Complementariedade do processo inovativo no Brasil: a decisão de produzir ou comprar inovação

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2018
Autor(a) principal: Aguiar, Fernando Amaral de lattes
Orientador(a): Mazali, Rogério lattes
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Católica de Brasília
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa Stricto Sensu em Economia de Empresas
Departamento: Escola de Gestão e Negócios
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Resumo em Inglês: Studies on the impact of technological innovation on the economy have spread through the literature. A specific field seeks to understand the advantages that a company or an industry has in deciding to produce technology internally or to buy it from third parties and to apply to existing processes. This paper reproduces the study by Cassiman and Veugelers (2006) and questions whether there is complementarity in the innovative process of the transformation industry in Brazil. The goal is to understand if the results found by the Belgian authors would be similar or different to Brazil, given the peculiarities of the Brazilian innovation sector. The evidence suggests that it is more advantageous for the transformation industry to buy technology rather than to invest in the creation of innovations within the sector. Therefore, the innovative process lacks complementarity. A possible explanation for this finding regards some particularities of Brazil, such as low labor productivity, excessive bureaucracy, low protection of intellectual property, but further investigation is necessary to distinguish the effects of those variables. This work is a pioneer in this topic for Brazil, and, for such reason, it does not exhaust the possibilities of inclusion of variables in the proposed models. The goal here is to introduce the subject and to raise discussions.
Link de acesso: https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2502
Resumo: Studies on the impact of technological innovation on the economy have spread through the literature. A specific field seeks to understand the advantages that a company or an industry has in deciding to produce technology internally or to buy it from third parties and to apply to existing processes. This paper reproduces the study by Cassiman and Veugelers (2006) and questions whether there is complementarity in the innovative process of the transformation industry in Brazil. The goal is to understand if the results found by the Belgian authors would be similar or different to Brazil, given the peculiarities of the Brazilian innovation sector. The evidence suggests that it is more advantageous for the transformation industry to buy technology rather than to invest in the creation of innovations within the sector. Therefore, the innovative process lacks complementarity. A possible explanation for this finding regards some particularities of Brazil, such as low labor productivity, excessive bureaucracy, low protection of intellectual property, but further investigation is necessary to distinguish the effects of those variables. This work is a pioneer in this topic for Brazil, and, for such reason, it does not exhaust the possibilities of inclusion of variables in the proposed models. The goal here is to introduce the subject and to raise discussions.
id UCB_a3eb813f7eabfd1e61bdf94b6e0f7d3e
oai_identifier_str oai:bdtd.ucb.br:tede/2502
network_acronym_str UCB
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB
spelling Mazali, Rogériohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9826490036298572http://lattes.cnpq.br/1093567743724510Aguiar, Fernando Amaral de2018-11-29T17:59:50Z2018-07-31AGUIAR, Fernando Amaral de. Complementariedade do processo inovativo no Brasil: a decisão de produzir ou comprar inovação. 2018. 26 f. Dissertação (Programa Stricto Sensu em Economia de Empresas) - Universidade Católica de Brasília, Brasília, 2018.https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2502Studies on the impact of technological innovation on the economy have spread through the literature. A specific field seeks to understand the advantages that a company or an industry has in deciding to produce technology internally or to buy it from third parties and to apply to existing processes. This paper reproduces the study by Cassiman and Veugelers (2006) and questions whether there is complementarity in the innovative process of the transformation industry in Brazil. The goal is to understand if the results found by the Belgian authors would be similar or different to Brazil, given the peculiarities of the Brazilian innovation sector. The evidence suggests that it is more advantageous for the transformation industry to buy technology rather than to invest in the creation of innovations within the sector. Therefore, the innovative process lacks complementarity. A possible explanation for this finding regards some particularities of Brazil, such as low labor productivity, excessive bureaucracy, low protection of intellectual property, but further investigation is necessary to distinguish the effects of those variables. This work is a pioneer in this topic for Brazil, and, for such reason, it does not exhaust the possibilities of inclusion of variables in the proposed models. The goal here is to introduce the subject and to raise discussions.Estudos relacionados ao impacto da inovação tecnológica na economia têm tomado cada vez mais espaço na literatura. Um campo específico busca compreender as vantagens que possui uma empresa ou um setor ao decidir produzir tecnologia internamente ou comprá-la de terceiros para aplicar nos processos já existentes. Este trabalho reproduz o artigo de Cassiman e Veugelers (2006) e busca entender se existe complementariedade no processo inovativo da indústria de transformação no Brasil. O objetivo é compreender se, dadas as peculiaridades do setor inovativo brasileiro, os resultados obtidos seriam semelhantes ou distintos daqueles encontrados no artigo dos autores belgas. Conclui-se que é mais vantajoso para a indústria de transformação comprar tecnologia pronta ao invés de investir na criação de inovações internas, não existindo, portanto, complementariedade no processo inovativo. Particularidades do caso brasileiro poderiam explicar tais resultados, a exemplo de baixa produtividade da mão de obra, intensa burocracia, baixa proteção da propriedade intelectual. Contudo novos estudos são necessários para se determinar os efeitos de cada uma dessas variáveis, etc. Este trabalho é pioneiro neste tema para o Brasil, e, por este motivo, não exaure as possibilidades de inclusão de variáveis nos modelos propostos. O objetivo é introduzir o assunto e suscitar discussões relacionadas ao tema.Submitted by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2018-11-29T17:59:35Z No. of bitstreams: 1 FernandoAmaraldeAguiarDissertacao2018.pdf: 613142 bytes, checksum: ca63fd03e438b9af6ede8dbd384e42aa (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2018-11-29T17:59:50Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 FernandoAmaraldeAguiarDissertacao2018.pdf: 613142 bytes, checksum: ca63fd03e438b9af6ede8dbd384e42aa (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2018-11-29T17:59:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 FernandoAmaraldeAguiarDissertacao2018.pdf: 613142 bytes, checksum: ca63fd03e438b9af6ede8dbd384e42aa (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-07-31application/pdfhttps://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/retrieve/6087/FernandoAmaraldeAguiarDissertacao2018.pdf.jpgporUniversidade Católica de BrasíliaPrograma Stricto Sensu em Economia de EmpresasUCBBrasilEscola de Gestão e NegóciosInovaçãoTecnologiaComplementariedadeIndústria de transformaçãoManufacturing IndustryComplementaritTechnologyInnovationCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::ECONOMIAComplementariedade do processo inovativo no Brasil: a decisão de produzir ou comprar inovaçãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCBinstname:Universidade Católica de Brasíliainstacron:UCBTHUMBNAILFernandoAmaraldeAguiarDissertacao2018.pdf.jpgFernandoAmaraldeAguiarDissertacao2018.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg5165https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2502/4/FernandoAmaraldeAguiarDissertacao2018.pdf.jpg33112c7c9da3553c0fb34d7ab605d0a7MD54TEXTFernandoAmaraldeAguiarDissertacao2018.pdf.txtFernandoAmaraldeAguiarDissertacao2018.pdf.txttext/plain40592https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2502/3/FernandoAmaraldeAguiarDissertacao2018.pdf.txt72978b1cbdfd027e82644603a364bf95MD53ORIGINALFernandoAmaraldeAguiarDissertacao2018.pdfFernandoAmaraldeAguiarDissertacao2018.pdfapplication/pdf613142https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2502/2/FernandoAmaraldeAguiarDissertacao2018.pdfca63fd03e438b9af6ede8dbd384e42aaMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81905https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2502/1/license.txt75558dcf859532757239878b42f1c2c7MD51tede/2502oai:bdtd.ucb.br:tede/25022018-11-30 01:05:10.789Biblioteca Digital de Dissertações da Universidade Católica de Brasília - UCBsdi@ucb.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
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Complementariedade do processo inovativo no Brasil: a decisão de produzir ou comprar inovação
title Complementariedade do processo inovativo no Brasil: a decisão de produzir ou comprar inovação
spellingShingle Complementariedade do processo inovativo no Brasil: a decisão de produzir ou comprar inovação
Aguiar, Fernando Amaral de
Inovação
Tecnologia
Complementariedade
Indústria de transformação
Manufacturing Industry
Complementarit
Technology
Innovation
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::ECONOMIA
title_short Complementariedade do processo inovativo no Brasil: a decisão de produzir ou comprar inovação
title_full Complementariedade do processo inovativo no Brasil: a decisão de produzir ou comprar inovação
title_fullStr Complementariedade do processo inovativo no Brasil: a decisão de produzir ou comprar inovação
title_full_unstemmed Complementariedade do processo inovativo no Brasil: a decisão de produzir ou comprar inovação
title_sort Complementariedade do processo inovativo no Brasil: a decisão de produzir ou comprar inovação
author Aguiar, Fernando Amaral de
author_facet Aguiar, Fernando Amaral de
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Mazali, Rogério
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/9826490036298572
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/1093567743724510
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Aguiar, Fernando Amaral de
contributor_str_mv Mazali, Rogério
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Inovação
Tecnologia
Complementariedade
Indústria de transformação
topic Inovação
Tecnologia
Complementariedade
Indústria de transformação
Manufacturing Industry
Complementarit
Technology
Innovation
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::ECONOMIA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Manufacturing Industry
Complementarit
Technology
Innovation
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::ECONOMIA
dc.description.abstract.eng.fl_txt_mv Studies on the impact of technological innovation on the economy have spread through the literature. A specific field seeks to understand the advantages that a company or an industry has in deciding to produce technology internally or to buy it from third parties and to apply to existing processes. This paper reproduces the study by Cassiman and Veugelers (2006) and questions whether there is complementarity in the innovative process of the transformation industry in Brazil. The goal is to understand if the results found by the Belgian authors would be similar or different to Brazil, given the peculiarities of the Brazilian innovation sector. The evidence suggests that it is more advantageous for the transformation industry to buy technology rather than to invest in the creation of innovations within the sector. Therefore, the innovative process lacks complementarity. A possible explanation for this finding regards some particularities of Brazil, such as low labor productivity, excessive bureaucracy, low protection of intellectual property, but further investigation is necessary to distinguish the effects of those variables. This work is a pioneer in this topic for Brazil, and, for such reason, it does not exhaust the possibilities of inclusion of variables in the proposed models. The goal here is to introduce the subject and to raise discussions.
dc.description.abstract.por.fl_txt_mv Estudos relacionados ao impacto da inovação tecnológica na economia têm tomado cada vez mais espaço na literatura. Um campo específico busca compreender as vantagens que possui uma empresa ou um setor ao decidir produzir tecnologia internamente ou comprá-la de terceiros para aplicar nos processos já existentes. Este trabalho reproduz o artigo de Cassiman e Veugelers (2006) e busca entender se existe complementariedade no processo inovativo da indústria de transformação no Brasil. O objetivo é compreender se, dadas as peculiaridades do setor inovativo brasileiro, os resultados obtidos seriam semelhantes ou distintos daqueles encontrados no artigo dos autores belgas. Conclui-se que é mais vantajoso para a indústria de transformação comprar tecnologia pronta ao invés de investir na criação de inovações internas, não existindo, portanto, complementariedade no processo inovativo. Particularidades do caso brasileiro poderiam explicar tais resultados, a exemplo de baixa produtividade da mão de obra, intensa burocracia, baixa proteção da propriedade intelectual. Contudo novos estudos são necessários para se determinar os efeitos de cada uma dessas variáveis, etc. Este trabalho é pioneiro neste tema para o Brasil, e, por este motivo, não exaure as possibilidades de inclusão de variáveis nos modelos propostos. O objetivo é introduzir o assunto e suscitar discussões relacionadas ao tema.
description Studies on the impact of technological innovation on the economy have spread through the literature. A specific field seeks to understand the advantages that a company or an industry has in deciding to produce technology internally or to buy it from third parties and to apply to existing processes. This paper reproduces the study by Cassiman and Veugelers (2006) and questions whether there is complementarity in the innovative process of the transformation industry in Brazil. The goal is to understand if the results found by the Belgian authors would be similar or different to Brazil, given the peculiarities of the Brazilian innovation sector. The evidence suggests that it is more advantageous for the transformation industry to buy technology rather than to invest in the creation of innovations within the sector. Therefore, the innovative process lacks complementarity. A possible explanation for this finding regards some particularities of Brazil, such as low labor productivity, excessive bureaucracy, low protection of intellectual property, but further investigation is necessary to distinguish the effects of those variables. This work is a pioneer in this topic for Brazil, and, for such reason, it does not exhaust the possibilities of inclusion of variables in the proposed models. The goal here is to introduce the subject and to raise discussions.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-11-29T17:59:50Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2018-07-31
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
format masterThesis
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv AGUIAR, Fernando Amaral de. Complementariedade do processo inovativo no Brasil: a decisão de produzir ou comprar inovação. 2018. 26 f. Dissertação (Programa Stricto Sensu em Economia de Empresas) - Universidade Católica de Brasília, Brasília, 2018.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2502
identifier_str_mv AGUIAR, Fernando Amaral de. Complementariedade do processo inovativo no Brasil: a decisão de produzir ou comprar inovação. 2018. 26 f. Dissertação (Programa Stricto Sensu em Economia de Empresas) - Universidade Católica de Brasília, Brasília, 2018.
url https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2502
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica de Brasília
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa Stricto Sensu em Economia de Empresas
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UCB
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Escola de Gestão e Negócios
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica de Brasília
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB
instname:Universidade Católica de Brasília
instacron:UCB
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB
instname_str Universidade Católica de Brasília
instacron_str UCB
institution UCB
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2502/4/FernandoAmaraldeAguiarDissertacao2018.pdf.jpg
https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2502/3/FernandoAmaraldeAguiarDissertacao2018.pdf.txt
https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2502/2/FernandoAmaraldeAguiarDissertacao2018.pdf
https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2502/1/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 33112c7c9da3553c0fb34d7ab605d0a7
72978b1cbdfd027e82644603a364bf95
ca63fd03e438b9af6ede8dbd384e42aa
75558dcf859532757239878b42f1c2c7
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Dissertações da Universidade Católica de Brasília - UCB
repository.mail.fl_str_mv sdi@ucb.br
_version_ 1643299890032279552