Dimensões do princípio do ne bis in idem

• Ano de defesa: 2012
• Autor(a) principal: Saboya, Keity Mara Ferreira de Souza e
• Orientador(a): Japiassú, Carlos Eduardo Adriano
• Banca de defesa: Béze, Patrícia Mothé Glioche , Tangerino, Davi de Paiva Costa , Vervaele, John Alois Emericus , Silveira, Renato Mello Jorge da
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito
• Departamento: Centro de Ciências Sociais::Faculdade de Direito
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Ne bis in idem; Direito penal; Direito administrativo sancionador; Acumulação de sanções
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Ne bis in idem; Criminal law; Administrative law sanctioning; Accumulation of penalties
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO PENAL
• Link de acesso: http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/9274

The purpose of this work is to reconstruct the meaning and scope of the principle of ne bis in idem, with the study of reciprocal interference of criminal law and sanctioning of administrative law, with an emphasis on competition rules between these manifestations of the penalizing authority of the State, its consequences and the risks posed to human freedom, especially in the face of prohibition of double ¬¬ or multiple punitive inset in principle under discussion.The text is structured on three pillars: the first part takes care of the most universal principle of ne bis in idem, covering both your track record as its international recognition; the second part examines the consistent European legal experience, analyzing the theoretical frameworks and related to practical matters; finally, the third part goes to the heart of research, focusing theoretically the principle of ne bis in idem in order to renew their interpretation at the national level, resizing the convergence between the criminal law and administrative law sanctioning the uniqueness the (re)action repressive state and the possibilities of coping with dysfunction of this principle in Brazilian law. It shows that the accumulation of punitive sanctions, criminal and/or administrative sanctions, if present assumptions identity of subject, facts and fundamentals, is forbidden by the specter of protection of the principle of ne bis in idem. It also intends to clarify whether, in cases of exacerbation punitive or confluent with similar purposes, shall always prevail criminal law enforcement. It is expected, moreover, to formulate proposals for the regulation of conflicts in cases of competition rules between the criminal law and administrative law sanctioning. It shows, finally, that the main objective of the investigation is fully understanding the principle of ne bis in idem, reflecting about the ilegitimacy accumulation of criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, especially with the fundament that it is not possible untying the rules of independence between the jurisdiction and the award of punitive or administration due to ontological indifferences between the illicit criminal and administrative.