O papel da jurisprudência no Processo Civil contemporâneo

• Ano de defesa: 2012
• Autor(a) principal: Madeira, Daniela Pereira
• Orientador(a): Mendes, Aluísio Gonçalves de Castro
• Banca de defesa: Fux, Luiz , Wambier, Teresa Arruda Alvim
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito
• Departamento: Centro de Ciências Sociais::Faculdade de Direito
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Jurisprudência; Jurisprudência dominante; Jurisprudencial; Decisão; Decisão Judicial; Precedente; Estabilidade; Estabilidade jurisprudencial; Previsibilidade; Previsibilidade jurisprudencial; Isonomia; Princípio da Isonomia; Segurança Jurídica; Princípio da Segurança Jurídica; Confiança; Princípio da Confiança; Interpretação; Aplicação; Modulação; Código de Processo Civil; Novo Código de Processo Civil; Fundamentação; Motivação; Reforma Processual; Instrumentos Processuais; Jurisdição; Jurisdicionados; Jurisdicional; Pauta de conduta; Celeridade; Celeridade processual; Eficiência; Eficácia; Uniformização; Conflitos; Conflitos intersubjetivos; Sociedade; Sociedade globalizada; Sociedade massificada
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Case law; Judicial; Stability; Principle of equality; Legislated standard; Judicial standard; Discrepancy; Unequally treated; Judgment isonomic; Eequal treatment; Certainty; Interpretation; Stable; Predictable; Modulation; Civil Procedure Code; Principle of legal certainty; Principle of legitimate expectations; Efficiency; Standardization
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO
• Link de acesso: http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/9675

The correct use of case law will lead Brazilian society to a greater judicial stability that complies with the principle of equality, not only before legal rules as well as before judicial norms.It should be avoided the discrepancy of judgments related to the same matter, which unequally treat the ones in the same circumstances, thus avoiding the long judicial journey in order to obtain a uniform judgment for similar situations. The principle of equality aims to ensure that everyone receives equal law treatment and on the other hand, assures that all judges should decide in the same way when they come across similar situations. The jurisprudence as it reflects the interpretation of the rule, should be stable and predictable, in order to guide the conduct of citizens as it states the highest Court understanding on a particular matter. An unstable and unpredictable rule does not create lawl certainty nor the social peace that one can reasonably expect. The application of case law in time, by means of its modulation, earns new contours due its legal provision in the Civil Procedure Code Project. The change of a settled understanding claims for an adequate and specific reasoning, considering the need for stability of legal relations (art. 847, § 1 of the completed project in the Senate). This increases the value of the legal certainty principle and of legitimate expectations principle that should have as one of their consequences that the legitimate expectation of the claimer is respected by applying him the old and more beneficial ruling jurisprudence. In this context, the aim for an effective procedural reform should be pursued, besides the procedural celerity and the efficiency of judicial acts, and also the standardization of jurisprudence. An unique agenda of conduct for the claimants should be desired as a goal. And this can only be achieved when there is a standardization and application of prevailing jurisprudence.