O processo administrativo como instrumento democrático de participação

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2012
Autor(a) principal: Taveira Junior, Rubens Silveira
Orientador(a): Moraes, Germana de Oliveira
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/12820
Resumo: The present work is a new reading of what the administrative process and its importance in relation to new forms of interpretation of Administrative Law, which is given to affirm the concept of legality and your reflexes in this branch of law, noting also their bias implementer of democracy. The study of this issue is limited to the federal administrative process that has as a general rule the Law 9.784/99, with subsidiary application in all the administrative competence of the Union Building on a historical analysis of democracy and what was characterized as participation democratic enough to conclude that such a policy institute was largely the story of a privileged class holding power, excluding political participation of various social classes. Liberalism also has used democracy to achieve their economic desiderata, it usurped the democratic ideals and instruments such as suffrage, to create a system of foundations that legitimize the preservation of private property and then serve as a tool to maintain power. It is understood that only a real democratic participation in a democracy is perfected taken by substantial, in particular the proposal by Paul Bonavides, considering how essential the participation of ordinary citizens in decision making, adding a new connotations to the word democracy to give it the characteristic of a fundamental right. It is essential to a real process characterization as a tool for participation, to become a reinterpretation of what is meant by process, understand it as a procedure described by contradiction we have the theory advocated by Elio Fazzalari. The contradiction is fundamental to such a task, then, from the exercise of this right, you can talk about the effectiveness of the principle of democratic participation. However, essential to the proposed application process as an instrument of participation, is an analysis of standards that make up the Law 9.784/99, since, by verifying the nature of such rules, one can envision an application from the normative weight informants principles of such a law, whereas values democracy and dignity that should permeate all decisions handed down by the Administration. Will be checked also two institutes democratic conveyed by Law 9.784/99, which are the public consultation and public hearing, these instruments are characterized by expanding the democratic bias of the administrative process, as well as legitimizing the conduct of the trustee to prolatar decision which has effects in a community. The proposed procedural purposes exceeds the primacy legalistic for many years was stressed in relation to that instrument, and the interpretation of the principles and the balancing of interests gained significant importance in Legal Dogmatics, especially when it sees a new way to operate the state. For such a task, it is necessary to analyze the current functions of the administrative process, particularly, to provide democratic legitimacy to citizens by fostering a real possibility of their participation in government decisions.
id UFC-7_d190859b812bba3e80457e6e9c8b351b
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufc.br:riufc/12820
network_acronym_str UFC-7
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository_id_str
spelling Taveira Junior, Rubens SilveiraMoraes, Germana de Oliveira2015-06-16T16:30:43Z2015-06-16T16:30:43Z2012TAVEIRA JUNIOR, Rubens Silveira. O processo administrativo como instrumento democrático de participação. 2012. 188 f.: Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Federal do Ceará, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito, Fortaleza-CE, 2012.http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/12820The present work is a new reading of what the administrative process and its importance in relation to new forms of interpretation of Administrative Law, which is given to affirm the concept of legality and your reflexes in this branch of law, noting also their bias implementer of democracy. The study of this issue is limited to the federal administrative process that has as a general rule the Law 9.784/99, with subsidiary application in all the administrative competence of the Union Building on a historical analysis of democracy and what was characterized as participation democratic enough to conclude that such a policy institute was largely the story of a privileged class holding power, excluding political participation of various social classes. Liberalism also has used democracy to achieve their economic desiderata, it usurped the democratic ideals and instruments such as suffrage, to create a system of foundations that legitimize the preservation of private property and then serve as a tool to maintain power. It is understood that only a real democratic participation in a democracy is perfected taken by substantial, in particular the proposal by Paul Bonavides, considering how essential the participation of ordinary citizens in decision making, adding a new connotations to the word democracy to give it the characteristic of a fundamental right. It is essential to a real process characterization as a tool for participation, to become a reinterpretation of what is meant by process, understand it as a procedure described by contradiction we have the theory advocated by Elio Fazzalari. The contradiction is fundamental to such a task, then, from the exercise of this right, you can talk about the effectiveness of the principle of democratic participation. However, essential to the proposed application process as an instrument of participation, is an analysis of standards that make up the Law 9.784/99, since, by verifying the nature of such rules, one can envision an application from the normative weight informants principles of such a law, whereas values democracy and dignity that should permeate all decisions handed down by the Administration. Will be checked also two institutes democratic conveyed by Law 9.784/99, which are the public consultation and public hearing, these instruments are characterized by expanding the democratic bias of the administrative process, as well as legitimizing the conduct of the trustee to prolatar decision which has effects in a community. The proposed procedural purposes exceeds the primacy legalistic for many years was stressed in relation to that instrument, and the interpretation of the principles and the balancing of interests gained significant importance in Legal Dogmatics, especially when it sees a new way to operate the state. For such a task, it is necessary to analyze the current functions of the administrative process, particularly, to provide democratic legitimacy to citizens by fostering a real possibility of their participation in government decisions.O presente trabalho faz uma nova leitura do que seja o processo administrativo e de sua importância frente à nova forma de interpretação do Direito Administrativo, a qual se dá ao afirmar o conceito de juridicidade e seus reflexos neste ramo do Direito, destacando seu viés implementador do modelo democrático através de sua prática. O estudo do referido tema limita-se ao processo administrativo federal que tem como norma geral a Lei 9.784/99, sendo esta de aplicação subsidiária em todos os processos administrativos de competência da União. Partindo de uma análise histórica da democracia e do que foi caracterizado como participação democrática, chega-se a concluir que tal instituto político foi, em grande parte da história, um privilégio das classes detentoras do poder, excluindo da participação política várias classes sociais. O liberalismo também se serviu da democracia para atingir seus desideratos econômicos, pois usurpou os ideais democráticos e os instrumentos destes, como o sufrágio, para criar um sistema de fundamentos que legitimasse a preservação da propriedade privada e depois servisse como instrumento de manutenção no poder. Entende-se que uma real participação democrática somente se aperfeiçoa em uma democracia tida por substancial, em particular a proposta por Paulo Bonavides, por considerar como primordial a participação do cidadão comum nos processos decisórios, adicionando uma nova conotação à palavra democracia ao atribuir-lhe a característica de direito fundamental. É essencial a uma real caracterização do processo como instrumento de participação que se faça uma releitura do que se entende por processo, entendo-o como um procedimento qualificado pelo contraditório nos termos da teoria propugnada por Elio Fazzalari. O contraditório é fundamental a tal mister, pois, a partir do exercício de tal direito, pode-se falar em efetividade do princípio da participação democrática. Porém, indispensável à proposta de aplicação do processo como instrumento de participação, é uma análise das normas que compõem a Lei 9.784/99, já que, ao se verificar a natureza de tais normas, pode-se vislumbrar uma aplicação normativa a partir da ponderação dos princípios informadores de tal lei, considerando os valores democracia e dignidade que devem permear todas as decisões prolatadas pela Administração. Serão verificados, ainda, dois institutos democráticos veiculados pela Lei 9.784/99, que são a consulta pública e a audiência pública, instrumentos estes caracterizados por ampliar o viés democrático do processo administrativo, bem como por legitimar a conduta do administrador ao prolatar decisão que tenha efeitos em uma coletividade. A acepção processual proposta supera a primazia legalista que, por muitos anos, foi a tônica em relação àquele instrumento, em que a interpretação dos princípios e a ponderação de interesses ganha relevante importância na Dogmática Jurídica, principalmente quando se vislumbra uma nova forma de atuar do Estado. Para tal incumbência, faz-se necessário analisar as atuais funções do processo administrativo, particularmente, a de propiciar legitimidade democrática aos administrados, ao fomentar uma real possibilidade de participação destes nas decisões estatais.Processo administrativoJuridicidadeDemocraciaParticipaçãoO processo administrativo como instrumento democrático de participaçãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisporreponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81786http://repositorio.ufc.br/bitstream/riufc/12820/2/license.txt8c4401d3d14722a7ca2d07c782a1aab3MD52ORIGINAL2012_dis_rstaveirajunior.pdf2012_dis_rstaveirajunior.pdfapplication/pdf1103501http://repositorio.ufc.br/bitstream/riufc/12820/1/2012_dis_rstaveirajunior.pdfd9f9ce36a5189cfece241dbae14a35ceMD51riufc/128202022-07-15 09:39:25.085oai:repositorio.ufc.br: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Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.ufc.br/ri-oai/requestbu@ufc.br || repositorio@ufc.bropendoar:2022-07-15T12:39:25Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv O processo administrativo como instrumento democrático de participação
title O processo administrativo como instrumento democrático de participação
spellingShingle O processo administrativo como instrumento democrático de participação
Taveira Junior, Rubens Silveira
Processo administrativo
Juridicidade
Democracia
Participação
title_short O processo administrativo como instrumento democrático de participação
title_full O processo administrativo como instrumento democrático de participação
title_fullStr O processo administrativo como instrumento democrático de participação
title_full_unstemmed O processo administrativo como instrumento democrático de participação
title_sort O processo administrativo como instrumento democrático de participação
author Taveira Junior, Rubens Silveira
author_facet Taveira Junior, Rubens Silveira
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Taveira Junior, Rubens Silveira
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Moraes, Germana de Oliveira
contributor_str_mv Moraes, Germana de Oliveira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Processo administrativo
Juridicidade
Democracia
Participação
topic Processo administrativo
Juridicidade
Democracia
Participação
description The present work is a new reading of what the administrative process and its importance in relation to new forms of interpretation of Administrative Law, which is given to affirm the concept of legality and your reflexes in this branch of law, noting also their bias implementer of democracy. The study of this issue is limited to the federal administrative process that has as a general rule the Law 9.784/99, with subsidiary application in all the administrative competence of the Union Building on a historical analysis of democracy and what was characterized as participation democratic enough to conclude that such a policy institute was largely the story of a privileged class holding power, excluding political participation of various social classes. Liberalism also has used democracy to achieve their economic desiderata, it usurped the democratic ideals and instruments such as suffrage, to create a system of foundations that legitimize the preservation of private property and then serve as a tool to maintain power. It is understood that only a real democratic participation in a democracy is perfected taken by substantial, in particular the proposal by Paul Bonavides, considering how essential the participation of ordinary citizens in decision making, adding a new connotations to the word democracy to give it the characteristic of a fundamental right. It is essential to a real process characterization as a tool for participation, to become a reinterpretation of what is meant by process, understand it as a procedure described by contradiction we have the theory advocated by Elio Fazzalari. The contradiction is fundamental to such a task, then, from the exercise of this right, you can talk about the effectiveness of the principle of democratic participation. However, essential to the proposed application process as an instrument of participation, is an analysis of standards that make up the Law 9.784/99, since, by verifying the nature of such rules, one can envision an application from the normative weight informants principles of such a law, whereas values democracy and dignity that should permeate all decisions handed down by the Administration. Will be checked also two institutes democratic conveyed by Law 9.784/99, which are the public consultation and public hearing, these instruments are characterized by expanding the democratic bias of the administrative process, as well as legitimizing the conduct of the trustee to prolatar decision which has effects in a community. The proposed procedural purposes exceeds the primacy legalistic for many years was stressed in relation to that instrument, and the interpretation of the principles and the balancing of interests gained significant importance in Legal Dogmatics, especially when it sees a new way to operate the state. For such a task, it is necessary to analyze the current functions of the administrative process, particularly, to provide democratic legitimacy to citizens by fostering a real possibility of their participation in government decisions.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2012
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2015-06-16T16:30:43Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2015-06-16T16:30:43Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv TAVEIRA JUNIOR, Rubens Silveira. O processo administrativo como instrumento democrático de participação. 2012. 188 f.: Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Federal do Ceará, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito, Fortaleza-CE, 2012.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/12820
identifier_str_mv TAVEIRA JUNIOR, Rubens Silveira. O processo administrativo como instrumento democrático de participação. 2012. 188 f.: Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Federal do Ceará, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito, Fortaleza-CE, 2012.
url http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/12820
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
collection Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufc.br/bitstream/riufc/12820/2/license.txt
http://repositorio.ufc.br/bitstream/riufc/12820/1/2012_dis_rstaveirajunior.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 8c4401d3d14722a7ca2d07c782a1aab3
d9f9ce36a5189cfece241dbae14a35ce
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bu@ufc.br || repositorio@ufc.br
_version_ 1847793410926182400