Controle interno do poder executivo federal : um estudo de caso da Controladoria-Geral da União (2001 - 2017)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2020
Autor(a) principal: Beatriz Silva da Costa
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Link de acesso: https://hdl.handle.net/1843/35583
Resumo: How did the institutional construction of the Brazilian Office of the Comptroller General take place in the context of Brazilian coalition presidentialism? This case study seeks to answer this question by analyzing the institutional designs of the CGU with initiatives from the Executive Power that have been processed in the legislative arena. This work is part of a research agenda aimed at understanding the internal dynamics of the Executive Branch in the light of three main theories: principal-agent, legislative review and design of agencies. According to the political control literature, the Executive is expected to take action to design the CGU as an institutional mechanism for intra-executive control of the coalition. On the other hand, the legislature and/or coalition parties are expected to act to moderate/reduce/neutralize the use of this instrument to limit the performance of parties in the Executive. In order to analyze the executive-legislative relationship, we identified the strategies adopted by the Executive in the Legislative and the latter's reactions to such proposals. The results of this work indicate that the Legislature was, in the main, favorable to the initiatives of the Executive Power with regard to the proposals for the administrative design of the CGU. Although the Legislative carried out minor interventions within the scope of the Executive's proposals, all the opinions that evaluated the Provisional Presidential Decree were favorable. The results also point out that the heterogeneity of the coalition is not a factor that drives many changes in the CGU that aim at greater intra-executive control. Without much significant variation in administrative design, CGU became institutionalized during the 18 years analyzed and maintained two agency standards.
id UFMG_6edfc262fbfa8610aafcdc9e1bcbb0d5
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/35583
network_acronym_str UFMG
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
repository_id_str
spelling 2021-04-08T10:50:37Z2025-09-08T23:31:05Z2021-04-08T10:50:37Z2020-02-27https://hdl.handle.net/1843/35583How did the institutional construction of the Brazilian Office of the Comptroller General take place in the context of Brazilian coalition presidentialism? This case study seeks to answer this question by analyzing the institutional designs of the CGU with initiatives from the Executive Power that have been processed in the legislative arena. This work is part of a research agenda aimed at understanding the internal dynamics of the Executive Branch in the light of three main theories: principal-agent, legislative review and design of agencies. According to the political control literature, the Executive is expected to take action to design the CGU as an institutional mechanism for intra-executive control of the coalition. On the other hand, the legislature and/or coalition parties are expected to act to moderate/reduce/neutralize the use of this instrument to limit the performance of parties in the Executive. In order to analyze the executive-legislative relationship, we identified the strategies adopted by the Executive in the Legislative and the latter's reactions to such proposals. The results of this work indicate that the Legislature was, in the main, favorable to the initiatives of the Executive Power with regard to the proposals for the administrative design of the CGU. Although the Legislative carried out minor interventions within the scope of the Executive's proposals, all the opinions that evaluated the Provisional Presidential Decree were favorable. The results also point out that the heterogeneity of the coalition is not a factor that drives many changes in the CGU that aim at greater intra-executive control. Without much significant variation in administrative design, CGU became institutionalized during the 18 years analyzed and maintained two agency standards.CNPq - Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoporUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisPoder executivoControle internoControladoria-Geral da UniãoLegislative reviewAgency designControle interno do poder executivo federal : um estudo de caso da Controladoria-Geral da União (2001 - 2017)Internal control of the federal executive power : a case study of the Comptroller General of the Union (2001 - 2017)info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisBeatriz Silva da Costainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMGinstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2162353708177288Magna Maria Ináciohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3137727272142712Bruno Pinheiro Wanderley ReisLeice Maria GarciaComo a construção institucional da Controladoria-Geral da União se deu no contexto de presidencialismo de coalizão brasileiro? Este estudo de caso busca responder esta pergunta ao analisar os desenhos institucionais da CGU com iniciativas do Poder Executivo que tramitaram na arena legislativa. Este trabalho está inserido em uma agenda de pesquisa voltada para entender a dinâmica interna do Poder Executivo à luz de três principais teorias: mandante-agente, revisão legislativa e desenho de agências. De acordo com a literatura de controle político, espera-se que Executivo se movimente para desenhar a CGU como mecanismo institucional de controle intraexecutivo da coalizão. Em contrapartida, espera-se que o legislativo e/ou os partidos da coalizão atuem para moderar/reduzir/neutralizar o uso desse instrumento para limitar a atuação dos partidos do Executivo. Para analisar a relação executivo-legislativo, identificamos a estratégia adotadas pelo Executivo no Legislativo e as reações deste último a tais propostas. Os resultados deste trabalho apontam que o Legislativo foi, majoritariamente, favorável às iniciativas do Poder Executivo no que diz respeito às propostas para o desenho administrativo da CGU. Embora o Legislativo realizasse pequenas intervenções o escopo das propostas do Executiva, todos os pareceres que avaliaram as Medidas Provisórias foram favoráveis. Os resultados também apontam que a heterogeneidade da coalizão não é um fator que impulsiona muitas alterações na CGU que visem maior controle intraexecutivo. Sem muita variação significativa de desenho, a CGU se institucionalizou durante os 18 anos analisados e manteve dois padrões de agência.https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6345-4646BrasilFAF - DEPARTAMENTO DE CIÊNCIA POLÍTICAPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciência PolíticaUFMGORIGINALDISSERTAÇÃO - VERSÃO PARA IMPRESSÃO.pdfapplication/pdf2210186https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/cbe59b75-d295-4e0b-93c8-023076cd1b4d/downloada3d6050e5f37808e03ad37f2d934c280MD51trueAnonymousREADLICENSElicense.txttext/plain2119https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/2b77ae59-2503-4916-9cf0-f9383d43fe11/download34badce4be7e31e3adb4575ae96af679MD52falseAnonymousREAD1843/355832025-09-08 20:31:05.27open.accessoai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/35583https://repositorio.ufmg.br/Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufmg.br/oairepositorio@ufmg.bropendoar:2025-09-08T23:31:05Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)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
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Controle interno do poder executivo federal : um estudo de caso da Controladoria-Geral da União (2001 - 2017)
dc.title.alternative.none.fl_str_mv Internal control of the federal executive power : a case study of the Comptroller General of the Union (2001 - 2017)
title Controle interno do poder executivo federal : um estudo de caso da Controladoria-Geral da União (2001 - 2017)
spellingShingle Controle interno do poder executivo federal : um estudo de caso da Controladoria-Geral da União (2001 - 2017)
Beatriz Silva da Costa
Poder executivo
Controle interno
Controladoria-Geral da União
Legislative review
Agency design
title_short Controle interno do poder executivo federal : um estudo de caso da Controladoria-Geral da União (2001 - 2017)
title_full Controle interno do poder executivo federal : um estudo de caso da Controladoria-Geral da União (2001 - 2017)
title_fullStr Controle interno do poder executivo federal : um estudo de caso da Controladoria-Geral da União (2001 - 2017)
title_full_unstemmed Controle interno do poder executivo federal : um estudo de caso da Controladoria-Geral da União (2001 - 2017)
title_sort Controle interno do poder executivo federal : um estudo de caso da Controladoria-Geral da União (2001 - 2017)
author Beatriz Silva da Costa
author_facet Beatriz Silva da Costa
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Beatriz Silva da Costa
dc.subject.other.none.fl_str_mv Poder executivo
Controle interno
Controladoria-Geral da União
Legislative review
Agency design
topic Poder executivo
Controle interno
Controladoria-Geral da União
Legislative review
Agency design
description How did the institutional construction of the Brazilian Office of the Comptroller General take place in the context of Brazilian coalition presidentialism? This case study seeks to answer this question by analyzing the institutional designs of the CGU with initiatives from the Executive Power that have been processed in the legislative arena. This work is part of a research agenda aimed at understanding the internal dynamics of the Executive Branch in the light of three main theories: principal-agent, legislative review and design of agencies. According to the political control literature, the Executive is expected to take action to design the CGU as an institutional mechanism for intra-executive control of the coalition. On the other hand, the legislature and/or coalition parties are expected to act to moderate/reduce/neutralize the use of this instrument to limit the performance of parties in the Executive. In order to analyze the executive-legislative relationship, we identified the strategies adopted by the Executive in the Legislative and the latter's reactions to such proposals. The results of this work indicate that the Legislature was, in the main, favorable to the initiatives of the Executive Power with regard to the proposals for the administrative design of the CGU. Although the Legislative carried out minor interventions within the scope of the Executive's proposals, all the opinions that evaluated the Provisional Presidential Decree were favorable. The results also point out that the heterogeneity of the coalition is not a factor that drives many changes in the CGU that aim at greater intra-executive control. Without much significant variation in administrative design, CGU became institutionalized during the 18 years analyzed and maintained two agency standards.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2020-02-27
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2021-04-08T10:50:37Z
2025-09-08T23:31:05Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2021-04-08T10:50:37Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/1843/35583
url https://hdl.handle.net/1843/35583
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMG
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
collection Repositório Institucional da UFMG
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/cbe59b75-d295-4e0b-93c8-023076cd1b4d/download
https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/2b77ae59-2503-4916-9cf0-f9383d43fe11/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv a3d6050e5f37808e03ad37f2d934c280
34badce4be7e31e3adb4575ae96af679
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@ufmg.br
_version_ 1862105899859968000