A produção do sujeito anormal: uma análise de práticas periciais em Goiás

• Ano de defesa: 2018
• Autor(a) principal: Santos Filho, Júlio Manoel dos
• Orientador(a): Cassoli, Tiago
• Banca de defesa: Cassoli , Tiago, Boechat, Filipe Milagres, Zanetti, Fernando Luiz
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Goiás
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-graduação em Psicologia (FE)
• Departamento: Faculdade de Educação - FE (RG)
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Anormalidade; Genealogia; Perícia psiquiátrica; Goiás
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Abnormality; Genealogy; Psychiatric expertise
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CIENCIAS HUMANAS::PSICOLOGIA
• Link de acesso: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/8399

Forensic Psychiatric Expertise aims collaborate for decisions in the justice field. Among other discursive possibilities, the expert-psychiatrist seeks to answer, to the Judge of Law, if a given subject can be considered criminally attributable or not. This research is based on the Foucauldian understanding of the relationship between apparatuses and the production of subjects. More specifically, we analyse the articulation between the legal and psychiatric knowledge, materialized in the psychiatric investigation apparatus, which produces of an abnormal subject. In which ways has the psychiatric investigation apparatus outcomes, in the state of Goias, an alliance between the legal and psychiatric knowledge? Based on this questioning, this paper seeks to problematize the production of psychiatric expertise reports in the scope of Criminal Law in the state of Goias. This problematization is made about psychiatric expertise, legal texts and technical materials produced in both forensic and psychiatric fields. The analyses we do are delimited in time since the establishment of the Brazilian Penal Code of 1940 to actuality. This research is qualitative and uses the genealogical perspective of Michel Foucault. Besides the methodological question, we consider the theoretical production of Foucault about the psychiatric expert device. In the analysed data, the performance of the disciplinary power and the power of normalization is verified. The analysed materials evidenced the relevance conferred to moral and behavioural factors for the diagnostic definition of the abnormality.