Estudo teórico e experimental de paredes esbeltas de alvenaria estrutural

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2014
Autor(a) principal: Lopes, Guilherme Martins
Orientador(a): Parsekian, Guilherme Aris lattes
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Civil - PPGECiv
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: BR
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/4690
Resumo: The resistance to compression is the property that determines the use of masonry as a structural system since the great majority of structural elements in such systems are generally subjected to compressive stresses. One of the factors to be taken into account in the design of these compression elements is their slenderness. For design in Brazil it is still used the concept of simplified slenderness where the buckling length is determined by an effective depth (hef) and the radius of gyration is replaced by a parameter called the effective thickness (tef) for calculating a resistance reduction factor. This reduction factor has its origin in very old international standards and building codes, dating back to when these codes used the allowable stresses method for the dimensioning of structural elements; due to its age, an effective explanation and derivation of this factor, therefore, has been lost and is unknown at this time. With the various updates of international standards for structural masonry and the consequent adoption of the limit state design method for dimensioning of elements, this factor has been abolished. In the Brazilian standards, however, even with the adoption of the limit state design method, this factor is still used, which is a contradiction. Studies on the strength reduction due to slenderness effects show that there are large differences when comparing the results given by the simplified method in the NBR with those given by international standards. These differences probably don t lead to loss of structural integrity of structures in Brazil because the slenderness ratio has been limited to low values, particularly in the case of unreinforced masonry.
id SCAR_6b5f1cfe7e9fff74f8d8ecd75223f202
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:20.500.14289/4690
network_acronym_str SCAR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
repository_id_str
spelling Lopes, Guilherme MartinsParsekian, Guilherme Arishttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7798651726059215http://lattes.cnpq.br/37115466792830976a2f2553-3dd0-419b-aa85-324cd2e3968d2016-06-02T20:09:19Z2014-06-302016-06-02T20:09:19Z2014-02-19LOPES, Guilherme Martins. Estudo teórico e experimental de paredes esbeltas de alvenaria estrutural. 2014. 150 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Exatas e da Terra) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2014.https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/4690The resistance to compression is the property that determines the use of masonry as a structural system since the great majority of structural elements in such systems are generally subjected to compressive stresses. One of the factors to be taken into account in the design of these compression elements is their slenderness. For design in Brazil it is still used the concept of simplified slenderness where the buckling length is determined by an effective depth (hef) and the radius of gyration is replaced by a parameter called the effective thickness (tef) for calculating a resistance reduction factor. This reduction factor has its origin in very old international standards and building codes, dating back to when these codes used the allowable stresses method for the dimensioning of structural elements; due to its age, an effective explanation and derivation of this factor, therefore, has been lost and is unknown at this time. With the various updates of international standards for structural masonry and the consequent adoption of the limit state design method for dimensioning of elements, this factor has been abolished. In the Brazilian standards, however, even with the adoption of the limit state design method, this factor is still used, which is a contradiction. Studies on the strength reduction due to slenderness effects show that there are large differences when comparing the results given by the simplified method in the NBR with those given by international standards. These differences probably don t lead to loss of structural integrity of structures in Brazil because the slenderness ratio has been limited to low values, particularly in the case of unreinforced masonry.A resistência a compressão é propriedade determinante no uso da alvenaria como estrutura, uma vez que a grande maioria dos elementos estruturais nesse tipo de sistema construtivo são submetidos preponderadamente ao esforço de compressão. Um dos fatores a ser levado em conta no dimensionamento de elementos comprimidos é a esbeltez desse elemento. Até hoje no Brasil utiliza-se o conceito de esbeltez simplificado, onde o comprimento de flambagem é determinado por uma altura efetiva (hef) e o raio de giração é substituído por um parâmetro chamado espessura efetiva (tef) para cálculo de fator minorador de resistência. Esse fator tem sua origem em normas e códigos de construção internacionais bastante antigos, remontando a épocas em que esses códigos tratavam o dimensionamento pelo Método das Tensões Admissíveis, tendo sido perdida e, portanto, sendo desconhecida a efetiva explicação da sua dedução. Com as diversas atualizações de normas internacionais em alvenaria estrutural e com a consequente adoção do Método dos Estados Limites para dimensionamento, esse fator foi abolido. Na normalização brasileira, mesmo com a adoção do Método dos Estados Limites, esse fator continua vigente, o que gera uma contradição. Estudos sobre o efeito da redução da resistência devido à esbeltez, mostram que existem grandes diferenças nos resultados quando se compara o método simplificado na NBR com os de outras normas internacionais. Essas diferenças provavelmente não induzem a perda de segurança nas estruturas nacionais porque o índice de esbeltez tem sido limitado a valores baixos, em especial no caso de alvenaria não-armada.Universidade Federal de Minas Geraisapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal de São CarlosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Civil - PPGECivUFSCarBRAlvenariaEsbeltezDimensionamento a compressãoParede esbeltaSlendernessCompressive designSlender WallENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA CIVIL::CONSTRUCAO CIVILEstudo teórico e experimental de paredes esbeltas de alvenaria estruturalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesiscc830dc1-debc-4e7f-bbc7-a442aa405614info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCARinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCARORIGINAL5795.pdfapplication/pdf7169522https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/1efee340-e4f0-4479-bbe8-54da8adcdf55/download82089f61a5b06c7100940687172cc2e6MD51trueAnonymousREADTEXT5795.pdf.txt5795.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain0https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/f3aea10d-4f19-41bd-aef4-e697823a62b4/downloadd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD54falseAnonymousREADTHUMBNAIL5795.pdf.jpg5795.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg5999https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/80eb53f1-36e2-4900-b1ac-e304b5894ace/downloadb43f451fa6ae5b0eecb4cd4098cde9beMD55falseAnonymousREAD20.500.14289/46902025-02-06 05:13:26.786open.accessoai:repositorio.ufscar.br:20.500.14289/4690https://repositorio.ufscar.brRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufscar.br/oai/requestrepositorio.sibi@ufscar.bropendoar:43222025-02-06T08:13:26Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Estudo teórico e experimental de paredes esbeltas de alvenaria estrutural
title Estudo teórico e experimental de paredes esbeltas de alvenaria estrutural
spellingShingle Estudo teórico e experimental de paredes esbeltas de alvenaria estrutural
Lopes, Guilherme Martins
Alvenaria
Esbeltez
Dimensionamento a compressão
Parede esbelta
Slenderness
Compressive design
Slender Wall
ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA CIVIL::CONSTRUCAO CIVIL
title_short Estudo teórico e experimental de paredes esbeltas de alvenaria estrutural
title_full Estudo teórico e experimental de paredes esbeltas de alvenaria estrutural
title_fullStr Estudo teórico e experimental de paredes esbeltas de alvenaria estrutural
title_full_unstemmed Estudo teórico e experimental de paredes esbeltas de alvenaria estrutural
title_sort Estudo teórico e experimental de paredes esbeltas de alvenaria estrutural
author Lopes, Guilherme Martins
author_facet Lopes, Guilherme Martins
author_role author
dc.contributor.authorlattes.por.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/3711546679283097
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lopes, Guilherme Martins
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Parsekian, Guilherme Aris
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/7798651726059215
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv 6a2f2553-3dd0-419b-aa85-324cd2e3968d
contributor_str_mv Parsekian, Guilherme Aris
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Alvenaria
Esbeltez
Dimensionamento a compressão
Parede esbelta
topic Alvenaria
Esbeltez
Dimensionamento a compressão
Parede esbelta
Slenderness
Compressive design
Slender Wall
ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA CIVIL::CONSTRUCAO CIVIL
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Slenderness
Compressive design
Slender Wall
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA CIVIL::CONSTRUCAO CIVIL
description The resistance to compression is the property that determines the use of masonry as a structural system since the great majority of structural elements in such systems are generally subjected to compressive stresses. One of the factors to be taken into account in the design of these compression elements is their slenderness. For design in Brazil it is still used the concept of simplified slenderness where the buckling length is determined by an effective depth (hef) and the radius of gyration is replaced by a parameter called the effective thickness (tef) for calculating a resistance reduction factor. This reduction factor has its origin in very old international standards and building codes, dating back to when these codes used the allowable stresses method for the dimensioning of structural elements; due to its age, an effective explanation and derivation of this factor, therefore, has been lost and is unknown at this time. With the various updates of international standards for structural masonry and the consequent adoption of the limit state design method for dimensioning of elements, this factor has been abolished. In the Brazilian standards, however, even with the adoption of the limit state design method, this factor is still used, which is a contradiction. Studies on the strength reduction due to slenderness effects show that there are large differences when comparing the results given by the simplified method in the NBR with those given by international standards. These differences probably don t lead to loss of structural integrity of structures in Brazil because the slenderness ratio has been limited to low values, particularly in the case of unreinforced masonry.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2014-06-30
2016-06-02T20:09:19Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2014-02-19
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2016-06-02T20:09:19Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv LOPES, Guilherme Martins. Estudo teórico e experimental de paredes esbeltas de alvenaria estrutural. 2014. 150 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Exatas e da Terra) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2014.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/4690
identifier_str_mv LOPES, Guilherme Martins. Estudo teórico e experimental de paredes esbeltas de alvenaria estrutural. 2014. 150 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Exatas e da Terra) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2014.
url https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/4690
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv cc830dc1-debc-4e7f-bbc7-a442aa405614
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Civil - PPGECiv
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSCar
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron:UFSCAR
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron_str UFSCAR
institution UFSCAR
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
collection Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/1efee340-e4f0-4479-bbe8-54da8adcdf55/download
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/f3aea10d-4f19-41bd-aef4-e697823a62b4/download
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/80eb53f1-36e2-4900-b1ac-e304b5894ace/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 82089f61a5b06c7100940687172cc2e6
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e
b43f451fa6ae5b0eecb4cd4098cde9be
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio.sibi@ufscar.br
_version_ 1851688889959317504