A questão epistemológica da formação de professores no curso de pedagogia: a ciência da educação entre a teoria pedagógica e o praticismo

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2022
Autor(a) principal: Adelson Ferreira da Silva
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: https://hdl.handle.net/1843/45962
Resumo: This doctorate thesis is bound to the field of teacher training and aims to answer the following research question: which epistemological presuppositions give basis to the training in Pedagogy at Bahia State University, and which is the position of teacher experience at the field of epistemological disputes traditionally consolidated on the courses' pedagogical-curricular projects? We start from the principle that an analysis of the Pedagogical-Curricular Project of the Pedagogy Course offered by this university and, at the same time, the research with egresses that have obtain their initial training on the afore mentioned course can point out possibilities of more fecund dialogues and of less hierarchical positions between pedagogy epistemology, education science, pedagogical theory and the experience built into the exercise of teaching. It is a qualitative research that uses the following devices for data generation: 1) documentary analysis; 2) structured questionnaire; and 3) interview. The data analysis is based on the methodological framework of content analysis, working with the categorical-thematic technique of meaning unities contained at the discourse of the subjects and at the documents, seeking to evince the qualitative aspects of the research object (BARDIN, 2016). It counts stills on the epistemic support of philosophical hermeneutics (GADAMER, 2015), in order to broaden the horizon of understanding of the interpretative context coded by the categorization process. The theoretical framework includes authors from the education field, among which stand out: Apple (2003, 2008), Charlot (2002), Franco (2008), Gatti (2010), Gauthier (2013), Libâneo (2006, 2010, 2012), Pimenta (2011), Saviani (2013); from epistemology field, such as: Gadamer (2001, 2002, 2015), Habermas (2014), Husserl (2012); and of others that has opened possibilities of investigative interfaces between pedagogy and epistemology. The results evinced that, with the advance of the neoliberal rationality, of management culture, and of the application of the economicist logic at the education field and teacher training, reassure pedagogy as an education science is a way to ground in more consistent bases its epistemology, its scientificity status and its epistemic autonomy at the domain of pedagogical knowledge. We also verified that the Resolutions CNE/CP nº 1/2002, CNE/CP nº 1/2006, CNE/CP nº 2/2015 and CNE/CP nº 2/2009 have instituted guidelines that advanced little in terms of a contribution to the epistemological question of pedagogy and the valuation of pedagogical theory as foundation of teacher training; and that the thesis of teaching as basis of the training in Pedagogy subordinates the pedagogical rationality to its professional activity, making concessions to practicism, to pedagogical dogmatism and to the pragmatic incursions coming from the corporative world. They also show the need to institute the Pedagogy Epistemology as curricular matter and branch of pedagogical science.
id UFMG_03dbcaa14922e27375d4dd44263df3e8
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/45962
network_acronym_str UFMG
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
repository_id_str
spelling 2022-10-05T14:26:15Z2025-09-08T23:10:42Z2022-10-05T14:26:15Z2022-05-05https://hdl.handle.net/1843/45962This doctorate thesis is bound to the field of teacher training and aims to answer the following research question: which epistemological presuppositions give basis to the training in Pedagogy at Bahia State University, and which is the position of teacher experience at the field of epistemological disputes traditionally consolidated on the courses' pedagogical-curricular projects? We start from the principle that an analysis of the Pedagogical-Curricular Project of the Pedagogy Course offered by this university and, at the same time, the research with egresses that have obtain their initial training on the afore mentioned course can point out possibilities of more fecund dialogues and of less hierarchical positions between pedagogy epistemology, education science, pedagogical theory and the experience built into the exercise of teaching. It is a qualitative research that uses the following devices for data generation: 1) documentary analysis; 2) structured questionnaire; and 3) interview. The data analysis is based on the methodological framework of content analysis, working with the categorical-thematic technique of meaning unities contained at the discourse of the subjects and at the documents, seeking to evince the qualitative aspects of the research object (BARDIN, 2016). It counts stills on the epistemic support of philosophical hermeneutics (GADAMER, 2015), in order to broaden the horizon of understanding of the interpretative context coded by the categorization process. The theoretical framework includes authors from the education field, among which stand out: Apple (2003, 2008), Charlot (2002), Franco (2008), Gatti (2010), Gauthier (2013), Libâneo (2006, 2010, 2012), Pimenta (2011), Saviani (2013); from epistemology field, such as: Gadamer (2001, 2002, 2015), Habermas (2014), Husserl (2012); and of others that has opened possibilities of investigative interfaces between pedagogy and epistemology. The results evinced that, with the advance of the neoliberal rationality, of management culture, and of the application of the economicist logic at the education field and teacher training, reassure pedagogy as an education science is a way to ground in more consistent bases its epistemology, its scientificity status and its epistemic autonomy at the domain of pedagogical knowledge. We also verified that the Resolutions CNE/CP nº 1/2002, CNE/CP nº 1/2006, CNE/CP nº 2/2015 and CNE/CP nº 2/2009 have instituted guidelines that advanced little in terms of a contribution to the epistemological question of pedagogy and the valuation of pedagogical theory as foundation of teacher training; and that the thesis of teaching as basis of the training in Pedagogy subordinates the pedagogical rationality to its professional activity, making concessions to practicism, to pedagogical dogmatism and to the pragmatic incursions coming from the corporative world. They also show the need to institute the Pedagogy Epistemology as curricular matter and branch of pedagogical science.CNPq - Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoporUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisEpistemologiaCiência da educaçãoCurso de PedagogiaFormação de professoresExperiência docenteUniversidade do Estado da Bahia - Professores - FormaçãoEducaçãoEducação - EpistemologiaProfessores - Formação - BahiaProfessores - Formação - EpistemologiaBahia - EducaçãoA questão epistemológica da formação de professores no curso de pedagogia: a ciência da educação entre a teoria pedagógica e o praticismoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisAdelson Ferreira da Silvainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMGinstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9729796550869174Suzana dos Santos Gomeshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7261628151334430José Carlos LibâneoAdemilson de Souza SoaresLenilda Rêgo Albuquerque de FariaMaria Amália de Almeida CunhaEsta tese vincula-se ao campo da formação de professores e procura responder a seguinte questão de pesquisa: que pressupostos epistemológicos fundamentam a formação em Pedagogia na Universidade do Estado da Bahia, e qual a posição da experiência docente no campo das disputas epistemológicas tradicionalmente consolidadas nos projetos pedagógico-curriculares dos cursos? Parte-se do princípio de que uma análise do Projeto Pedagógico Curricular do Curso de Pedagogia ofertado nesta universidade e, ao mesmo tempo, a pesquisa com sujeitos egressos que obtiveram sua formação inicial no referido curso podem apontar possibilidades de diálogos mais fecundos e de posições menos hierarquizadas entre a epistemologia da pedagogia, a ciência da educação, a teoria pedagógica e a experiência construída no exercício da docência. Trata-se de pesquisa qualitativa que utiliza os seguintes instrumentos de geração de dados: 1) análise documental, 2) questionário estruturado; e 3) entrevista. A análise dos dados está pautada no aporte metodológico da análise de conteúdo, operando com a técnica categórico-temática das unidades de sentido contidas no discurso dos sujeitos e nos documentos, procurando evidenciar os aspectos qualitativos do objeto de pesquisa (BARDIN, 2016). Conta-se, ainda, como o suporte epistêmico da hermenêutica filosófica (GADAMER, 2015), a fim de ampliar o horizonte de compreensão do contexto interpretativo codificado pelo processo de categorização. O referencial teórico contempla autores do campo da educação, dos quais destacam-se: Apple (2003, 2008), Charlot (2002), Franco (2008), Gatti (2010), Gauthier (2013), Libâneo (2006, 2010, 2012), Pimenta (2011), Saviani (2013); e do campo da epistemologia, como: Gadamer (2001, 2002, 2015), Habermas (2014), Husserl (2012); e de outros que têm aberto possibilidades de interfaces investigativas entre pedagogia e epistemologia. Os resultados evidenciaram que, com avanço da racionalidade neoliberal, da cultura empresarial e da aplicação da lógica economicista no campo educacional e da formação de professores, reafirmar a pedagogia como ciência da educação é uma forma de amparar em bases mais consistentes a sua epistemologia, o seu estatuto de cientificidade e sua autonomia epistêmica no domínio do conhecimento pedagógico. Verificou-se ainda que as Resoluções CNE/CP nº 1/2002, CNE/CP nº 1/2006, CNE/CP nº 2/2015 e CNE/CP nº 2/2009 instituíram diretrizes que pouco avançaram em termos de uma contribuição à questão epistemológica da pedagogia e da valorização da teoria pedagógica como fundamento da formação docente; e que a tese da docência como base da formação em Pedagogia subordina a racionalidade pedagógica à sua atividade profissional, fazendo concessões ao praticismo, ao dogmatismo pedagógico e às incursões pragmatistas advindas do mundo corporativo. Demonstram ainda a necessidade de se instituir a epistemologia da pedagogia como disciplina curricular e ramo da ciência pedagógica.https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9336-7922BrasilFAE - FACULDADE DE EDUCAÇÃOPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Educação - Conhecimento e Inclusão SocialUFMGORIGINALARQUIVO TESE ADELSON REPOSITÓRIO UFMG.pdfapplication/pdf2427414https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/e83b7ae9-a167-4cde-a196-c5d03bdd2788/download5c2277788116586d8d564bc10a8de098MD51trueAnonymousREADLICENSElicense.txttext/plain2118https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/b4d7c812-8456-4f10-bfce-6bb404e6f3d7/downloadcda590c95a0b51b4d15f60c9642ca272MD52falseAnonymousREAD1843/459622025-09-08 20:10:42.668open.accessoai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/45962https://repositorio.ufmg.br/Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufmg.br/oairepositorio@ufmg.bropendoar:2025-09-08T23:10:42Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)falseTElDRU7Dh0EgREUgRElTVFJJQlVJw4fDg08gTsODTy1FWENMVVNJVkEgRE8gUkVQT1NJVMOTUklPIElOU1RJVFVDSU9OQUwgREEgVUZNRwoKQ29tIGEgYXByZXNlbnRhw6fDo28gZGVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EsIHZvY8OqIChvIGF1dG9yIChlcykgb3UgbyB0aXR1bGFyIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBkZSBhdXRvcikgY29uY2VkZSBhbyBSZXBvc2l0w7NyaW8gSW5zdGl0dWNpb25hbCBkYSBVRk1HIChSSS1VRk1HKSBvIGRpcmVpdG8gbsOjbyBleGNsdXNpdm8gZSBpcnJldm9nw6F2ZWwgZGUgcmVwcm9kdXppciBlL291IGRpc3RyaWJ1aXIgYSBzdWEgcHVibGljYcOnw6NvIChpbmNsdWluZG8gbyByZXN1bW8pIHBvciB0b2RvIG8gbXVuZG8gbm8gZm9ybWF0byBpbXByZXNzbyBlIGVsZXRyw7RuaWNvIGUgZW0gcXVhbHF1ZXIgbWVpbywgaW5jbHVpbmRvIG9zIGZvcm1hdG9zIMOhdWRpbyBvdSB2w61kZW8uCgpWb2PDqiBkZWNsYXJhIHF1ZSBjb25oZWNlIGEgcG9sw610aWNhIGRlIGNvcHlyaWdodCBkYSBlZGl0b3JhIGRvIHNldSBkb2N1bWVudG8gZSBxdWUgY29uaGVjZSBlIGFjZWl0YSBhcyBEaXJldHJpemVzIGRvIFJJLVVGTUcuCgpWb2PDqiBjb25jb3JkYSBxdWUgbyBSZXBvc2l0w7NyaW8gSW5zdGl0dWNpb25hbCBkYSBVRk1HIHBvZGUsIHNlbSBhbHRlcmFyIG8gY29udGXDumRvLCB0cmFuc3BvciBhIHN1YSBwdWJsaWNhw6fDo28gcGFyYSBxdWFscXVlciBtZWlvIG91IGZvcm1hdG8gcGFyYSBmaW5zIGRlIHByZXNlcnZhw6fDo28uCgpWb2PDqiB0YW1iw6ltIGNvbmNvcmRhIHF1ZSBvIFJlcG9zaXTDs3JpbyBJbnN0aXR1Y2lvbmFsIGRhIFVGTUcgcG9kZSBtYW50ZXIgbWFpcyBkZSB1bWEgY8OzcGlhIGRlIHN1YSBwdWJsaWNhw6fDo28gcGFyYSBmaW5zIGRlIHNlZ3VyYW7Dp2EsIGJhY2stdXAgZSBwcmVzZXJ2YcOnw6NvLgoKVm9jw6ogZGVjbGFyYSBxdWUgYSBzdWEgcHVibGljYcOnw6NvIMOpIG9yaWdpbmFsIGUgcXVlIHZvY8OqIHRlbSBvIHBvZGVyIGRlIGNvbmNlZGVyIG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGNvbnRpZG9zIG5lc3RhIGxpY2Vuw6dhLiBWb2PDqiB0YW1iw6ltIGRlY2xhcmEgcXVlIG8gZGVww7NzaXRvIGRlIHN1YSBwdWJsaWNhw6fDo28gbsOjbywgcXVlIHNlamEgZGUgc2V1IGNvbmhlY2ltZW50bywgaW5mcmluZ2UgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXV0b3JhaXMgZGUgbmluZ3XDqW0uCgpDYXNvIGEgc3VhIHB1YmxpY2HDp8OjbyBjb250ZW5oYSBtYXRlcmlhbCBxdWUgdm9jw6ogbsOjbyBwb3NzdWkgYSB0aXR1bGFyaWRhZGUgZG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzLCB2b2PDqiBkZWNsYXJhIHF1ZSBvYnRldmUgYSBwZXJtaXNzw6NvIGlycmVzdHJpdGEgZG8gZGV0ZW50b3IgZG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzIHBhcmEgY29uY2VkZXIgYW8gUmVwb3NpdMOzcmlvIEluc3RpdHVjaW9uYWwgZGEgVUZNRyBvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBhcHJlc2VudGFkb3MgbmVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EsIGUgcXVlIGVzc2UgbWF0ZXJpYWwgZGUgcHJvcHJpZWRhZGUgZGUgdGVyY2Vpcm9zIGVzdMOhIGNsYXJhbWVudGUgaWRlbnRpZmljYWRvIGUgcmVjb25oZWNpZG8gbm8gdGV4dG8gb3Ugbm8gY29udGXDumRvIGRhIHB1YmxpY2HDp8OjbyBvcmEgZGVwb3NpdGFkYS4KCkNBU08gQSBQVUJMSUNBw4fDg08gT1JBIERFUE9TSVRBREEgVEVOSEEgU0lETyBSRVNVTFRBRE8gREUgVU0gUEFUUk9Dw41OSU8gT1UgQVBPSU8gREUgVU1BIEFHw4pOQ0lBIERFIEZPTUVOVE8gT1UgT1VUUk8gT1JHQU5JU01PLCBWT0PDiiBERUNMQVJBIFFVRSBSRVNQRUlUT1UgVE9ET1MgRSBRVUFJU1FVRVIgRElSRUlUT1MgREUgUkVWSVPDg08gQ09NTyBUQU1Cw4lNIEFTIERFTUFJUyBPQlJJR0HDh8OVRVMgRVhJR0lEQVMgUE9SIENPTlRSQVRPIE9VIEFDT1JETy4KCk8gUmVwb3NpdMOzcmlvIEluc3RpdHVjaW9uYWwgZGEgVUZNRyBzZSBjb21wcm9tZXRlIGEgaWRlbnRpZmljYXIgY2xhcmFtZW50ZSBvIHNldSBub21lKHMpIG91IG8ocykgbm9tZXMocykgZG8ocykgZGV0ZW50b3IoZXMpIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBhdXRvcmFpcyBkYSBwdWJsaWNhw6fDo28sIGUgbsOjbyBmYXLDoSBxdWFscXVlciBhbHRlcmHDp8OjbywgYWzDqW0gZGFxdWVsYXMgY29uY2VkaWRhcyBwb3IgZXN0YSBsaWNlbsOnYS4K
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A questão epistemológica da formação de professores no curso de pedagogia: a ciência da educação entre a teoria pedagógica e o praticismo
title A questão epistemológica da formação de professores no curso de pedagogia: a ciência da educação entre a teoria pedagógica e o praticismo
spellingShingle A questão epistemológica da formação de professores no curso de pedagogia: a ciência da educação entre a teoria pedagógica e o praticismo
Adelson Ferreira da Silva
Universidade do Estado da Bahia - Professores - Formação
Educação
Educação - Epistemologia
Professores - Formação - Bahia
Professores - Formação - Epistemologia
Bahia - Educação
Epistemologia
Ciência da educação
Curso de Pedagogia
Formação de professores
Experiência docente
title_short A questão epistemológica da formação de professores no curso de pedagogia: a ciência da educação entre a teoria pedagógica e o praticismo
title_full A questão epistemológica da formação de professores no curso de pedagogia: a ciência da educação entre a teoria pedagógica e o praticismo
title_fullStr A questão epistemológica da formação de professores no curso de pedagogia: a ciência da educação entre a teoria pedagógica e o praticismo
title_full_unstemmed A questão epistemológica da formação de professores no curso de pedagogia: a ciência da educação entre a teoria pedagógica e o praticismo
title_sort A questão epistemológica da formação de professores no curso de pedagogia: a ciência da educação entre a teoria pedagógica e o praticismo
author Adelson Ferreira da Silva
author_facet Adelson Ferreira da Silva
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Adelson Ferreira da Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Universidade do Estado da Bahia - Professores - Formação
Educação
Educação - Epistemologia
Professores - Formação - Bahia
Professores - Formação - Epistemologia
Bahia - Educação
topic Universidade do Estado da Bahia - Professores - Formação
Educação
Educação - Epistemologia
Professores - Formação - Bahia
Professores - Formação - Epistemologia
Bahia - Educação
Epistemologia
Ciência da educação
Curso de Pedagogia
Formação de professores
Experiência docente
dc.subject.other.none.fl_str_mv Epistemologia
Ciência da educação
Curso de Pedagogia
Formação de professores
Experiência docente
description This doctorate thesis is bound to the field of teacher training and aims to answer the following research question: which epistemological presuppositions give basis to the training in Pedagogy at Bahia State University, and which is the position of teacher experience at the field of epistemological disputes traditionally consolidated on the courses' pedagogical-curricular projects? We start from the principle that an analysis of the Pedagogical-Curricular Project of the Pedagogy Course offered by this university and, at the same time, the research with egresses that have obtain their initial training on the afore mentioned course can point out possibilities of more fecund dialogues and of less hierarchical positions between pedagogy epistemology, education science, pedagogical theory and the experience built into the exercise of teaching. It is a qualitative research that uses the following devices for data generation: 1) documentary analysis; 2) structured questionnaire; and 3) interview. The data analysis is based on the methodological framework of content analysis, working with the categorical-thematic technique of meaning unities contained at the discourse of the subjects and at the documents, seeking to evince the qualitative aspects of the research object (BARDIN, 2016). It counts stills on the epistemic support of philosophical hermeneutics (GADAMER, 2015), in order to broaden the horizon of understanding of the interpretative context coded by the categorization process. The theoretical framework includes authors from the education field, among which stand out: Apple (2003, 2008), Charlot (2002), Franco (2008), Gatti (2010), Gauthier (2013), Libâneo (2006, 2010, 2012), Pimenta (2011), Saviani (2013); from epistemology field, such as: Gadamer (2001, 2002, 2015), Habermas (2014), Husserl (2012); and of others that has opened possibilities of investigative interfaces between pedagogy and epistemology. The results evinced that, with the advance of the neoliberal rationality, of management culture, and of the application of the economicist logic at the education field and teacher training, reassure pedagogy as an education science is a way to ground in more consistent bases its epistemology, its scientificity status and its epistemic autonomy at the domain of pedagogical knowledge. We also verified that the Resolutions CNE/CP nº 1/2002, CNE/CP nº 1/2006, CNE/CP nº 2/2015 and CNE/CP nº 2/2009 have instituted guidelines that advanced little in terms of a contribution to the epistemological question of pedagogy and the valuation of pedagogical theory as foundation of teacher training; and that the thesis of teaching as basis of the training in Pedagogy subordinates the pedagogical rationality to its professional activity, making concessions to practicism, to pedagogical dogmatism and to the pragmatic incursions coming from the corporative world. They also show the need to institute the Pedagogy Epistemology as curricular matter and branch of pedagogical science.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2022-10-05T14:26:15Z
2025-09-08T23:10:42Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2022-10-05T14:26:15Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2022-05-05
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/1843/45962
url https://hdl.handle.net/1843/45962
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMG
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
collection Repositório Institucional da UFMG
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/e83b7ae9-a167-4cde-a196-c5d03bdd2788/download
https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/b4d7c812-8456-4f10-bfce-6bb404e6f3d7/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 5c2277788116586d8d564bc10a8de098
cda590c95a0b51b4d15f60c9642ca272
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@ufmg.br
_version_ 1862105821531340800