Avaliação das instituições de longa permanência para pessoas idosas

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2021
Autor(a) principal: Mirna Rodrigues Costa Guimarães
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: https://hdl.handle.net/1843/41527
Resumo: The objective of this study was the development and validation of a Multidimensional Assessment Matrix (MMA) composed of indicators created using the variables of the 2018 Unified Social Assistance System Census (SUAS Census) to describe the quality of Brazilian LSIAPs, and compare the performance achieved between the regions of the country. This is a descriptive ecological study with secondary public data from the LSIAP participating in the SUAS 2018 Census. The MMA was developed based on the Integrated Multidimensional Theoretical Model of Quality and Service by Rantz et al. (1999). 66 variables from the SUAS Census were selected for the elaboration of the Matrix, which was validated by the modified Delphi technique, with the participation of 15 experts, through the online platform Survey Monkey. Eighteen indicators were proposed for the MMA and two validation cycles were needed until consensus was reached. Quality parameters, based on literature, legislation or statistical criteria were used to classify the performance of institutions for each indicator as “incipient”, “under development” or “desirable”. The percentages of LSIAP with “desirable” performance were represented by means of maps, according to the Brazilian regions. The disparity index was obtained for each indicator and expressed the average deviation in the percentage of institutions with desirable performance among Brazilian regions. More than 70% of the institutions showed desirable performance only in three indicators: "Favoring the Family Bond" (94.18%), "Adequate physical structure" (87.51%) and "Valuing the team of professionals" (76.22 %). “Incipient” performance was observed for 83.81% of the institutions regarding the indicator “Professionals for leisure activities”. Disparities were observed in the percentages of LSIE with “desirable” performance among Brazilian regions, whose indices ranged from 6.21 (favoring family ties) to 48.48 (multiprofessional team in the health area). Brazilian LSIEs have valued the team of professionals, have physical structure and favor the family bond. There is a need for advances in the proportion of caregivers of elderly people, composition of the multidisciplinary team, improved accessibility, as well as the need to expand the supply of health promotion actions, government support, suppression of exclusionary differentiation criteria and expansion of services to overcome overcrowding. Regional disparities indicate unequal performance of institutions in the national territory.
id UFMG_74c8ac71472fa417db2d0072b343eebf
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/41527
network_acronym_str UFMG
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
repository_id_str
spelling Avaliação das instituições de longa permanência para pessoas idosasEvaluation of long-term care institutions for the older adultsIdosoInstituição de longa permanência para idososAssistência a idososAvaliação de processos(cuidados de saúde)Pessoa idosaCasas de repousoInstituição de longa permanência para idososAssistência a idososAvaliação de processos em cuidados de saúdeThe objective of this study was the development and validation of a Multidimensional Assessment Matrix (MMA) composed of indicators created using the variables of the 2018 Unified Social Assistance System Census (SUAS Census) to describe the quality of Brazilian LSIAPs, and compare the performance achieved between the regions of the country. This is a descriptive ecological study with secondary public data from the LSIAP participating in the SUAS 2018 Census. The MMA was developed based on the Integrated Multidimensional Theoretical Model of Quality and Service by Rantz et al. (1999). 66 variables from the SUAS Census were selected for the elaboration of the Matrix, which was validated by the modified Delphi technique, with the participation of 15 experts, through the online platform Survey Monkey. Eighteen indicators were proposed for the MMA and two validation cycles were needed until consensus was reached. Quality parameters, based on literature, legislation or statistical criteria were used to classify the performance of institutions for each indicator as “incipient”, “under development” or “desirable”. The percentages of LSIAP with “desirable” performance were represented by means of maps, according to the Brazilian regions. The disparity index was obtained for each indicator and expressed the average deviation in the percentage of institutions with desirable performance among Brazilian regions. More than 70% of the institutions showed desirable performance only in three indicators: "Favoring the Family Bond" (94.18%), "Adequate physical structure" (87.51%) and "Valuing the team of professionals" (76.22 %). “Incipient” performance was observed for 83.81% of the institutions regarding the indicator “Professionals for leisure activities”. Disparities were observed in the percentages of LSIE with “desirable” performance among Brazilian regions, whose indices ranged from 6.21 (favoring family ties) to 48.48 (multiprofessional team in the health area). Brazilian LSIEs have valued the team of professionals, have physical structure and favor the family bond. There is a need for advances in the proportion of caregivers of elderly people, composition of the multidisciplinary team, improved accessibility, as well as the need to expand the supply of health promotion actions, government support, suppression of exclusionary differentiation criteria and expansion of services to overcome overcrowding. Regional disparities indicate unequal performance of institutions in the national territory.Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais2022-05-10T21:46:58Z2025-09-08T23:39:35Z2022-05-10T21:46:58Z2021-07-23info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/41527porMirna Rodrigues Costa Guimarãesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMGinstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMG2025-09-08T23:39:35Zoai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/41527Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufmg.br/oairepositorio@ufmg.bropendoar:2025-09-08T23:39:35Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Avaliação das instituições de longa permanência para pessoas idosas
Evaluation of long-term care institutions for the older adults
title Avaliação das instituições de longa permanência para pessoas idosas
spellingShingle Avaliação das instituições de longa permanência para pessoas idosas
Mirna Rodrigues Costa Guimarães
Idoso
Instituição de longa permanência para idosos
Assistência a idosos
Avaliação de processos(cuidados de saúde)
Pessoa idosa
Casas de repouso
Instituição de longa permanência para idosos
Assistência a idosos
Avaliação de processos em cuidados de saúde
title_short Avaliação das instituições de longa permanência para pessoas idosas
title_full Avaliação das instituições de longa permanência para pessoas idosas
title_fullStr Avaliação das instituições de longa permanência para pessoas idosas
title_full_unstemmed Avaliação das instituições de longa permanência para pessoas idosas
title_sort Avaliação das instituições de longa permanência para pessoas idosas
author Mirna Rodrigues Costa Guimarães
author_facet Mirna Rodrigues Costa Guimarães
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mirna Rodrigues Costa Guimarães
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Idoso
Instituição de longa permanência para idosos
Assistência a idosos
Avaliação de processos(cuidados de saúde)
Pessoa idosa
Casas de repouso
Instituição de longa permanência para idosos
Assistência a idosos
Avaliação de processos em cuidados de saúde
topic Idoso
Instituição de longa permanência para idosos
Assistência a idosos
Avaliação de processos(cuidados de saúde)
Pessoa idosa
Casas de repouso
Instituição de longa permanência para idosos
Assistência a idosos
Avaliação de processos em cuidados de saúde
description The objective of this study was the development and validation of a Multidimensional Assessment Matrix (MMA) composed of indicators created using the variables of the 2018 Unified Social Assistance System Census (SUAS Census) to describe the quality of Brazilian LSIAPs, and compare the performance achieved between the regions of the country. This is a descriptive ecological study with secondary public data from the LSIAP participating in the SUAS 2018 Census. The MMA was developed based on the Integrated Multidimensional Theoretical Model of Quality and Service by Rantz et al. (1999). 66 variables from the SUAS Census were selected for the elaboration of the Matrix, which was validated by the modified Delphi technique, with the participation of 15 experts, through the online platform Survey Monkey. Eighteen indicators were proposed for the MMA and two validation cycles were needed until consensus was reached. Quality parameters, based on literature, legislation or statistical criteria were used to classify the performance of institutions for each indicator as “incipient”, “under development” or “desirable”. The percentages of LSIAP with “desirable” performance were represented by means of maps, according to the Brazilian regions. The disparity index was obtained for each indicator and expressed the average deviation in the percentage of institutions with desirable performance among Brazilian regions. More than 70% of the institutions showed desirable performance only in three indicators: "Favoring the Family Bond" (94.18%), "Adequate physical structure" (87.51%) and "Valuing the team of professionals" (76.22 %). “Incipient” performance was observed for 83.81% of the institutions regarding the indicator “Professionals for leisure activities”. Disparities were observed in the percentages of LSIE with “desirable” performance among Brazilian regions, whose indices ranged from 6.21 (favoring family ties) to 48.48 (multiprofessional team in the health area). Brazilian LSIEs have valued the team of professionals, have physical structure and favor the family bond. There is a need for advances in the proportion of caregivers of elderly people, composition of the multidisciplinary team, improved accessibility, as well as the need to expand the supply of health promotion actions, government support, suppression of exclusionary differentiation criteria and expansion of services to overcome overcrowding. Regional disparities indicate unequal performance of institutions in the national territory.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-07-23
2022-05-10T21:46:58Z
2022-05-10T21:46:58Z
2025-09-08T23:39:35Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/1843/41527
url https://hdl.handle.net/1843/41527
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMG
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
collection Repositório Institucional da UFMG
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@ufmg.br
_version_ 1879513261188055040