenados em compartimentos eletr?nicos. Para tanto, foi realizada uma an?lise cr?tica e multidisciplinar dos temas, a partir da consulta a trabalhos cient?ficos e publica??es jornal?sticas, sendo cogente a pesquisa documental para demonstrar a necessidade de enfrentamento do tema e a relev?ncia pr?tica do mesmo, como ficou atestado pela an?lise das decis?es dos Tribunais Superiores e manifesta??es de outros sujeitos processuais. Como resultado, evidenciou-se a necessidade de um regime jur?dico pr?prio para a busca de dados digitais armazenados em compartimentos eletr?nicos. Os dispositivos que regram a busca e apreens?o ortodoxa n?o t?m o cond?o de manter a integridade e mesmidade de conte?do vol?til, tang?vel e com f?cil deteriora??o. Ao mesmo tempo, na esteira do que fora comentado sobre a distin??o ontol?gica entre intercepta??o e busca informacional, o regramento da Lei n. 9.296, de 24 de julho de 1996, n?o pode preservar as especificidades da coleta de conte?do armazenado. Nesse passo, fora afastada a aplica??o da interpreta??o extensiva e privilegiada, uma taxatividade com amparo em uma hermen?utica constitucional. Conclui-se que o Marco Civil da Internet n?o supriu, com requisitos e pressupostos, o ponto cego mencionado. N?o h? regras claras quanto ? legitimidade, compet?ncia, fundamenta??o e prazo. Esse vazio proporcionou a an?lise de decis?es do primeiro grau ao Supremo Tribunal Federal, o que evidenciou a inseguran?a jur?dica constru?da por uma legisla??o inexistente ou deficiente.Submitted by PPG Ci?ncias Criminais (ppgccrim@pucrs.br) on 2018-07-11T18:42:24Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Disserta??o_Ivan Jezler Costa J?nior_vers?o dep?sito biblioteca PUCRS_08_06_2018_com capa e contracapa.pdf: 2153899 bytes, checksum: 22b1ffc03b820d4e1b4f17b19739ea18 (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Sheila Dias (sheila.dias@pucrs.br) on 2018-07-16T13:19:03Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Disserta??o_Ivan Jezler Costa J?nior_vers?o dep?sito biblioteca PUCRS_08_06_2018_com capa e contracapa.pdf: 2153899 bytes, checksum: 22b1ffc03b820d4e1b4f17b19739ea18 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2018-07-16T13:27:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Disserta??o_Ivan Jezler Costa J?nior_vers?o dep?sito biblioteca PUCRS_08_06_2018_com capa e contracapa.pdf: 2153899 bytes, checksum: 22b1ffc03b820d4e1b4f17b19739ea18 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-03-22application/pdfhttp://tede2.pucrs.br:80/tede2/retrieve/172826/Disserta%c3%a7%c3%a3o_Ivan%20%20Jezler%20Costa%20J%c3%banior_vers%c3%a3o%20dep%c3%b3sito%20biblioteca%20PUCRS_08_06_2018_com%20capa%20e%20contracapa.pdf.jpgporPontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do SulPrograma de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncias CriminaisPUCRSBrasilEscola de DireitoCiberculturaProte??o ? IntimidadeMarco Civil da InternetCadeia de Cust?dia das ProvasCIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOA busca por um marco processual da internet : requisitos para colheita dos dados armazenados em compartimentos eletr?nicosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisTrabalho n?o apresenta restri??o para publica??o32637738960505291735005005004512033976268881925-7277407233034425144info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RSinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSTHUMBNAILDisserta??o_Ivan Jezler Costa J?nior_vers?o dep?sito biblioteca PUCRS_08_06_2018_com capa e contracapa.pdf.jpgDisserta??o_Ivan Jezler Costa J?nior_vers?o dep?sito biblioteca PUCRS_08_06_2018_com capa e contracapa.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg5547http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8209/4/Disserta%C3%A7%C3%A3o_Ivan++Jezler+Costa+J%C3%BAnior_vers%C3%A3o+dep%C3%B3sito+biblioteca+PUCRS_08_06_2018_com+capa+e+contracapa.pdf.jpg159ed20610533db05c63bd2100fd1d3cMD54TEXTDisserta??o_Ivan Jezler Costa J?nior_vers?o dep?sito biblioteca PUCRS_08_06_2018_com capa e contracapa.pdf.txtDisserta??o_Ivan Jezler Costa J?nior_vers?o dep?sito biblioteca PUCRS_08_06_2018_com capa e contracapa.pdf.txttext/plain517457http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8209/3/Disserta%C3%A7%C3%A3o_Ivan++Jezler+Costa+J%C3%BAnior_vers%C3%A3o+dep%C3%B3sito+biblioteca+PUCRS_08_06_2018_com+capa+e+contracapa.pdf.txt9435ad772245bfb2581263424ca25f7fMD53ORIGINALDisserta??o_Ivan Jezler Costa J?nior_vers?o dep?sito biblioteca PUCRS_08_06_2018_com capa e contracapa.pdfDisserta??o_Ivan Jezler Costa J?nior_vers?o dep?sito biblioteca PUCRS_08_06_2018_com capa e contracapa.pdfapplication/pdf2153899http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8209/2/Disserta%C3%A7%C3%A3o_Ivan++Jezler+Costa+J%C3%BAnior_vers%C3%A3o+dep%C3%B3sito+biblioteca+PUCRS_08_06_2018_com+capa+e+contracapa.pdf22b1ffc03b820d4e1b4f17b19739ea18MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8610http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8209/1/license.txt5a9d6006225b368ef605ba16b4f6d1beMD51tede/82092018-07-16 12:00:59.703oai:tede2.pucrs.br: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/PRIhttps://tede2.pucrs.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.central@pucrs.br||opendoar:2018-07-16T15:00:59Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv A busca por um marco processual da internet : requisitos para colheita dos dados armazenados em compartimentos eletr?nicos
title A busca por um marco processual da internet : requisitos para colheita dos dados armazenados em compartimentos eletr?nicos
spellingShingle A busca por um marco processual da internet : requisitos para colheita dos dados armazenados em compartimentos eletr?nicos
Costa Jr., Ivan Jezler
Cibercultura
Prote??o ? Intimidade
Marco Civil da Internet
Cadeia de Cust?dia das Provas
CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
title_short A busca por um marco processual da internet : requisitos para colheita dos dados armazenados em compartimentos eletr?nicos
title_full A busca por um marco processual da internet : requisitos para colheita dos dados armazenados em compartimentos eletr?nicos
title_fullStr A busca por um marco processual da internet : requisitos para colheita dos dados armazenados em compartimentos eletr?nicos
title_full_unstemmed A busca por um marco processual da internet : requisitos para colheita dos dados armazenados em compartimentos eletr?nicos
title_sort A busca por um marco processual da internet : requisitos para colheita dos dados armazenados em compartimentos eletr?nicos
author Costa Jr., Ivan Jezler
author_facet Costa Jr., Ivan Jezler
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Lopes Junior, Aury Celso Lima
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/4629371641091359
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/0136206458490576
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa Jr., Ivan Jezler
contributor_str_mv Lopes Junior, Aury Celso Lima
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cibercultura
Prote??o ? Intimidade
Marco Civil da Internet
Cadeia de Cust?dia das Provas
topic Cibercultura
Prote??o ? Intimidade
Marco Civil da Internet
Cadeia de Cust?dia das Provas
CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
description This paper analyzes the Civil Internet Framework in the context of the right to evidence in criminal proceedings. From the new technological resources of investigation energized by electronic compartments and by the Internet, the main legislative vacuums were pointed out in the orientation of these means of proof. There are no strong guiding rules, which contributed to a jurisprudential oscillation, with arbitrariness and decisionism in judicial decisions analyzed. In the pursuit of an absolute and anticipated truth, the trivialization of the hidden means of investigation had been demonstrated, even directly, when a public audience had been witnessed and concluded, which pursued the insertion of back door in applications with rigid encryption to propitiate the collection of communications stored in these telematic vehicles. The criminal prosecution organs questioned on this solemnity still supported the suppression of the rules of international cooperation for the collection of electronic data abroad. The distinction between interception and capture of conversations had still been drawn in a watertight manner. The general objective of the research is to analyze if the Civil Framework of the Internet presents itself as sufficient to regulate the capture of telematic data stored in electronic compartments. For that, a critical and multidisciplinary analysis of the themes was done, based on the consultation of scientific works and journalistic publications, and the documentary research was used to demonstrate the need to face the theme and the practical relevance of the theme, as attested by the analysis of the decisions of the Superior Courts and manifestations of other procedural subjects. As a result, the necessity of a proper legal regime for the search of digital data stored in electronic compartments was evidenced. The devices that regulate orthodox search and seizure do not have the ability to maintain the integrity and sameness of content volatile, tangible, and easily deteriorated. At the same time, in the wake of what had been commented on the ontological distinction between interception and informational search, the rule of Law no. 9,296, dated July 24, 1996, can not preserve the specificities of the collection of stored content. In this step, the application of the extensive and privileged interpretation, a taxation with protection in a constitutional hermeneutic, had been removed. It is concluded that the Civilian Internet Framework did not provide, with requirements and assumptions, the blind spot mentioned. There are no clear rules as to legitimacy, competence, reasoning and timing. This void provided the analysis of decisions of the first degree to the Federal Supreme Court, which evidenced the legal insecurity built by a non-existent or deficient legislation.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-07-16T13:27:26Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2018-03-22
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8209
url http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8209
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv 3263773896050529173
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 500
500
500
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv 4512033976268881925
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv -7277407233034425144
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncias Criminais
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv PUCRS
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8209/4/Disserta%C3%A7%C3%A3o_Ivan++Jezler+Costa+J%C3%BAnior_vers%C3%A3o+dep%C3%B3sito+biblioteca+PUCRS_08_06_2018_com+capa+e+contracapa.pdf.jpg
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8209/3/Disserta%C3%A7%C3%A3o_Ivan++Jezler+Costa+J%C3%BAnior_vers%C3%A3o+dep%C3%B3sito+biblioteca+PUCRS_08_06_2018_com+capa+e+contracapa.pdf.txt
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8209/2/Disserta%C3%A7%C3%A3o_Ivan++Jezler+Costa+J%C3%BAnior_vers%C3%A3o+dep%C3%B3sito+biblioteca+PUCRS_08_06_2018_com+capa+e+contracapa.pdf
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8209/1/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 159ed20610533db05c63bd2100fd1d3c
9435ad772245bfb2581263424ca25f7f
22b1ffc03b820d4e1b4f17b19739ea18
5a9d6006225b368ef605ba16b4f6d1be
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.central@pucrs.br||
_version_ 1796793234760925184