A comissão nacional da verdade e a produção da “verdade” do sujeito indígena

• Ano de defesa: 2023
• Autor(a) principal: Colins, Carlos Eduardo da Silva
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo; BR; Mestrado em Ciências Sociais; Centro de Ciências Humanas e Naturais; UFES; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais
• Palavras-chave em Português: Justiça; Justiça de transição; Comissão Nacional da Verdade; Povos indígenas; Aleturgia; subject.br-rjbn; Sociologia
• Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/17256

This dissertation is part of the line of research “socio-environmental studies, cultures and identities” of the Graduate Program in Social Sciences at the Federal University of Espírito Santo and is linked to the research project of Professor Sandro José da Silva “Anthropology, Human Rights and participation policy". This work focuses on the meanings of “truth” produced during the work of the National Truth Commission (CNV), with special interest in the effects on indigenous peoples. I try to describe the performance of the public authorities in response to the CNV recommendations, regarding indigenous peoples, after completing ten years of creation, in November 2021. I focus on the problems that the CNV actions raised for the recognition and guarantees of indigenous peoples. victimized by authoritarian state abuses, thus advocating the promotion of transitional rights. First, in the light of concepts from political/power anthropology and an ethnography of documents, I describe the production of a state discourse by the CNV for the pretense of national integration/unity and reparation through the revelation of a national “truth” used to national reconciliation. For this set of reflections, I use the analysis of power proposed by Michel Foucault (1979, 2004, 2005, 2008) and Agamben (2008), related to memory and testimony as a focus on the production of subjectivities. Secondly, I carry out a bibliographical analysis on the condition of truth after the Report, based on the evaluations of scholars and activists about the precariousness of the production of “truth”. Finally, I critically consider the legal conditions of reparation and their limits in their processes of producing truth through memories and the manifestation and resistance of civil society, the academy, and the indigenous peoples themselves regarding the truths consigned as evidence for reparation policies, this in turn, which can basically configure continuities of the arbitrariness of governmentality.