Cobertura florestal ou função ecológica: o dilema da restauração na bacia do Rio Sorocaba
| Ano de defesa: | 2016 |
|---|---|
| Autor(a) principal: | |
| Orientador(a): | |
| Banca de defesa: | |
| Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
| Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: | por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Câmpus Sorocaba |
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sustentabilidade na Gestão Ambiental - PPGSGA-So
|
| Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: | |
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: | |
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: | |
| Link de acesso: | https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/8531 |
Resumo: | The study aimed to evaluate restored areas implemented in the basin of the Sorocaba River and Middle Tiete based on terms of commitments to environmental restoration and conduct adjustment terms. We selected two to three projects in each sub-basin to those with the presence of restoration, certified by the consent of the owner. In each restoration, we evaluated attributes of species diversity and functions, control and management, soil protection and nutrient cycling. The restored areas restoration presented 17 ± 10 species, under the condition established by law, mortality was high, around 40% with an average of 1090 individuals/ha. Croton floribundus, Schinus terebinthifolius, Guazuma ulmifolia, Inga vera, Citharexylum myrianthum, Cordia sellowiana represented 31.7% of species planted and together with Enterolobium contortisiliquum, colubrina Anadenanthera, C. urucurana, Ceiba speciosa, Eugenia uniflora, Lithraea molleoides, Psidium guajava, Triplaris americana, Erythrina speciosa represented 52.8% of the planted individuals. The restoration were in critical situation and, although species richness is according to legal requirements, we observed the concentration on few common and frequent species in general pioneers. Regardless of age, the studied areas did not restore the structural and physical aspects of the forest, and were not efficient in the establishment of ecological processes, highlighting the need to review the procedures adopted in the legal and technical mechanisms of restoration in the region. |
| id |
SCAR_01af89761ff5b2b6a17b7342193f882d |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:20.500.14289/8531 |
| network_acronym_str |
SCAR |
| network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Fernandes, Gerson EliPiña-Rodrigues, Fátima Conceição Márquezhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1475369713141675http://lattes.cnpq.br/1584529288982418c89e5621-20cf-49c8-9309-c0195e8b00702017-02-24T15:58:30Z2017-02-24T15:58:30Z2016-09-21FERNANDES, Gerson Eli. Cobertura florestal ou função ecológica: o dilema da restauração na bacia do Rio Sorocaba. 2016. Dissertação (Mestrado em Sustentabilidade na Gestão Ambiental) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Sorocaba, 2016. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/8531.https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/8531The study aimed to evaluate restored areas implemented in the basin of the Sorocaba River and Middle Tiete based on terms of commitments to environmental restoration and conduct adjustment terms. We selected two to three projects in each sub-basin to those with the presence of restoration, certified by the consent of the owner. In each restoration, we evaluated attributes of species diversity and functions, control and management, soil protection and nutrient cycling. The restored areas restoration presented 17 ± 10 species, under the condition established by law, mortality was high, around 40% with an average of 1090 individuals/ha. Croton floribundus, Schinus terebinthifolius, Guazuma ulmifolia, Inga vera, Citharexylum myrianthum, Cordia sellowiana represented 31.7% of species planted and together with Enterolobium contortisiliquum, colubrina Anadenanthera, C. urucurana, Ceiba speciosa, Eugenia uniflora, Lithraea molleoides, Psidium guajava, Triplaris americana, Erythrina speciosa represented 52.8% of the planted individuals. The restoration were in critical situation and, although species richness is according to legal requirements, we observed the concentration on few common and frequent species in general pioneers. Regardless of age, the studied areas did not restore the structural and physical aspects of the forest, and were not efficient in the establishment of ecological processes, highlighting the need to review the procedures adopted in the legal and technical mechanisms of restoration in the region.O estudo teve por objetivo avaliar projetos de restauração de áreas degradadas implantados na bacia dos Rios Sorocaba e Médio Tietê realizados a partir de termos de compromissos de restauração ambiental e termo de ajustamento de conduta. Foram selecionados dois a três projetos em cada sub-bacia entre os que apresentavam presença da restauração, atestada pela anuência do proprietário. Em cada restauração foram avaliados os atributos da diversidade de espécies e de funções, controle e manejo, proteção do solo e ciclagem de nutrientes. As áreas em restauração apresentaram 17±10 espécies, abaixo da condição estabelecida pela legislação, com alta mortalidade, em torno de 40% e média de 1090 indivíduos/ha. Das espécies, Croton floribundus, Schinus terebinthifolius, Guazuma ulmifolia, Inga vera, Citharexylum myrianthum, Cordia sellowiana, representaram 31,7% dos indivíduos e, juntamente com Enterolobium contortisiliquum, Anadenanthera colubrina, Croton urucurana, Ceiba speciosa, Eugenia uniflora, Lithraea molleoides, Psidium guajava, Triplaris americana, Erythrina speciosa somaram 52,8% dos indivíduos plantados. Os projetos de restauração foram considerados em situação crítica e, embora apresentem riqueza dentro do recomendado, concentraram-se em poucas de espécies mais comuns e frequentes, em geral pioneiras. Independentemente da idade, as áreas estudadas não restauraram os aspectos estruturais e físicos da floresta, e não foram eficientes no estabelecimento dos processos ecológicos, evidenciando a necessidade de se rever os procedimentos adotados nos mecanismos legais e técnicos da restauração na região.Não recebi financiamentoporUniversidade Federal de São CarlosCâmpus SorocabaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Sustentabilidade na Gestão Ambiental - PPGSGA-SoUFSCarRecuperação ecológicaIndicadores biológicosBioindicadoresRestoration ecologyIndicators (Biology)Bio-indicatorsCIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS::ECOLOGIA::ECOLOGIA APLICADACobertura florestal ou função ecológica: o dilema da restauração na bacia do Rio SorocabaForest cover or ecological function: the dilemma of the restoration in the basin of Sorocaba River and Middle Tieteinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisOnline600b7b5022a-6d56-47c2-8237-5b4fd70945edinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCARinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCARORIGINALFERNANDES_Gerson_2016.pdfFERNANDES_Gerson_2016.pdfapplication/pdf13725241https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/3e67e63c-f1a2-4867-84bb-870e76995eb8/download4bf54868355621d2ad09ae85d6c244f4MD51trueAnonymousREADLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81957https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/0c855a6a-1a13-40f4-986b-2b221b938fe7/downloadae0398b6f8b235e40ad82cba6c50031dMD52falseAnonymousREADTEXTFERNANDES_Gerson_2016.pdf.txtFERNANDES_Gerson_2016.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain33https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/fd182f9d-da19-4b56-b87a-11fdf08d88bb/downloadaad62841dead4c5f8d867cd3447c0161MD55falseAnonymousREADTHUMBNAILFERNANDES_Gerson_2016.pdf.jpgFERNANDES_Gerson_2016.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg3642https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/56be6414-6925-419c-a2bd-2b3592aa70a3/download14d2752a5fb0e1256078b0d57805959fMD56falseAnonymousREAD20.500.14289/85312025-02-05 17:31:02.296Acesso abertoopen.accessoai:repositorio.ufscar.br:20.500.14289/8531https://repositorio.ufscar.brRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufscar.br/oai/requestrepositorio.sibi@ufscar.bropendoar:43222025-02-05T20:31:02Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)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 |
| dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Cobertura florestal ou função ecológica: o dilema da restauração na bacia do Rio Sorocaba |
| dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Forest cover or ecological function: the dilemma of the restoration in the basin of Sorocaba River and Middle Tiete |
| title |
Cobertura florestal ou função ecológica: o dilema da restauração na bacia do Rio Sorocaba |
| spellingShingle |
Cobertura florestal ou função ecológica: o dilema da restauração na bacia do Rio Sorocaba Fernandes, Gerson Eli Recuperação ecológica Indicadores biológicos Bioindicadores Restoration ecology Indicators (Biology) Bio-indicators CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS::ECOLOGIA::ECOLOGIA APLICADA |
| title_short |
Cobertura florestal ou função ecológica: o dilema da restauração na bacia do Rio Sorocaba |
| title_full |
Cobertura florestal ou função ecológica: o dilema da restauração na bacia do Rio Sorocaba |
| title_fullStr |
Cobertura florestal ou função ecológica: o dilema da restauração na bacia do Rio Sorocaba |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Cobertura florestal ou função ecológica: o dilema da restauração na bacia do Rio Sorocaba |
| title_sort |
Cobertura florestal ou função ecológica: o dilema da restauração na bacia do Rio Sorocaba |
| author |
Fernandes, Gerson Eli |
| author_facet |
Fernandes, Gerson Eli |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.authorlattes.por.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/1584529288982418 |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fernandes, Gerson Eli |
| dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Piña-Rodrigues, Fátima Conceição Márquez |
| dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/1475369713141675 |
| dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv |
c89e5621-20cf-49c8-9309-c0195e8b0070 |
| contributor_str_mv |
Piña-Rodrigues, Fátima Conceição Márquez |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Recuperação ecológica Indicadores biológicos Bioindicadores |
| topic |
Recuperação ecológica Indicadores biológicos Bioindicadores Restoration ecology Indicators (Biology) Bio-indicators CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS::ECOLOGIA::ECOLOGIA APLICADA |
| dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Restoration ecology Indicators (Biology) Bio-indicators |
| dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS::ECOLOGIA::ECOLOGIA APLICADA |
| description |
The study aimed to evaluate restored areas implemented in the basin of the Sorocaba River and Middle Tiete based on terms of commitments to environmental restoration and conduct adjustment terms. We selected two to three projects in each sub-basin to those with the presence of restoration, certified by the consent of the owner. In each restoration, we evaluated attributes of species diversity and functions, control and management, soil protection and nutrient cycling. The restored areas restoration presented 17 ± 10 species, under the condition established by law, mortality was high, around 40% with an average of 1090 individuals/ha. Croton floribundus, Schinus terebinthifolius, Guazuma ulmifolia, Inga vera, Citharexylum myrianthum, Cordia sellowiana represented 31.7% of species planted and together with Enterolobium contortisiliquum, colubrina Anadenanthera, C. urucurana, Ceiba speciosa, Eugenia uniflora, Lithraea molleoides, Psidium guajava, Triplaris americana, Erythrina speciosa represented 52.8% of the planted individuals. The restoration were in critical situation and, although species richness is according to legal requirements, we observed the concentration on few common and frequent species in general pioneers. Regardless of age, the studied areas did not restore the structural and physical aspects of the forest, and were not efficient in the establishment of ecological processes, highlighting the need to review the procedures adopted in the legal and technical mechanisms of restoration in the region. |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2016-09-21 |
| dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2017-02-24T15:58:30Z |
| dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2017-02-24T15:58:30Z |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| format |
masterThesis |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
FERNANDES, Gerson Eli. Cobertura florestal ou função ecológica: o dilema da restauração na bacia do Rio Sorocaba. 2016. Dissertação (Mestrado em Sustentabilidade na Gestão Ambiental) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Sorocaba, 2016. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/8531. |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/8531 |
| identifier_str_mv |
FERNANDES, Gerson Eli. Cobertura florestal ou função ecológica: o dilema da restauração na bacia do Rio Sorocaba. 2016. Dissertação (Mestrado em Sustentabilidade na Gestão Ambiental) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Sorocaba, 2016. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/8531. |
| url |
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/8531 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
| language |
por |
| dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 |
| dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv |
b7b5022a-6d56-47c2-8237-5b4fd70945ed |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos Câmpus Sorocaba |
| dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sustentabilidade na Gestão Ambiental - PPGSGA-So |
| dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFSCar |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos Câmpus Sorocaba |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) instacron:UFSCAR |
| instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) |
| instacron_str |
UFSCAR |
| institution |
UFSCAR |
| reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR |
| collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/3e67e63c-f1a2-4867-84bb-870e76995eb8/download https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/0c855a6a-1a13-40f4-986b-2b221b938fe7/download https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/fd182f9d-da19-4b56-b87a-11fdf08d88bb/download https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/56be6414-6925-419c-a2bd-2b3592aa70a3/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
4bf54868355621d2ad09ae85d6c244f4 ae0398b6f8b235e40ad82cba6c50031d aad62841dead4c5f8d867cd3447c0161 14d2752a5fb0e1256078b0d57805959f |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio.sibi@ufscar.br |
| _version_ |
1851688821002862592 |