A hermenêutica da obra de arte : a experiência da arte como um jogo infinito entre pergunta e resposta em Gadamer

• Ano de defesa: 2011
• Autor(a) principal: Bom Jesus Neto, Antonio Almeida do
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo; BR; Mestrado em Filosofia; UFES; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia
• Palavras-chave em Português: Hermeneutics; Experience; Aesthetics; Philosophy of art; Experiência; Filosofia da arte; Equação universal de perda de solos; Estética; Arte - Filosofia; Hermenêutica; Filosofia; 101
• Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/3649

What does it mean to understand a work of art? Hermeneutics, according to Hans Georg Gadamer, is identified with a question and answer structure within a limit of a possible conversation. A work of art can be understood as a text. But is not any question that we can direct to the work. For this, we need to get the point. Would it be an appropriative method, ie, we win the issue and so we can dominate what is being worked at a work? The game concept is, in our project, reconsidered in the light of Gadamer. This will allow us to show the game of art where only participating of it, where gain the issue makes sense. Thus, articulating the notion of playing with the idea of "logic" question and answer we will endeavor to show such a possibility from the perspective of interpretative Gadamerian that one can understand the work of art as well as a text. Understanding and interpreting are not activities related only to texts but they both expresses daily experience of the human being in the world. When we understand the tradition, we don’t understand only a text, but also views and insights that can be recognized also as truths. Henceforth, we will try to investigate the phenomenon of understanding directing this to the experience of art. Understanding that never runs out. The work of art as a text challenges us to think about what kind of comprehension is this that is always renewed, that is always possible. What has the genuine work of art to participate (belong) to the inexhaustible "character" things? Thus the relevance of our study is to investigate exactly why, either ancient or modern art, the experience of such work goes over, in an essential way, the whole subjective horizon of interpretation of both the author (artist) and the receiver that takes the work. Where nobody has the last word.