Cobertura florestal ou função ecológica: o dilema da restauração na bacia do Rio Sorocaba

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2016
Autor(a) principal: Fernandes, Gerson Eli
Orientador(a): Piña-Rodrigues, Fátima Conceição Márquez lattes
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Câmpus Sorocaba
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sustentabilidade na Gestão Ambiental - PPGSGA-So
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/8531
Resumo: The study aimed to evaluate restored areas implemented in the basin of the Sorocaba River and Middle Tiete based on terms of commitments to environmental restoration and conduct adjustment terms. We selected two to three projects in each sub-basin to those with the presence of restoration, certified by the consent of the owner. In each restoration, we evaluated attributes of species diversity and functions, control and management, soil protection and nutrient cycling. The restored areas restoration presented 17 ± 10 species, under the condition established by law, mortality was high, around 40% with an average of 1090 individuals/ha. Croton floribundus, Schinus terebinthifolius, Guazuma ulmifolia, Inga vera, Citharexylum myrianthum, Cordia sellowiana represented 31.7% of species planted and together with Enterolobium contortisiliquum, colubrina Anadenanthera, C. urucurana, Ceiba speciosa, Eugenia uniflora, Lithraea molleoides, Psidium guajava, Triplaris americana, Erythrina speciosa represented 52.8% of the planted individuals. The restoration were in critical situation and, although species richness is according to legal requirements, we observed the concentration on few common and frequent species in general pioneers. Regardless of age, the studied areas did not restore the structural and physical aspects of the forest, and were not efficient in the establishment of ecological processes, highlighting the need to review the procedures adopted in the legal and technical mechanisms of restoration in the region.
id SCAR_01af89761ff5b2b6a17b7342193f882d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:20.500.14289/8531
network_acronym_str SCAR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
repository_id_str
spelling Fernandes, Gerson EliPiña-Rodrigues, Fátima Conceição Márquezhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1475369713141675http://lattes.cnpq.br/1584529288982418c89e5621-20cf-49c8-9309-c0195e8b00702017-02-24T15:58:30Z2017-02-24T15:58:30Z2016-09-21FERNANDES, Gerson Eli. Cobertura florestal ou função ecológica: o dilema da restauração na bacia do Rio Sorocaba. 2016. Dissertação (Mestrado em Sustentabilidade na Gestão Ambiental) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Sorocaba, 2016. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/8531.https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/8531The study aimed to evaluate restored areas implemented in the basin of the Sorocaba River and Middle Tiete based on terms of commitments to environmental restoration and conduct adjustment terms. We selected two to three projects in each sub-basin to those with the presence of restoration, certified by the consent of the owner. In each restoration, we evaluated attributes of species diversity and functions, control and management, soil protection and nutrient cycling. The restored areas restoration presented 17 ± 10 species, under the condition established by law, mortality was high, around 40% with an average of 1090 individuals/ha. Croton floribundus, Schinus terebinthifolius, Guazuma ulmifolia, Inga vera, Citharexylum myrianthum, Cordia sellowiana represented 31.7% of species planted and together with Enterolobium contortisiliquum, colubrina Anadenanthera, C. urucurana, Ceiba speciosa, Eugenia uniflora, Lithraea molleoides, Psidium guajava, Triplaris americana, Erythrina speciosa represented 52.8% of the planted individuals. The restoration were in critical situation and, although species richness is according to legal requirements, we observed the concentration on few common and frequent species in general pioneers. Regardless of age, the studied areas did not restore the structural and physical aspects of the forest, and were not efficient in the establishment of ecological processes, highlighting the need to review the procedures adopted in the legal and technical mechanisms of restoration in the region.O estudo teve por objetivo avaliar projetos de restauração de áreas degradadas implantados na bacia dos Rios Sorocaba e Médio Tietê realizados a partir de termos de compromissos de restauração ambiental e termo de ajustamento de conduta. Foram selecionados dois a três projetos em cada sub-bacia entre os que apresentavam presença da restauração, atestada pela anuência do proprietário. Em cada restauração foram avaliados os atributos da diversidade de espécies e de funções, controle e manejo, proteção do solo e ciclagem de nutrientes. As áreas em restauração apresentaram 17±10 espécies, abaixo da condição estabelecida pela legislação, com alta mortalidade, em torno de 40% e média de 1090 indivíduos/ha. Das espécies, Croton floribundus, Schinus terebinthifolius, Guazuma ulmifolia, Inga vera, Citharexylum myrianthum, Cordia sellowiana, representaram 31,7% dos indivíduos e, juntamente com Enterolobium contortisiliquum, Anadenanthera colubrina, Croton urucurana, Ceiba speciosa, Eugenia uniflora, Lithraea molleoides, Psidium guajava, Triplaris americana, Erythrina speciosa somaram 52,8% dos indivíduos plantados. Os projetos de restauração foram considerados em situação crítica e, embora apresentem riqueza dentro do recomendado, concentraram-se em poucas de espécies mais comuns e frequentes, em geral pioneiras. Independentemente da idade, as áreas estudadas não restauraram os aspectos estruturais e físicos da floresta, e não foram eficientes no estabelecimento dos processos ecológicos, evidenciando a necessidade de se rever os procedimentos adotados nos mecanismos legais e técnicos da restauração na região.Não recebi financiamentoporUniversidade Federal de São CarlosCâmpus SorocabaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Sustentabilidade na Gestão Ambiental - PPGSGA-SoUFSCarRecuperação ecológicaIndicadores biológicosBioindicadoresRestoration ecologyIndicators (Biology)Bio-indicatorsCIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS::ECOLOGIA::ECOLOGIA APLICADACobertura florestal ou função ecológica: o dilema da restauração na bacia do Rio SorocabaForest cover or ecological function: the dilemma of the restoration in the basin of Sorocaba River and Middle Tieteinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisOnline600b7b5022a-6d56-47c2-8237-5b4fd70945edinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCARinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCARORIGINALFERNANDES_Gerson_2016.pdfFERNANDES_Gerson_2016.pdfapplication/pdf13725241https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/3e67e63c-f1a2-4867-84bb-870e76995eb8/download4bf54868355621d2ad09ae85d6c244f4MD51trueAnonymousREADLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81957https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/0c855a6a-1a13-40f4-986b-2b221b938fe7/downloadae0398b6f8b235e40ad82cba6c50031dMD52falseAnonymousREADTEXTFERNANDES_Gerson_2016.pdf.txtFERNANDES_Gerson_2016.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain33https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/fd182f9d-da19-4b56-b87a-11fdf08d88bb/downloadaad62841dead4c5f8d867cd3447c0161MD55falseAnonymousREADTHUMBNAILFERNANDES_Gerson_2016.pdf.jpgFERNANDES_Gerson_2016.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg3642https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/56be6414-6925-419c-a2bd-2b3592aa70a3/download14d2752a5fb0e1256078b0d57805959fMD56falseAnonymousREAD20.500.14289/85312025-02-05 17:31:02.296Acesso abertoopen.accessoai:repositorio.ufscar.br:20.500.14289/8531https://repositorio.ufscar.brRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufscar.br/oai/requestrepositorio.sibi@ufscar.bropendoar:43222025-02-05T20:31:02Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)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
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Cobertura florestal ou função ecológica: o dilema da restauração na bacia do Rio Sorocaba
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Forest cover or ecological function: the dilemma of the restoration in the basin of Sorocaba River and Middle Tiete
title Cobertura florestal ou função ecológica: o dilema da restauração na bacia do Rio Sorocaba
spellingShingle Cobertura florestal ou função ecológica: o dilema da restauração na bacia do Rio Sorocaba
Fernandes, Gerson Eli
Recuperação ecológica
Indicadores biológicos
Bioindicadores
Restoration ecology
Indicators (Biology)
Bio-indicators
CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS::ECOLOGIA::ECOLOGIA APLICADA
title_short Cobertura florestal ou função ecológica: o dilema da restauração na bacia do Rio Sorocaba
title_full Cobertura florestal ou função ecológica: o dilema da restauração na bacia do Rio Sorocaba
title_fullStr Cobertura florestal ou função ecológica: o dilema da restauração na bacia do Rio Sorocaba
title_full_unstemmed Cobertura florestal ou função ecológica: o dilema da restauração na bacia do Rio Sorocaba
title_sort Cobertura florestal ou função ecológica: o dilema da restauração na bacia do Rio Sorocaba
author Fernandes, Gerson Eli
author_facet Fernandes, Gerson Eli
author_role author
dc.contributor.authorlattes.por.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/1584529288982418
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fernandes, Gerson Eli
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Piña-Rodrigues, Fátima Conceição Márquez
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/1475369713141675
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv c89e5621-20cf-49c8-9309-c0195e8b0070
contributor_str_mv Piña-Rodrigues, Fátima Conceição Márquez
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Recuperação ecológica
Indicadores biológicos
Bioindicadores
topic Recuperação ecológica
Indicadores biológicos
Bioindicadores
Restoration ecology
Indicators (Biology)
Bio-indicators
CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS::ECOLOGIA::ECOLOGIA APLICADA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Restoration ecology
Indicators (Biology)
Bio-indicators
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS::ECOLOGIA::ECOLOGIA APLICADA
description The study aimed to evaluate restored areas implemented in the basin of the Sorocaba River and Middle Tiete based on terms of commitments to environmental restoration and conduct adjustment terms. We selected two to three projects in each sub-basin to those with the presence of restoration, certified by the consent of the owner. In each restoration, we evaluated attributes of species diversity and functions, control and management, soil protection and nutrient cycling. The restored areas restoration presented 17 ± 10 species, under the condition established by law, mortality was high, around 40% with an average of 1090 individuals/ha. Croton floribundus, Schinus terebinthifolius, Guazuma ulmifolia, Inga vera, Citharexylum myrianthum, Cordia sellowiana represented 31.7% of species planted and together with Enterolobium contortisiliquum, colubrina Anadenanthera, C. urucurana, Ceiba speciosa, Eugenia uniflora, Lithraea molleoides, Psidium guajava, Triplaris americana, Erythrina speciosa represented 52.8% of the planted individuals. The restoration were in critical situation and, although species richness is according to legal requirements, we observed the concentration on few common and frequent species in general pioneers. Regardless of age, the studied areas did not restore the structural and physical aspects of the forest, and were not efficient in the establishment of ecological processes, highlighting the need to review the procedures adopted in the legal and technical mechanisms of restoration in the region.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2016-09-21
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2017-02-24T15:58:30Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2017-02-24T15:58:30Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv FERNANDES, Gerson Eli. Cobertura florestal ou função ecológica: o dilema da restauração na bacia do Rio Sorocaba. 2016. Dissertação (Mestrado em Sustentabilidade na Gestão Ambiental) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Sorocaba, 2016. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/8531.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/8531
identifier_str_mv FERNANDES, Gerson Eli. Cobertura florestal ou função ecológica: o dilema da restauração na bacia do Rio Sorocaba. 2016. Dissertação (Mestrado em Sustentabilidade na Gestão Ambiental) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Sorocaba, 2016. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/8531.
url https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/8531
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv b7b5022a-6d56-47c2-8237-5b4fd70945ed
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Câmpus Sorocaba
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sustentabilidade na Gestão Ambiental - PPGSGA-So
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSCar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Câmpus Sorocaba
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron:UFSCAR
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron_str UFSCAR
institution UFSCAR
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
collection Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/3e67e63c-f1a2-4867-84bb-870e76995eb8/download
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/0c855a6a-1a13-40f4-986b-2b221b938fe7/download
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/fd182f9d-da19-4b56-b87a-11fdf08d88bb/download
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/56be6414-6925-419c-a2bd-2b3592aa70a3/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 4bf54868355621d2ad09ae85d6c244f4
ae0398b6f8b235e40ad82cba6c50031d
aad62841dead4c5f8d867cd3447c0161
14d2752a5fb0e1256078b0d57805959f
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio.sibi@ufscar.br
_version_ 1851688821002862592