Evidências preliminares da eficácia do gel contendo própolis na prevenção e no tratamento da mucosite e da candidose bucais em pacientes submetidos a radioterapia em região de cabeça e pescoço

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2011
Autor(a) principal: Vladimir Reimar Augusto de Souza Noronha
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: https://hdl.handle.net/1843/ZMRO-835N3S
Resumo: During radiotherapy and chemotherapy, some side effects can be observed, leading to a considerable loss of life quality or even desertion of treatment due to the patients death. Of the effects mentioned above, the most common ones found in the oral cavity are mucositis and candidiasis. Several drugs have already been suggested as a treatment for mucositis, but none of them has shown effective pharmacological characteristics when combined with an ideal residence in the oral cavity. Propolis is a natural product that has been used by people since ancient times and it has analgesic, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial and wound healing properties. These characteristics that have already been proved in in vitro studies, when associated with the lack of side effects originated from a mucus-bonding gel generate a great prospect for the prevention and treatment of candidiasis and superimposed musosite observed during and after radiotherapy. In the period from September/10 until March/11 33 patients were selected, of which 27 (81.8%) were males and 6 (18.2%) were females. Their mean age was about 57.36 years (±11,20). Regarding skin color, 19 (57.6%) were caucasian. The majority of patients consisted of former smokers (23 patients - 69.7%). Concerning the histological prospect, the squamous cell carcinoma was more prevalent, reaching 31 (93.9%) patients. We collected saliva from 23 patients before using propolis and of these 8 (88.9%) had C. albicans, 1 (4.7%) had C. kefyr and 9 (39.1%) presented no yeast involvement. After the gel application, the Candida sp. population diversified, which gave us a new prospect, having 6 (46.2%) patients with C. albicans, 3 (23.1%) with C. kefyr and 2 (15.4%) showed no yeasts at all. For C. tropicallis, C. parapsilosis, C. krusei, only 1 (7.7%) we found only one patient per species. The resistance to antifungal agents was more evident for fluconazole and miconazole, either prior to the gel application or after it. The 6 strains of C. albicans previously found before the gel application, were resistant to fluconazole. After the gel application, from those 6 strains of C. albicans, 3 (50%) are now resistant to fluconazole and 5 (83.3%) are resistant to miconazole. The gel containing propolis was well accepted by patients and its effectiveness can be proven by the gel containing propolis evaluation of 13 (39.4%) patients with complete data using a segmentation analysis. The result of the Fisher's exact test showed an association between the presence of mucositis during 4 weeks of propolis application and clusters (p = 0.026). In cluster 2, which consisted of patients using the propolis gel in a preventive way, no patient developed mucositis in a 4 weeks follow-up.
id UFMG_50baad338ecdbffbbbe7de6cd2e1c9dc
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/ZMRO-835N3S
network_acronym_str UFMG
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
repository_id_str
spelling 2019-08-11T23:07:54Z2025-09-08T23:18:10Z2019-08-11T23:07:54Z2011-06-21https://hdl.handle.net/1843/ZMRO-835N3SDuring radiotherapy and chemotherapy, some side effects can be observed, leading to a considerable loss of life quality or even desertion of treatment due to the patients death. Of the effects mentioned above, the most common ones found in the oral cavity are mucositis and candidiasis. Several drugs have already been suggested as a treatment for mucositis, but none of them has shown effective pharmacological characteristics when combined with an ideal residence in the oral cavity. Propolis is a natural product that has been used by people since ancient times and it has analgesic, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial and wound healing properties. These characteristics that have already been proved in in vitro studies, when associated with the lack of side effects originated from a mucus-bonding gel generate a great prospect for the prevention and treatment of candidiasis and superimposed musosite observed during and after radiotherapy. In the period from September/10 until March/11 33 patients were selected, of which 27 (81.8%) were males and 6 (18.2%) were females. Their mean age was about 57.36 years (±11,20). Regarding skin color, 19 (57.6%) were caucasian. The majority of patients consisted of former smokers (23 patients - 69.7%). Concerning the histological prospect, the squamous cell carcinoma was more prevalent, reaching 31 (93.9%) patients. We collected saliva from 23 patients before using propolis and of these 8 (88.9%) had C. albicans, 1 (4.7%) had C. kefyr and 9 (39.1%) presented no yeast involvement. After the gel application, the Candida sp. population diversified, which gave us a new prospect, having 6 (46.2%) patients with C. albicans, 3 (23.1%) with C. kefyr and 2 (15.4%) showed no yeasts at all. For C. tropicallis, C. parapsilosis, C. krusei, only 1 (7.7%) we found only one patient per species. The resistance to antifungal agents was more evident for fluconazole and miconazole, either prior to the gel application or after it. The 6 strains of C. albicans previously found before the gel application, were resistant to fluconazole. After the gel application, from those 6 strains of C. albicans, 3 (50%) are now resistant to fluconazole and 5 (83.3%) are resistant to miconazole. The gel containing propolis was well accepted by patients and its effectiveness can be proven by the gel containing propolis evaluation of 13 (39.4%) patients with complete data using a segmentation analysis. The result of the Fisher's exact test showed an association between the presence of mucositis during 4 weeks of propolis application and clusters (p = 0.026). In cluster 2, which consisted of patients using the propolis gel in a preventive way, no patient developed mucositis in a 4 weeks follow-up.Universidade Federal de Minas Geraisradioterapiaquimioterapiaoncologiaprópolis e antifúngicoscâncer de cabeça e pescoçoPrópole/uso terapêuticoPescoço CâncerPrópoleCâncer QuimioterapiaAntimicóticosCâncer RadioterapiaNeoplasias de cabeça e pescoço/terapiaEvidências preliminares da eficácia do gel contendo própolis na prevenção e no tratamento da mucosite e da candidose bucais em pacientes submetidos a radioterapia em região de cabeça e pescoçoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisVladimir Reimar Augusto de Souza Noronhainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessporreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMGinstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGVagner Rodrigues SantosEvandro Neves AbdoBruno Coirreia JhamJoão Marcos Aantes SoaresO tratamento para o câncer de cabeça e pescoço envolve cirurgia para ablação do tumor, radioterapia e quimioterapia. Durante os tratamentos de radioterapia e de quimioterapia, pode-se observar comorbidades que levam a uma considerável perda de qualidade de vida e até mesmo a interrupção do tratamento por óbito. As comorbidades mais conhecidas são a mucosite e a candidose. Diversos medicamentos têm sido sugeridos para tratamento da mucosite, entretanto nenhum deles apresenta características farmacológicas que sejam efetivas quando associadas a uma permanência ideal na cavidade bucal. Medicamentos livres de álcool, que sejam eficazes no combate a mucosite e a candidose e que reúnam propriedades farmacológicas ideais aliadas a aderência na cavidade bucal, sem efeitos colaterais e que tragam conforto para o paciente são alvo de estudos recentes. A própolis é um produto natural já utilizado pela população desde a antiguidade, que possui atividade analgésica, anti-inflamatória, antimicrobiana e cicatrizante. Essas características da própolis já comprovadas em estudos in vitro, aliadas à inexistência de efeitos colaterais associadas a um gel mucoaderente cria uma expectativa de grande conforto para a prevenção e o tratamento da musosite e candidose sobreposta observada durante e após a radioterapia. No período de Setembro/10 a Março/11 foram selecionados 33 pacientes sendo 27 (81,8%) do sexo masculino e 6(18,2%) do sexo feminino com idade média de 57,36 anos (± 11,20). Em relação a cor da pele 19 (57,6%) eram brancos. Grande parte dos pacientes são ex-fumantes com 23 (69,7%) pacientes. O tipo histológico mais presente foi o carcinoma de células escamosas com 31(93,9%) pacientes. Foi coletado a saliva de 21 pacientes antes do inicio do uso da própolis e destes 31(93,9%) apresentaram C. albicans, 1(4,7%) apresentou C. kefyr e 14(66,6%) não apresentavam leveduras. Após o uso do gel a população de Candida sp. tornou-se mais variada com 4 (30,7%) pacientes apresentando C. albicans, 2(15,4%) C. kefyr e 2(15,4%) não apresentaram leveduras. Para C. tropicallis, C. parapsilosis, C. krusei, apenas 1(7,7%) paciente para cada uma destas espécies. A resistência aos antifúngicos foi mais evidente para o fluconazol e miconazol tanto previamente ao uso do gel quanto após o uso deste. As 6 cepas de C.albicans encontradas previamente ao uso do gel são resistentes ao fluconazol. Após o uso do gel das 6 cepas de C. albicans 3(50%) são resistentes ao fluconazol e 5(83,3%) são resistentes ao miconazol. O gel contendo própolis foi bem aceito pelos pacientes e a sua eficácia pode ser comprovada pela avaliação do gel contendo própolis dos 13 (39,4%) pacientes com dados completos utilizando-se a análise de segmentação. O resultado do teste Exato de Fisher mostrou associação entre a presença de mucosite em 4 semanas de uso de própolis e os clusters (p=0,026). No cluster 2 formado por pacientes que utilizaram o gel de própolis de forma preventiva, nenhum paciente desenvolveu mucosite nas 4 semanas de acompanhamento.UFMGORIGINALdisseta__o_mestrado_vladimir.pdfapplication/pdf21614479https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/a5c5f566-a6f0-4f37-9b06-f3bdf41bbb92/downloadc19f7724bf7ef5fdd46fa6d12ecebc43MD51trueAnonymousREADTEXTdisseta__o_mestrado_vladimir.pdf.txttext/plain195123https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/12230086-0a3b-44da-b57c-d541c8c6b0ce/download0f492b348e2b7aef03bd4990f91689e6MD52falseAnonymousREAD1843/ZMRO-835N3S2025-09-08 20:18:10.019open.accessoai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/ZMRO-835N3Shttps://repositorio.ufmg.br/Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufmg.br/oairepositorio@ufmg.bropendoar:2025-09-08T23:18:10Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evidências preliminares da eficácia do gel contendo própolis na prevenção e no tratamento da mucosite e da candidose bucais em pacientes submetidos a radioterapia em região de cabeça e pescoço
title Evidências preliminares da eficácia do gel contendo própolis na prevenção e no tratamento da mucosite e da candidose bucais em pacientes submetidos a radioterapia em região de cabeça e pescoço
spellingShingle Evidências preliminares da eficácia do gel contendo própolis na prevenção e no tratamento da mucosite e da candidose bucais em pacientes submetidos a radioterapia em região de cabeça e pescoço
Vladimir Reimar Augusto de Souza Noronha
Própole/uso terapêutico
Pescoço Câncer
Própole
Câncer Quimioterapia
Antimicóticos
Câncer Radioterapia
Neoplasias de cabeça e pescoço/terapia
radioterapia
quimioterapia
oncologia
própolis e antifúngicos
câncer de cabeça e pescoço
title_short Evidências preliminares da eficácia do gel contendo própolis na prevenção e no tratamento da mucosite e da candidose bucais em pacientes submetidos a radioterapia em região de cabeça e pescoço
title_full Evidências preliminares da eficácia do gel contendo própolis na prevenção e no tratamento da mucosite e da candidose bucais em pacientes submetidos a radioterapia em região de cabeça e pescoço
title_fullStr Evidências preliminares da eficácia do gel contendo própolis na prevenção e no tratamento da mucosite e da candidose bucais em pacientes submetidos a radioterapia em região de cabeça e pescoço
title_full_unstemmed Evidências preliminares da eficácia do gel contendo própolis na prevenção e no tratamento da mucosite e da candidose bucais em pacientes submetidos a radioterapia em região de cabeça e pescoço
title_sort Evidências preliminares da eficácia do gel contendo própolis na prevenção e no tratamento da mucosite e da candidose bucais em pacientes submetidos a radioterapia em região de cabeça e pescoço
author Vladimir Reimar Augusto de Souza Noronha
author_facet Vladimir Reimar Augusto de Souza Noronha
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vladimir Reimar Augusto de Souza Noronha
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Própole/uso terapêutico
Pescoço Câncer
Própole
Câncer Quimioterapia
Antimicóticos
Câncer Radioterapia
Neoplasias de cabeça e pescoço/terapia
topic Própole/uso terapêutico
Pescoço Câncer
Própole
Câncer Quimioterapia
Antimicóticos
Câncer Radioterapia
Neoplasias de cabeça e pescoço/terapia
radioterapia
quimioterapia
oncologia
própolis e antifúngicos
câncer de cabeça e pescoço
dc.subject.other.none.fl_str_mv radioterapia
quimioterapia
oncologia
própolis e antifúngicos
câncer de cabeça e pescoço
description During radiotherapy and chemotherapy, some side effects can be observed, leading to a considerable loss of life quality or even desertion of treatment due to the patients death. Of the effects mentioned above, the most common ones found in the oral cavity are mucositis and candidiasis. Several drugs have already been suggested as a treatment for mucositis, but none of them has shown effective pharmacological characteristics when combined with an ideal residence in the oral cavity. Propolis is a natural product that has been used by people since ancient times and it has analgesic, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial and wound healing properties. These characteristics that have already been proved in in vitro studies, when associated with the lack of side effects originated from a mucus-bonding gel generate a great prospect for the prevention and treatment of candidiasis and superimposed musosite observed during and after radiotherapy. In the period from September/10 until March/11 33 patients were selected, of which 27 (81.8%) were males and 6 (18.2%) were females. Their mean age was about 57.36 years (±11,20). Regarding skin color, 19 (57.6%) were caucasian. The majority of patients consisted of former smokers (23 patients - 69.7%). Concerning the histological prospect, the squamous cell carcinoma was more prevalent, reaching 31 (93.9%) patients. We collected saliva from 23 patients before using propolis and of these 8 (88.9%) had C. albicans, 1 (4.7%) had C. kefyr and 9 (39.1%) presented no yeast involvement. After the gel application, the Candida sp. population diversified, which gave us a new prospect, having 6 (46.2%) patients with C. albicans, 3 (23.1%) with C. kefyr and 2 (15.4%) showed no yeasts at all. For C. tropicallis, C. parapsilosis, C. krusei, only 1 (7.7%) we found only one patient per species. The resistance to antifungal agents was more evident for fluconazole and miconazole, either prior to the gel application or after it. The 6 strains of C. albicans previously found before the gel application, were resistant to fluconazole. After the gel application, from those 6 strains of C. albicans, 3 (50%) are now resistant to fluconazole and 5 (83.3%) are resistant to miconazole. The gel containing propolis was well accepted by patients and its effectiveness can be proven by the gel containing propolis evaluation of 13 (39.4%) patients with complete data using a segmentation analysis. The result of the Fisher's exact test showed an association between the presence of mucositis during 4 weeks of propolis application and clusters (p = 0.026). In cluster 2, which consisted of patients using the propolis gel in a preventive way, no patient developed mucositis in a 4 weeks follow-up.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2011-06-21
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2019-08-11T23:07:54Z
2025-09-08T23:18:10Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2019-08-11T23:07:54Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/1843/ZMRO-835N3S
url https://hdl.handle.net/1843/ZMRO-835N3S
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMG
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
collection Repositório Institucional da UFMG
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/a5c5f566-a6f0-4f37-9b06-f3bdf41bbb92/download
https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/12230086-0a3b-44da-b57c-d541c8c6b0ce/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv c19f7724bf7ef5fdd46fa6d12ecebc43
0f492b348e2b7aef03bd4990f91689e6
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@ufmg.br
_version_ 1862105933027475456