Tolerância de porta-enxertos de videira ao encharcamento

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2012
Autor(a) principal: Mendonça, Luciana Freitas de Medeiros
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
Brasil
Centro de Ciências Agrárias - CCA
UFERSA
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Fitotecnia
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufersa.edu.br/handle/prefix/7027
Resumo: To evaluate grapevine rootstock cultivars and its tolerance to waterlogging, an experiment was conducted in UFERSA in 2010. The experimental design was in a randomized blocks in 4 x 6 factorial. Six rootstocks (Harmony, 1103 Paulsen, Riparia of Traviú, IAC 572 'Jales', IAC 571-6 'Jundiaí' and IAC 766 'Campinas') and four periods of waterlogging (0, 4, 7 and 14 days) were tested in four replications. Cuttings were rooted in polyethylene bags containing sand and Plantmax ® (3:1 v / v) as substrate. At the time of application of treatments, bags were placed in polystyrene boxes containing water up plants collar, with a block in each box. The application was in reversed order of time. The fourteen-day waterlogging period treatment was placed in box in the first day, seven days after that the seven-days, three days after that the four-days one. Four days later, all the boxes were emptied, completing the cycle. At the end of the waterlogging, evaluation was made for maximum leaf water potential, photosynthesis measurements, transpiration, stomatal conductance, intracellular CO2 concentration, leaf temperature were done; water use efficiency and carboxylation efficiency were also measured. Using relative humidity and temperature data, the values of water vapor pressure deficit were obtained. For the determination of chlorophyll it was used a portable chlorophyll meter. Plant growth variables were number of leaves, number of branches, branch length, branch diameter and length of the root system. In addition, plants were separated and dryed in an oven at 65 ° C until constant weight for further evaluation of the dry mass of leaves, shoots, cuttings, root mass and total dry mass. Waterlogging affected negatively the growth and physiology traits of rootstock genotypes studied. Genotypes and waterlogging time were important factors in determining the severity of injuries caused by waterlogging. Waterlogging time affected the growth of branches from the third day, just as affected stomatal conductance and photosynthesis from day 2, influence that increased with increasing stress. Cultivar Paulsen 1103 was more sensitive to waterlogging, with sudden drops in test values as the soaking time increased, while values of cultivar the Ripária of Traviú cultivar remained more constant during the waterlogging time, fact that can be considered a sign of tolerance to this type of environmental stress
id UFER_3cc088f914808b0dfa6b8c7b7ca752b2
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufersa.edu.br:prefix/7027
network_acronym_str UFER
network_name_str Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (RDU)
repository_id_str
spelling Tolerância de porta-enxertos de videira ao encharcamentoVitis sppParreiraÁguaEstresseVitis sppVineWaterStressCIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA::FITOTECNIATo evaluate grapevine rootstock cultivars and its tolerance to waterlogging, an experiment was conducted in UFERSA in 2010. The experimental design was in a randomized blocks in 4 x 6 factorial. Six rootstocks (Harmony, 1103 Paulsen, Riparia of Traviú, IAC 572 'Jales', IAC 571-6 'Jundiaí' and IAC 766 'Campinas') and four periods of waterlogging (0, 4, 7 and 14 days) were tested in four replications. Cuttings were rooted in polyethylene bags containing sand and Plantmax ® (3:1 v / v) as substrate. At the time of application of treatments, bags were placed in polystyrene boxes containing water up plants collar, with a block in each box. The application was in reversed order of time. The fourteen-day waterlogging period treatment was placed in box in the first day, seven days after that the seven-days, three days after that the four-days one. Four days later, all the boxes were emptied, completing the cycle. At the end of the waterlogging, evaluation was made for maximum leaf water potential, photosynthesis measurements, transpiration, stomatal conductance, intracellular CO2 concentration, leaf temperature were done; water use efficiency and carboxylation efficiency were also measured. Using relative humidity and temperature data, the values of water vapor pressure deficit were obtained. For the determination of chlorophyll it was used a portable chlorophyll meter. Plant growth variables were number of leaves, number of branches, branch length, branch diameter and length of the root system. In addition, plants were separated and dryed in an oven at 65 ° C until constant weight for further evaluation of the dry mass of leaves, shoots, cuttings, root mass and total dry mass. Waterlogging affected negatively the growth and physiology traits of rootstock genotypes studied. Genotypes and waterlogging time were important factors in determining the severity of injuries caused by waterlogging. Waterlogging time affected the growth of branches from the third day, just as affected stomatal conductance and photosynthesis from day 2, influence that increased with increasing stress. Cultivar Paulsen 1103 was more sensitive to waterlogging, with sudden drops in test values as the soaking time increased, while values of cultivar the Ripária of Traviú cultivar remained more constant during the waterlogging time, fact that can be considered a sign of tolerance to this type of environmental stressPara avaliar cultivares porta-enxertos de videira quanto à sua tolerância ao encharcamento, foi realizado o experimento na UFERSA, em 2010. O delineamento foi o de blocos ao acaso em fatorial 6 x 4, sendo seis porta-enxertos (Harmony, Paulsen 1103, Ripária do Traviú, IAC 572 ‘Jales’, IAC 571-6 ‘Jundiaí’ e IAC 766 ‘Campinas’) e quatro tempos de encharcamento (0, 4, 7 e 14 dias), em quatro repetições. As estacas foram enraizadas em sacos de polietileno contendo areia e plantmax® (3:1 v/v) como substrato. Na ocasião da aplicação dos tratamentos os sacos foram acondicionados em caixas de poliestireno contendo água no nível do colo das plantas, com um bloco em cada caixa. A aplicação deu-se em modo de tempo invertido: no primeiro dia, encharcamento no tratamento de 14 dias; sete dias depois aquele de 7 dias; três dias depois o de 4 dias. Quatro dias depois, todas as caixas foram esvaziadas, completando o ciclo. Ao final do encharcamento, foram realizadas avaliações do potencial hídrico foliar máximo, medições de fotossíntese, transpiração, condutância estomática, concentração de CO2 intracelular, temperatura da folha. Foram calculadas a eficiência do uso da água e a eficiência de carboxilação. A partir dos dados de umidade relativa e temperatura da cubeta, foram obtidos os valores do déficit de pressão de vapor da atmosfera. Para a determinação do teor de clorofila utilizou-se um clorofilômetro portátil. As variáveis de crescimento foram número de folhas, número de ramos, comprimento dos ramos, diâmetro dos ramos e comprimento do sistema radicular. Além disso, as plantas foram separadas e colocadas para secar em estufa a 65°C até atingir peso constante, para posterior avaliação da massa seca das folhas, massa seca da parte aérea, massa seca da estaca, massa seca do sistema radicular e massa seca total em gramas. O encharcamento afetou negativamente o crescimento e a fisiologia dos genótipos porta-enxertos estudados. Genótipos e período de encharcamento foram importantes fatores na determinação da severidade dos prejuízos provocados pelo encharcamento. No experimento, o período de encharcamento afetou o crescimento dos ramos a partir do 3º dia. Afetou ainda a condutância estomática e fotossíntese a partir do 2° dia, efeito agravado com o prolongamento do estresse. A cultivar Paulsen 1103 mostrou-se mais sensível ao encharcamento, havendo quedas bruscas nos valores das análises conforme aumentou o tempo de encharcamento; a cultivar Riparia do Traviú manteve valores mais constantes no decorrer do tempo de encharcamento, podendo ser indício de tolerância a esse tipo de estresse ambientalTrabalho não financiado por agência de fomento, ou autofinanciadoUniversidade Federal Rural do Semi-ÁridoBrasilCentro de Ciências Agrárias - CCAUFERSAPrograma de Pós-Graduação em FitotecniaPommer, Celso Valdevino32897553804http://lattes.cnpq.br/3146144251550722Dombroski, Jeferson Luiz Dallabona41974999149http://lattes.cnpq.br/4808680563026772Souza, Francisco Xavier dehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4014849457129237Mendonça, Luciana Freitas de Medeiros2022-05-16T20:45:20Z2012-02-152022-05-16T20:45:20Z2012-02-15info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfMendonça (2012) (MENDONÇA, 2012)https://repositorio.ufersa.edu.br/handle/prefix/7027ark:/74562/00130000089c2porMENDONÇA, Luciana Freitas de Medeiros. Tolerância de porta-enxertos de videira ao encharcamento. 2012. 84 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Fitotecnia), Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido, Mossoró, 2012.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCC-BY-SAreponame:Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (RDU)instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSA2023-12-19T02:01:31Zoai:repositorio.ufersa.edu.br:prefix/7027Repositório Institucionalhttps://repositorio.ufersa.edu.br/PUBhttps://repositorio.ufersa.edu.br/server/oai/requestrepositorio@ufersa.edu.br || admrepositorio@ufersa.edu.bropendoar:2023-12-19T02:01:31Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (RDU) - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Tolerância de porta-enxertos de videira ao encharcamento
title Tolerância de porta-enxertos de videira ao encharcamento
spellingShingle Tolerância de porta-enxertos de videira ao encharcamento
Mendonça, Luciana Freitas de Medeiros
Vitis spp
Parreira
Água
Estresse
Vitis spp
Vine
Water
Stress
CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA::FITOTECNIA
title_short Tolerância de porta-enxertos de videira ao encharcamento
title_full Tolerância de porta-enxertos de videira ao encharcamento
title_fullStr Tolerância de porta-enxertos de videira ao encharcamento
title_full_unstemmed Tolerância de porta-enxertos de videira ao encharcamento
title_sort Tolerância de porta-enxertos de videira ao encharcamento
author Mendonça, Luciana Freitas de Medeiros
author_facet Mendonça, Luciana Freitas de Medeiros
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Pommer, Celso Valdevino
32897553804
http://lattes.cnpq.br/3146144251550722
Dombroski, Jeferson Luiz Dallabona
41974999149
http://lattes.cnpq.br/4808680563026772
Souza, Francisco Xavier de
http://lattes.cnpq.br/4014849457129237
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mendonça, Luciana Freitas de Medeiros
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Vitis spp
Parreira
Água
Estresse
Vitis spp
Vine
Water
Stress
CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA::FITOTECNIA
topic Vitis spp
Parreira
Água
Estresse
Vitis spp
Vine
Water
Stress
CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA::FITOTECNIA
description To evaluate grapevine rootstock cultivars and its tolerance to waterlogging, an experiment was conducted in UFERSA in 2010. The experimental design was in a randomized blocks in 4 x 6 factorial. Six rootstocks (Harmony, 1103 Paulsen, Riparia of Traviú, IAC 572 'Jales', IAC 571-6 'Jundiaí' and IAC 766 'Campinas') and four periods of waterlogging (0, 4, 7 and 14 days) were tested in four replications. Cuttings were rooted in polyethylene bags containing sand and Plantmax ® (3:1 v / v) as substrate. At the time of application of treatments, bags were placed in polystyrene boxes containing water up plants collar, with a block in each box. The application was in reversed order of time. The fourteen-day waterlogging period treatment was placed in box in the first day, seven days after that the seven-days, three days after that the four-days one. Four days later, all the boxes were emptied, completing the cycle. At the end of the waterlogging, evaluation was made for maximum leaf water potential, photosynthesis measurements, transpiration, stomatal conductance, intracellular CO2 concentration, leaf temperature were done; water use efficiency and carboxylation efficiency were also measured. Using relative humidity and temperature data, the values of water vapor pressure deficit were obtained. For the determination of chlorophyll it was used a portable chlorophyll meter. Plant growth variables were number of leaves, number of branches, branch length, branch diameter and length of the root system. In addition, plants were separated and dryed in an oven at 65 ° C until constant weight for further evaluation of the dry mass of leaves, shoots, cuttings, root mass and total dry mass. Waterlogging affected negatively the growth and physiology traits of rootstock genotypes studied. Genotypes and waterlogging time were important factors in determining the severity of injuries caused by waterlogging. Waterlogging time affected the growth of branches from the third day, just as affected stomatal conductance and photosynthesis from day 2, influence that increased with increasing stress. Cultivar Paulsen 1103 was more sensitive to waterlogging, with sudden drops in test values as the soaking time increased, while values of cultivar the Ripária of Traviú cultivar remained more constant during the waterlogging time, fact that can be considered a sign of tolerance to this type of environmental stress
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-02-15
2012-02-15
2022-05-16T20:45:20Z
2022-05-16T20:45:20Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Mendonça (2012) (MENDONÇA, 2012)
https://repositorio.ufersa.edu.br/handle/prefix/7027
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/74562/00130000089c2
identifier_str_mv Mendonça (2012) (MENDONÇA, 2012)
ark:/74562/00130000089c2
url https://repositorio.ufersa.edu.br/handle/prefix/7027
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv MENDONÇA, Luciana Freitas de Medeiros. Tolerância de porta-enxertos de videira ao encharcamento. 2012. 84 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Fitotecnia), Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido, Mossoró, 2012.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
CC-BY-SA
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv CC-BY-SA
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
Brasil
Centro de Ciências Agrárias - CCA
UFERSA
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Fitotecnia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
Brasil
Centro de Ciências Agrárias - CCA
UFERSA
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Fitotecnia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (RDU)
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron:UFERSA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron_str UFERSA
institution UFERSA
reponame_str Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (RDU)
collection Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (RDU)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (RDU) - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@ufersa.edu.br || admrepositorio@ufersa.edu.br
_version_ 1846631480915132416