Do conhecimento tradicional ao princípio ativo: dilemas sociais da atividade de pesquisa etnofarmacológica
Ano de defesa: | 2008 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso embargado |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sociologia - PPGS
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Palavras-chave em Inglês: | |
Área do conhecimento CNPq: | |
Link de acesso: | https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/6697 |
Resumo: | The Research and Development (R&D) in ethnopharmacology and etnobiology fields, guided by the therapeutic information obtained with local communities and indigenous people, holders of traditional knowledge, produces social conflicts and social disputes. Firstly, it is a paradoxical scientific activity since the modern scientific discovery in ethnopharmacology is produced by a non-scientific knowledge. This controversial research strategy intends to produce a socially legitimized knowledge through a process of epistemic standardization. Secondly, although the use of traditional knowledge is a typical activity, to access it and to use it requires the signature of a contract for the equitable sharing of benefits as well as the signature of a term of prior consent access. These two juridical requirements are at the same time a new ethical parameter in scientific research and a barrier to the autonomy of the scientific field. Therefore, through the politic action scientists and researches seeks new social strategies to recovery the autonomy of the scientific field in ethnopharmacology and ethnobiology areas. Thus, this sociological research analyzes the internal conflicts between scientists in the scientific field through the examination of the social controversies in the use of two distinct research models, the vertical and the horizontal research models, as well as the examination of the external social disputes of the scientific activity, specially the politic action of scientists concerning to the autonomy question. In this research, the question of access, use and equitable sharing of benefits in R&D processes emerges as an interesting strategy used by scientists to legitimate the appropriation of the traditional knowledge. As non-knowledge, the traditional knowledge is transformed by the modern commercial science in generic information without significance. At the same time, this traditional generic information would be liable to be manipulated and appropriated by pharmaceutical multinationals trough the application of intellectual property rights. Finally, the appropriation of the traditional communities claim intends to legitimate socially the controversial scientific activity of ethnopharmacologists, ethnobiologists and pharmaceutical industries. |
id |
SCAR_6dd7c0b66cf68418ccf26ee56551e593 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:ufscar/6697 |
network_acronym_str |
SCAR |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Almeida, Marcelo Fetz deVargas, Marcelo Coutinhohttp://genos.cnpq.br:12010/dwlattes/owa/prc_imp_cv_int?f_cod=K4787342P0http://lattes.cnpq.br/39361249768800884b6c1f4e-3948-435e-b9e3-d400f7e980e52016-06-02T20:39:10Z2008-11-182016-06-02T20:39:10Z2008-03-13ALMEIDA, Marcelo Fetz de. From traditional knowledge to active principle social dilemmas of the ethnopharmacologic research activity. 2008. 279 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Humanas) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2008.https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/6697The Research and Development (R&D) in ethnopharmacology and etnobiology fields, guided by the therapeutic information obtained with local communities and indigenous people, holders of traditional knowledge, produces social conflicts and social disputes. Firstly, it is a paradoxical scientific activity since the modern scientific discovery in ethnopharmacology is produced by a non-scientific knowledge. This controversial research strategy intends to produce a socially legitimized knowledge through a process of epistemic standardization. Secondly, although the use of traditional knowledge is a typical activity, to access it and to use it requires the signature of a contract for the equitable sharing of benefits as well as the signature of a term of prior consent access. These two juridical requirements are at the same time a new ethical parameter in scientific research and a barrier to the autonomy of the scientific field. Therefore, through the politic action scientists and researches seeks new social strategies to recovery the autonomy of the scientific field in ethnopharmacology and ethnobiology areas. Thus, this sociological research analyzes the internal conflicts between scientists in the scientific field through the examination of the social controversies in the use of two distinct research models, the vertical and the horizontal research models, as well as the examination of the external social disputes of the scientific activity, specially the politic action of scientists concerning to the autonomy question. In this research, the question of access, use and equitable sharing of benefits in R&D processes emerges as an interesting strategy used by scientists to legitimate the appropriation of the traditional knowledge. As non-knowledge, the traditional knowledge is transformed by the modern commercial science in generic information without significance. At the same time, this traditional generic information would be liable to be manipulated and appropriated by pharmaceutical multinationals trough the application of intellectual property rights. Finally, the appropriation of the traditional communities claim intends to legitimate socially the controversial scientific activity of ethnopharmacologists, ethnobiologists and pharmaceutical industries.A pesquisa e desenvolvimento (P&D) nas áreas de etnofarmacologia e etnobiologia, guiada por informações terapêuticas levantadas junto as comunidades locais e indígenas, detentoras do conhecimento tradicional, acarreta uma série de disputas e conflitos sociais. Em primeiro lugar, trata-se de uma atividade científica paradoxal, pois a descoberta científica moderna é produzida a partir de um conhecimento nãocientífico. Esta controversa atividade de pesquisa busca um conhecimento socialmente legitimado através de um processo de padronização epistêmica. Em segundo lugar, embora o emprego de conhecimento tradicional seja uma atividade usual, acessá-lo e utilizá-lo requerem a assinatura de um contrato para a divisão justa e eqüitativa de benefícios e do termo de consentimento livre e esclarecido. Estes dois pré-requisitos jurídicos são, ao mesmo tempo, um novo parâmetro ético na pesquisa científica e uma barreira para a autonomia do campo científico. Neste universo, através da ação política, cientistas e pesquisadores buscam novas estratégias para recuperar a autonomia perdida do campo científico nas áreas de etnofarmacologia e etnobiologia. Assim, esta pesquisa sociológica analisa os conflitos internos entre cientistas no interior do campo científico através do exame das controvérsias sociais no uso de dois modelos distintos de pesquisa, o modelo vertical e o modelo horizontal de pesquisa, bem como examina as disputas sociais externas à atividade científica, especialmente a ação política de cientistas sobre a questão da autonomia. Nesta pesquisa, a questão do acesso, do uso e da repartição justa e eqüitativa de benefícios nos processos de P&D emerge como uma interessante estratégia utilizada por cientistas para legitimar a apropriação do conhecimento tradicional. Como um não-conhecimento, o conhecimento tradicional é transformado pela moderna ciência comercial em uma informação genérica sem significado. Ao mesmo tempo, esta informação tradicional genérica seria passível de ser manipulada e apropriada por multinacionais farmacêuticas através da aplicação de direitos de propriedade intelectual. Finalmente, a apropriação das reivindicações de comunidades tradicionais objetiva legitimar socialmente a controversa atividade científica de etnofarmacólogos, etnobiólogos e indústrias farmacêuticas.Universidade Federal de Minas Geraisapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal de São CarlosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Sociologia - PPGSUFSCarBRCiência - aspectos sociaisCientistasConhecimento tradicionalPropriedade intelectualEtnociênciaTeoria dos CamposTechnoscienceEthnopharmacologyTraditional knowledgeIntellectual property rightsScientific fieldSocial autonomyCIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIADo conhecimento tradicional ao princípio ativo: dilemas sociais da atividade de pesquisa etnofarmacológicaFrom traditional knowledge to active principle social dilemmas of the ethnopharmacologic research activityinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis-1-1876968d2-d84b-4625-94e8-1fecdd4a36c5info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCARinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCARORIGINAL1938.pdfapplication/pdf3986372https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/6697/1/1938.pdf48c2d4899bb71a816ebddf58562a54bfMD51THUMBNAIL1938.pdf.jpg1938.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg5992https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/6697/2/1938.pdf.jpg1cdec34a841e52af27f2a0b72a47a9a4MD52ufscar/66972023-09-18 18:31:12.629oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:ufscar/6697Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufscar.br/oai/requestopendoar:43222023-09-18T18:31:12Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Do conhecimento tradicional ao princípio ativo: dilemas sociais da atividade de pesquisa etnofarmacológica |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
From traditional knowledge to active principle social dilemmas of the ethnopharmacologic research activity |
title |
Do conhecimento tradicional ao princípio ativo: dilemas sociais da atividade de pesquisa etnofarmacológica |
spellingShingle |
Do conhecimento tradicional ao princípio ativo: dilemas sociais da atividade de pesquisa etnofarmacológica Almeida, Marcelo Fetz de Ciência - aspectos sociais Cientistas Conhecimento tradicional Propriedade intelectual Etnociência Teoria dos Campos Technoscience Ethnopharmacology Traditional knowledge Intellectual property rights Scientific field Social autonomy CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIA |
title_short |
Do conhecimento tradicional ao princípio ativo: dilemas sociais da atividade de pesquisa etnofarmacológica |
title_full |
Do conhecimento tradicional ao princípio ativo: dilemas sociais da atividade de pesquisa etnofarmacológica |
title_fullStr |
Do conhecimento tradicional ao princípio ativo: dilemas sociais da atividade de pesquisa etnofarmacológica |
title_full_unstemmed |
Do conhecimento tradicional ao princípio ativo: dilemas sociais da atividade de pesquisa etnofarmacológica |
title_sort |
Do conhecimento tradicional ao princípio ativo: dilemas sociais da atividade de pesquisa etnofarmacológica |
author |
Almeida, Marcelo Fetz de |
author_facet |
Almeida, Marcelo Fetz de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.authorlattes.por.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/3936124976880088 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Almeida, Marcelo Fetz de |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Vargas, Marcelo Coutinho |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://genos.cnpq.br:12010/dwlattes/owa/prc_imp_cv_int?f_cod=K4787342P0 |
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv |
4b6c1f4e-3948-435e-b9e3-d400f7e980e5 |
contributor_str_mv |
Vargas, Marcelo Coutinho |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ciência - aspectos sociais Cientistas Conhecimento tradicional Propriedade intelectual Etnociência Teoria dos Campos |
topic |
Ciência - aspectos sociais Cientistas Conhecimento tradicional Propriedade intelectual Etnociência Teoria dos Campos Technoscience Ethnopharmacology Traditional knowledge Intellectual property rights Scientific field Social autonomy CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Technoscience Ethnopharmacology Traditional knowledge Intellectual property rights Scientific field Social autonomy |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIA |
description |
The Research and Development (R&D) in ethnopharmacology and etnobiology fields, guided by the therapeutic information obtained with local communities and indigenous people, holders of traditional knowledge, produces social conflicts and social disputes. Firstly, it is a paradoxical scientific activity since the modern scientific discovery in ethnopharmacology is produced by a non-scientific knowledge. This controversial research strategy intends to produce a socially legitimized knowledge through a process of epistemic standardization. Secondly, although the use of traditional knowledge is a typical activity, to access it and to use it requires the signature of a contract for the equitable sharing of benefits as well as the signature of a term of prior consent access. These two juridical requirements are at the same time a new ethical parameter in scientific research and a barrier to the autonomy of the scientific field. Therefore, through the politic action scientists and researches seeks new social strategies to recovery the autonomy of the scientific field in ethnopharmacology and ethnobiology areas. Thus, this sociological research analyzes the internal conflicts between scientists in the scientific field through the examination of the social controversies in the use of two distinct research models, the vertical and the horizontal research models, as well as the examination of the external social disputes of the scientific activity, specially the politic action of scientists concerning to the autonomy question. In this research, the question of access, use and equitable sharing of benefits in R&D processes emerges as an interesting strategy used by scientists to legitimate the appropriation of the traditional knowledge. As non-knowledge, the traditional knowledge is transformed by the modern commercial science in generic information without significance. At the same time, this traditional generic information would be liable to be manipulated and appropriated by pharmaceutical multinationals trough the application of intellectual property rights. Finally, the appropriation of the traditional communities claim intends to legitimate socially the controversial scientific activity of ethnopharmacologists, ethnobiologists and pharmaceutical industries. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2008-11-18 2016-06-02T20:39:10Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2008-03-13 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2016-06-02T20:39:10Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
ALMEIDA, Marcelo Fetz de. From traditional knowledge to active principle social dilemmas of the ethnopharmacologic research activity. 2008. 279 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Humanas) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2008. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/6697 |
identifier_str_mv |
ALMEIDA, Marcelo Fetz de. From traditional knowledge to active principle social dilemmas of the ethnopharmacologic research activity. 2008. 279 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Humanas) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2008. |
url |
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/6697 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
-1 -1 |
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv |
876968d2-d84b-4625-94e8-1fecdd4a36c5 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
embargoedAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sociologia - PPGS |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFSCar |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
BR |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) instacron:UFSCAR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) |
instacron_str |
UFSCAR |
institution |
UFSCAR |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/6697/1/1938.pdf https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/6697/2/1938.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
48c2d4899bb71a816ebddf58562a54bf 1cdec34a841e52af27f2a0b72a47a9a4 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1802136508115714048 |