Acesso à justiça e a (in)constitucionalidade da sucumbência no processo do trabalho após a Lei 13.467/17:

• Ano de defesa: 2020
• Autor(a) principal: Menezes, Pedro Henrique Barreto
• Orientador(a): Pimentel, Alexandre Freire
• Banca de defesa: Teixeira, Sérgio Torres, Gouveia Filho, Roberto Pinheiro Campos, Lima, Leonardo Tibo Barbosa
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Católica de Pernambuco
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Mestrado em Direito
• Departamento: Departamento de Pós-Graduação
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Dissertações; Advogados - Honorários; Processo legal justo; Proporcionalidade (Direito); Processo do trabalho
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Dissertations; Lawyers - Fees; Fair legal process; Proportionality (Right); Work process
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
• Link de acesso: http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/1458

Law 13.467 / 17 introduced in the Consolidation of Labor Laws the payment of attorney fees, in the event of succumbence, under the terms of article 791-A. The objective of the research is to analyze whether the mentioned institute (succumbence) is ruled or not of unconstitutionality, in violation of the content of article 5, XXXV, of CF / 88 (access to justice), facing, therefore, the substantive due process, which deals with the reasonableness and proportionality that standards must have. To do so, we will discuss some guidelines that will guide the interpreter in assessing this reasonableness and proportionality. Thus, we will analyze the degree of effectiveness of the rule contained in article 5, XXXV, of CF / 88, showing its contained nature, and which therefore admits restrictions in the infraconstitutional plan. We will also deal with the legal framework that governs succumbential fees - subjective right of the lawyer with a food nature - in the light of the principle of causality. Finally, we will analyze the hyposufficiency and the principle of worker protection, highlighting the information and interpretive function of this principle, which will result not in the impossibility of collecting fees due to the succumbence, but in the way of fixing and demanding the funds. As a conclusion, comparing all these variables, it will be seen that succumbence is a necessary and appropriate measure, complying with the vectors of reasonableness and proportionality, thus not offending article 5, XXXV, of the CF / 88. The developed research used the hypothetical-deductive method, with a qualitative approach and bibliographic and documentary procedure.