Uso dos pronomes pessoais e possessivos da língua inglesa na produção escrita de brasileiros aprendizes de inglês como primeira e segunda língua estrangeira

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2018
Autor(a) principal: Souza, Eveline Tomaz
Orientador(a): Borges, Vládia Maria Cabral
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/34459
Resumo: In the last decades, especially in Brazil, there has been a growing interest in learning other foreign languages besides English. This interest has led to research on Multilingualism, which, in turn, has increased the number of studies on the mental processes involved in the acquisition of one or more foreign languages. The purpose of this study was to investigate the similarities and the differences in the process of learning English by Brazilians who had already studied other foreign languages prior to English and by those to whom English was the first foreign language to be studied. This study was based on the studies of: second language acquisition by Swain (1985), Chomsky (1959), Ellis (1975) and Selinker (2008); acquisition of a third or other languages by Cenoz (2001, 2002 and 2008), Jessner (2007) and Hammarberg (1998); Interlanguage by Selinker (1972) and Sharwood (1994); and Linguistic Transference by Odlin (1989), Boechat (2008), Brito (2008) and Corder (1983). The research aimed at identifying and classifying the types of errors made in the use of personal pronouns and possessive adjectives in English by language learners for whom English was their first foreign language and by language learners who had previously studied another foreign language. This quali-quantitative study examined the results obtained from the completion of two different tasks – a controlled multiple-choice task and a written composition – by learners of English at three different proficiency levels – basic (Semester II), pre-intermediate (Semester IV) and intermediate (Semester VI) – in Casa de Cultura Britânica (an outreach program of the Federal University of Ceará), divided into two groups: learners of English as first foreign language and learners of English as a second/third foreign language. For each group (based on the level of proficiency) and sub-group (distinguished by having studied another foreign language prior to English or not), the number and the type of errors made in the completion of the two tasks were analyzed. The results obtained from the multiple-choice task indicate that the percentage of errors decreased from Semester II to Semester VI. The errors made by both groups – the ones that had not studied a foreign language prior to English and the ones that had studied another foreign language prior to English decreased from one semester to another. The comparison of the errors made by the groups that had studied another foreign language prior to English in the three semesters also suggests a decrease in the number of errors made by the groups in relation to years of study. However, the Wilcoxon test comparing the results among the participants of each group in the three semesters demonstrated that the differences are only significant in semester II, which tells us that having a previous foreign language helps in the acquisition of subject and possessive pronouns at the beginning of the learning process, but it is not very significant in the following semesters. Therefore, is not possible to make generalizations of these differences to other groups.The analysis of compositions written by the two groups in the three semesters identified the omission of the subject pronoun as the most frequent error, possibly because of the influence of the learners’ native language, Portuguese, which allows for the ellipsis of the subject of a sentence. The learners in the group that had studied another foreign language prior to English had either studied Spanish or Italian which also permit the ellipsis of the subject. The most frequently omitted pronouns were I, followed by IT, SHE and HE. Insertion errors occurred by inserting the pronoun IT when it was unnecessary. Substitution errors were made in the following situations: exchanging the object pronoun for the subject pronoun, using the possessive adjective in place of the subject pronoun or the object pronoun. Overall results indicate that knowledge of the rules for pronoun use in other languages and familiarity with theprocess of acquiring another language aided learners in the selection and use of grammatical structures. Errors made by the group who had not studied another language prior to English can be attributed to the transference of grammatical structures from the native language to the foreign language being learned, while errors made by those who had studied another foreign language can be the result of the transference of grammatical structures from the previously studied foreign language to the one being learned.
id UFC-7_79b66d1be35aef4e444d25ec10c9f045
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufc.br:riufc/34459
network_acronym_str UFC-7
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository_id_str
spelling Souza, Eveline TomazBorges, Vládia Maria Cabral2018-07-27T16:42:50Z2018-07-27T16:42:50Z2018SOUZA, Eveline Tomaz. Uso dos pronomes pessoais e possessivos da língua inglesa na produção escrita de brasileiros aprendizes de inglês como primeira e segunda língua estrangeira. 2018. 114f. - Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade Federal do Ceará, Programa de Pós-graduação em Linguística, Fortaleza (CE), 2018.http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/34459In the last decades, especially in Brazil, there has been a growing interest in learning other foreign languages besides English. This interest has led to research on Multilingualism, which, in turn, has increased the number of studies on the mental processes involved in the acquisition of one or more foreign languages. The purpose of this study was to investigate the similarities and the differences in the process of learning English by Brazilians who had already studied other foreign languages prior to English and by those to whom English was the first foreign language to be studied. This study was based on the studies of: second language acquisition by Swain (1985), Chomsky (1959), Ellis (1975) and Selinker (2008); acquisition of a third or other languages by Cenoz (2001, 2002 and 2008), Jessner (2007) and Hammarberg (1998); Interlanguage by Selinker (1972) and Sharwood (1994); and Linguistic Transference by Odlin (1989), Boechat (2008), Brito (2008) and Corder (1983). The research aimed at identifying and classifying the types of errors made in the use of personal pronouns and possessive adjectives in English by language learners for whom English was their first foreign language and by language learners who had previously studied another foreign language. This quali-quantitative study examined the results obtained from the completion of two different tasks – a controlled multiple-choice task and a written composition – by learners of English at three different proficiency levels – basic (Semester II), pre-intermediate (Semester IV) and intermediate (Semester VI) – in Casa de Cultura Britânica (an outreach program of the Federal University of Ceará), divided into two groups: learners of English as first foreign language and learners of English as a second/third foreign language. For each group (based on the level of proficiency) and sub-group (distinguished by having studied another foreign language prior to English or not), the number and the type of errors made in the completion of the two tasks were analyzed. The results obtained from the multiple-choice task indicate that the percentage of errors decreased from Semester II to Semester VI. The errors made by both groups – the ones that had not studied a foreign language prior to English and the ones that had studied another foreign language prior to English decreased from one semester to another. The comparison of the errors made by the groups that had studied another foreign language prior to English in the three semesters also suggests a decrease in the number of errors made by the groups in relation to years of study. However, the Wilcoxon test comparing the results among the participants of each group in the three semesters demonstrated that the differences are only significant in semester II, which tells us that having a previous foreign language helps in the acquisition of subject and possessive pronouns at the beginning of the learning process, but it is not very significant in the following semesters. Therefore, is not possible to make generalizations of these differences to other groups.The analysis of compositions written by the two groups in the three semesters identified the omission of the subject pronoun as the most frequent error, possibly because of the influence of the learners’ native language, Portuguese, which allows for the ellipsis of the subject of a sentence. The learners in the group that had studied another foreign language prior to English had either studied Spanish or Italian which also permit the ellipsis of the subject. The most frequently omitted pronouns were I, followed by IT, SHE and HE. Insertion errors occurred by inserting the pronoun IT when it was unnecessary. Substitution errors were made in the following situations: exchanging the object pronoun for the subject pronoun, using the possessive adjective in place of the subject pronoun or the object pronoun. Overall results indicate that knowledge of the rules for pronoun use in other languages and familiarity with theprocess of acquiring another language aided learners in the selection and use of grammatical structures. Errors made by the group who had not studied another language prior to English can be attributed to the transference of grammatical structures from the native language to the foreign language being learned, while errors made by those who had studied another foreign language can be the result of the transference of grammatical structures from the previously studied foreign language to the one being learned.Nas últimas décadas, especialmente no Brasil, houve um crescimento no interesse sobre aquisição de outras línguas estrangeiras além do inglês. Tal interesse tem incentivado diversas pesquisas acerca do Multilinguismo. Considerando a complexidade do processo de aquisição de línguas, nos indagamos acerca de que forma a aquisição de uma língua estrangeira é afetada pela familiaridade com outra língua estrangeira em momento anterior ao início do processo de aquisição dessa nova língua. Em outras palavras, nos questionamos sobre as similaridades e diferenças no processo de aquisição da língua inglesa por aprendizes que já haviam estudado outra(s) língua(s) estrangeira(s) anteriormente e por aqueles para quem o inglês era a primeira língua estrangeira a ser estudada. A partir desses questionamentos e apoiados nos estudos de aquisição de segunda língua de Swain (1985), Chomsky (1959), Ellis (1975) e Selinker (2008), de aquisição de terceira e outras línguas de Cenoz (2001, 2002 e 2008), Jessner (2007) e Hammarberg (1998), nos conceitos de Interlíngua de Selinker (1972) e Sharwood (1994) e de Transferência Linguística de Odlin (1989), Boechat (2008), Brito (2008) e Corder (1983), buscamos identificar e diagnosticar os tipos de erros cometidos, no uso dos pronomes pessoais e possessivos do inglês, por aprendizes dessa língua como primeira língua estrangeira e por aqueles que já tinham familiaridade com outra(s) língua(s). Delineamos uma pesquisa quali-quantitativa, que analisou os resultados obtidos em duas tarefas escritas – uma controlada de múltipla escolha e outra livre de produção textual – por aprendizes de inglês em três níveis de proficiência linguística: básico (Semestre II), pré-intermediário (Semestre IV) e intermediário (Semestre VI), da Casa de Cultura Britânica, subdividos em dois grupos: aprendizes de inglês como primeira LE e aprendizes de inglês como segunda LE. Para cada grupo (com base no nível de proficiência) e sub-grupo (os que já tinham estudado uma outra língua estrangeira e os que nunca tinham estudado outra língua) foram contabilizados o número e os tipos de erros cometidos em cada uma das tarefas. Os resultados obtidos na tarefa controlada permitiram-nos constatar que a porcentagem de erros diminuiu, de modo geral, do semestre II para o semestre VI. Os erros dos grupos sem LE anterior e os dos grupos com LE anterior também diminuíram de um semestre para o outro. A comparação dos erros cometidos pelo grupo de aprendizes com LE anterior nos três semestres estudados revelou que houve uma diminuição na porcentagem de erros cometidos por esse grupo em relação ao grupo que não havia estudado outra língua estrangeira antes do inglês, diminuindo também de um semestre para outro. Entretanto, o teste de Wilcoxon comparando os resultados, por participantes, de cada grupo nos três semestres, demonstrou que as diferenças são significativas apenas no semestre II, o que nos diz que ter uma língua estrangeira prévia ajuda na aquisição dos pronomes pessoais e possessivos no início do estudo, mas não é muito significativo nos semestres seguintes; assim, não nos é permitido tecer generalizações acerca dessas diferenças para outros grupos. A análise das produções textuais revelou que, nos três semestres analisados, o erro mais recorrente foi o de apagamento de sujeito, possivelmente tanto como consequência da influência da língua materna como do caráter pro-drop do pronome sujeito das línguas anteriormente estudadas pelos participantes dos grupos com LE. Os pronomes mais comumente apagados nas produções foram os do caso reto: I, primeira pessoa singular; IT, neutro, terceira pessoa singular; e SHE e HE, terceira pessoa do singular. Os casos encontrados de erros de inserção corresponderam ao uso irregular do pronome IT. Já os erros de substituição ocorreram pela troca do pronome oblíquo pelo do caso reto, troca do pronome possessivo pelo do caso reto, pronome possessivo pelo pronome oblíquo, pronome do caso reto pelo oblíquo e pronome possessivo poroutro possessivo, mas de outra pessoa. Em suma, podemos concluir que o conhecimento de outras regras de uso pronominal e o contato com outra língua estrangeira é capaz de fazer o aprendiz, no mínimo, refletir sobre regras de uso da nova LE e fazer uso de estratégias de aprendizagem. Enquanto os erros que ocorreram no grupo sem LE anterior podem, em sua maioria, ser explicados pela transferência da língua materna, no grupo com LE anterior, os erros podem, em sua maioria, ser explicados pelo conhecimento e transferência de estruturas pronominais da LE anterior para o inglês.Aquisição de segunda e terceira línguaErros no uso de pronomes do inglêsInterlínguaUso dos pronomes pessoais e possessivos da língua inglesa na produção escrita de brasileiros aprendizes de inglês como primeira e segunda língua estrangeirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisporreponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessORIGINAL2018_dis_etsouza.pdf2018_dis_etsouza.pdfapplication/pdf729941http://repositorio.ufc.br/bitstream/riufc/34459/1/2018_dis_etsouza.pdff0ebacfba84260812900b47f81d29f79MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81812http://repositorio.ufc.br/bitstream/riufc/34459/2/license.txt9351db63ea91b32e01910aaf21c0fd0aMD52riufc/344592019-05-13 12:13:19.761oai:repositorio.ufc.br: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ório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.ufc.br/ri-oai/requestbu@ufc.br || repositorio@ufc.bropendoar:2019-05-13T15:13:19Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Uso dos pronomes pessoais e possessivos da língua inglesa na produção escrita de brasileiros aprendizes de inglês como primeira e segunda língua estrangeira
title Uso dos pronomes pessoais e possessivos da língua inglesa na produção escrita de brasileiros aprendizes de inglês como primeira e segunda língua estrangeira
spellingShingle Uso dos pronomes pessoais e possessivos da língua inglesa na produção escrita de brasileiros aprendizes de inglês como primeira e segunda língua estrangeira
Souza, Eveline Tomaz
Aquisição de segunda e terceira língua
Erros no uso de pronomes do inglês
Interlíngua
title_short Uso dos pronomes pessoais e possessivos da língua inglesa na produção escrita de brasileiros aprendizes de inglês como primeira e segunda língua estrangeira
title_full Uso dos pronomes pessoais e possessivos da língua inglesa na produção escrita de brasileiros aprendizes de inglês como primeira e segunda língua estrangeira
title_fullStr Uso dos pronomes pessoais e possessivos da língua inglesa na produção escrita de brasileiros aprendizes de inglês como primeira e segunda língua estrangeira
title_full_unstemmed Uso dos pronomes pessoais e possessivos da língua inglesa na produção escrita de brasileiros aprendizes de inglês como primeira e segunda língua estrangeira
title_sort Uso dos pronomes pessoais e possessivos da língua inglesa na produção escrita de brasileiros aprendizes de inglês como primeira e segunda língua estrangeira
author Souza, Eveline Tomaz
author_facet Souza, Eveline Tomaz
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza, Eveline Tomaz
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Borges, Vládia Maria Cabral
contributor_str_mv Borges, Vládia Maria Cabral
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aquisição de segunda e terceira língua
Erros no uso de pronomes do inglês
Interlíngua
topic Aquisição de segunda e terceira língua
Erros no uso de pronomes do inglês
Interlíngua
description In the last decades, especially in Brazil, there has been a growing interest in learning other foreign languages besides English. This interest has led to research on Multilingualism, which, in turn, has increased the number of studies on the mental processes involved in the acquisition of one or more foreign languages. The purpose of this study was to investigate the similarities and the differences in the process of learning English by Brazilians who had already studied other foreign languages prior to English and by those to whom English was the first foreign language to be studied. This study was based on the studies of: second language acquisition by Swain (1985), Chomsky (1959), Ellis (1975) and Selinker (2008); acquisition of a third or other languages by Cenoz (2001, 2002 and 2008), Jessner (2007) and Hammarberg (1998); Interlanguage by Selinker (1972) and Sharwood (1994); and Linguistic Transference by Odlin (1989), Boechat (2008), Brito (2008) and Corder (1983). The research aimed at identifying and classifying the types of errors made in the use of personal pronouns and possessive adjectives in English by language learners for whom English was their first foreign language and by language learners who had previously studied another foreign language. This quali-quantitative study examined the results obtained from the completion of two different tasks – a controlled multiple-choice task and a written composition – by learners of English at three different proficiency levels – basic (Semester II), pre-intermediate (Semester IV) and intermediate (Semester VI) – in Casa de Cultura Britânica (an outreach program of the Federal University of Ceará), divided into two groups: learners of English as first foreign language and learners of English as a second/third foreign language. For each group (based on the level of proficiency) and sub-group (distinguished by having studied another foreign language prior to English or not), the number and the type of errors made in the completion of the two tasks were analyzed. The results obtained from the multiple-choice task indicate that the percentage of errors decreased from Semester II to Semester VI. The errors made by both groups – the ones that had not studied a foreign language prior to English and the ones that had studied another foreign language prior to English decreased from one semester to another. The comparison of the errors made by the groups that had studied another foreign language prior to English in the three semesters also suggests a decrease in the number of errors made by the groups in relation to years of study. However, the Wilcoxon test comparing the results among the participants of each group in the three semesters demonstrated that the differences are only significant in semester II, which tells us that having a previous foreign language helps in the acquisition of subject and possessive pronouns at the beginning of the learning process, but it is not very significant in the following semesters. Therefore, is not possible to make generalizations of these differences to other groups.The analysis of compositions written by the two groups in the three semesters identified the omission of the subject pronoun as the most frequent error, possibly because of the influence of the learners’ native language, Portuguese, which allows for the ellipsis of the subject of a sentence. The learners in the group that had studied another foreign language prior to English had either studied Spanish or Italian which also permit the ellipsis of the subject. The most frequently omitted pronouns were I, followed by IT, SHE and HE. Insertion errors occurred by inserting the pronoun IT when it was unnecessary. Substitution errors were made in the following situations: exchanging the object pronoun for the subject pronoun, using the possessive adjective in place of the subject pronoun or the object pronoun. Overall results indicate that knowledge of the rules for pronoun use in other languages and familiarity with theprocess of acquiring another language aided learners in the selection and use of grammatical structures. Errors made by the group who had not studied another language prior to English can be attributed to the transference of grammatical structures from the native language to the foreign language being learned, while errors made by those who had studied another foreign language can be the result of the transference of grammatical structures from the previously studied foreign language to the one being learned.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-07-27T16:42:50Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2018-07-27T16:42:50Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2018
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv SOUZA, Eveline Tomaz. Uso dos pronomes pessoais e possessivos da língua inglesa na produção escrita de brasileiros aprendizes de inglês como primeira e segunda língua estrangeira. 2018. 114f. - Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade Federal do Ceará, Programa de Pós-graduação em Linguística, Fortaleza (CE), 2018.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/34459
identifier_str_mv SOUZA, Eveline Tomaz. Uso dos pronomes pessoais e possessivos da língua inglesa na produção escrita de brasileiros aprendizes de inglês como primeira e segunda língua estrangeira. 2018. 114f. - Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade Federal do Ceará, Programa de Pós-graduação em Linguística, Fortaleza (CE), 2018.
url http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/34459
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
collection Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufc.br/bitstream/riufc/34459/1/2018_dis_etsouza.pdf
http://repositorio.ufc.br/bitstream/riufc/34459/2/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv f0ebacfba84260812900b47f81d29f79
9351db63ea91b32e01910aaf21c0fd0a
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bu@ufc.br || repositorio@ufc.br
_version_ 1847793299187826688