Influência de diferentes técnicas de cimentação de pinos de fibra de vidro na resistência à fratura, detecção de trincas e geração de artefatos em pré-molares unirradiculares

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2019
Autor(a) principal: Peixoto, Larissa Rangel lattes
Orientador(a): Melo, Daniela Pita de lattes
Banca de defesa: Bento, Patrícia Meira lattes, Melo, Saulo Leonardo Sousa lattes, Oliveira, Matheus Lima De lattes, Cavalcanti, Yuri Wanderley lattes
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Estadual da Paraíba
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Odontologia - PPGO
Departamento: Pró-Reitoria de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa - PRPGP
País: BR
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://repositorio.uepb.edu.br/handle/123456789/71946
Resumo: Objectives: To evaluate the influence of different fiberglass post (FGP) cementation techniques on root fracture resistance, crack detection potential and generation of tomographic and microtomographic artifacts. Methodology: Forty single-rooted human premolars teeth were randomly divided into four groups (n=10): FGA- Fiberglass post cemented with dual-curing resin cement; FGCore- Fiberglass post cemented with dual-curing resin cement with high filler content; MCFG- Metal core fiberglass post cemented with dual- curing resin cement; AFG- Anatomical fiberglass post cemented with dual-curing resin cement. Each tooth was submitted to fracture resistance test at 0.5mm/min in a universal testing machine (ISTRON 3365 Machine). Then, all teeth were scanned on Skyscan 1172 to assess initial tooth morphology and fracture pattern using the following scores: (1) Fracture of the coronal composite resin; (2) Favorable root fracture; and (3) Unfavorable root fracture. In addition, a quantification of the percentage of artifacts generated in Computed Micro- Tomography (Micro-CT) images was performed. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images were acquired using the CS 9000 3D (Kodak Dental Systems, Carestream Health, Rochester, NY, USA). Each tooth was scanned under four exposure parameters: 74kV, 80kV, 85kV and 90kV. The other parameters were set at 76 µm voxel size, 5 cm x 3.75 cm FOV size and 10 mA. Two observers assessed all CBCT images for root fracture detection using a 5-point confidence scale and a 4-point score for the presence of artifacts. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test were used to verify fracture resistance values between groups, while Fisher's exact test was used to verify the association between fracture pattern and groups. Quantitative evaluation of Micro-TC artifacts was analyzed using Kruskall Wallis and Mann Whitney tests. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the ROC curve (AUC) values were calculated and compared by two-way analyses of variance (ANOVA two-way) and Tukey's test Artifact interference on root fracture was assessed by chi-square test. Data were treated statistically at significance level of 5% ( α=0.05). Results: Fracture resistance values varied from 465,38 ± 127,29 N to 364,47 ± 78,64 N (p=0.159). No association between the fracture pattern and fiberglass cementation techniques was observed (p=0.276). The quantification of Micro-CT image artifacts for all groups presented less than 10% of artifacts (p=0,062). There were no significant differences between the exposure parameters for sensitivity, specificity and AUC values (p>0.05). AFG presented higher sensitivity values, statistically differing from FGCore and MCFG (p=0.037). MCFG specificity values differed statistically from FGCore (p=0.012). MCFG presented higher percentage of moderate artifacts than the other studied groups (p=0.001). Conclusions: Fiberglass cementation techniques did not influence the resistance, fracture pattern, and Micro-CT artifact intensity. Different exposure parameters do not seem to interfere on root fracture detection. The presence of a metal core fiberglass post decreases root fracture detection specificity values and increases artifact intensity in CBCT images.
id UEPB-2_c320507d480d085c67d5a8a4d5643890
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uepb.edu.br:123456789/71946
network_acronym_str UEPB-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB)
repository_id_str
spelling 2019-10-10T14:14:48Z2026-02-24T14:12:41Z2019-07-22PEIXOTO, L. R. Influência de diferentes técnicas de cimentação de pinos de fibra de vidro na resistência à fratura, detecção de trincas e geração de artefatos em pré-molares unirradiculares. 2019. 107f. Tese (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Odontologia - PPGO) - Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, Campina Grande, 2019.https://repositorio.uepb.edu.br/handle/123456789/7194624004014010P2Objectives: To evaluate the influence of different fiberglass post (FGP) cementation techniques on root fracture resistance, crack detection potential and generation of tomographic and microtomographic artifacts. Methodology: Forty single-rooted human premolars teeth were randomly divided into four groups (n=10): FGA- Fiberglass post cemented with dual-curing resin cement; FGCore- Fiberglass post cemented with dual-curing resin cement with high filler content; MCFG- Metal core fiberglass post cemented with dual- curing resin cement; AFG- Anatomical fiberglass post cemented with dual-curing resin cement. Each tooth was submitted to fracture resistance test at 0.5mm/min in a universal testing machine (ISTRON 3365 Machine). Then, all teeth were scanned on Skyscan 1172 to assess initial tooth morphology and fracture pattern using the following scores: (1) Fracture of the coronal composite resin; (2) Favorable root fracture; and (3) Unfavorable root fracture. In addition, a quantification of the percentage of artifacts generated in Computed Micro- Tomography (Micro-CT) images was performed. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images were acquired using the CS 9000 3D (Kodak Dental Systems, Carestream Health, Rochester, NY, USA). Each tooth was scanned under four exposure parameters: 74kV, 80kV, 85kV and 90kV. The other parameters were set at 76 µm voxel size, 5 cm x 3.75 cm FOV size and 10 mA. Two observers assessed all CBCT images for root fracture detection using a 5-point confidence scale and a 4-point score for the presence of artifacts. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test were used to verify fracture resistance values between groups, while Fisher's exact test was used to verify the association between fracture pattern and groups. Quantitative evaluation of Micro-TC artifacts was analyzed using Kruskall Wallis and Mann Whitney tests. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the ROC curve (AUC) values were calculated and compared by two-way analyses of variance (ANOVA two-way) and Tukey's test Artifact interference on root fracture was assessed by chi-square test. Data were treated statistically at significance level of 5% ( α=0.05). Results: Fracture resistance values varied from 465,38 ± 127,29 N to 364,47 ± 78,64 N (p=0.159). No association between the fracture pattern and fiberglass cementation techniques was observed (p=0.276). The quantification of Micro-CT image artifacts for all groups presented less than 10% of artifacts (p=0,062). There were no significant differences between the exposure parameters for sensitivity, specificity and AUC values (p>0.05). AFG presented higher sensitivity values, statistically differing from FGCore and MCFG (p=0.037). MCFG specificity values differed statistically from FGCore (p=0.012). MCFG presented higher percentage of moderate artifacts than the other studied groups (p=0.001). Conclusions: Fiberglass cementation techniques did not influence the resistance, fracture pattern, and Micro-CT artifact intensity. Different exposure parameters do not seem to interfere on root fracture detection. The presence of a metal core fiberglass post decreases root fracture detection specificity values and increases artifact intensity in CBCT images.Objetivos: Avaliar a influência de diferentes técnicas de cimentação de pinos de fibra de vidro (PFV) na resistência à fratura radicular, potencial de detecção de trincas e geração de artefatos tomográficos e microtomográficos. Metodologia: Quarenta dentes pré-molares unirradiculares foram divididos aleatoriamente em quatro grupos (n = 10): FGA- PFV cimentado com cimento resinoso dual; FGCore- PFV cimentado com cimento resinoso dual com alto conteúdo de carga; MCFG- PFV com filamento metálico cimentado com cimento resinoso dual; AFG – PFV anatomizado cimentado com cimento resinoso dual. Cada dente foi submetido ao teste de resistência à fratura a 0,5mm/min em uma máquina universal de testes (ISTRON 3365 Machine). A amostra foi escaneada no Skyscan 1172 (Bruker, Kontich, Bélgica) para avaliar a morfologia inicial dos dentes e o padrão de fratura, utilizando os seguintes escores: (1) fratura do núcleo de preenchimento; (2) fratura radicular favorável; e (3) fratura radicular desfavorável. Além disso, foi realizada uma quantificação da porcentagem de artefatos gerados em imagens de Micro-Tomografia Computadorizada (Micro-TC). As imagens de Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico (TCFC) foram adquiridas usando o CS 9000 3D (Kodak Dental Systems, Carestream Health, Rochester, NY, EUA). Cada dente foi escaneado sob quatro parâmetros de exposição: 74kV, 80kV, 85kV e 90kV. Os demais parâmetros foram fixados em 76 µm de tamanho de voxel, 5 cm x 3,75 cm de tamanho de FOV e 10 mA. Dois observadores avaliaram as imagens de TCFC para detecção de fratura radicular utilizando uma escala de confiança de 5 pontos e um escore de 4 pontos para a presença de artefatos. A análise de variância unidirecional (ANOVA) e o teste de Tukey foram utilizados para verificar os valores de resistência a fratura entre os grupos, enquanto o teste exato de Fisher foi usado para averiguar a associação entre o padrão de fratura e os grupos. A avaliação quantitativa de artefatos de Micro-TC foi analisada usando os testes de Kruskall Wallis e Mann Whitney. Os valores de sensibilidade, especificidade e área sob a curva ROC (AUC) foram calculados e comparados por análises de variância bidirecional (ANOVA two-way) e teste de Tukey. A interferência dos artefatos no diagnóstico de fratura radicular foi avaliada pelo teste do qui-quadrado. Os dados foram tratados estatisticamente ao nível de significância de 5% (α = 0,05). Resultados: Os valores de resistência à fratura radicular variaram de 465,38 ± 127,29 N a 364,47 ± 78,64 N (p = 0,159). Não foi observada associação estatisticamente significante entre o padrão de fratura e as técnicas de cimentação de PFV (p = 0,276). A quantificação de artefatos de imagem de Micro-TC para todos os grupos apresentou menos de 10% de artefatos (p = 0,062). Não houve diferenças significativas entre os parâmetros de exposição para sensibilidade, especificidade e valores de AUC (p> 0,05). O grupo AFG apresentou maiores valores de sensibilidade, diferindo estatisticamente do FGCore e do MCFG (p = 0,037). Os valores de especificidade do MCFG diferiram estatisticamente do FGCore (p = 0,012), apresentando menores valores. O grupo MCFG apresentou maior porcentagem de artefatos do que os demais grupos estudados (p <0,001). Conclusões: As diferentes técnicas de cimentação de PFV não influenciaram na resistência à fratura, no padrão de fratura e na intensidade de artefatos de Micro-CT. Diferentes parâmetros de exposição não interferem na detecção de fraturas radiculares. A presença do filamento metálico no interior do PFV diminui os valores de especificidade de fratura radicular e aumentou a intensidade do artefato em imagens de TCFC.application/pdfUniversidade Estadual da ParaíbaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Odontologia - PPGOUEPBBRPró-Reitoria de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa - PRPGPPró-Reitoria de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa - PRPGPArtifactsCone-Beam Computed TomographyFiberglassCIENCIAS DA SAUDEPinos de fibra de vidroArtefatosTomografia Computadorizada de Feixe CônicoInfluência de diferentes técnicas de cimentação de pinos de fibra de vidro na resistência à fratura, detecção de trincas e geração de artefatos em pré-molares unirradicularesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisBento, Patrícia Meirahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7371238765825611Melo, Saulo Leonardo Sousahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3043966507619496Oliveira, Matheus Lima Dehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3156969817236677Cavalcanti, Yuri Wanderleyhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1303695205442802Melo, Daniela Pita dehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2824485698432887http://lattes.cnpq.br/4194623340602725Peixoto, Larissa Rangelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessporreponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB)instname:Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB)instacron:UEPBORIGINALPDF - Larissa Rangel Peixoto.pdfPDF - Larissa Rangel Peixoto.pdfPDF - Larissa Rangel Peixotoapplication/pdf2424939https://repositorio.uepb.edu.br/bitstreams/95785441-3f57-4c44-9e83-3bfa42077b11/download8270b91e164211743eee1a7224fe7822MD52trueAnonymousREADLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81960https://repositorio.uepb.edu.br/bitstreams/c4d1eb7c-1e26-4310-9667-4f09a0837824/download6052ae61e77222b2086e666b7ae213ceMD51falseAnonymousREADlicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81324https://repositorio.uepb.edu.br/bitstreams/b683abae-fb53-46da-acb8-5f6bd062f4c7/downloadea12793326f265c7d8ea2bcdd2c49d6fMD55falseAnonymousREADTEXTPDF - Larissa Rangel Peixoto.pdf.txtPDF - Larissa Rangel Peixoto.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain185479https://repositorio.uepb.edu.br/bitstreams/151601f4-cb17-467c-84f9-ce22214a59cc/download2dfae2db59c3f29c160598d4602bb6e3MD53falseAnonymousREADTHUMBNAILPDF - Larissa Rangel Peixoto.pdf.jpgPDF - Larissa Rangel Peixoto.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg3847https://repositorio.uepb.edu.br/bitstreams/18b74582-3d4c-43bc-bb27-e3ea9fc2ddd2/download0455826625184eabd2b6cb3de8d4a0c0MD54falseAnonymousREAD123456789/719462026-05-06T11:51:09.130339Zopen.accessoai:repositorio.uepb.edu.br:123456789/71946https://repositorio.uepb.edu.brRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://dspace.bc.uepb.edu.br/oai/requestsibuepb@setor.uepb.edu.bropendoar:2026-05-06T11:51:09Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB) - Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB)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
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influência de diferentes técnicas de cimentação de pinos de fibra de vidro na resistência à fratura, detecção de trincas e geração de artefatos em pré-molares unirradiculares
title Influência de diferentes técnicas de cimentação de pinos de fibra de vidro na resistência à fratura, detecção de trincas e geração de artefatos em pré-molares unirradiculares
spellingShingle Influência de diferentes técnicas de cimentação de pinos de fibra de vidro na resistência à fratura, detecção de trincas e geração de artefatos em pré-molares unirradiculares
Peixoto, Larissa Rangel
Artifacts
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Fiberglass
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE
Pinos de fibra de vidro
Artefatos
Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico
title_short Influência de diferentes técnicas de cimentação de pinos de fibra de vidro na resistência à fratura, detecção de trincas e geração de artefatos em pré-molares unirradiculares
title_full Influência de diferentes técnicas de cimentação de pinos de fibra de vidro na resistência à fratura, detecção de trincas e geração de artefatos em pré-molares unirradiculares
title_fullStr Influência de diferentes técnicas de cimentação de pinos de fibra de vidro na resistência à fratura, detecção de trincas e geração de artefatos em pré-molares unirradiculares
title_full_unstemmed Influência de diferentes técnicas de cimentação de pinos de fibra de vidro na resistência à fratura, detecção de trincas e geração de artefatos em pré-molares unirradiculares
title_sort Influência de diferentes técnicas de cimentação de pinos de fibra de vidro na resistência à fratura, detecção de trincas e geração de artefatos em pré-molares unirradiculares
author Peixoto, Larissa Rangel
author_facet Peixoto, Larissa Rangel
author_role author
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Bento, Patrícia Meira
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/7371238765825611
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Melo, Saulo Leonardo Sousa
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/3043966507619496
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Matheus Lima De
dc.contributor.referee3Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/3156969817236677
dc.contributor.referee4.fl_str_mv Cavalcanti, Yuri Wanderley
dc.contributor.referee4Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/1303695205442802
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Melo, Daniela Pita de
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/2824485698432887
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/4194623340602725
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Peixoto, Larissa Rangel
contributor_str_mv Bento, Patrícia Meira
Melo, Saulo Leonardo Sousa
Oliveira, Matheus Lima De
Cavalcanti, Yuri Wanderley
Melo, Daniela Pita de
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Artifacts
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Fiberglass
topic Artifacts
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Fiberglass
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE
Pinos de fibra de vidro
Artefatos
Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS DA SAUDE
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pinos de fibra de vidro
Artefatos
Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico
description Objectives: To evaluate the influence of different fiberglass post (FGP) cementation techniques on root fracture resistance, crack detection potential and generation of tomographic and microtomographic artifacts. Methodology: Forty single-rooted human premolars teeth were randomly divided into four groups (n=10): FGA- Fiberglass post cemented with dual-curing resin cement; FGCore- Fiberglass post cemented with dual-curing resin cement with high filler content; MCFG- Metal core fiberglass post cemented with dual- curing resin cement; AFG- Anatomical fiberglass post cemented with dual-curing resin cement. Each tooth was submitted to fracture resistance test at 0.5mm/min in a universal testing machine (ISTRON 3365 Machine). Then, all teeth were scanned on Skyscan 1172 to assess initial tooth morphology and fracture pattern using the following scores: (1) Fracture of the coronal composite resin; (2) Favorable root fracture; and (3) Unfavorable root fracture. In addition, a quantification of the percentage of artifacts generated in Computed Micro- Tomography (Micro-CT) images was performed. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images were acquired using the CS 9000 3D (Kodak Dental Systems, Carestream Health, Rochester, NY, USA). Each tooth was scanned under four exposure parameters: 74kV, 80kV, 85kV and 90kV. The other parameters were set at 76 µm voxel size, 5 cm x 3.75 cm FOV size and 10 mA. Two observers assessed all CBCT images for root fracture detection using a 5-point confidence scale and a 4-point score for the presence of artifacts. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test were used to verify fracture resistance values between groups, while Fisher's exact test was used to verify the association between fracture pattern and groups. Quantitative evaluation of Micro-TC artifacts was analyzed using Kruskall Wallis and Mann Whitney tests. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the ROC curve (AUC) values were calculated and compared by two-way analyses of variance (ANOVA two-way) and Tukey's test Artifact interference on root fracture was assessed by chi-square test. Data were treated statistically at significance level of 5% ( α=0.05). Results: Fracture resistance values varied from 465,38 ± 127,29 N to 364,47 ± 78,64 N (p=0.159). No association between the fracture pattern and fiberglass cementation techniques was observed (p=0.276). The quantification of Micro-CT image artifacts for all groups presented less than 10% of artifacts (p=0,062). There were no significant differences between the exposure parameters for sensitivity, specificity and AUC values (p>0.05). AFG presented higher sensitivity values, statistically differing from FGCore and MCFG (p=0.037). MCFG specificity values differed statistically from FGCore (p=0.012). MCFG presented higher percentage of moderate artifacts than the other studied groups (p=0.001). Conclusions: Fiberglass cementation techniques did not influence the resistance, fracture pattern, and Micro-CT artifact intensity. Different exposure parameters do not seem to interfere on root fracture detection. The presence of a metal core fiberglass post decreases root fracture detection specificity values and increases artifact intensity in CBCT images.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2019-10-10T14:14:48Z
2026-02-24T14:12:41Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2019-07-22
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv PEIXOTO, L. R. Influência de diferentes técnicas de cimentação de pinos de fibra de vidro na resistência à fratura, detecção de trincas e geração de artefatos em pré-molares unirradiculares. 2019. 107f. Tese (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Odontologia - PPGO) - Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, Campina Grande, 2019.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.uepb.edu.br/handle/123456789/71946
dc.identifier.capesdegreeprogramcode.none.fl_str_mv 24004014010P2
identifier_str_mv PEIXOTO, L. R. Influência de diferentes técnicas de cimentação de pinos de fibra de vidro na resistência à fratura, detecção de trincas e geração de artefatos em pré-molares unirradiculares. 2019. 107f. Tese (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Odontologia - PPGO) - Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, Campina Grande, 2019.
24004014010P2
url https://repositorio.uepb.edu.br/handle/123456789/71946
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual da Paraíba
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Odontologia - PPGO
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UEPB
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Pró-Reitoria de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa - PRPGP
Pró-Reitoria de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa - PRPGP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual da Paraíba
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB)
instname:Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB)
instacron:UEPB
instname_str Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB)
instacron_str UEPB
institution UEPB
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB)
collection Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB)
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.uepb.edu.br/bitstreams/95785441-3f57-4c44-9e83-3bfa42077b11/download
https://repositorio.uepb.edu.br/bitstreams/c4d1eb7c-1e26-4310-9667-4f09a0837824/download
https://repositorio.uepb.edu.br/bitstreams/b683abae-fb53-46da-acb8-5f6bd062f4c7/download
https://repositorio.uepb.edu.br/bitstreams/151601f4-cb17-467c-84f9-ce22214a59cc/download
https://repositorio.uepb.edu.br/bitstreams/18b74582-3d4c-43bc-bb27-e3ea9fc2ddd2/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 8270b91e164211743eee1a7224fe7822
6052ae61e77222b2086e666b7ae213ce
ea12793326f265c7d8ea2bcdd2c49d6f
2dfae2db59c3f29c160598d4602bb6e3
0455826625184eabd2b6cb3de8d4a0c0
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB) - Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv sibuepb@setor.uepb.edu.br
_version_ 1865082736879861760