Avaliação da qualidade de vida do paciente transplantado hepático

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2015
Autor(a) principal: Flor, Maria José Nascimento
Orientador(a): Garcia, José Huygens Parente
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/19704
Resumo: The increased survival with liver transplantation sparked concern about the quality of life (QOL) of people in the short and long-term postoperative period. Objective: To evaluate the QOL of liver transplanted with donor graft, over the age of 60 years. Method: Prospective, descriptive and analytical, with a quantitative approach. Data were collected in Ceará Liver Transplant Center at Walter Cantídio University Hospital, and the participants were those undergoing liver transplantation in the period 2007 to 2013. It was used for data collection the Short Form-36 questionnaire ( SF-36), generic instrument to assess QOL; and to characterize the subjects, they used the form of call service and surgery of organ harvesting report. They were applied one hundred thirty-seven questionnaires by the researcher and four were answered by the patient, totaling 141 participants. The sample was divided into two groups: Group A (GA) consisting of receivers that received less donor liver grafts or equal to 60 years old, and Group B (GB) formed by receivers receiving liver graft donor above 60 years of age. Results: The mean age of the GA receptor was 52.5 (between 20 and 75 years) and GB was 54 (between 27 and 76 years); He was male in both groups; the domains of the SF-36: physical functioning, social aspect, mental health and role emotional, showed better score (p = 0.001) in the variable time of transplant, score MELD and recipient age in both groups, but no significant difference between they. Conclusion: The donor's age did not influence the quality of life of patients undergoing liver transplantation; the MELD score less than 21 had a positive influence on QOL in both groups; QOL in both groups was not modified after transplantation; post-transplant QOL was similar in the three groups divided by age. Keywords: Quality of Life. Liver transplant.
id UFC-7_421c346c982cd566dca7b01daee73bb6
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufc.br:riufc/19704
network_acronym_str UFC-7
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository_id_str
spelling Flor, Maria José NascimentoGarcia, José Huygens Parente2016-09-23T11:50:19Z2016-09-23T11:50:19Z2015-04-29FLOR, M. J. N. Avaliação da qualidade de vida do paciente transplantado hepático. 2015. 53 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Cirurgia) - Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, 2015.http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/19704The increased survival with liver transplantation sparked concern about the quality of life (QOL) of people in the short and long-term postoperative period. Objective: To evaluate the QOL of liver transplanted with donor graft, over the age of 60 years. Method: Prospective, descriptive and analytical, with a quantitative approach. Data were collected in Ceará Liver Transplant Center at Walter Cantídio University Hospital, and the participants were those undergoing liver transplantation in the period 2007 to 2013. It was used for data collection the Short Form-36 questionnaire ( SF-36), generic instrument to assess QOL; and to characterize the subjects, they used the form of call service and surgery of organ harvesting report. They were applied one hundred thirty-seven questionnaires by the researcher and four were answered by the patient, totaling 141 participants. The sample was divided into two groups: Group A (GA) consisting of receivers that received less donor liver grafts or equal to 60 years old, and Group B (GB) formed by receivers receiving liver graft donor above 60 years of age. Results: The mean age of the GA receptor was 52.5 (between 20 and 75 years) and GB was 54 (between 27 and 76 years); He was male in both groups; the domains of the SF-36: physical functioning, social aspect, mental health and role emotional, showed better score (p = 0.001) in the variable time of transplant, score MELD and recipient age in both groups, but no significant difference between they. Conclusion: The donor's age did not influence the quality of life of patients undergoing liver transplantation; the MELD score less than 21 had a positive influence on QOL in both groups; QOL in both groups was not modified after transplantation; post-transplant QOL was similar in the three groups divided by age. Keywords: Quality of Life. Liver transplant.O aumento da sobrevida com o transplante hepático despertou a preocupação com a qualidade de vida (QV) das pessoas no pós-operatório a curto e longo prazo. Objetivo: Avaliar a QV do transplantado hepático, com enxerto de doador, com idade acima de 60 anos. Método: Estudo prospectivo, descritivo e analítico, com abordagem quantitativa. Os dados foram coletados no Centro de Transplante de Fígado do Ceará, no Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio, e os participantes foram aqueles submetidos a transplante hepático, no período de 2007 a 2013. Utilizou-se para coleta dos dados o questionário Short Form-36 (SF-36), instrumento genérico para avaliar a QV; e para caracterização dos sujeitos, foram utilizados o impresso de atendimento do serviço e relatório da cirurgia da captação de órgãos. Foram aplicados cento e trinta e sete questionários pelo pesquisador e quatro foram respondidos pelo próprio paciente, totalizando 141 participantes. A amostra foi dividida em dois grupos: Grupo A (GA), composta por receptores que receberam enxerto hepático de doador menor ou igual a 60 anos de idade, e Grupo B (GB), formado por receptores que receberam enxerto hepático de doador acima de 60 anos de idade. Resultados: A idade média do receptor do GA foi de 52,5 (entre 20 e 75 anos) e do GB foi de 54 (entre 27 e 76 anos); predominou o sexo masculino nos dois grupos; os domínios do SF-36: capacidade funcional, aspecto social, saúde mental e limitação por aspectos emocionais, mostraram melhor pontuação (p=0,001) na variável tempo de transplante, score MELD e idade do receptor nos dois grupos, porém sem diferença significativa entre eles. Conclusão: A idade do doador não influenciou na qualidade de vida dos pacientes submetidos ao transplante hepático; o score MELD menor que 21 teve influência positiva na QV nos dois grupos; a QV nos dois grupos não foi modificada após transplante; a QV pós-transplante foi semelhante nos três grupos divididos por idade.Qualidade de VidaDoadores de TecidosTransplante de FígadoAvaliação da qualidade de vida do paciente transplantado hepáticoEvaluation of the quality of life of patients transplanted hepaticinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisporreponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessORIGINAL2015_dis_mjnflor.pdf2015_dis_mjnflor.pdfapplication/pdf716491http://repositorio.ufc.br/bitstream/riufc/19704/1/2015_dis_mjnflor.pdfdbf6d7f3d8fae413bbf37c5e19cdefe0MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748http://repositorio.ufc.br/bitstream/riufc/19704/2/license.txt8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD52riufc/197042018-12-13 14:50:08.673oai:repositorio.ufc.br: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Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.ufc.br/ri-oai/requestbu@ufc.br || repositorio@ufc.bropendoar:2018-12-13T17:50:08Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Avaliação da qualidade de vida do paciente transplantado hepático
dc.title.en.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Evaluation of the quality of life of patients transplanted hepatic
title Avaliação da qualidade de vida do paciente transplantado hepático
spellingShingle Avaliação da qualidade de vida do paciente transplantado hepático
Flor, Maria José Nascimento
Qualidade de Vida
Doadores de Tecidos
Transplante de Fígado
title_short Avaliação da qualidade de vida do paciente transplantado hepático
title_full Avaliação da qualidade de vida do paciente transplantado hepático
title_fullStr Avaliação da qualidade de vida do paciente transplantado hepático
title_full_unstemmed Avaliação da qualidade de vida do paciente transplantado hepático
title_sort Avaliação da qualidade de vida do paciente transplantado hepático
author Flor, Maria José Nascimento
author_facet Flor, Maria José Nascimento
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Flor, Maria José Nascimento
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Garcia, José Huygens Parente
contributor_str_mv Garcia, José Huygens Parente
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Qualidade de Vida
Doadores de Tecidos
Transplante de Fígado
topic Qualidade de Vida
Doadores de Tecidos
Transplante de Fígado
description The increased survival with liver transplantation sparked concern about the quality of life (QOL) of people in the short and long-term postoperative period. Objective: To evaluate the QOL of liver transplanted with donor graft, over the age of 60 years. Method: Prospective, descriptive and analytical, with a quantitative approach. Data were collected in Ceará Liver Transplant Center at Walter Cantídio University Hospital, and the participants were those undergoing liver transplantation in the period 2007 to 2013. It was used for data collection the Short Form-36 questionnaire ( SF-36), generic instrument to assess QOL; and to characterize the subjects, they used the form of call service and surgery of organ harvesting report. They were applied one hundred thirty-seven questionnaires by the researcher and four were answered by the patient, totaling 141 participants. The sample was divided into two groups: Group A (GA) consisting of receivers that received less donor liver grafts or equal to 60 years old, and Group B (GB) formed by receivers receiving liver graft donor above 60 years of age. Results: The mean age of the GA receptor was 52.5 (between 20 and 75 years) and GB was 54 (between 27 and 76 years); He was male in both groups; the domains of the SF-36: physical functioning, social aspect, mental health and role emotional, showed better score (p = 0.001) in the variable time of transplant, score MELD and recipient age in both groups, but no significant difference between they. Conclusion: The donor's age did not influence the quality of life of patients undergoing liver transplantation; the MELD score less than 21 had a positive influence on QOL in both groups; QOL in both groups was not modified after transplantation; post-transplant QOL was similar in the three groups divided by age. Keywords: Quality of Life. Liver transplant.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2015-04-29
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2016-09-23T11:50:19Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2016-09-23T11:50:19Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv FLOR, M. J. N. Avaliação da qualidade de vida do paciente transplantado hepático. 2015. 53 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Cirurgia) - Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, 2015.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/19704
identifier_str_mv FLOR, M. J. N. Avaliação da qualidade de vida do paciente transplantado hepático. 2015. 53 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Cirurgia) - Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, 2015.
url http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/19704
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
collection Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufc.br/bitstream/riufc/19704/1/2015_dis_mjnflor.pdf
http://repositorio.ufc.br/bitstream/riufc/19704/2/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv dbf6d7f3d8fae413bbf37c5e19cdefe0
8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bu@ufc.br || repositorio@ufc.br
_version_ 1847793254611812352