Avaliação cinemática da mandíbula e efeito do tratamento por terapia manual e estabilização segmentar da coluna cervical na disfunção temporomandibular

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2018
Autor(a) principal: Calixtre, Letícia Bojikian
Orientador(a): Oliveira, Ana Beatriz de lattes
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Câmpus São Carlos
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia - PPGFt
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/9947
Resumo: The central aims of this PhD thesis were: (1) to verify the reproducibility of kinematic variables during maximum mouth opening (MMO) and (2) to investigate the regional interdependency between the upper cervical spine and the orofacial region, using a randomized controlled trial (RCT) where was collected kinematic and clinical outcomes after a physiotherapeutic treatment for the neck in women with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Therefore, 4 studies were developed. The First Study investigated the reliability of the kinematic analysis of the jaw movement in asymptomatic subjects. The results showed that the reproducibility of the measures depends on the data analysis and on the variables. Static measurements like jaw radius and width were the most reproducible ones. Furthermore, the interincisal distance during MMO and the angular movements of the jaw in sagittal plane presented the smallest errors and should be used in future studies. In general, the variables with low amplitude were less reproductible, with higher Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) and Minimum Detectable Change (MDC). Finally, the inter-rater comparisons presented larger limits of agreement and more frequent outliers. The Second, Third and Fourth studies were elaborated from one RCT that included 61 women with TMD, divided into two groups: Control Group (CG) and Intervention Group (IG). IG was submitted to 10 sessions of physiotherapy based on manual therapy applied on the upper cervical spine and stabilization exercises to the neck, for 5 weeks. The CG did not get any intervention for 5 weeks. Clinical and kinematic variables were collected on baseline and after 5 weeks by a blind rater. The analysis of the Second study aimed: (1) to determine the effectiveness of the protocol to reduce orofacial pain intensity on IG compared to CG, after and during 5 weeks (2) to verify the differences between the groups after 5 weeks on the following secondary variables: Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) of the masticatory muscles, mandibular function and headache impact in women with TMD. The results showed significant decrease of orofacial pain intensity since 4 weeks of treatment in comparison to CG and in comparison to baseline. There were no significant differences on PPT and no clinically relevant differences on mandibular function. The Third study was based on a secondary analysis of the RCT in order to (1) provide the Minimum Clinical Important Difference (MCID) from the variables related to orofacial pain, headache impact, sensibility of the masticatory muscles, mandibular function and the performance of deep neck flexor muscles, according to an anchor method of analysis, using the Global Rating of Change Scale (GRCS); (2) verify which outcomes can predict the moderate or large response to the treatment. The analysis provided MCID values for variables related to maximum, minimum and current orofacial pain using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), for the Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire (MFIQ), for the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), for the PPT of the masticatory muscles, for the MMO measured with a caliper, and for the Craniocervical Flexion Test (CCFT). On the univariate regression analysis, among all the outcomes, the ones related to pain and the HIT-6 presented better capacity of discrimination between patients who largely or moderately got better from those who did not. On the multivariate regression analysis, the combination of minimum pain (or any other pain score) and HIT-6 presented the best capacity of discrimination between patients who largely or moderately improved from those who did not. Finally, the Fourth study focused on two clinical variables and several kinematic variables, with the following objectives: (1) verify the effects of the intervention on the behavior of kinematic variables related to range of motion and coordination of the head and jaw during MMO, speech and chewing in women with TMD; (2) verify the differences between the groups regarding the performance of the deep neck flexor muscles (according to the CCFT) and the perception of the patients regarding their global status of health (according to the GRCS) after the intervention/control. The results showed absence of significant effect of the intervention on the kinematic variable´s behaviour regarding range of motion and coordination between head and jaw during MMO, speech and chewing in women with TMD. On the other hand, the IG presented significant improvement on the GRCS, as well as on the CCFT. In general, this thesis enabled the kinematic evaluation of the jaw in order to investigate the normal or pathologic biomechanical patterns of the jaw, provided reference measures for the interpretation of clinical variables related to TMD, that can be used on the clinical settings and research fields, so future studies can continue to investigate this population. On top of that, this thesis cooperates for the evidence of regional interdependency between the upper cervical spine and the jaw, filling some of the knowledge gaps on the literature and suggesting ideas for future studies.
id SCAR_66c4ae529d1600fd562dbede38f76867
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:20.500.14289/9947
network_acronym_str SCAR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
repository_id_str
spelling Calixtre, Letícia BojikianOliveira, Ana Beatriz dehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1049547759186556Alburquerque-Sendín, Franciscohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7551905278202959http://lattes.cnpq.br/8265560955064959cdebf319-11ab-4373-8874-96ee385f754b2018-05-10T13:32:48Z2018-05-10T13:32:48Z2018-02-15CALIXTRE, Letícia Bojikian. Avaliação cinemática da mandíbula e efeito do tratamento por terapia manual e estabilização segmentar da coluna cervical na disfunção temporomandibular. 2018. Tese (Doutorado em Fisioterapia) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2018. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/9947.https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/9947The central aims of this PhD thesis were: (1) to verify the reproducibility of kinematic variables during maximum mouth opening (MMO) and (2) to investigate the regional interdependency between the upper cervical spine and the orofacial region, using a randomized controlled trial (RCT) where was collected kinematic and clinical outcomes after a physiotherapeutic treatment for the neck in women with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Therefore, 4 studies were developed. The First Study investigated the reliability of the kinematic analysis of the jaw movement in asymptomatic subjects. The results showed that the reproducibility of the measures depends on the data analysis and on the variables. Static measurements like jaw radius and width were the most reproducible ones. Furthermore, the interincisal distance during MMO and the angular movements of the jaw in sagittal plane presented the smallest errors and should be used in future studies. In general, the variables with low amplitude were less reproductible, with higher Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) and Minimum Detectable Change (MDC). Finally, the inter-rater comparisons presented larger limits of agreement and more frequent outliers. The Second, Third and Fourth studies were elaborated from one RCT that included 61 women with TMD, divided into two groups: Control Group (CG) and Intervention Group (IG). IG was submitted to 10 sessions of physiotherapy based on manual therapy applied on the upper cervical spine and stabilization exercises to the neck, for 5 weeks. The CG did not get any intervention for 5 weeks. Clinical and kinematic variables were collected on baseline and after 5 weeks by a blind rater. The analysis of the Second study aimed: (1) to determine the effectiveness of the protocol to reduce orofacial pain intensity on IG compared to CG, after and during 5 weeks (2) to verify the differences between the groups after 5 weeks on the following secondary variables: Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) of the masticatory muscles, mandibular function and headache impact in women with TMD. The results showed significant decrease of orofacial pain intensity since 4 weeks of treatment in comparison to CG and in comparison to baseline. There were no significant differences on PPT and no clinically relevant differences on mandibular function. The Third study was based on a secondary analysis of the RCT in order to (1) provide the Minimum Clinical Important Difference (MCID) from the variables related to orofacial pain, headache impact, sensibility of the masticatory muscles, mandibular function and the performance of deep neck flexor muscles, according to an anchor method of analysis, using the Global Rating of Change Scale (GRCS); (2) verify which outcomes can predict the moderate or large response to the treatment. The analysis provided MCID values for variables related to maximum, minimum and current orofacial pain using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), for the Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire (MFIQ), for the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), for the PPT of the masticatory muscles, for the MMO measured with a caliper, and for the Craniocervical Flexion Test (CCFT). On the univariate regression analysis, among all the outcomes, the ones related to pain and the HIT-6 presented better capacity of discrimination between patients who largely or moderately got better from those who did not. On the multivariate regression analysis, the combination of minimum pain (or any other pain score) and HIT-6 presented the best capacity of discrimination between patients who largely or moderately improved from those who did not. Finally, the Fourth study focused on two clinical variables and several kinematic variables, with the following objectives: (1) verify the effects of the intervention on the behavior of kinematic variables related to range of motion and coordination of the head and jaw during MMO, speech and chewing in women with TMD; (2) verify the differences between the groups regarding the performance of the deep neck flexor muscles (according to the CCFT) and the perception of the patients regarding their global status of health (according to the GRCS) after the intervention/control. The results showed absence of significant effect of the intervention on the kinematic variable´s behaviour regarding range of motion and coordination between head and jaw during MMO, speech and chewing in women with TMD. On the other hand, the IG presented significant improvement on the GRCS, as well as on the CCFT. In general, this thesis enabled the kinematic evaluation of the jaw in order to investigate the normal or pathologic biomechanical patterns of the jaw, provided reference measures for the interpretation of clinical variables related to TMD, that can be used on the clinical settings and research fields, so future studies can continue to investigate this population. On top of that, this thesis cooperates for the evidence of regional interdependency between the upper cervical spine and the jaw, filling some of the knowledge gaps on the literature and suggesting ideas for future studies.Os objetivos centrais dessa tese de Doutorado foram: (1) verificar a reprodutibilidade de variáveis cinemáticas durante a máxima abertura da boca (MAB) e (2) investigar a interdependência regional entre a coluna cervical alta e a região orofacial por meio de um ensaio clínico randomizado controlado (RCT), a partir de variáveis cinemáticas e clínicas, após um protocolo de intervenção fisioterapêutica voltado para a coluna cervical, em mulheres com Disfunção temporomandibular (DTM). Para isso, foram desenvolvidos 4 estudos. O Estudo 1 avaliou a confiabilidade da análise cinemática dos movimentos da mandíbula em sujeitos assintomáticos. Os resultados indicaram que a reprodutibilidade das medidas depende da análise de dados e também das variáveis. Medidas estáticas, como o raio e a largura da mandíbula, foram as variáveis mais reprodutíveis. Além disso, a distância interincisal durante a MAB e os movimentos angulares da mandíbula no plano sagital apresentaram os menores erros e podem ser usados em futuros estudos. As variáveis com pouca amplitude foram, em geral, menos reprodutíveis, com maior Erro Padrão da Medida (EPM) e Diferença Mínima Detectável (DMD). Por fim, a comparação entre-avaliadores aprentou limites de concordância mais amplos e mostraram mais outliers. Os Estudos 2, 3 e 4 foram elaborados a partir de dados coletados em um RCT, que incluiu 61 mulheres com DTM, divididas em dois grupos: Grupo Controle (GC) e Grupo Intervenção (GI). O GI foi tratado com 10 sessões de um protocolo fisioterapêutico baseado em terapia manual para a coluna cervical alta e exercícios de estabilização segmentar para a coluna cervical, por 5 semanas. O GC não recebeu intervenção alguma por 5 semanas. Variáveis clínicas e cinemáticas foram coletadas antes e após o período de 5 semanas por um avaliador cego. A análise proposta no Estudo 2 teve como objetivo: (1) determinar se o protocolo de intervenção foi capaz de melhorar a intensidade da dor orofacial do GI, comparado ao GC; (2) verificar se, ao final de 5 semanas, houve diferença entre os grupos nas seguintes variáveis secundárias: Limiar de Dor à Pressão (LDP) dos músculos mastigatórios, função mandibular e impacto da cefaleia. Os resultados mostraram que o protocolo foi capaz de diminuir a dor orofacial e o impacto da cefaleia em mulheres com DTM. A dor melhorou significativamente a partir da quarta semana de intervenção, em comparação ao GC e à avaliação inicial. Não houve melhora no LDP da musculatura mastigatória e diferenças clinicamente irrelevantes foram encontradas na variável referente à função mandibular. No Estudo 3 foi realizada uma análise secundária do RCT a fim de (1) fornecer a Diferença Mínima Clinicamente Importante (DMCI) das variáveis referentes à dor orofacial, impacto da cefaleia, sensibilidade dos músculos mastigatórios, função mandibular e performance dos músculos flexores profundos cervicais a partir de um método baseado em ancoragem, utilizando a Global Rating of Change Scale (GRCS); (2) verificar quais desfechos podem predizer a melhora moderada ou intensa do quadro clínico de um paciente após o tratamento. O método de análise possibilitou o cálculo das DMCI para as variáveis de dor orofacial máxima, mínima e no momento da avaliação pela Escala Visual Analógica (EVA), para o Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire (MFIQ), para o Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), para o LDP dos músculos mastigatórios, para a MAB e para o Teste de Flexão Craniocervical (TFCC). As escalas de dor e o HIT-6 isoladamente apresentaram moderada capacidade de predizer a melhora do quadro clínico. A combinação de dor mínima (ou qualquer outra escala de dor) com o HIT-6 apresentou melhor capacidade de discriminar sujeitos que melhoraram moderadamente e intensamente dos que não melhoraram. Por fim, o Estudo 4 foi focado em duas variáveis clínicas que se referiam ao movimento e nas variáveis cinemáticas, com os seguintes objetivos: (1) observar os efeitos da intervenção no comportamento de variáveis cinemáticas relacionadas à amplitude e coordenação dos movimentos de cabeça e mandíbula durante a MAB, a fala e a mastigação em mulheres com DTM; (2) observar a variação da performance dos músculos flexores profundos do pescoço e a percepção das participantes em relação à evolução do quadro clínico após a intervenção. Nesse recorte, verificou-se a ausência de efeitos da intervenção proposta no comportamento de variáveis cinemáticas relacionadas à amplitude e coordenação dos movimentos de cabeça e mandíbula durante a MAB, a fala e a mastigação em mulheres com DTM. Por outro lado, os sujeitos tratados apresentaram melhora significativa do seu quadro clínico (a partir da GRCS), bem como da performance dos músculos flexores profundos da coluna cervical. De forma geral, essa tese viabiliza o uso da avaliação cinemática da mandíbula, que será útil na investigação do padrão biomecânico normal e alterado da mandíbula, fornece medidas de referência para interpretação de variaveis relacionadas à DTM e utilizadas tanto na prática clínica como no ambiente de pesquisa para que futuros estudos continuem investigando o tema, e coopera para a evidência da interdependência regional entre a coluna cervical e a mandíbula, completando algumas lacunas do conhecimento e sugerindo ideas para futuros estudos.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)FAPESP: 2014/05276-7porUniversidade Federal de São CarlosCâmpus São CarlosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia - PPGFtUFSCarFisioterapiaBiomecânicaReprodutibilidade dos testesDisfunção temporomandibularDiferença mínima detectávelDiferença mínima clinicamente importanteMovimento tridimensionalPhysical therapy specialtyBiomechanicsReproducibility of findingsTemporomandibular joint disordersMusculoskeletal manipulationsNeckCIENCIAS DA SAUDE::FISIOTERAPIA E TERAPIA OCUPACIONALAvaliação cinemática da mandíbula e efeito do tratamento por terapia manual e estabilização segmentar da coluna cervical na disfunção temporomandibularinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisOnline600abcad86a-2e7f-4b8e-931b-5764becc5fafinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCARinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCARORIGINALTese-Leticia Calixtre_Final pos defesa_Final.pdfTese-Leticia Calixtre_Final pos defesa_Final.pdfDocumento referente à versão final da teseapplication/pdf2126749https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/9226b088-5ef7-47fc-8271-42014d867124/download280f4d10c2d42e73486aecd747e53360MD53trueAnonymousREADaprovação versão final tese.pdfaprovação versão final tese.pdfDocumento assinado pelo orientador aprovando a versão final da teseapplication/pdf172217https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/735765f7-8356-4646-9dbe-e0cdf2010653/download5a056f7ad888f64a5c16a387e658b120MD54falseAnonymousREADLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81957https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/e980349c-1e30-4214-af3c-9aa7a3ed8b18/downloadae0398b6f8b235e40ad82cba6c50031dMD55falseAnonymousREADTEXTTese-Leticia Calixtre_Final pos defesa_Final.pdf.txtTese-Leticia Calixtre_Final pos defesa_Final.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain260610https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/cd0c36cb-244e-417b-ad07-78c125387e52/download676855aee540369772cc111b36532498MD510falseAnonymousREADaprovação versão final tese.pdf.txtaprovação versão final tese.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain1150https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/e84cc0c1-6818-4db3-a35a-41ec89fe6c2d/downloada6c56a03f403434ea0bb202c3d918fefMD512falseAnonymousREADTHUMBNAILTese-Leticia Calixtre_Final pos defesa_Final.pdf.jpgTese-Leticia Calixtre_Final pos defesa_Final.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg7556https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/dbdfad31-3212-4272-bc94-fc52ee0e0607/downloade5a59f3ad1ddcf8c50c7f7e620e8cf5cMD511falseAnonymousREADaprovação versão final tese.pdf.jpgaprovação versão final tese.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg8217https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/d9dc4485-ff02-4b55-b203-661215ba5291/download85134ed2ac6fc73d538ee453cf7db6b0MD513falseAnonymousREAD20.500.14289/99472025-02-05 19:05:05.348Acesso abertoopen.accessoai:repositorio.ufscar.br:20.500.14289/9947https://repositorio.ufscar.brRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufscar.br/oai/requestrepositorio.sibi@ufscar.bropendoar:43222025-02-05T22:05:05Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)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
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Avaliação cinemática da mandíbula e efeito do tratamento por terapia manual e estabilização segmentar da coluna cervical na disfunção temporomandibular
title Avaliação cinemática da mandíbula e efeito do tratamento por terapia manual e estabilização segmentar da coluna cervical na disfunção temporomandibular
spellingShingle Avaliação cinemática da mandíbula e efeito do tratamento por terapia manual e estabilização segmentar da coluna cervical na disfunção temporomandibular
Calixtre, Letícia Bojikian
Fisioterapia
Biomecânica
Reprodutibilidade dos testes
Disfunção temporomandibular
Diferença mínima detectável
Diferença mínima clinicamente importante
Movimento tridimensional
Physical therapy specialty
Biomechanics
Reproducibility of findings
Temporomandibular joint disorders
Musculoskeletal manipulations
Neck
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::FISIOTERAPIA E TERAPIA OCUPACIONAL
title_short Avaliação cinemática da mandíbula e efeito do tratamento por terapia manual e estabilização segmentar da coluna cervical na disfunção temporomandibular
title_full Avaliação cinemática da mandíbula e efeito do tratamento por terapia manual e estabilização segmentar da coluna cervical na disfunção temporomandibular
title_fullStr Avaliação cinemática da mandíbula e efeito do tratamento por terapia manual e estabilização segmentar da coluna cervical na disfunção temporomandibular
title_full_unstemmed Avaliação cinemática da mandíbula e efeito do tratamento por terapia manual e estabilização segmentar da coluna cervical na disfunção temporomandibular
title_sort Avaliação cinemática da mandíbula e efeito do tratamento por terapia manual e estabilização segmentar da coluna cervical na disfunção temporomandibular
author Calixtre, Letícia Bojikian
author_facet Calixtre, Letícia Bojikian
author_role author
dc.contributor.authorlattes.por.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/8265560955064959
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Calixtre, Letícia Bojikian
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Ana Beatriz de
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/1049547759186556
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv Alburquerque-Sendín, Francisco
dc.contributor.advisor-co1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/7551905278202959
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv cdebf319-11ab-4373-8874-96ee385f754b
contributor_str_mv Oliveira, Ana Beatriz de
Alburquerque-Sendín, Francisco
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fisioterapia
Biomecânica
Reprodutibilidade dos testes
Disfunção temporomandibular
Diferença mínima detectável
Diferença mínima clinicamente importante
Movimento tridimensional
topic Fisioterapia
Biomecânica
Reprodutibilidade dos testes
Disfunção temporomandibular
Diferença mínima detectável
Diferença mínima clinicamente importante
Movimento tridimensional
Physical therapy specialty
Biomechanics
Reproducibility of findings
Temporomandibular joint disorders
Musculoskeletal manipulations
Neck
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::FISIOTERAPIA E TERAPIA OCUPACIONAL
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Physical therapy specialty
Biomechanics
Reproducibility of findings
Temporomandibular joint disorders
Musculoskeletal manipulations
Neck
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::FISIOTERAPIA E TERAPIA OCUPACIONAL
description The central aims of this PhD thesis were: (1) to verify the reproducibility of kinematic variables during maximum mouth opening (MMO) and (2) to investigate the regional interdependency between the upper cervical spine and the orofacial region, using a randomized controlled trial (RCT) where was collected kinematic and clinical outcomes after a physiotherapeutic treatment for the neck in women with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Therefore, 4 studies were developed. The First Study investigated the reliability of the kinematic analysis of the jaw movement in asymptomatic subjects. The results showed that the reproducibility of the measures depends on the data analysis and on the variables. Static measurements like jaw radius and width were the most reproducible ones. Furthermore, the interincisal distance during MMO and the angular movements of the jaw in sagittal plane presented the smallest errors and should be used in future studies. In general, the variables with low amplitude were less reproductible, with higher Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) and Minimum Detectable Change (MDC). Finally, the inter-rater comparisons presented larger limits of agreement and more frequent outliers. The Second, Third and Fourth studies were elaborated from one RCT that included 61 women with TMD, divided into two groups: Control Group (CG) and Intervention Group (IG). IG was submitted to 10 sessions of physiotherapy based on manual therapy applied on the upper cervical spine and stabilization exercises to the neck, for 5 weeks. The CG did not get any intervention for 5 weeks. Clinical and kinematic variables were collected on baseline and after 5 weeks by a blind rater. The analysis of the Second study aimed: (1) to determine the effectiveness of the protocol to reduce orofacial pain intensity on IG compared to CG, after and during 5 weeks (2) to verify the differences between the groups after 5 weeks on the following secondary variables: Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) of the masticatory muscles, mandibular function and headache impact in women with TMD. The results showed significant decrease of orofacial pain intensity since 4 weeks of treatment in comparison to CG and in comparison to baseline. There were no significant differences on PPT and no clinically relevant differences on mandibular function. The Third study was based on a secondary analysis of the RCT in order to (1) provide the Minimum Clinical Important Difference (MCID) from the variables related to orofacial pain, headache impact, sensibility of the masticatory muscles, mandibular function and the performance of deep neck flexor muscles, according to an anchor method of analysis, using the Global Rating of Change Scale (GRCS); (2) verify which outcomes can predict the moderate or large response to the treatment. The analysis provided MCID values for variables related to maximum, minimum and current orofacial pain using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), for the Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire (MFIQ), for the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), for the PPT of the masticatory muscles, for the MMO measured with a caliper, and for the Craniocervical Flexion Test (CCFT). On the univariate regression analysis, among all the outcomes, the ones related to pain and the HIT-6 presented better capacity of discrimination between patients who largely or moderately got better from those who did not. On the multivariate regression analysis, the combination of minimum pain (or any other pain score) and HIT-6 presented the best capacity of discrimination between patients who largely or moderately improved from those who did not. Finally, the Fourth study focused on two clinical variables and several kinematic variables, with the following objectives: (1) verify the effects of the intervention on the behavior of kinematic variables related to range of motion and coordination of the head and jaw during MMO, speech and chewing in women with TMD; (2) verify the differences between the groups regarding the performance of the deep neck flexor muscles (according to the CCFT) and the perception of the patients regarding their global status of health (according to the GRCS) after the intervention/control. The results showed absence of significant effect of the intervention on the kinematic variable´s behaviour regarding range of motion and coordination between head and jaw during MMO, speech and chewing in women with TMD. On the other hand, the IG presented significant improvement on the GRCS, as well as on the CCFT. In general, this thesis enabled the kinematic evaluation of the jaw in order to investigate the normal or pathologic biomechanical patterns of the jaw, provided reference measures for the interpretation of clinical variables related to TMD, that can be used on the clinical settings and research fields, so future studies can continue to investigate this population. On top of that, this thesis cooperates for the evidence of regional interdependency between the upper cervical spine and the jaw, filling some of the knowledge gaps on the literature and suggesting ideas for future studies.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-05-10T13:32:48Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2018-05-10T13:32:48Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2018-02-15
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv CALIXTRE, Letícia Bojikian. Avaliação cinemática da mandíbula e efeito do tratamento por terapia manual e estabilização segmentar da coluna cervical na disfunção temporomandibular. 2018. Tese (Doutorado em Fisioterapia) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2018. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/9947.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/9947
identifier_str_mv CALIXTRE, Letícia Bojikian. Avaliação cinemática da mandíbula e efeito do tratamento por terapia manual e estabilização segmentar da coluna cervical na disfunção temporomandibular. 2018. Tese (Doutorado em Fisioterapia) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2018. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/9947.
url https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/9947
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv abcad86a-2e7f-4b8e-931b-5764becc5faf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Câmpus São Carlos
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia - PPGFt
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSCar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Câmpus São Carlos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron:UFSCAR
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron_str UFSCAR
institution UFSCAR
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
collection Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/9226b088-5ef7-47fc-8271-42014d867124/download
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/735765f7-8356-4646-9dbe-e0cdf2010653/download
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/e980349c-1e30-4214-af3c-9aa7a3ed8b18/download
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/cd0c36cb-244e-417b-ad07-78c125387e52/download
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/e84cc0c1-6818-4db3-a35a-41ec89fe6c2d/download
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/dbdfad31-3212-4272-bc94-fc52ee0e0607/download
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/d9dc4485-ff02-4b55-b203-661215ba5291/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 280f4d10c2d42e73486aecd747e53360
5a056f7ad888f64a5c16a387e658b120
ae0398b6f8b235e40ad82cba6c50031d
676855aee540369772cc111b36532498
a6c56a03f403434ea0bb202c3d918fef
e5a59f3ad1ddcf8c50c7f7e620e8cf5c
85134ed2ac6fc73d538ee453cf7db6b0
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio.sibi@ufscar.br
_version_ 1851688919851073536