Enhancing the Multi-Objective Recommendation from three new perspectives: data characterization, risk-sensitiveness, and prioritization of the objectives

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2022
Autor(a) principal: Reinaldo Silva Fortes
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: eng
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: https://hdl.handle.net/1843/43915
Resumo: Recommender Systems are tools whose main objective is to help users find relevant items among many options. However, different "relevance" concepts can be defined, making the recommendation task even more challenging if we want good recommendations on multiple quality concepts, e.g., accuracy, novelty, and diversity. In this scenario, the recommendation needs to use multi-objective optimization mechanisms. Although we find works focused on this type of recommendation, most of them are limited in some relevant aspects. In particular, three aspects provide scope for improving the multi-objective recommendation on new perspectives with the use of additional resources: (a) meta-features: implicit characteristics of input data can influence algorithms, e.g., quantity and distribution of items' ratings, therefore, explicit use of statistical measures capable of measuring some of those characteristics can be helpful in the multi-objective recommendation; (b) risk sensitivity: the optimization by global averages of multiple criteria can generate bad results in exchange for some excellent results that, although rare, can positively affect these averages, therefore, explicit use of risk sensitivity metrics can be helpful in the optimization process, reducing harmful recommendations without degrading global averages; (c) prioritization of objectives: users have different preferences regarding the quality criteria of recommendations, e.g., while some users do not give up favorite items, others may be more tolerant of discovering new items or a greater diversification of items, therefore, explicit use of users' preferences regarding the quality criteria can also be helpful to improve multi-objective recommendations further. Accordingly, in this work, we investigated the multi-objective recommendation from these three new perspectives and defined specific recommendation methods. Extensive experiments validated these methods, answered our research questions positively, and improved our knowledge concerning multi-objective recommendations on these three aspects, opening opportunities for relevant future work.
id UFMG_255665e0584e33efb9124e84728b682c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/43915
network_acronym_str UFMG
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
repository_id_str
spelling Enhancing the Multi-Objective Recommendation from three new perspectives: data characterization, risk-sensitiveness, and prioritization of the objectivesComputação – TesesSistemas de recomendação – TesesOtimização multi-objetivo – TesesComputerRecommender SystemsHybrid FilteringMulti-Objective FilteringRecommender Systems are tools whose main objective is to help users find relevant items among many options. However, different "relevance" concepts can be defined, making the recommendation task even more challenging if we want good recommendations on multiple quality concepts, e.g., accuracy, novelty, and diversity. In this scenario, the recommendation needs to use multi-objective optimization mechanisms. Although we find works focused on this type of recommendation, most of them are limited in some relevant aspects. In particular, three aspects provide scope for improving the multi-objective recommendation on new perspectives with the use of additional resources: (a) meta-features: implicit characteristics of input data can influence algorithms, e.g., quantity and distribution of items' ratings, therefore, explicit use of statistical measures capable of measuring some of those characteristics can be helpful in the multi-objective recommendation; (b) risk sensitivity: the optimization by global averages of multiple criteria can generate bad results in exchange for some excellent results that, although rare, can positively affect these averages, therefore, explicit use of risk sensitivity metrics can be helpful in the optimization process, reducing harmful recommendations without degrading global averages; (c) prioritization of objectives: users have different preferences regarding the quality criteria of recommendations, e.g., while some users do not give up favorite items, others may be more tolerant of discovering new items or a greater diversification of items, therefore, explicit use of users' preferences regarding the quality criteria can also be helpful to improve multi-objective recommendations further. Accordingly, in this work, we investigated the multi-objective recommendation from these three new perspectives and defined specific recommendation methods. Extensive experiments validated these methods, answered our research questions positively, and improved our knowledge concerning multi-objective recommendations on these three aspects, opening opportunities for relevant future work.Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais2022-08-03T15:23:43Z2025-09-08T23:01:22Z2022-08-03T15:23:43Z2022-05-27info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/43915engReinaldo Silva Fortesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMGinstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMG2025-09-08T23:01:22Zoai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/43915Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufmg.br/oairepositorio@ufmg.bropendoar:2025-09-08T23:01:22Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Enhancing the Multi-Objective Recommendation from three new perspectives: data characterization, risk-sensitiveness, and prioritization of the objectives
title Enhancing the Multi-Objective Recommendation from three new perspectives: data characterization, risk-sensitiveness, and prioritization of the objectives
spellingShingle Enhancing the Multi-Objective Recommendation from three new perspectives: data characterization, risk-sensitiveness, and prioritization of the objectives
Reinaldo Silva Fortes
Computação – Teses
Sistemas de recomendação – Teses
Otimização multi-objetivo – Teses
Computer
Recommender Systems
Hybrid Filtering
Multi-Objective Filtering
title_short Enhancing the Multi-Objective Recommendation from three new perspectives: data characterization, risk-sensitiveness, and prioritization of the objectives
title_full Enhancing the Multi-Objective Recommendation from three new perspectives: data characterization, risk-sensitiveness, and prioritization of the objectives
title_fullStr Enhancing the Multi-Objective Recommendation from three new perspectives: data characterization, risk-sensitiveness, and prioritization of the objectives
title_full_unstemmed Enhancing the Multi-Objective Recommendation from three new perspectives: data characterization, risk-sensitiveness, and prioritization of the objectives
title_sort Enhancing the Multi-Objective Recommendation from three new perspectives: data characterization, risk-sensitiveness, and prioritization of the objectives
author Reinaldo Silva Fortes
author_facet Reinaldo Silva Fortes
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Reinaldo Silva Fortes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Computação – Teses
Sistemas de recomendação – Teses
Otimização multi-objetivo – Teses
Computer
Recommender Systems
Hybrid Filtering
Multi-Objective Filtering
topic Computação – Teses
Sistemas de recomendação – Teses
Otimização multi-objetivo – Teses
Computer
Recommender Systems
Hybrid Filtering
Multi-Objective Filtering
description Recommender Systems are tools whose main objective is to help users find relevant items among many options. However, different "relevance" concepts can be defined, making the recommendation task even more challenging if we want good recommendations on multiple quality concepts, e.g., accuracy, novelty, and diversity. In this scenario, the recommendation needs to use multi-objective optimization mechanisms. Although we find works focused on this type of recommendation, most of them are limited in some relevant aspects. In particular, three aspects provide scope for improving the multi-objective recommendation on new perspectives with the use of additional resources: (a) meta-features: implicit characteristics of input data can influence algorithms, e.g., quantity and distribution of items' ratings, therefore, explicit use of statistical measures capable of measuring some of those characteristics can be helpful in the multi-objective recommendation; (b) risk sensitivity: the optimization by global averages of multiple criteria can generate bad results in exchange for some excellent results that, although rare, can positively affect these averages, therefore, explicit use of risk sensitivity metrics can be helpful in the optimization process, reducing harmful recommendations without degrading global averages; (c) prioritization of objectives: users have different preferences regarding the quality criteria of recommendations, e.g., while some users do not give up favorite items, others may be more tolerant of discovering new items or a greater diversification of items, therefore, explicit use of users' preferences regarding the quality criteria can also be helpful to improve multi-objective recommendations further. Accordingly, in this work, we investigated the multi-objective recommendation from these three new perspectives and defined specific recommendation methods. Extensive experiments validated these methods, answered our research questions positively, and improved our knowledge concerning multi-objective recommendations on these three aspects, opening opportunities for relevant future work.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-03T15:23:43Z
2022-08-03T15:23:43Z
2022-05-27
2025-09-08T23:01:22Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/1843/43915
url https://hdl.handle.net/1843/43915
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMG
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
collection Repositório Institucional da UFMG
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@ufmg.br
_version_ 1856414039503011840