Desempenho operacional e energético do conjunto trator semeadora adubadora camalhoeira: adubação em milho consorciado e viabilidade econômica

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2020
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Paulo Ricardo Alves dos
Orientador(a): Chioderoli, Carlos Alessandro
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/55830
Resumo: The use of machinery that allows at the same time the preparation of the soil to capture rainwater in situ and the sowing of crops in consortium (corn + fodder) with the fertilizer momentarily is an alternative of great importance in the conditions of semi-arid regions, because it favors the conservation of the soil, allowing the retention of water for longer in the soil, in addition to reducing the costs of field operations. Thus, in the present work, three studies were carried out, where the first aimed to evaluate the operational and energetic performance of a shrimp fertilizer spreader, in the use of six sowing systems: (S1 - sowing of corn in consortium on top of the ridge; S2 - sowing of corn in ridge without consortium; S3 - sowing of corn in consortium within the furrow; S4 - sowing of corn within the furrow without consortium; S5 - conventional sowing in consortium; S6 - conventional sowing without consortium) and two mechanisms for deposition of fertilizers (M1- disc mechanism and M2 - rod mechanism) in the factor scheme 6 x 2 with 4 repetitions. In the second study, the objective was to evaluate the corn crop production according to different sowing systems, mechanism for fertilizer deposition and different levels of nitrogen fertilization in mulch taking into account the needs of the crops in consortium. For this purpose, six sowing systems (S1, S2, S3, S4, S5 and S6), two mechanisms (M1- disc mechanism and M2 - rod mechanism) and four levels of nitrogen fertilization in mulch were used, (0; 60; 110 and 165 Kg/ha-1), making a factorial 6x2x4 with four repetitions. For the third study, the objective was to analyze, economically, the effect of the same factors of study II. The statistical analysis was performed using the SISVAR program at 5% of significance. It was possible to conclude that independent of the sowing system (camallion or furrow) and mechanism used, there is no difference in the initial population of corn plants and in the depth of seeds (corn and fodder). However, more attention is needed to the depth of fertilizer and fodder seed when momentarily deposited together. The sowing systems that mobilize the soil (furrow and ridge) present higher energy consumption, as well as the rod mechanism; The S5 sowing system presents better operational performance, together with the disc mechanism. For the second study, it was possible to conclude that the systems of sowing in camallion and furrow with the use of the mechanism stem favor the components of growth of the corn crop, already in relation to the productivity of grains, the systems of sowing in camallion is the most indicated, independent of the mechanism used; nitrogen fertilization in cover realized in function of the necessity of all the crops in consortium is promising alternative, because it increases linearly the components of the production and the productivity of the crop of corn in consortium with fodder. In the third study, it was concluded that the system in camalhão (S2) fertilized with the dose of 165 kg ha-1 of N in covering with the use of the rod mechanism favors greater profitability. However, it is not recommended the use of the S3 and S4 system without fertilization and with the use of the disc, because they promote lower rates of profitability and operational profit, favoring losses to producers.
id UFC-7_e21f6415ff815af90f53907cc9557b3e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufc.br:riufc/55830
network_acronym_str UFC-7
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository_id_str
spelling Santos, Paulo Ricardo Alves dosChioderoli, Carlos Alessandro2020-12-28T12:08:24Z2020-12-28T12:08:24Z2020SANTOS, Paulo Ricardo Alves dos. Desempenho operacional e energético do conjunto trator semeadora adubadora camalhoeira: adubação em milho consorciado e viabilidade econômica. 127 f. Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia Agrícola) – Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, 2020.http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/55830The use of machinery that allows at the same time the preparation of the soil to capture rainwater in situ and the sowing of crops in consortium (corn + fodder) with the fertilizer momentarily is an alternative of great importance in the conditions of semi-arid regions, because it favors the conservation of the soil, allowing the retention of water for longer in the soil, in addition to reducing the costs of field operations. Thus, in the present work, three studies were carried out, where the first aimed to evaluate the operational and energetic performance of a shrimp fertilizer spreader, in the use of six sowing systems: (S1 - sowing of corn in consortium on top of the ridge; S2 - sowing of corn in ridge without consortium; S3 - sowing of corn in consortium within the furrow; S4 - sowing of corn within the furrow without consortium; S5 - conventional sowing in consortium; S6 - conventional sowing without consortium) and two mechanisms for deposition of fertilizers (M1- disc mechanism and M2 - rod mechanism) in the factor scheme 6 x 2 with 4 repetitions. In the second study, the objective was to evaluate the corn crop production according to different sowing systems, mechanism for fertilizer deposition and different levels of nitrogen fertilization in mulch taking into account the needs of the crops in consortium. For this purpose, six sowing systems (S1, S2, S3, S4, S5 and S6), two mechanisms (M1- disc mechanism and M2 - rod mechanism) and four levels of nitrogen fertilization in mulch were used, (0; 60; 110 and 165 Kg/ha-1), making a factorial 6x2x4 with four repetitions. For the third study, the objective was to analyze, economically, the effect of the same factors of study II. The statistical analysis was performed using the SISVAR program at 5% of significance. It was possible to conclude that independent of the sowing system (camallion or furrow) and mechanism used, there is no difference in the initial population of corn plants and in the depth of seeds (corn and fodder). However, more attention is needed to the depth of fertilizer and fodder seed when momentarily deposited together. The sowing systems that mobilize the soil (furrow and ridge) present higher energy consumption, as well as the rod mechanism; The S5 sowing system presents better operational performance, together with the disc mechanism. For the second study, it was possible to conclude that the systems of sowing in camallion and furrow with the use of the mechanism stem favor the components of growth of the corn crop, already in relation to the productivity of grains, the systems of sowing in camallion is the most indicated, independent of the mechanism used; nitrogen fertilization in cover realized in function of the necessity of all the crops in consortium is promising alternative, because it increases linearly the components of the production and the productivity of the crop of corn in consortium with fodder. In the third study, it was concluded that the system in camalhão (S2) fertilized with the dose of 165 kg ha-1 of N in covering with the use of the rod mechanism favors greater profitability. However, it is not recommended the use of the S3 and S4 system without fertilization and with the use of the disc, because they promote lower rates of profitability and operational profit, favoring losses to producers.A utilização de maquinários que permita ao mesmo tempo o preparo do solo para captação da água da chuva in situ e a semeadura das culturas em consórcio (milho + forrageiras) com o fertilizante de forma momentânea é uma alternativa de grande importância nas condições das regiões semiáridas, pois favorece a conservação do solo, possibilitando a retenção da água por mais tempo no solo, além de diminuir os gastos com operações em campo. Assim, no presente trabalho foram realizados três estudos, onde o primeiro teve como objetivo avaliar o desempenho operacional e energético de uma semeadora adubadora camalhoeira, no uso de seis sistemas de semeadura, os quais foram: (S1 - semeadura do milho em consórcio em cima do camalhão; S2 - semeadura do milho em camalhão sem consórcio; S3 - semeadura do milho em consórcio dentro do sulco; S4 - semeadura do milho dentro do sulco sem consórcio; S5 - semeadura convencional em consórcio; S6 - semeadura convencional sem consórcio) e dois mecanismos para deposição de fertilizantes (M1- mecanismo disco e M2 – mecanismo haste) no esquema fatorial 6 x 2 com 4 repetições. No segundo estudo, o objetivo foi avaliar a produção da cultura do milho em função de diferentes sistemas de semeadura, mecanismo para deposição de fertilizantes e diferentes níveis de adubação nitrogenada em cobertura levando em consideração a necessidade das culturas em consórcio. Para tanto, foram utilizados seis sistemas de semeadura (S1, S2, S3, S4, S5 e S6), dois mecanismos (M1- mecanismo disco e M2 – mecanismo haste) e quatro níveis de adubação nitrogenada em cobertura, (0; 60; 110 e 165 Kg/ha-1), perfazendo um fatorial 6x2x4 com quatro repetições. Para o terceiro estudo, o objetivo foi analisar, economicamente, o efeito dos mesmos fatores do estudo II. A análise estatística foi realizada com uso do programa SISVAR a 5% de significância. Foi possível concluir que independente do sistema de semeadura (camalhão ou sulco) e mecanismo usado, não há diferença na população inicial de plantas de milho e na profundidade das sementes (milho e forrageira). No entanto, é necessário maior atenção na profundidade do fertilizante e semente de forrageira quando depositados juntos de maneira momentânea. Os sistemas de semeadura que mobilizam o solo (sulco e camalhão) apresentam maior consumo energético, assim como o mecanismo haste; O sistema de semeadura S5 apresenta melhor desempenho operacional, juntamente com o mecanismo disco. Para o segundo estudo, foi possível concluir que os sistemas de semeadura em camalhão e sulco com uso do mecanismo haste favorecem os componentes de crescimento da cultura do milho, já em relação à produtividade de grãos, os sistemas de semeadura em camalhão é o mais indicado, independente do mecanismo utilizado; adubação nitrogenada em cobertura realizada em função da necessidade de todas as culturas em consórcio é alternativa promissora, pois aumenta linearmente os componentes da produção e a produtividade da cultura do milho em consórcio com forrageira. No terceiro estudo, conclui-se que o sistema em camalhão (S2) adubado com a dose de 165 kg ha-1 de N em cobertura com uso do mecanismo haste favorece maior rentabilidade. No entanto, não é recomendado o uso do sistema S3 e S4 sem adubação e com uso do disco, pois os mesmos promovem menores índices de lucratividade e lucro operacional, favorecendo prejuízo aos produtores.Zea mays L.Integração lavoura pecuáriaViabilidade econômicaLivestock farming integrationEconomic viabilityDesempenho operacional e energético do conjunto trator semeadora adubadora camalhoeira: adubação em milho consorciado e viabilidade econômicaOperational and energy performance of the tractor seeder fertilizer camalhoeira: fertilization in consortiated corn and economic viabilityinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisporreponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748http://repositorio.ufc.br/bitstream/riufc/55830/4/license.txt8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD54ORIGINAL2020_tese_pradsantos.pdf2020_tese_pradsantos.pdfapplication/pdf1742593http://repositorio.ufc.br/bitstream/riufc/55830/3/2020_tese_pradsantos.pdfae2875d1ffea9f1db2cab22350316b86MD53riufc/558302020-12-28 09:08:24.931oai:repositorio.ufc.br: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Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.ufc.br/ri-oai/requestbu@ufc.br || repositorio@ufc.bropendoar:2020-12-28T12:08:24Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Desempenho operacional e energético do conjunto trator semeadora adubadora camalhoeira: adubação em milho consorciado e viabilidade econômica
dc.title.en.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Operational and energy performance of the tractor seeder fertilizer camalhoeira: fertilization in consortiated corn and economic viability
title Desempenho operacional e energético do conjunto trator semeadora adubadora camalhoeira: adubação em milho consorciado e viabilidade econômica
spellingShingle Desempenho operacional e energético do conjunto trator semeadora adubadora camalhoeira: adubação em milho consorciado e viabilidade econômica
Santos, Paulo Ricardo Alves dos
Zea mays L.
Integração lavoura pecuária
Viabilidade econômica
Livestock farming integration
Economic viability
title_short Desempenho operacional e energético do conjunto trator semeadora adubadora camalhoeira: adubação em milho consorciado e viabilidade econômica
title_full Desempenho operacional e energético do conjunto trator semeadora adubadora camalhoeira: adubação em milho consorciado e viabilidade econômica
title_fullStr Desempenho operacional e energético do conjunto trator semeadora adubadora camalhoeira: adubação em milho consorciado e viabilidade econômica
title_full_unstemmed Desempenho operacional e energético do conjunto trator semeadora adubadora camalhoeira: adubação em milho consorciado e viabilidade econômica
title_sort Desempenho operacional e energético do conjunto trator semeadora adubadora camalhoeira: adubação em milho consorciado e viabilidade econômica
author Santos, Paulo Ricardo Alves dos
author_facet Santos, Paulo Ricardo Alves dos
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Paulo Ricardo Alves dos
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Chioderoli, Carlos Alessandro
contributor_str_mv Chioderoli, Carlos Alessandro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Zea mays L.
Integração lavoura pecuária
Viabilidade econômica
Livestock farming integration
Economic viability
topic Zea mays L.
Integração lavoura pecuária
Viabilidade econômica
Livestock farming integration
Economic viability
description The use of machinery that allows at the same time the preparation of the soil to capture rainwater in situ and the sowing of crops in consortium (corn + fodder) with the fertilizer momentarily is an alternative of great importance in the conditions of semi-arid regions, because it favors the conservation of the soil, allowing the retention of water for longer in the soil, in addition to reducing the costs of field operations. Thus, in the present work, three studies were carried out, where the first aimed to evaluate the operational and energetic performance of a shrimp fertilizer spreader, in the use of six sowing systems: (S1 - sowing of corn in consortium on top of the ridge; S2 - sowing of corn in ridge without consortium; S3 - sowing of corn in consortium within the furrow; S4 - sowing of corn within the furrow without consortium; S5 - conventional sowing in consortium; S6 - conventional sowing without consortium) and two mechanisms for deposition of fertilizers (M1- disc mechanism and M2 - rod mechanism) in the factor scheme 6 x 2 with 4 repetitions. In the second study, the objective was to evaluate the corn crop production according to different sowing systems, mechanism for fertilizer deposition and different levels of nitrogen fertilization in mulch taking into account the needs of the crops in consortium. For this purpose, six sowing systems (S1, S2, S3, S4, S5 and S6), two mechanisms (M1- disc mechanism and M2 - rod mechanism) and four levels of nitrogen fertilization in mulch were used, (0; 60; 110 and 165 Kg/ha-1), making a factorial 6x2x4 with four repetitions. For the third study, the objective was to analyze, economically, the effect of the same factors of study II. The statistical analysis was performed using the SISVAR program at 5% of significance. It was possible to conclude that independent of the sowing system (camallion or furrow) and mechanism used, there is no difference in the initial population of corn plants and in the depth of seeds (corn and fodder). However, more attention is needed to the depth of fertilizer and fodder seed when momentarily deposited together. The sowing systems that mobilize the soil (furrow and ridge) present higher energy consumption, as well as the rod mechanism; The S5 sowing system presents better operational performance, together with the disc mechanism. For the second study, it was possible to conclude that the systems of sowing in camallion and furrow with the use of the mechanism stem favor the components of growth of the corn crop, already in relation to the productivity of grains, the systems of sowing in camallion is the most indicated, independent of the mechanism used; nitrogen fertilization in cover realized in function of the necessity of all the crops in consortium is promising alternative, because it increases linearly the components of the production and the productivity of the crop of corn in consortium with fodder. In the third study, it was concluded that the system in camalhão (S2) fertilized with the dose of 165 kg ha-1 of N in covering with the use of the rod mechanism favors greater profitability. However, it is not recommended the use of the S3 and S4 system without fertilization and with the use of the disc, because they promote lower rates of profitability and operational profit, favoring losses to producers.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2020-12-28T12:08:24Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2020-12-28T12:08:24Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2020
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv SANTOS, Paulo Ricardo Alves dos. Desempenho operacional e energético do conjunto trator semeadora adubadora camalhoeira: adubação em milho consorciado e viabilidade econômica. 127 f. Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia Agrícola) – Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, 2020.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/55830
identifier_str_mv SANTOS, Paulo Ricardo Alves dos. Desempenho operacional e energético do conjunto trator semeadora adubadora camalhoeira: adubação em milho consorciado e viabilidade econômica. 127 f. Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia Agrícola) – Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, 2020.
url http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/55830
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
collection Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufc.br/bitstream/riufc/55830/4/license.txt
http://repositorio.ufc.br/bitstream/riufc/55830/3/2020_tese_pradsantos.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
ae2875d1ffea9f1db2cab22350316b86
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bu@ufc.br || repositorio@ufc.br
_version_ 1847793376230899712