Proposição de soluções de esgotamento sanitário em comunidades rurais do Estado de Goiás
| Ano de defesa: | 2022 |
|---|---|
| Autor(a) principal: | |
| Orientador(a): | |
| Banca de defesa: | , , |
| Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
| Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: | por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Goiás
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Engenharia Ambiental e Sanitária (EECA)
|
| Departamento: |
Escola de Engenharia Civil e Ambiental - EECA (RMG)
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: | |
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: | |
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: | |
| Link de acesso: | http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/13605 |
Resumo: | Surveys show how sewage coverage in rural communities is mostly characterized by its precariousness or lack of solutions throughout Brazil, with rudimentary septic tanks being used in the State of Goiás by 60 to 80% of the rural population (BRASIL, 2019). This framework contributes to the emergence of environmental risks and to the health of populations. To improve this situation, according to article 3-B of Federal Law 14026 of July 15, 2020, which updates the legal framework for sanitation, individual and collective sewage services involve the treatment unit and the alternative management sludge, which must be disposed of in an environmentally appropriate manner, including septic tanks. These units are the most suitable alternatives currently used in rural areas, and are characterized by producing sludge, which when poorly managed harms the treatment and environment, making the study of its management relevant. Furthermore, solutions for sewage treatment can be applied according to the effluent generated in the rural household, and analysis of the possibility of integrating treatment with animal manure management and practiced agriculture. Thus, the objective of this work is to propose solutions for the treatment of sanitary sewage and sludge management in rural communities in the State of Goiás. To this end, a survey was carried out on the service in 113 communities in the State of Goiás, including riverside communities, quilombolas and settlements, diagnosed in the Environmental Sanitation and Health Project (SanRural). the need for animal manure for the technologies to work, or plantations for the application of the treated effluent, in order to allow its reuse in agriculture/plantations and the management of animal manure together with the treatment. Technological groups were elaborated for proposition, being: A and D (with restrictions only on the type of effluent), B (with planting and manure needs) and C (planting needs). For the sludge management solutions, individual management modalities (exclusively and shared) and collective management without analytical control and with (analysis of the quality of the effluent and receiving body) were considered, and how these would impact the operational and maintenance costs of tanks septic, varying the amount of population served from 20 to 2000 inhabitants. From the results, it was observed that the service in the communities was characterized by a high deficit in all typologies. The proposition of solutions indicated the greater applicability of the technologies of group A and D in all typologies. Those in group B were more applicable in settlements, where there is a greater presence of plantations and animal manure. In general, all propositions pointed to solutions that allow the adequate treatment of effluents, feces and urine, which can contribute to the promotion of environmental health. As for sludge management, based on the per capita costs of the solutions, it was identified that: shared individual management is more applicable in communities, and collective management can be favored in the absence of analytical control. Therefore, it is concluded that it is possible to apply several solutions for the treatment of sewage, which can contribute to agricultural production, environmental quality and management of animal manure. In general, shared individual management had the lowest cost, however, the participation of different sectors of society and public authorities is important. |
| id |
UFG-2_8154598cebe9cc0a7af0c76c44bd01fb |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.bc.ufg.br:tede/13605 |
| network_acronym_str |
UFG-2 |
| network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFG |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Scalize, Paulo Sérgiohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0957896448117207Huggeri Júnior, Humberto Carloshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1316502250729632Scalize, Paulo SérgioTonetti, Adriano LuizTeran, Francisco Javier Cubahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0251113712041031Vale, Gabrielle Brito do2024-10-30T17:11:05Z2024-10-30T17:11:05Z2022-06-27VALE, G. B. Proposição de soluções de esgotamento sanitário em comunidades rurais do Estado de Goiás. 2022. 101 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Ambiental e Sanitária) - Escola de Engenharia Civil e Ambiental, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2022.http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/13605Surveys show how sewage coverage in rural communities is mostly characterized by its precariousness or lack of solutions throughout Brazil, with rudimentary septic tanks being used in the State of Goiás by 60 to 80% of the rural population (BRASIL, 2019). This framework contributes to the emergence of environmental risks and to the health of populations. To improve this situation, according to article 3-B of Federal Law 14026 of July 15, 2020, which updates the legal framework for sanitation, individual and collective sewage services involve the treatment unit and the alternative management sludge, which must be disposed of in an environmentally appropriate manner, including septic tanks. These units are the most suitable alternatives currently used in rural areas, and are characterized by producing sludge, which when poorly managed harms the treatment and environment, making the study of its management relevant. Furthermore, solutions for sewage treatment can be applied according to the effluent generated in the rural household, and analysis of the possibility of integrating treatment with animal manure management and practiced agriculture. Thus, the objective of this work is to propose solutions for the treatment of sanitary sewage and sludge management in rural communities in the State of Goiás. To this end, a survey was carried out on the service in 113 communities in the State of Goiás, including riverside communities, quilombolas and settlements, diagnosed in the Environmental Sanitation and Health Project (SanRural). the need for animal manure for the technologies to work, or plantations for the application of the treated effluent, in order to allow its reuse in agriculture/plantations and the management of animal manure together with the treatment. Technological groups were elaborated for proposition, being: A and D (with restrictions only on the type of effluent), B (with planting and manure needs) and C (planting needs). For the sludge management solutions, individual management modalities (exclusively and shared) and collective management without analytical control and with (analysis of the quality of the effluent and receiving body) were considered, and how these would impact the operational and maintenance costs of tanks septic, varying the amount of population served from 20 to 2000 inhabitants. From the results, it was observed that the service in the communities was characterized by a high deficit in all typologies. The proposition of solutions indicated the greater applicability of the technologies of group A and D in all typologies. Those in group B were more applicable in settlements, where there is a greater presence of plantations and animal manure. In general, all propositions pointed to solutions that allow the adequate treatment of effluents, feces and urine, which can contribute to the promotion of environmental health. As for sludge management, based on the per capita costs of the solutions, it was identified that: shared individual management is more applicable in communities, and collective management can be favored in the absence of analytical control. Therefore, it is concluded that it is possible to apply several solutions for the treatment of sewage, which can contribute to agricultural production, environmental quality and management of animal manure. In general, shared individual management had the lowest cost, however, the participation of different sectors of society and public authorities is important.Levantamentos demonstram como a cobertura por esgotamento sanitário em comunidades rurais é caracterizada majoritariamente por sua precariedade ou ausência de soluções em todo o Brasil, sendo utilizado no Estado de Goiás fossas rudimentares por 60 a 80% da população rural (BRASIL, 2019). Tal quadro, contribui para o surgimento de riscos ambientais e à saúde das populações. Para melhorar esta situação, conforme artigo 3º-B da Lei Federal 14026 de 15 de julho de 2020, que atualiza o marco legal do saneamento, os serviços para atendimento do esgoto, individual e coletivo, envolvem a unidade de tratamento e a alternativa de manejo do lodo, que deve ser destinado de forma ambientalmente adequada, inclusive dos tanques sépticos. Estas unidades são as alternativas adequadas mais empregadas atualmente em áreas rurais, e se caracterizam por produzir lodo, que quanto mal gerido prejudica o tratamento e ambiente, tornando-se relevante o estudo de sua gestão. Ademais, as soluções para tratamento do esgoto podem ser aplicadas conforme o efluente gerado no domicílio rural, e análise da possibilidade de integração do tratamento com gestão de esterco animal e agricultura praticada. Desta forma, o objetivo deste trabalho é propor soluções para o tratamento do esgoto sanitário e gestão do lodo em comunidades rurais do Estado de Goiás. Para tanto, foi realizado levantamento do atendimento em 113 comunidades do Estado de Goiás, incluindo ribeirinhas, quilombolas e assentamentos, diagnosticadas no Projeto Saneamento e Saúde Ambiental (SanRural), sendo a proposição das soluções de esgotamento baseada no tipo de esgoto gerado no domicílio e na necessidade de esterco animal para funcionamento das tecnologias, ou de plantações para aplicação do efluente tratado, de forma a permitir o reaproveitamento na agricultura/plantações e a gestão de esterco animal juntamente ao tratamento. Foram elaborados grupos tecnológicos para proposição, sendo: A e D (com restrições apenas do tipo de efluente), B (com necessidade de plantação e esterco) e C (necessidade de plantação). Para as soluções do gerenciamento do lodo, foram consideradas as modalidades de gestão individuais (unifamiliar e conjunta) e coletiva sem controle analítico e com (análise da qualidade do efluente e corpo receptor), e como essas impactariam nos custos operacionais e de manutenção de tanques sépticos, variando a quantidade populacional atendida de 20 a 2000 habitantes. A partir dos resultados observou-se que o atendimento nas comunidades se caracterizou por elevado déficit em todas as tipologias. A proposição de soluções indicou a maior aplicabilidade das tecnologias do grupo A e D em todas as tipologias. As do grupo B foram mais aplicáveis em assentamentos, nos quais há maior presença de plantações e esterco animal. De forma geral, todas as proposições apontaram soluções que permitem o tratamento adequado dos efluentes, fezes e urina, o que pode contribuir para a promoção de salubridade ambiental. Quanto à gestão do lodo, a partir dos custos per capita das soluções identificou-se que: a gestão unifamiliar conjunta é mais aplicável nas comunidades, sendo que a coletiva pode ser favorecida na ausência de controle analítico. Sendo assim, conclui-se que é possível aplicar diversas soluções para o tratamento do esgoto, que podem contribuir para a produção agrícola, qualidade ambiental e manejo do esterco animal. De forma geral, a gestão unifamiliar conjunta apresentou o menor custo, no entanto, é importante a participação dos diversos setores da sociedade e poder público.Fundação de Apoio à PesquisaOutroporUniversidade Federal de GoiásPrograma de Pós-graduação em Engenharia Ambiental e Sanitária (EECA)UFGBrasilEscola de Engenharia Civil e Ambiental - EECA (RMG)Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEsgotoComunidades ruraisSoluçõesTecnologiasLodoSewerRural communitiesSolutionsTechnologiesSludgeENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA SANITARIA::SANEAMENTO AMBIENTALProposição de soluções de esgotamento sanitário em comunidades rurais do Estado de GoiásProposition of sewage solutions in rural communities in the State of Goiásinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFGinstname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/f0c6166e-5c66-4f6f-a01a-0cd3808f3306/download8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/d199d286-8b39-4f2d-bf1c-2a2892a9241d/download4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52ORIGINALDissertação - Gabrielle Brito do Vale - 2022.pdfDissertação - Gabrielle Brito do Vale - 2022.pdfapplication/pdf3297727http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/c55f5186-a5b3-44ec-a33e-1bba0ba151c6/downloaddcf0a919e7ff042de2ec3bd33c9283acMD53tede/136052024-10-30 14:11:05.552http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalopen.accessoai:repositorio.bc.ufg.br:tede/13605http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tedeRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tedeserver/oai/requestgrt.bc@ufg.bropendoar:oai:repositorio.bc.ufg.br:tede/12342024-10-30T17:11:05Repositório Institucional da UFG - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)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 |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Proposição de soluções de esgotamento sanitário em comunidades rurais do Estado de Goiás |
| dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Proposition of sewage solutions in rural communities in the State of Goiás |
| title |
Proposição de soluções de esgotamento sanitário em comunidades rurais do Estado de Goiás |
| spellingShingle |
Proposição de soluções de esgotamento sanitário em comunidades rurais do Estado de Goiás Vale, Gabrielle Brito do Esgoto Comunidades rurais Soluções Tecnologias Lodo Sewer Rural communities Solutions Technologies Sludge ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA SANITARIA::SANEAMENTO AMBIENTAL |
| title_short |
Proposição de soluções de esgotamento sanitário em comunidades rurais do Estado de Goiás |
| title_full |
Proposição de soluções de esgotamento sanitário em comunidades rurais do Estado de Goiás |
| title_fullStr |
Proposição de soluções de esgotamento sanitário em comunidades rurais do Estado de Goiás |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Proposição de soluções de esgotamento sanitário em comunidades rurais do Estado de Goiás |
| title_sort |
Proposição de soluções de esgotamento sanitário em comunidades rurais do Estado de Goiás |
| author |
Vale, Gabrielle Brito do |
| author_facet |
Vale, Gabrielle Brito do |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Scalize, Paulo Sérgio |
| dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0957896448117207 |
| dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv |
Huggeri Júnior, Humberto Carlos |
| dc.contributor.advisor-co1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/1316502250729632 |
| dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Scalize, Paulo Sérgio |
| dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Tonetti, Adriano Luiz |
| dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv |
Teran, Francisco Javier Cuba |
| dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0251113712041031 |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vale, Gabrielle Brito do |
| contributor_str_mv |
Scalize, Paulo Sérgio Huggeri Júnior, Humberto Carlos Scalize, Paulo Sérgio Tonetti, Adriano Luiz Teran, Francisco Javier Cuba |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Esgoto Comunidades rurais Soluções Tecnologias Lodo |
| topic |
Esgoto Comunidades rurais Soluções Tecnologias Lodo Sewer Rural communities Solutions Technologies Sludge ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA SANITARIA::SANEAMENTO AMBIENTAL |
| dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Sewer Rural communities Solutions Technologies Sludge |
| dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA SANITARIA::SANEAMENTO AMBIENTAL |
| description |
Surveys show how sewage coverage in rural communities is mostly characterized by its precariousness or lack of solutions throughout Brazil, with rudimentary septic tanks being used in the State of Goiás by 60 to 80% of the rural population (BRASIL, 2019). This framework contributes to the emergence of environmental risks and to the health of populations. To improve this situation, according to article 3-B of Federal Law 14026 of July 15, 2020, which updates the legal framework for sanitation, individual and collective sewage services involve the treatment unit and the alternative management sludge, which must be disposed of in an environmentally appropriate manner, including septic tanks. These units are the most suitable alternatives currently used in rural areas, and are characterized by producing sludge, which when poorly managed harms the treatment and environment, making the study of its management relevant. Furthermore, solutions for sewage treatment can be applied according to the effluent generated in the rural household, and analysis of the possibility of integrating treatment with animal manure management and practiced agriculture. Thus, the objective of this work is to propose solutions for the treatment of sanitary sewage and sludge management in rural communities in the State of Goiás. To this end, a survey was carried out on the service in 113 communities in the State of Goiás, including riverside communities, quilombolas and settlements, diagnosed in the Environmental Sanitation and Health Project (SanRural). the need for animal manure for the technologies to work, or plantations for the application of the treated effluent, in order to allow its reuse in agriculture/plantations and the management of animal manure together with the treatment. Technological groups were elaborated for proposition, being: A and D (with restrictions only on the type of effluent), B (with planting and manure needs) and C (planting needs). For the sludge management solutions, individual management modalities (exclusively and shared) and collective management without analytical control and with (analysis of the quality of the effluent and receiving body) were considered, and how these would impact the operational and maintenance costs of tanks septic, varying the amount of population served from 20 to 2000 inhabitants. From the results, it was observed that the service in the communities was characterized by a high deficit in all typologies. The proposition of solutions indicated the greater applicability of the technologies of group A and D in all typologies. Those in group B were more applicable in settlements, where there is a greater presence of plantations and animal manure. In general, all propositions pointed to solutions that allow the adequate treatment of effluents, feces and urine, which can contribute to the promotion of environmental health. As for sludge management, based on the per capita costs of the solutions, it was identified that: shared individual management is more applicable in communities, and collective management can be favored in the absence of analytical control. Therefore, it is concluded that it is possible to apply several solutions for the treatment of sewage, which can contribute to agricultural production, environmental quality and management of animal manure. In general, shared individual management had the lowest cost, however, the participation of different sectors of society and public authorities is important. |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-27 |
| dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2024-10-30T17:11:05Z |
| dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2024-10-30T17:11:05Z |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| format |
masterThesis |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
VALE, G. B. Proposição de soluções de esgotamento sanitário em comunidades rurais do Estado de Goiás. 2022. 101 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Ambiental e Sanitária) - Escola de Engenharia Civil e Ambiental, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2022. |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/13605 |
| identifier_str_mv |
VALE, G. B. Proposição de soluções de esgotamento sanitário em comunidades rurais do Estado de Goiás. 2022. 101 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Ambiental e Sanitária) - Escola de Engenharia Civil e Ambiental, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2022. |
| url |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/13605 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
| language |
por |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
| dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Engenharia Ambiental e Sanitária (EECA) |
| dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFG |
| dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
| dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Engenharia Civil e Ambiental - EECA (RMG) |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFG instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) instacron:UFG |
| instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
| instacron_str |
UFG |
| institution |
UFG |
| reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFG |
| collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFG |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/f0c6166e-5c66-4f6f-a01a-0cd3808f3306/download http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/d199d286-8b39-4f2d-bf1c-2a2892a9241d/download http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/c55f5186-a5b3-44ec-a33e-1bba0ba151c6/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347 dcf0a919e7ff042de2ec3bd33c9283ac |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFG - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
grt.bc@ufg.br |
| _version_ |
1861293776861921280 |