Enhancing the Multi-Objective Recommendation from three new perspectives: data characterization, risk-sensitiveness, and prioritization of the objectives
| Ano de defesa: | 2022 |
|---|---|
| Autor(a) principal: | |
| Orientador(a): | |
| Banca de defesa: | |
| Tipo de documento: | Tese |
| Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: | eng |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: | |
| Link de acesso: | https://hdl.handle.net/1843/43915 |
Resumo: | Recommender Systems are tools whose main objective is to help users find relevant items among many options. However, different "relevance" concepts can be defined, making the recommendation task even more challenging if we want good recommendations on multiple quality concepts, e.g., accuracy, novelty, and diversity. In this scenario, the recommendation needs to use multi-objective optimization mechanisms. Although we find works focused on this type of recommendation, most of them are limited in some relevant aspects. In particular, three aspects provide scope for improving the multi-objective recommendation on new perspectives with the use of additional resources: (a) meta-features: implicit characteristics of input data can influence algorithms, e.g., quantity and distribution of items' ratings, therefore, explicit use of statistical measures capable of measuring some of those characteristics can be helpful in the multi-objective recommendation; (b) risk sensitivity: the optimization by global averages of multiple criteria can generate bad results in exchange for some excellent results that, although rare, can positively affect these averages, therefore, explicit use of risk sensitivity metrics can be helpful in the optimization process, reducing harmful recommendations without degrading global averages; (c) prioritization of objectives: users have different preferences regarding the quality criteria of recommendations, e.g., while some users do not give up favorite items, others may be more tolerant of discovering new items or a greater diversification of items, therefore, explicit use of users' preferences regarding the quality criteria can also be helpful to improve multi-objective recommendations further. Accordingly, in this work, we investigated the multi-objective recommendation from these three new perspectives and defined specific recommendation methods. Extensive experiments validated these methods, answered our research questions positively, and improved our knowledge concerning multi-objective recommendations on these three aspects, opening opportunities for relevant future work. |
| id |
UFMG_255665e0584e33efb9124e84728b682c |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/43915 |
| network_acronym_str |
UFMG |
| network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Enhancing the Multi-Objective Recommendation from three new perspectives: data characterization, risk-sensitiveness, and prioritization of the objectivesComputação – TesesSistemas de recomendação – TesesOtimização multi-objetivo – TesesComputerRecommender SystemsHybrid FilteringMulti-Objective FilteringRecommender Systems are tools whose main objective is to help users find relevant items among many options. However, different "relevance" concepts can be defined, making the recommendation task even more challenging if we want good recommendations on multiple quality concepts, e.g., accuracy, novelty, and diversity. In this scenario, the recommendation needs to use multi-objective optimization mechanisms. Although we find works focused on this type of recommendation, most of them are limited in some relevant aspects. In particular, three aspects provide scope for improving the multi-objective recommendation on new perspectives with the use of additional resources: (a) meta-features: implicit characteristics of input data can influence algorithms, e.g., quantity and distribution of items' ratings, therefore, explicit use of statistical measures capable of measuring some of those characteristics can be helpful in the multi-objective recommendation; (b) risk sensitivity: the optimization by global averages of multiple criteria can generate bad results in exchange for some excellent results that, although rare, can positively affect these averages, therefore, explicit use of risk sensitivity metrics can be helpful in the optimization process, reducing harmful recommendations without degrading global averages; (c) prioritization of objectives: users have different preferences regarding the quality criteria of recommendations, e.g., while some users do not give up favorite items, others may be more tolerant of discovering new items or a greater diversification of items, therefore, explicit use of users' preferences regarding the quality criteria can also be helpful to improve multi-objective recommendations further. Accordingly, in this work, we investigated the multi-objective recommendation from these three new perspectives and defined specific recommendation methods. Extensive experiments validated these methods, answered our research questions positively, and improved our knowledge concerning multi-objective recommendations on these three aspects, opening opportunities for relevant future work.Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais2022-08-03T15:23:43Z2025-09-08T23:01:22Z2022-08-03T15:23:43Z2022-05-27info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/43915engReinaldo Silva Fortesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMGinstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMG2025-09-08T23:01:22Zoai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/43915Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufmg.br/oairepositorio@ufmg.bropendoar:2025-09-08T23:01:22Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Enhancing the Multi-Objective Recommendation from three new perspectives: data characterization, risk-sensitiveness, and prioritization of the objectives |
| title |
Enhancing the Multi-Objective Recommendation from three new perspectives: data characterization, risk-sensitiveness, and prioritization of the objectives |
| spellingShingle |
Enhancing the Multi-Objective Recommendation from three new perspectives: data characterization, risk-sensitiveness, and prioritization of the objectives Reinaldo Silva Fortes Computação – Teses Sistemas de recomendação – Teses Otimização multi-objetivo – Teses Computer Recommender Systems Hybrid Filtering Multi-Objective Filtering |
| title_short |
Enhancing the Multi-Objective Recommendation from three new perspectives: data characterization, risk-sensitiveness, and prioritization of the objectives |
| title_full |
Enhancing the Multi-Objective Recommendation from three new perspectives: data characterization, risk-sensitiveness, and prioritization of the objectives |
| title_fullStr |
Enhancing the Multi-Objective Recommendation from three new perspectives: data characterization, risk-sensitiveness, and prioritization of the objectives |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Enhancing the Multi-Objective Recommendation from three new perspectives: data characterization, risk-sensitiveness, and prioritization of the objectives |
| title_sort |
Enhancing the Multi-Objective Recommendation from three new perspectives: data characterization, risk-sensitiveness, and prioritization of the objectives |
| author |
Reinaldo Silva Fortes |
| author_facet |
Reinaldo Silva Fortes |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Reinaldo Silva Fortes |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Computação – Teses Sistemas de recomendação – Teses Otimização multi-objetivo – Teses Computer Recommender Systems Hybrid Filtering Multi-Objective Filtering |
| topic |
Computação – Teses Sistemas de recomendação – Teses Otimização multi-objetivo – Teses Computer Recommender Systems Hybrid Filtering Multi-Objective Filtering |
| description |
Recommender Systems are tools whose main objective is to help users find relevant items among many options. However, different "relevance" concepts can be defined, making the recommendation task even more challenging if we want good recommendations on multiple quality concepts, e.g., accuracy, novelty, and diversity. In this scenario, the recommendation needs to use multi-objective optimization mechanisms. Although we find works focused on this type of recommendation, most of them are limited in some relevant aspects. In particular, three aspects provide scope for improving the multi-objective recommendation on new perspectives with the use of additional resources: (a) meta-features: implicit characteristics of input data can influence algorithms, e.g., quantity and distribution of items' ratings, therefore, explicit use of statistical measures capable of measuring some of those characteristics can be helpful in the multi-objective recommendation; (b) risk sensitivity: the optimization by global averages of multiple criteria can generate bad results in exchange for some excellent results that, although rare, can positively affect these averages, therefore, explicit use of risk sensitivity metrics can be helpful in the optimization process, reducing harmful recommendations without degrading global averages; (c) prioritization of objectives: users have different preferences regarding the quality criteria of recommendations, e.g., while some users do not give up favorite items, others may be more tolerant of discovering new items or a greater diversification of items, therefore, explicit use of users' preferences regarding the quality criteria can also be helpful to improve multi-objective recommendations further. Accordingly, in this work, we investigated the multi-objective recommendation from these three new perspectives and defined specific recommendation methods. Extensive experiments validated these methods, answered our research questions positively, and improved our knowledge concerning multi-objective recommendations on these three aspects, opening opportunities for relevant future work. |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-08-03T15:23:43Z 2022-08-03T15:23:43Z 2022-05-27 2025-09-08T23:01:22Z |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| format |
doctoralThesis |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/1843/43915 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/1843/43915 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMG instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) instacron:UFMG |
| instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
| instacron_str |
UFMG |
| institution |
UFMG |
| reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
| collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@ufmg.br |
| _version_ |
1856414039503011840 |