Accountability social: casos do Banco Mundial e BNDES em perspectiva comparada

• Ano de defesa: 2015
• Autor(a) principal: Siston, Felipe Rodrigues
• Orientador(a): Tostes, Ana Paula Balthazar
• Banca de defesa: Rocha, Mauricio Santoro , Lima, Luciana Badin Pereira
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Relações Internacionais
• Departamento: Centro de Ciências Sociais::Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Accountability social; Democracia; Sociedade civil; Bancos de desenvolvimento; Políticas públicas Brasil; Desenvolvimento econômico Aspectos sociais; Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social (Brasil)
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Social accountability; Democracy; Civil society; Development Banks
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::CIENCIA POLITICA::POLITICA INTERNACIONAL::RELACOES I?INTERNACIONAIS, BILATERAIS E MULTILATERAIS
• Link de acesso: http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/15613

This research analyses the social accountability in development banks, state-owned institutions manly concerned in providing long-term capital to industry in order to distribute economic and social gains. The choice of two representative cases The World Bank and the Brazilian BNDES (National Bank for Economic and Social Development) - aims to elucidate differences in the practices of transparency and participation, focusing on the principles and procedures identified in these institutions. This dissertation is divided in three sections. First, a theoretical section, in which several understandings of accountability are analyzed, using the literature of International Relations, Public Relations and others disciplines. After that, a history section, regarding the development of an institutional self-regulation mechanism instead of external mechanisms and the history of the two banks. Finally, the third section focuses on the empirical effort made by this research to describe and compare the two cases, using instruments such as interviews, primary documents and websites from both institutions. Thus, a bibliographic and theoretical review are added to a comparative picture of the institutions made from December 2014 and January 2015, in terms of principles and procedures. The systematization of the conceptual, historical and empirical data aims to contribute to the scarce research on ways of measuring social accountability efforts in the development banks, comparing a multinational and a national case.