Investimento estrangeiro direto, inovação regional e capacidade de absorção no Brasil

• Ano de defesa: 2023
• Autor(a) principal: Cassânego, Vitor Melão
• Orientador(a): Moralles, Herick Fernando
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: eng
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de São Carlos; Câmpus São Carlos
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de Produção - PPGEP
• Palavras-chave em Português: IED; FDI; Inovação regional; Patentes; Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Brazil; Regional Innovation; Patents
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::ECONOMIA::CRESCIMENTO, FLUTUACOES E PLANEJAMENTO ECONOMICO; CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::ECONOMIA::METODOS QUANTITATIVOS EM ECONOMIA; ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA DE PRODUCAO::ENGENHARIA ECONOMICA
• Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/17555

Foreign direct investment (FDI) has been seen by the literature as an influential factor in the technological evolution of host-countries innovation ecosystems, with several developing nations such as Brazil aiming to attract FDI as a way to potentialize their development through innovative output. However, the evidence on whether FDI configures a source of positive or negative influence on regional innovation capabilities is definitely mixed. Furthermore, despite the existence of studies regarding emerging economies, there is a gap when it comes to the regional level in Brazil. We intend to contribute to the literature by examining whether regional MNEs are inducing high or low-intensity innovations in this last context. Thus, this study aims to complement academic investigations by analyzing the influence of multinational enterprises (MNEs) on regional innovation intensity in Brazil in the state of São Paulo using a unique regional-level FDI database in a panel ranging from 2010 to 2016. The results indicate that the presence of MNEs boosts the production of high and low-intensity inventions, slightly more for the latter than the former. In other words, FDI is better for the production of inventions in general, which can later become innovation, but even more so for utility models and certificates of addition. These findings corroborate with various regression specifications and alternative estimation methods explored throughout the academic literature while remaining robust to endogeneity issues.